Goods Donations Increase Charitable Credit for Low-Warmth Donors

Low-warmth actors are often assumed to lack communal (or other-oriented) intentions, even when acting generously. Low-warmth donors must therefore send stronger signals of their communal intent when donating to receive the same amount of charitable credit as high-warmth donors. Because goods are lin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of consumer research 2018-08, Vol.45 (2), p.451-469
Hauptverfasser: GERSHON, RACHEL, CRYDER, CYNTHIA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 469
container_issue 2
container_start_page 451
container_title The Journal of consumer research
container_volume 45
creator GERSHON, RACHEL
CRYDER, CYNTHIA
description Low-warmth actors are often assumed to lack communal (or other-oriented) intentions, even when acting generously. Low-warmth donors must therefore send stronger signals of their communal intent when donating to receive the same amount of charitable credit as high-warmth donors. Because goods are linked with communal norms, we find that donating goods allows low-warmth donors to signal communal intent and increase charitable credit received. Study 1 establishes that low-warmth donors receive less credit for unspecified donations than their high-warmth counterparts. Studies 2A and 2B show that goods donations, compared to equally valued monetary or unspecified donations, increase charitable credit for low-warmth donors. Studies 3A and 3B show that donating goods boosts charitable credit for low-warmth donors in particular; high-warmth donors are assumed to have communal intentions, and receive large amounts of credit, regardless of donation type. Finally, study 4 shows that low-warmth donors can increase charitable credit for monetary donations by describing the donation in communal terms—specifically, as a gift. This research has clear practical implications. For example, many corporations are viewed as low warmth, and most corporate donations are monetary, yet companies always have the option to donate goods instead.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jcr/ucx126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jcr_ucx126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27030198</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27030198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-168df1f2b0a8266d81bdb80eb889d8b2fc6cb1368462f70588148ce68a46d2dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv3oWchdiZ3WYzuSm11kLAi-Ix7CdNabOyu6L-e1MqnuaFeeaFZxi7RrhDaMRsa-Ls03wjlydsgpWoy4rX9SmbwLgtKwF4zi5S2gIAAuKE3a9CsKl4DIPKfRhSsR5MdCq5YrFRsc9K78YYne1z4UMs2vBVvqu4z5vDTYjpkp15tUvu6m9O2dvT8nXxXLYvq_XioS2NQMolSrIePdegiEtpCbXVBE4TNZY090YajULSXHJfQ0WEczJOkppLy60VU3Z77DUxpBSd7z5iv1fxp0PoDu7d6N4d3Uf45ghvUw7xn-Q1jB9oSPwC3UlXDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goods Donations Increase Charitable Credit for Low-Warmth Donors</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>GERSHON, RACHEL ; CRYDER, CYNTHIA</creator><contributor>Morwitz, Vicki ; Bagchi, Rajesh</contributor><creatorcontrib>GERSHON, RACHEL ; CRYDER, CYNTHIA ; Morwitz, Vicki ; Bagchi, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><description>Low-warmth actors are often assumed to lack communal (or other-oriented) intentions, even when acting generously. Low-warmth donors must therefore send stronger signals of their communal intent when donating to receive the same amount of charitable credit as high-warmth donors. Because goods are linked with communal norms, we find that donating goods allows low-warmth donors to signal communal intent and increase charitable credit received. Study 1 establishes that low-warmth donors receive less credit for unspecified donations than their high-warmth counterparts. Studies 2A and 2B show that goods donations, compared to equally valued monetary or unspecified donations, increase charitable credit for low-warmth donors. Studies 3A and 3B show that donating goods boosts charitable credit for low-warmth donors in particular; high-warmth donors are assumed to have communal intentions, and receive large amounts of credit, regardless of donation type. Finally, study 4 shows that low-warmth donors can increase charitable credit for monetary donations by describing the donation in communal terms—specifically, as a gift. This research has clear practical implications. For example, many corporations are viewed as low warmth, and most corporate donations are monetary, yet companies always have the option to donate goods instead.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-5301</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucx126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of consumer research, 2018-08, Vol.45 (2), p.451-469</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-168df1f2b0a8266d81bdb80eb889d8b2fc6cb1368462f70588148ce68a46d2dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-168df1f2b0a8266d81bdb80eb889d8b2fc6cb1368462f70588148ce68a46d2dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27030198$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27030198$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Morwitz, Vicki</contributor><contributor>Bagchi, Rajesh</contributor><creatorcontrib>GERSHON, RACHEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRYDER, CYNTHIA</creatorcontrib><title>Goods Donations Increase Charitable Credit for Low-Warmth Donors</title><title>The Journal of consumer research</title><description>Low-warmth actors are often assumed to lack communal (or other-oriented) intentions, even when acting generously. Low-warmth donors must therefore send stronger signals of their communal intent when donating to receive the same amount of charitable credit as high-warmth donors. Because goods are linked with communal norms, we find that donating goods allows low-warmth donors to signal communal intent and increase charitable credit received. Study 1 establishes that low-warmth donors receive less credit for unspecified donations than their high-warmth counterparts. Studies 2A and 2B show that goods donations, compared to equally valued monetary or unspecified donations, increase charitable credit for low-warmth donors. Studies 3A and 3B show that donating goods boosts charitable credit for low-warmth donors in particular; high-warmth donors are assumed to have communal intentions, and receive large amounts of credit, regardless of donation type. Finally, study 4 shows that low-warmth donors can increase charitable credit for monetary donations by describing the donation in communal terms—specifically, as a gift. This research has clear practical implications. For example, many corporations are viewed as low warmth, and most corporate donations are monetary, yet companies always have the option to donate goods instead.</description><issn>0093-5301</issn><issn>1537-5277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv3oWchdiZ3WYzuSm11kLAi-Ix7CdNabOyu6L-e1MqnuaFeeaFZxi7RrhDaMRsa-Ls03wjlydsgpWoy4rX9SmbwLgtKwF4zi5S2gIAAuKE3a9CsKl4DIPKfRhSsR5MdCq5YrFRsc9K78YYne1z4UMs2vBVvqu4z5vDTYjpkp15tUvu6m9O2dvT8nXxXLYvq_XioS2NQMolSrIePdegiEtpCbXVBE4TNZY090YajULSXHJfQ0WEczJOkppLy60VU3Z77DUxpBSd7z5iv1fxp0PoDu7d6N4d3Uf45ghvUw7xn-Q1jB9oSPwC3UlXDg</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>GERSHON, RACHEL</creator><creator>CRYDER, CYNTHIA</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Goods Donations Increase Charitable Credit for Low-Warmth Donors</title><author>GERSHON, RACHEL ; CRYDER, CYNTHIA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-168df1f2b0a8266d81bdb80eb889d8b2fc6cb1368462f70588148ce68a46d2dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GERSHON, RACHEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRYDER, CYNTHIA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of consumer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GERSHON, RACHEL</au><au>CRYDER, CYNTHIA</au><au>Morwitz, Vicki</au><au>Bagchi, Rajesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goods Donations Increase Charitable Credit for Low-Warmth Donors</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of consumer research</jtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>451-469</pages><issn>0093-5301</issn><eissn>1537-5277</eissn><abstract>Low-warmth actors are often assumed to lack communal (or other-oriented) intentions, even when acting generously. Low-warmth donors must therefore send stronger signals of their communal intent when donating to receive the same amount of charitable credit as high-warmth donors. Because goods are linked with communal norms, we find that donating goods allows low-warmth donors to signal communal intent and increase charitable credit received. Study 1 establishes that low-warmth donors receive less credit for unspecified donations than their high-warmth counterparts. Studies 2A and 2B show that goods donations, compared to equally valued monetary or unspecified donations, increase charitable credit for low-warmth donors. Studies 3A and 3B show that donating goods boosts charitable credit for low-warmth donors in particular; high-warmth donors are assumed to have communal intentions, and receive large amounts of credit, regardless of donation type. Finally, study 4 shows that low-warmth donors can increase charitable credit for monetary donations by describing the donation in communal terms—specifically, as a gift. This research has clear practical implications. For example, many corporations are viewed as low warmth, and most corporate donations are monetary, yet companies always have the option to donate goods instead.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jcr/ucx126</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-5301
ispartof The Journal of consumer research, 2018-08, Vol.45 (2), p.451-469
issn 0093-5301
1537-5277
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jcr_ucx126
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Goods Donations Increase Charitable Credit for Low-Warmth Donors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A12%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goods%20Donations%20Increase%20Charitable%20Credit%20for%20Low-Warmth%20Donors&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20consumer%20research&rft.au=GERSHON,%20RACHEL&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=451-469&rft.issn=0093-5301&rft.eissn=1537-5277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jcr/ucx126&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E27030198%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27030198&rfr_iscdi=true