210 Evaluation of Benzoic Acid As an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Weaned Pigs

Abstract Benzoic acid supplement (BA) was evaluated as an alternative to anti-microbial growth promoter in weaned pigs. A total of 96 piglets (6.2±.3 kg BW) were weaned at d 21 of age and placed in pens (4 piglets per pen) based on BW and gender and allocated to three diets to give 8 replicates. Die...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2018-04, Vol.96 (suppl_2), p.111-112
Hauptverfasser: Voth, C, Zhu, C, Wey, D, Vingerhoeds, P, Borucki, S, Kiarie, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 112
container_issue suppl_2
container_start_page 111
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 96
creator Voth, C
Zhu, C
Wey, D
Vingerhoeds, P
Borucki, S
Kiarie, E
description Abstract Benzoic acid supplement (BA) was evaluated as an alternative to anti-microbial growth promoter in weaned pigs. A total of 96 piglets (6.2±.3 kg BW) were weaned at d 21 of age and placed in pens (4 piglets per pen) based on BW and gender and allocated to three diets to give 8 replicates. Diets included: control (C) corn-soybean meal diet, C + in-feed antibiotic (AB, 220mg/kg chlortetracycline hydrochloride and 31.2 mg/kg tiamulin) and C + 0.5% BA (BA). Pigs had free access to diets and water for six weeks. Feed intake and BW were taken weekly to calculate ADG, ADFI and FCR. Fecal scores were taken from d 8-14 post-weaning to assess incidence and severity of diarrhea and grab fecal samples taken for fecal DM content. The severity of diarrhea was assessed using a fecal consistency scoring (1, normal; 2, soft feces; 3, mild diarrhea; 4, severe diarrhea). In wk 2, pigs fed BA showed greater (P = 0.04) ADG than C fed pigs which in turn had similar ADG to AB fed pigs. However, in wk 4 and 5, pigs fed AB showed greater (P < 0.05) ADG than C whereas BA fed pigs had intermediate and similar (P > 0.10) ADG to C or AB fed pigs. The overall (wk 1-6) ADG and final BW were greater (P < 0.05) for AB and tended to be higher (P = 0.07) for BA fed pigs than for C fed pigs. However, ADG and final BW for pigs fed AB and BA was similar (P > 0.10). The overall ADG was 494, 533, 528 g/d for C, AB and BA, respectively and corresponding final BW was 26.9, 28.6 and 28.2 kg, respectively. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of diets on feed intake. In the overall, pigs fed AB (1.58) and BA (1.54) had better (P < 0.05) FCR compared to C (1.64) fed pigs. Treatment effects (P < 0.05) on fecal score was only observed on d 12 in which case pigs fed AB and BA showed lower score than C fed pigs. In the overall, the mean fecal score was 2.5, 2.2 and 2.3 for C, AB and BA, respectively. There was no diet effect (P > 0.05) on fecal DM content; the overall mean values were 22.3, 23.9 and 23.6%, respectively. In conclusion, benzoic acid supported piglet growth to the same extent as AB growth promoter.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/sky073.207
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_sky073_207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/sky073.207</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jas/sky073.207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1137-1efe25f37d8498c5f798cf614015bd8c8b2354a2fe6b1379778fcadcb872cd613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFPAjEchRujiYiuzl0dDvpr6bU3ngTRhEQGjZO59HqtFqEl7QHBv94a3F3eW773hg-hWyAjIBUbr1Qap68jEWxEiThDA-CUFwxKdo4GhFAopAR6ia5SWhEClFd8gN4pEDzbq_VO9S54HCy-N_47OI1r7TpcJ6w8rte9iT4Te4P7gGvfu9aFPkPzGA79J17GsAmZwc7jN6O86fDSfaRrdGHVOpmbvx6i14fZy_SxWDzPn6b1otAATBRgrKHcMtHJSSU1tyKnLWFCgLed1LKljE8UtaZsM18JIa1WnW6loLorgQ3R6PSrY0gpGttso9uoeGyANL9ymiynOclpspw8uDsNwm77H_sDL2NmbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>210 Evaluation of Benzoic Acid As an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Weaned Pigs</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Voth, C ; Zhu, C ; Wey, D ; Vingerhoeds, P ; Borucki, S ; Kiarie, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Voth, C ; Zhu, C ; Wey, D ; Vingerhoeds, P ; Borucki, S ; Kiarie, E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Benzoic acid supplement (BA) was evaluated as an alternative to anti-microbial growth promoter in weaned pigs. A total of 96 piglets (6.2±.3 kg BW) were weaned at d 21 of age and placed in pens (4 piglets per pen) based on BW and gender and allocated to three diets to give 8 replicates. Diets included: control (C) corn-soybean meal diet, C + in-feed antibiotic (AB, 220mg/kg chlortetracycline hydrochloride and 31.2 mg/kg tiamulin) and C + 0.5% BA (BA). Pigs had free access to diets and water for six weeks. Feed intake and BW were taken weekly to calculate ADG, ADFI and FCR. Fecal scores were taken from d 8-14 post-weaning to assess incidence and severity of diarrhea and grab fecal samples taken for fecal DM content. The severity of diarrhea was assessed using a fecal consistency scoring (1, normal; 2, soft feces; 3, mild diarrhea; 4, severe diarrhea). In wk 2, pigs fed BA showed greater (P = 0.04) ADG than C fed pigs which in turn had similar ADG to AB fed pigs. However, in wk 4 and 5, pigs fed AB showed greater (P &lt; 0.05) ADG than C whereas BA fed pigs had intermediate and similar (P &gt; 0.10) ADG to C or AB fed pigs. The overall (wk 1-6) ADG and final BW were greater (P &lt; 0.05) for AB and tended to be higher (P = 0.07) for BA fed pigs than for C fed pigs. However, ADG and final BW for pigs fed AB and BA was similar (P &gt; 0.10). The overall ADG was 494, 533, 528 g/d for C, AB and BA, respectively and corresponding final BW was 26.9, 28.6 and 28.2 kg, respectively. There was no effect (P &gt; 0.05) of diets on feed intake. In the overall, pigs fed AB (1.58) and BA (1.54) had better (P &lt; 0.05) FCR compared to C (1.64) fed pigs. Treatment effects (P &lt; 0.05) on fecal score was only observed on d 12 in which case pigs fed AB and BA showed lower score than C fed pigs. In the overall, the mean fecal score was 2.5, 2.2 and 2.3 for C, AB and BA, respectively. There was no diet effect (P &gt; 0.05) on fecal DM content; the overall mean values were 22.3, 23.9 and 23.6%, respectively. In conclusion, benzoic acid supported piglet growth to the same extent as AB growth promoter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky073.207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2018-04, Vol.96 (suppl_2), p.111-112</ispartof><rights>American Society of Animal Science 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1580,27906,27907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voth, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wey, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vingerhoeds, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borucki, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiarie, E</creatorcontrib><title>210 Evaluation of Benzoic Acid As an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Weaned Pigs</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract Benzoic acid supplement (BA) was evaluated as an alternative to anti-microbial growth promoter in weaned pigs. A total of 96 piglets (6.2±.3 kg BW) were weaned at d 21 of age and placed in pens (4 piglets per pen) based on BW and gender and allocated to three diets to give 8 replicates. Diets included: control (C) corn-soybean meal diet, C + in-feed antibiotic (AB, 220mg/kg chlortetracycline hydrochloride and 31.2 mg/kg tiamulin) and C + 0.5% BA (BA). Pigs had free access to diets and water for six weeks. Feed intake and BW were taken weekly to calculate ADG, ADFI and FCR. Fecal scores were taken from d 8-14 post-weaning to assess incidence and severity of diarrhea and grab fecal samples taken for fecal DM content. The severity of diarrhea was assessed using a fecal consistency scoring (1, normal; 2, soft feces; 3, mild diarrhea; 4, severe diarrhea). In wk 2, pigs fed BA showed greater (P = 0.04) ADG than C fed pigs which in turn had similar ADG to AB fed pigs. However, in wk 4 and 5, pigs fed AB showed greater (P &lt; 0.05) ADG than C whereas BA fed pigs had intermediate and similar (P &gt; 0.10) ADG to C or AB fed pigs. The overall (wk 1-6) ADG and final BW were greater (P &lt; 0.05) for AB and tended to be higher (P = 0.07) for BA fed pigs than for C fed pigs. However, ADG and final BW for pigs fed AB and BA was similar (P &gt; 0.10). The overall ADG was 494, 533, 528 g/d for C, AB and BA, respectively and corresponding final BW was 26.9, 28.6 and 28.2 kg, respectively. There was no effect (P &gt; 0.05) of diets on feed intake. In the overall, pigs fed AB (1.58) and BA (1.54) had better (P &lt; 0.05) FCR compared to C (1.64) fed pigs. Treatment effects (P &lt; 0.05) on fecal score was only observed on d 12 in which case pigs fed AB and BA showed lower score than C fed pigs. In the overall, the mean fecal score was 2.5, 2.2 and 2.3 for C, AB and BA, respectively. There was no diet effect (P &gt; 0.05) on fecal DM content; the overall mean values were 22.3, 23.9 and 23.6%, respectively. In conclusion, benzoic acid supported piglet growth to the same extent as AB growth promoter.</description><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkLFPAjEchRujiYiuzl0dDvpr6bU3ngTRhEQGjZO59HqtFqEl7QHBv94a3F3eW773hg-hWyAjIBUbr1Qap68jEWxEiThDA-CUFwxKdo4GhFAopAR6ia5SWhEClFd8gN4pEDzbq_VO9S54HCy-N_47OI1r7TpcJ6w8rte9iT4Te4P7gGvfu9aFPkPzGA79J17GsAmZwc7jN6O86fDSfaRrdGHVOpmbvx6i14fZy_SxWDzPn6b1otAATBRgrKHcMtHJSSU1tyKnLWFCgLed1LKljE8UtaZsM18JIa1WnW6loLorgQ3R6PSrY0gpGttso9uoeGyANL9ymiynOclpspw8uDsNwm77H_sDL2NmbQ</recordid><startdate>20180410</startdate><enddate>20180410</enddate><creator>Voth, C</creator><creator>Zhu, C</creator><creator>Wey, D</creator><creator>Vingerhoeds, P</creator><creator>Borucki, S</creator><creator>Kiarie, E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180410</creationdate><title>210 Evaluation of Benzoic Acid As an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Weaned Pigs</title><author>Voth, C ; Zhu, C ; Wey, D ; Vingerhoeds, P ; Borucki, S ; Kiarie, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1137-1efe25f37d8498c5f798cf614015bd8c8b2354a2fe6b1379778fcadcb872cd613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voth, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wey, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vingerhoeds, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borucki, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiarie, E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voth, C</au><au>Zhu, C</au><au>Wey, D</au><au>Vingerhoeds, P</au><au>Borucki, S</au><au>Kiarie, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>210 Evaluation of Benzoic Acid As an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Weaned Pigs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2018-04-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>suppl_2</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>111-112</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract Benzoic acid supplement (BA) was evaluated as an alternative to anti-microbial growth promoter in weaned pigs. A total of 96 piglets (6.2±.3 kg BW) were weaned at d 21 of age and placed in pens (4 piglets per pen) based on BW and gender and allocated to three diets to give 8 replicates. Diets included: control (C) corn-soybean meal diet, C + in-feed antibiotic (AB, 220mg/kg chlortetracycline hydrochloride and 31.2 mg/kg tiamulin) and C + 0.5% BA (BA). Pigs had free access to diets and water for six weeks. Feed intake and BW were taken weekly to calculate ADG, ADFI and FCR. Fecal scores were taken from d 8-14 post-weaning to assess incidence and severity of diarrhea and grab fecal samples taken for fecal DM content. The severity of diarrhea was assessed using a fecal consistency scoring (1, normal; 2, soft feces; 3, mild diarrhea; 4, severe diarrhea). In wk 2, pigs fed BA showed greater (P = 0.04) ADG than C fed pigs which in turn had similar ADG to AB fed pigs. However, in wk 4 and 5, pigs fed AB showed greater (P &lt; 0.05) ADG than C whereas BA fed pigs had intermediate and similar (P &gt; 0.10) ADG to C or AB fed pigs. The overall (wk 1-6) ADG and final BW were greater (P &lt; 0.05) for AB and tended to be higher (P = 0.07) for BA fed pigs than for C fed pigs. However, ADG and final BW for pigs fed AB and BA was similar (P &gt; 0.10). The overall ADG was 494, 533, 528 g/d for C, AB and BA, respectively and corresponding final BW was 26.9, 28.6 and 28.2 kg, respectively. There was no effect (P &gt; 0.05) of diets on feed intake. In the overall, pigs fed AB (1.58) and BA (1.54) had better (P &lt; 0.05) FCR compared to C (1.64) fed pigs. Treatment effects (P &lt; 0.05) on fecal score was only observed on d 12 in which case pigs fed AB and BA showed lower score than C fed pigs. In the overall, the mean fecal score was 2.5, 2.2 and 2.3 for C, AB and BA, respectively. There was no diet effect (P &gt; 0.05) on fecal DM content; the overall mean values were 22.3, 23.9 and 23.6%, respectively. In conclusion, benzoic acid supported piglet growth to the same extent as AB growth promoter.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/sky073.207</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2018-04, Vol.96 (suppl_2), p.111-112
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_sky073_207
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title 210 Evaluation of Benzoic Acid As an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Weaned Pigs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=210%20Evaluation%20of%20Benzoic%20Acid%20As%20an%20Alternative%20to%20Antibiotic%20Growth%20Promoter%20in%20Weaned%20Pigs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Voth,%20C&rft.date=2018-04-10&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=suppl_2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=111-112&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/sky073.207&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jas/sky073.207%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/sky073.207&rfr_iscdi=true