Certifying Biodiversity: The Union for Ethical BioTrade and the Search for Ethical Sourcing

This article is concerned with the potential for private action to improve sourcing practices to promote biodiversity. More specifically this article examines the Union for Ethical BioTrade (UEBT) and its verification and certification of ‘sourcing with respect’: that is, sourcing ingredients from b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental law 2020-12, Vol.32 (3), p.503-528
Hauptverfasser: Stamboulakis, Drossos, Sanderson, Jay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 528
container_issue 3
container_start_page 503
container_title Journal of environmental law
container_volume 32
creator Stamboulakis, Drossos
Sanderson, Jay
description This article is concerned with the potential for private action to improve sourcing practices to promote biodiversity. More specifically this article examines the Union for Ethical BioTrade (UEBT) and its verification and certification of ‘sourcing with respect’: that is, sourcing ingredients from biodiversity in a way that is respectful to both the local environment and people. While key international biodiversity treaties and instruments—such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Nagoya Protocol—encourage public actors to work with private actors to develop methods for the sustainable use of biological resources, our examination of UEBT shows that there are concerns over the standards, implementation and enforcement of private initiatives. In conclusion, we suggest two key ways in which transnational or public/private initiatives can be strengthened. First, via more proactively promoting public/private cooperation, including about how certification is used to reduce inconsistency and consumer overload or confusion. Secondly, by placing greater emphasis on mechanisms that place pressure on supply chain actors to source in ways that promote biodiversity.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jel/eqaa013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jel_eqaa013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_jel_eqaa013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-d38f0235921099bed7107ca099af2f0711b7421bc8068c4d6fe935435ab355b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1KxDAYRYMoWEdXvkD2UudL0jSNOy0zKgy4mA4ILkqaH5uhtppUoW9vB2fj6t7F4cI9CF0TuCUg2XJvu6X9UgoIO0EJyfIsZSJ7PUUJSE7TohDsHF3EuAcASglN0Ftpw-jd5Pt3_OAH439siH6c7nDVWrzr_dBjNwS8GluvVXdgqqCMxao3eJyRrVVBt_-Y7fAd9Dx4ic6c6qK9OuYC7darqnxKNy-Pz-X9JtVUkjE1rHBAGZd0_iAbawQBodXclaMOBCGNyChpdAF5oTOTOysZzxhXDeO8IWyBbv52dRhiDNbVn8F_qDDVBOqDl3r2Uh-9sF8Da1cK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Certifying Biodiversity: The Union for Ethical BioTrade and the Search for Ethical Sourcing</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Stamboulakis, Drossos ; Sanderson, Jay</creator><creatorcontrib>Stamboulakis, Drossos ; Sanderson, Jay</creatorcontrib><description>This article is concerned with the potential for private action to improve sourcing practices to promote biodiversity. More specifically this article examines the Union for Ethical BioTrade (UEBT) and its verification and certification of ‘sourcing with respect’: that is, sourcing ingredients from biodiversity in a way that is respectful to both the local environment and people. While key international biodiversity treaties and instruments—such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Nagoya Protocol—encourage public actors to work with private actors to develop methods for the sustainable use of biological resources, our examination of UEBT shows that there are concerns over the standards, implementation and enforcement of private initiatives. In conclusion, we suggest two key ways in which transnational or public/private initiatives can be strengthened. First, via more proactively promoting public/private cooperation, including about how certification is used to reduce inconsistency and consumer overload or confusion. Secondly, by placing greater emphasis on mechanisms that place pressure on supply chain actors to source in ways that promote biodiversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-374X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqaa013</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of environmental law, 2020-12, Vol.32 (3), p.503-528</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-d38f0235921099bed7107ca099af2f0711b7421bc8068c4d6fe935435ab355b13</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-9029-8255</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stamboulakis, Drossos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, Jay</creatorcontrib><title>Certifying Biodiversity: The Union for Ethical BioTrade and the Search for Ethical Sourcing</title><title>Journal of environmental law</title><description>This article is concerned with the potential for private action to improve sourcing practices to promote biodiversity. More specifically this article examines the Union for Ethical BioTrade (UEBT) and its verification and certification of ‘sourcing with respect’: that is, sourcing ingredients from biodiversity in a way that is respectful to both the local environment and people. While key international biodiversity treaties and instruments—such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Nagoya Protocol—encourage public actors to work with private actors to develop methods for the sustainable use of biological resources, our examination of UEBT shows that there are concerns over the standards, implementation and enforcement of private initiatives. In conclusion, we suggest two key ways in which transnational or public/private initiatives can be strengthened. First, via more proactively promoting public/private cooperation, including about how certification is used to reduce inconsistency and consumer overload or confusion. Secondly, by placing greater emphasis on mechanisms that place pressure on supply chain actors to source in ways that promote biodiversity.</description><issn>0952-8873</issn><issn>1464-374X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1KxDAYRYMoWEdXvkD2UudL0jSNOy0zKgy4mA4ILkqaH5uhtppUoW9vB2fj6t7F4cI9CF0TuCUg2XJvu6X9UgoIO0EJyfIsZSJ7PUUJSE7TohDsHF3EuAcASglN0Ftpw-jd5Pt3_OAH439siH6c7nDVWrzr_dBjNwS8GluvVXdgqqCMxao3eJyRrVVBt_-Y7fAd9Dx4ic6c6qK9OuYC7darqnxKNy-Pz-X9JtVUkjE1rHBAGZd0_iAbawQBodXclaMOBCGNyChpdAF5oTOTOysZzxhXDeO8IWyBbv52dRhiDNbVn8F_qDDVBOqDl3r2Uh-9sF8Da1cK</recordid><startdate>20201224</startdate><enddate>20201224</enddate><creator>Stamboulakis, Drossos</creator><creator>Sanderson, Jay</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-8255</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201224</creationdate><title>Certifying Biodiversity: The Union for Ethical BioTrade and the Search for Ethical Sourcing</title><author>Stamboulakis, Drossos ; Sanderson, Jay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-d38f0235921099bed7107ca099af2f0711b7421bc8068c4d6fe935435ab355b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stamboulakis, Drossos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, Jay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stamboulakis, Drossos</au><au>Sanderson, Jay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Certifying Biodiversity: The Union for Ethical BioTrade and the Search for Ethical Sourcing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental law</jtitle><date>2020-12-24</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>503-528</pages><issn>0952-8873</issn><eissn>1464-374X</eissn><abstract>This article is concerned with the potential for private action to improve sourcing practices to promote biodiversity. More specifically this article examines the Union for Ethical BioTrade (UEBT) and its verification and certification of ‘sourcing with respect’: that is, sourcing ingredients from biodiversity in a way that is respectful to both the local environment and people. While key international biodiversity treaties and instruments—such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Nagoya Protocol—encourage public actors to work with private actors to develop methods for the sustainable use of biological resources, our examination of UEBT shows that there are concerns over the standards, implementation and enforcement of private initiatives. In conclusion, we suggest two key ways in which transnational or public/private initiatives can be strengthened. First, via more proactively promoting public/private cooperation, including about how certification is used to reduce inconsistency and consumer overload or confusion. Secondly, by placing greater emphasis on mechanisms that place pressure on supply chain actors to source in ways that promote biodiversity.</abstract><doi>10.1093/jel/eqaa013</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-8255</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8873
ispartof Journal of environmental law, 2020-12, Vol.32 (3), p.503-528
issn 0952-8873
1464-374X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jel_eqaa013
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Certifying Biodiversity: The Union for Ethical BioTrade and the Search for Ethical Sourcing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A14%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Certifying%20Biodiversity:%20The%20Union%20for%20Ethical%20BioTrade%20and%20the%20Search%20for%20Ethical%20Sourcing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20law&rft.au=Stamboulakis,%20Drossos&rft.date=2020-12-24&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=503-528&rft.issn=0952-8873&rft.eissn=1464-374X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jel/eqaa013&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_jel_eqaa013%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true