Microwave-assisted extraction as an alternative to Soxhlet, sonication, and supercritical fluid extraction
Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), Soxhlet, soni cation, and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) were compared in their ability to extract 95 compounds listed in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 8250. Freshly spiked soil samples and 2 standard reference materials were extracted with he...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of AOAC International 1996, Vol.79 (1), p.142-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), Soxhlet, soni cation, and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) were compared in their ability to extract 95 compounds listed in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 8250. Freshly spiked soil samples and 2 standard reference materials were extracted with hexane-acetone (1 + 1) by MAE and Soxhlet extraction, with methylene chloride-acetone (1 + 1) by sonication extraction, and with supercritical carbondioxide modified with 10% methanol by SFE. Results indicate that MAE is a promising extraction technique. Of 94 compounds for which we are reporting data, 51 compounds gave MAE recoveries of >80%; 33,50-79%; 8,20-49%; and 2, 80%; 32,50-79%; 8,20-49%; and 4, 80%; 25,50-79%; 4,20-49%; and 2, 80%; 37, 50-79%; 12,20-49%, and 8, |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1060-3271 1944-7922 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jaoac/79.1.142 |