PSII-12 Effect of a Supplemental Water Source on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs

Crossbred pigs (Fast Genetics 276 × PIC 800; n = 2,388; initial BW = 74.1 ± 2.0 kg) were used in two, 63-d growth trials to evaluate the addition of a water source (fixed double nipple waterer) to wet/dry feeders on finishing pig performance. Pigs were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 treatments with 27...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2022-04, Vol.100 (Supplement_2), p.138-139
Hauptverfasser: Hammers, Kelsey L, Jasper, Jessica, Kern, Simon, Johnston, Lee J, Knott, Jeff S, Boerboom, Mike J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 138
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 100
creator Hammers, Kelsey L
Jasper, Jessica
Kern, Simon
Johnston, Lee J
Knott, Jeff S
Boerboom, Mike J
description Crossbred pigs (Fast Genetics 276 × PIC 800; n = 2,388; initial BW = 74.1 ± 2.0 kg) were used in two, 63-d growth trials to evaluate the addition of a water source (fixed double nipple waterer) to wet/dry feeders on finishing pig performance. Pigs were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 treatments with 27 to 30 pigs per pen and 40 pens per treatment. Pens were equipped with a wet/dry feeder (SDI, drop shelf wet/dry feeder) with no supplemental water or a wet/dry feeder with a supplemental water source available from 74 kg BW until marketing. Growth data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure with repeated measures over time. The model included fixed effects of water treatment, trial, and time with all possible two-way interactions. Removals, mortalities, and total removals were analyzed using a binomial distribution. No differences (P > 0.05) in body weight were observed initially or at the last marketing event between water source treatments; however, a supplemental water source tended (P = 0.061) to decrease average market weight compared to pigs not given a supplemental waterer (Table). Overall average daily gain (ADG) was lower (P = 0.011) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) was decreased (P = 0.002) for pigs given a supplemental waterer compared to pigs only drinking from a wet/dry feeder. No differences were observed for the percentage of mortalities, pigs removed, or total removals (P > 0.05) regardless of treatment. Finally, daily water disappearance was 2.5 liters greater for pigs with a supplemental waterer compared to pigs with no supplemental waterer. In conclusion, the addition of a supplemental water source to wet/dry feeders decreased growth performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skac064.237
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skac064_237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_jas_skac064_237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c817-f385d643e4701e56912071e32111c9670e159966ecbc9327f4eb4f88ec1870cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0M1qAjEUhuFQWqi1XXebGxjNSSZ_yyJqBaEDY-lyiOmJjp0fSUZK776Krj54F9_iIeQV2ASYFdODS9P04zxT-YQLfUdGILnMBChxT0aMcciMAf5InlI6MAZcWjkin0W5WmXA6TwE9APtA3W0PB2PDbbYDa6hX27ASMv-FD3SvqPL2P8Oe1pgDH1sXXepgS7qrk77utvRot6lZ_IQXJPw5bZjslnMN7P3bP2xXM3e1pk3oLMgjPxWucBcM0CpLHCmAQUHAG-VZgjSWqXQb70VXIcct3kwBj0YzfxWjMn0eutjn1LEUB1j3br4VwGrLijVGaW6oVRnFPEPds5VMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PSII-12 Effect of a Supplemental Water Source on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hammers, Kelsey L ; Jasper, Jessica ; Kern, Simon ; Johnston, Lee J ; Knott, Jeff S ; Boerboom, Mike J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hammers, Kelsey L ; Jasper, Jessica ; Kern, Simon ; Johnston, Lee J ; Knott, Jeff S ; Boerboom, Mike J</creatorcontrib><description>Crossbred pigs (Fast Genetics 276 × PIC 800; n = 2,388; initial BW = 74.1 ± 2.0 kg) were used in two, 63-d growth trials to evaluate the addition of a water source (fixed double nipple waterer) to wet/dry feeders on finishing pig performance. Pigs were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 treatments with 27 to 30 pigs per pen and 40 pens per treatment. Pens were equipped with a wet/dry feeder (SDI, drop shelf wet/dry feeder) with no supplemental water or a wet/dry feeder with a supplemental water source available from 74 kg BW until marketing. Growth data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure with repeated measures over time. The model included fixed effects of water treatment, trial, and time with all possible two-way interactions. Removals, mortalities, and total removals were analyzed using a binomial distribution. No differences (P &gt; 0.05) in body weight were observed initially or at the last marketing event between water source treatments; however, a supplemental water source tended (P = 0.061) to decrease average market weight compared to pigs not given a supplemental waterer (Table). Overall average daily gain (ADG) was lower (P = 0.011) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) was decreased (P = 0.002) for pigs given a supplemental waterer compared to pigs only drinking from a wet/dry feeder. No differences were observed for the percentage of mortalities, pigs removed, or total removals (P &gt; 0.05) regardless of treatment. Finally, daily water disappearance was 2.5 liters greater for pigs with a supplemental waterer compared to pigs with no supplemental waterer. In conclusion, the addition of a supplemental water source to wet/dry feeders decreased growth performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac064.237</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2022-04, Vol.100 (Supplement_2), p.138-139</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hammers, Kelsey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jasper, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Lee J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knott, Jeff S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerboom, Mike J</creatorcontrib><title>PSII-12 Effect of a Supplemental Water Source on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Crossbred pigs (Fast Genetics 276 × PIC 800; n = 2,388; initial BW = 74.1 ± 2.0 kg) were used in two, 63-d growth trials to evaluate the addition of a water source (fixed double nipple waterer) to wet/dry feeders on finishing pig performance. Pigs were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 treatments with 27 to 30 pigs per pen and 40 pens per treatment. Pens were equipped with a wet/dry feeder (SDI, drop shelf wet/dry feeder) with no supplemental water or a wet/dry feeder with a supplemental water source available from 74 kg BW until marketing. Growth data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure with repeated measures over time. The model included fixed effects of water treatment, trial, and time with all possible two-way interactions. Removals, mortalities, and total removals were analyzed using a binomial distribution. No differences (P &gt; 0.05) in body weight were observed initially or at the last marketing event between water source treatments; however, a supplemental water source tended (P = 0.061) to decrease average market weight compared to pigs not given a supplemental waterer (Table). Overall average daily gain (ADG) was lower (P = 0.011) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) was decreased (P = 0.002) for pigs given a supplemental waterer compared to pigs only drinking from a wet/dry feeder. No differences were observed for the percentage of mortalities, pigs removed, or total removals (P &gt; 0.05) regardless of treatment. Finally, daily water disappearance was 2.5 liters greater for pigs with a supplemental waterer compared to pigs with no supplemental waterer. In conclusion, the addition of a supplemental water source to wet/dry feeders decreased growth performance.</description><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNot0M1qAjEUhuFQWqi1XXebGxjNSSZ_yyJqBaEDY-lyiOmJjp0fSUZK776Krj54F9_iIeQV2ASYFdODS9P04zxT-YQLfUdGILnMBChxT0aMcciMAf5InlI6MAZcWjkin0W5WmXA6TwE9APtA3W0PB2PDbbYDa6hX27ASMv-FD3SvqPL2P8Oe1pgDH1sXXepgS7qrk77utvRot6lZ_IQXJPw5bZjslnMN7P3bP2xXM3e1pk3oLMgjPxWucBcM0CpLHCmAQUHAG-VZgjSWqXQb70VXIcct3kwBj0YzfxWjMn0eutjn1LEUB1j3br4VwGrLijVGaW6oVRnFPEPds5VMQ</recordid><startdate>20220412</startdate><enddate>20220412</enddate><creator>Hammers, Kelsey L</creator><creator>Jasper, Jessica</creator><creator>Kern, Simon</creator><creator>Johnston, Lee J</creator><creator>Knott, Jeff S</creator><creator>Boerboom, Mike J</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220412</creationdate><title>PSII-12 Effect of a Supplemental Water Source on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs</title><author>Hammers, Kelsey L ; Jasper, Jessica ; Kern, Simon ; Johnston, Lee J ; Knott, Jeff S ; Boerboom, Mike J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c817-f385d643e4701e56912071e32111c9670e159966ecbc9327f4eb4f88ec1870cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hammers, Kelsey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jasper, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Lee J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knott, Jeff S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerboom, Mike J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hammers, Kelsey L</au><au>Jasper, Jessica</au><au>Kern, Simon</au><au>Johnston, Lee J</au><au>Knott, Jeff S</au><au>Boerboom, Mike J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PSII-12 Effect of a Supplemental Water Source on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2022-04-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>138-139</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Crossbred pigs (Fast Genetics 276 × PIC 800; n = 2,388; initial BW = 74.1 ± 2.0 kg) were used in two, 63-d growth trials to evaluate the addition of a water source (fixed double nipple waterer) to wet/dry feeders on finishing pig performance. Pigs were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 treatments with 27 to 30 pigs per pen and 40 pens per treatment. Pens were equipped with a wet/dry feeder (SDI, drop shelf wet/dry feeder) with no supplemental water or a wet/dry feeder with a supplemental water source available from 74 kg BW until marketing. Growth data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure with repeated measures over time. The model included fixed effects of water treatment, trial, and time with all possible two-way interactions. Removals, mortalities, and total removals were analyzed using a binomial distribution. No differences (P &gt; 0.05) in body weight were observed initially or at the last marketing event between water source treatments; however, a supplemental water source tended (P = 0.061) to decrease average market weight compared to pigs not given a supplemental waterer (Table). Overall average daily gain (ADG) was lower (P = 0.011) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) was decreased (P = 0.002) for pigs given a supplemental waterer compared to pigs only drinking from a wet/dry feeder. No differences were observed for the percentage of mortalities, pigs removed, or total removals (P &gt; 0.05) regardless of treatment. Finally, daily water disappearance was 2.5 liters greater for pigs with a supplemental waterer compared to pigs with no supplemental waterer. In conclusion, the addition of a supplemental water source to wet/dry feeders decreased growth performance.</abstract><doi>10.1093/jas/skac064.237</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2022-04, Vol.100 (Supplement_2), p.138-139
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skac064_237
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title PSII-12 Effect of a Supplemental Water Source on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PSII-12%20Effect%20of%20a%20Supplemental%20Water%20Source%20on%20Growth%20Performance%20of%20Finishing%20Pigs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Hammers,%20Kelsey%20L&rft.date=2022-04-12&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=138-139&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skac064.237&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_jas_skac064_237%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true