412 Volume vs. Rate-Based Tube Feeding in Burn Patients: Improving Nutrition
Abstract Introduction Proper nutrition is critical in healing from burns. Tube feeding is routinely employed to help meet nutritional goals, especially in intubated patients and large burns; however, the complexities of burn care frequently involve pausing tube feeding. Volume-based tube feeding is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of burn care & research 2018-04, Vol.39 (suppl_1), p.S177-S177 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S177 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl_1 |
container_start_page | S177 |
container_title | Journal of burn care & research |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Rochlin, D H Sheckter, C Moshrefi, S Sche, M Vargas, V Sproul, J Karanas, Y L |
description | Abstract
Introduction
Proper nutrition is critical in healing from burns. Tube feeding is routinely employed to help meet nutritional goals, especially in intubated patients and large burns; however, the complexities of burn care frequently involve pausing tube feeding. Volume-based tube feeding is a strategy that provides goal volumes based on available hours per day compared to fixed hourly rates. This study aims to assess whether volume-based tube feeding is superior to traditional rate-based tube feeding at meeting nutritional goals.
Methods
Starting in January 2016, a single burn center implemented a volume-based tube feeding protocol. All patients for calendar year 2016 requiring tube feeds for at least 5 continuous days were compared to all patients from the prior calendar year 2015. Demographics, burn characteristics, and tube feeding details were compared with univariate analysis. Daily tube feed goals and length of stay were primary outcomes; both were assessed with multivariate analysis using linear modeling.
Results
Thirty patients met study criteria. The cohort was 30.0% female and 93.3% flame burned, with a mean age of 44.2 years and mean TBSA of 30.6%. All patients suffered 3rd degree burns. Pausing tube feeds for perioperative care was the most common reason tube feeds were held at 33.7% of all held days. Volume-based tube feeding was the only independent predictor of increasing tube feed goals with an average goal met of 91.41% (SD 19.41) vs. 74.14% (SD 21.72), (linear coefficient 10.05, 95% CI 4.49–15.61, p-value 0.001). Tube feed hours held was the only independent predictor of lower tube feed goals (linear coefficient -5.52, 95% CI -7.73 - -3.31, p-value |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jbcr/iry006.334 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jbcr_iry006_334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jbcr/iry006.334</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jbcr/iry006.334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1214-36cf73ba3dc5a3c7b9cb99ce7279ab222dfa47ced804136c860bb610f328c3ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtLwzAAxoMoOKdnrzkLbfNq03hzw-mgqMgUbyFJU8lYHyTtYP-9LRWvnr4PvsfhB8AtRjFGgiZ7bXzi_AmhLKaUnYEFTlMRIZbn53-ef12CqxD2CDGGeLoABcMEfraHobbwGGL4rnobrVSwJdwN2sKNtaVrvqFr4GrwDXxTvbNNH-7htu58e5yyl6H3rndtcw0uKnUI9uZXl-Bj87hbP0fF69N2_VBEBhPMIpqZilOtaGlSRQ3XwmghjOWEC6UJIWWlGDe2zBHDYznPkNYZRhUluaHK0CVI5l_j2xC8rWTnXa38SWIkJxhygiFnGHKEMS7u5kU7dP-WfwAmYmHU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>412 Volume vs. Rate-Based Tube Feeding in Burn Patients: Improving Nutrition</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Rochlin, D H ; Sheckter, C ; Moshrefi, S ; Sche, M ; Vargas, V ; Sproul, J ; Karanas, Y L</creator><creatorcontrib>Rochlin, D H ; Sheckter, C ; Moshrefi, S ; Sche, M ; Vargas, V ; Sproul, J ; Karanas, Y L</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Introduction
Proper nutrition is critical in healing from burns. Tube feeding is routinely employed to help meet nutritional goals, especially in intubated patients and large burns; however, the complexities of burn care frequently involve pausing tube feeding. Volume-based tube feeding is a strategy that provides goal volumes based on available hours per day compared to fixed hourly rates. This study aims to assess whether volume-based tube feeding is superior to traditional rate-based tube feeding at meeting nutritional goals.
Methods
Starting in January 2016, a single burn center implemented a volume-based tube feeding protocol. All patients for calendar year 2016 requiring tube feeds for at least 5 continuous days were compared to all patients from the prior calendar year 2015. Demographics, burn characteristics, and tube feeding details were compared with univariate analysis. Daily tube feed goals and length of stay were primary outcomes; both were assessed with multivariate analysis using linear modeling.
Results
Thirty patients met study criteria. The cohort was 30.0% female and 93.3% flame burned, with a mean age of 44.2 years and mean TBSA of 30.6%. All patients suffered 3rd degree burns. Pausing tube feeds for perioperative care was the most common reason tube feeds were held at 33.7% of all held days. Volume-based tube feeding was the only independent predictor of increasing tube feed goals with an average goal met of 91.41% (SD 19.41) vs. 74.14% (SD 21.72), (linear coefficient 10.05, 95% CI 4.49–15.61, p-value 0.001). Tube feed hours held was the only independent predictor of lower tube feed goals (linear coefficient -5.52, 95% CI -7.73 - -3.31, p-value <0.001). Volume-based tube feeding was not associated with a significant difference in length of stay after controlling for covariates. Rate-based feeds showed an adjusted mean stay of 33.6 (SD 7.5) days vs. 36.3 (SD 11.1) days for volume-based feeds (linear coefficient 0.84, 95% CI -13.6 - 15.2, p=0.905).
Conclusions
Perioperative care was the most common reason for holding tube feeding. Volume-based tube feeding was superior to rate-based tube feeding in maximizing daily nutritional goals. Additional studies are needed to assess whether volume-based feeding is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Applicability of Research to Practice
Volume-based tube feeds optimize nutritional goals and thus should be the preferred method of tube feeding in patients who require such nutritional support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-047X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/iry006.334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of burn care & research, 2018-04, Vol.39 (suppl_1), p.S177-S177</ispartof><rights>American Burn Association 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1214-36cf73ba3dc5a3c7b9cb99ce7279ab222dfa47ced804136c860bb610f328c3ac3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rochlin, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheckter, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moshrefi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sche, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sproul, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karanas, Y L</creatorcontrib><title>412 Volume vs. Rate-Based Tube Feeding in Burn Patients: Improving Nutrition</title><title>Journal of burn care & research</title><description>Abstract
Introduction
Proper nutrition is critical in healing from burns. Tube feeding is routinely employed to help meet nutritional goals, especially in intubated patients and large burns; however, the complexities of burn care frequently involve pausing tube feeding. Volume-based tube feeding is a strategy that provides goal volumes based on available hours per day compared to fixed hourly rates. This study aims to assess whether volume-based tube feeding is superior to traditional rate-based tube feeding at meeting nutritional goals.
Methods
Starting in January 2016, a single burn center implemented a volume-based tube feeding protocol. All patients for calendar year 2016 requiring tube feeds for at least 5 continuous days were compared to all patients from the prior calendar year 2015. Demographics, burn characteristics, and tube feeding details were compared with univariate analysis. Daily tube feed goals and length of stay were primary outcomes; both were assessed with multivariate analysis using linear modeling.
Results
Thirty patients met study criteria. The cohort was 30.0% female and 93.3% flame burned, with a mean age of 44.2 years and mean TBSA of 30.6%. All patients suffered 3rd degree burns. Pausing tube feeds for perioperative care was the most common reason tube feeds were held at 33.7% of all held days. Volume-based tube feeding was the only independent predictor of increasing tube feed goals with an average goal met of 91.41% (SD 19.41) vs. 74.14% (SD 21.72), (linear coefficient 10.05, 95% CI 4.49–15.61, p-value 0.001). Tube feed hours held was the only independent predictor of lower tube feed goals (linear coefficient -5.52, 95% CI -7.73 - -3.31, p-value <0.001). Volume-based tube feeding was not associated with a significant difference in length of stay after controlling for covariates. Rate-based feeds showed an adjusted mean stay of 33.6 (SD 7.5) days vs. 36.3 (SD 11.1) days for volume-based feeds (linear coefficient 0.84, 95% CI -13.6 - 15.2, p=0.905).
Conclusions
Perioperative care was the most common reason for holding tube feeding. Volume-based tube feeding was superior to rate-based tube feeding in maximizing daily nutritional goals. Additional studies are needed to assess whether volume-based feeding is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Applicability of Research to Practice
Volume-based tube feeds optimize nutritional goals and thus should be the preferred method of tube feeding in patients who require such nutritional support.</description><issn>1559-047X</issn><issn>1559-0488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtLwzAAxoMoOKdnrzkLbfNq03hzw-mgqMgUbyFJU8lYHyTtYP-9LRWvnr4PvsfhB8AtRjFGgiZ7bXzi_AmhLKaUnYEFTlMRIZbn53-ef12CqxD2CDGGeLoABcMEfraHobbwGGL4rnobrVSwJdwN2sKNtaVrvqFr4GrwDXxTvbNNH-7htu58e5yyl6H3rndtcw0uKnUI9uZXl-Bj87hbP0fF69N2_VBEBhPMIpqZilOtaGlSRQ3XwmghjOWEC6UJIWWlGDe2zBHDYznPkNYZRhUluaHK0CVI5l_j2xC8rWTnXa38SWIkJxhygiFnGHKEMS7u5kU7dP-WfwAmYmHU</recordid><startdate>20180409</startdate><enddate>20180409</enddate><creator>Rochlin, D H</creator><creator>Sheckter, C</creator><creator>Moshrefi, S</creator><creator>Sche, M</creator><creator>Vargas, V</creator><creator>Sproul, J</creator><creator>Karanas, Y L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180409</creationdate><title>412 Volume vs. Rate-Based Tube Feeding in Burn Patients: Improving Nutrition</title><author>Rochlin, D H ; Sheckter, C ; Moshrefi, S ; Sche, M ; Vargas, V ; Sproul, J ; Karanas, Y L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1214-36cf73ba3dc5a3c7b9cb99ce7279ab222dfa47ced804136c860bb610f328c3ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rochlin, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheckter, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moshrefi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sche, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sproul, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karanas, Y L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of burn care & research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rochlin, D H</au><au>Sheckter, C</au><au>Moshrefi, S</au><au>Sche, M</au><au>Vargas, V</au><au>Sproul, J</au><au>Karanas, Y L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>412 Volume vs. Rate-Based Tube Feeding in Burn Patients: Improving Nutrition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of burn care & research</jtitle><date>2018-04-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>S177</spage><epage>S177</epage><pages>S177-S177</pages><issn>1559-047X</issn><eissn>1559-0488</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Introduction
Proper nutrition is critical in healing from burns. Tube feeding is routinely employed to help meet nutritional goals, especially in intubated patients and large burns; however, the complexities of burn care frequently involve pausing tube feeding. Volume-based tube feeding is a strategy that provides goal volumes based on available hours per day compared to fixed hourly rates. This study aims to assess whether volume-based tube feeding is superior to traditional rate-based tube feeding at meeting nutritional goals.
Methods
Starting in January 2016, a single burn center implemented a volume-based tube feeding protocol. All patients for calendar year 2016 requiring tube feeds for at least 5 continuous days were compared to all patients from the prior calendar year 2015. Demographics, burn characteristics, and tube feeding details were compared with univariate analysis. Daily tube feed goals and length of stay were primary outcomes; both were assessed with multivariate analysis using linear modeling.
Results
Thirty patients met study criteria. The cohort was 30.0% female and 93.3% flame burned, with a mean age of 44.2 years and mean TBSA of 30.6%. All patients suffered 3rd degree burns. Pausing tube feeds for perioperative care was the most common reason tube feeds were held at 33.7% of all held days. Volume-based tube feeding was the only independent predictor of increasing tube feed goals with an average goal met of 91.41% (SD 19.41) vs. 74.14% (SD 21.72), (linear coefficient 10.05, 95% CI 4.49–15.61, p-value 0.001). Tube feed hours held was the only independent predictor of lower tube feed goals (linear coefficient -5.52, 95% CI -7.73 - -3.31, p-value <0.001). Volume-based tube feeding was not associated with a significant difference in length of stay after controlling for covariates. Rate-based feeds showed an adjusted mean stay of 33.6 (SD 7.5) days vs. 36.3 (SD 11.1) days for volume-based feeds (linear coefficient 0.84, 95% CI -13.6 - 15.2, p=0.905).
Conclusions
Perioperative care was the most common reason for holding tube feeding. Volume-based tube feeding was superior to rate-based tube feeding in maximizing daily nutritional goals. Additional studies are needed to assess whether volume-based feeding is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Applicability of Research to Practice
Volume-based tube feeds optimize nutritional goals and thus should be the preferred method of tube feeding in patients who require such nutritional support.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jbcr/iry006.334</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-047X |
ispartof | Journal of burn care & research, 2018-04, Vol.39 (suppl_1), p.S177-S177 |
issn | 1559-047X 1559-0488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jbcr_iry006_334 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | 412 Volume vs. Rate-Based Tube Feeding in Burn Patients: Improving Nutrition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=412%20Volume%20vs.%20Rate-Based%20Tube%20Feeding%20in%20Burn%20Patients:%20Improving%20Nutrition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20burn%20care%20&%20research&rft.au=Rochlin,%20D%20H&rft.date=2018-04-09&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=S177&rft.epage=S177&rft.pages=S177-S177&rft.issn=1559-047X&rft.eissn=1559-0488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jbcr/iry006.334&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jbcr/iry006.334%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jbcr/iry006.334&rfr_iscdi=true |