Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation

US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global Studies Quarterly 2022-07, Vol.2 (3)
Hauptverfasser: Onderco, Michal, Joosen, Rik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title Global Studies Quarterly
container_volume 2
creator Onderco, Michal
Joosen, Rik
description US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House of Representatives, held forty-four votes related to nuclear weapons in the last two parliamentary periods alone. Although parliament's powers are restricted, these votes can oblige government to pursue a certain policy and ultimately put soft constraints on government's freedom of action. Yet, the extent of the contestation of nuclear weapons in European parliaments is almost unknown. Using the Dutch case and spatial modeling methods, we offer three lessons: first, that security policy does not stand above the parliamentary politics; second, that cross-bench voting happens but the activity originates in partisan silos; and third, that there is a strong partisan element to the debates about nuclear weapons in Europe.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/isagsq/ksac028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_isagsq_ksac028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A777680243</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/isagsq/ksac028</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A777680243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1978-188fadc4a846952c59f06773dfd65ec31e735c00b1d4342556ef7938a4b113c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EElXpyuyVIa0dO3HCVpWPIgpIqIgxcp1za0jsECegTvx10g9EN3TDne6e54YXoXNKhpSkbGS8XPqP0buXioTJEeqFMeMBE6k4PphP0cD7N0I6RLCQxz30_diqAmSNX0FWznpsLG5WgOdfADnge1lCfYnHVhZrbzx2Gv8KD64xB8JV26gVnrrWw4Z6hqoGD7aRjfmELTU3JWw_TJxtwG8uzp6hEy0LD4N976OXm-v5ZBrMnm7vJuNZoGgqkoAmiZa54jLhcRqFKko1iYVguc7jCBSjIFikCFnQnDMeRlEMWqQskXxBKVOE9dFw93cpC8iM1a6ppeoqh9IoZ0Gbbj8WQsQJCTn7E1TtvK9BZ1VtSlmvM0qyTeTZLvJsH3knXOwE11b_sT_zSYWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Onderco, Michal ; Joosen, Rik</creator><creatorcontrib>Onderco, Michal ; Joosen, Rik</creatorcontrib><description>US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House of Representatives, held forty-four votes related to nuclear weapons in the last two parliamentary periods alone. Although parliament's powers are restricted, these votes can oblige government to pursue a certain policy and ultimately put soft constraints on government's freedom of action. Yet, the extent of the contestation of nuclear weapons in European parliaments is almost unknown. Using the Dutch case and spatial modeling methods, we offer three lessons: first, that security policy does not stand above the parliamentary politics; second, that cross-bench voting happens but the activity originates in partisan silos; and third, that there is a strong partisan element to the debates about nuclear weapons in Europe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2634-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2634-3797</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksac028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Nuclear weapons ; Political aspects ; Security management ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Global Studies Quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.2 (3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) (2022). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1978-188fadc4a846952c59f06773dfd65ec31e735c00b1d4342556ef7938a4b113c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1978-188fadc4a846952c59f06773dfd65ec31e735c00b1d4342556ef7938a4b113c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9911-3782</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,1599,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Onderco, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joosen, Rik</creatorcontrib><title>Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation</title><title>Global Studies Quarterly</title><description>US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House of Representatives, held forty-four votes related to nuclear weapons in the last two parliamentary periods alone. Although parliament's powers are restricted, these votes can oblige government to pursue a certain policy and ultimately put soft constraints on government's freedom of action. Yet, the extent of the contestation of nuclear weapons in European parliaments is almost unknown. Using the Dutch case and spatial modeling methods, we offer three lessons: first, that security policy does not stand above the parliamentary politics; second, that cross-bench voting happens but the activity originates in partisan silos; and third, that there is a strong partisan element to the debates about nuclear weapons in Europe.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Nuclear weapons</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Security management</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>2634-3797</issn><issn>2634-3797</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EElXpyuyVIa0dO3HCVpWPIgpIqIgxcp1za0jsECegTvx10g9EN3TDne6e54YXoXNKhpSkbGS8XPqP0buXioTJEeqFMeMBE6k4PphP0cD7N0I6RLCQxz30_diqAmSNX0FWznpsLG5WgOdfADnge1lCfYnHVhZrbzx2Gv8KD64xB8JV26gVnrrWw4Z6hqoGD7aRjfmELTU3JWw_TJxtwG8uzp6hEy0LD4N976OXm-v5ZBrMnm7vJuNZoGgqkoAmiZa54jLhcRqFKko1iYVguc7jCBSjIFikCFnQnDMeRlEMWqQskXxBKVOE9dFw93cpC8iM1a6ppeoqh9IoZ0Gbbj8WQsQJCTn7E1TtvK9BZ1VtSlmvM0qyTeTZLvJsH3knXOwE11b_sT_zSYWw</recordid><startdate>20220720</startdate><enddate>20220720</enddate><creator>Onderco, Michal</creator><creator>Joosen, Rik</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-3782</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220720</creationdate><title>Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation</title><author>Onderco, Michal ; Joosen, Rik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1978-188fadc4a846952c59f06773dfd65ec31e735c00b1d4342556ef7938a4b113c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Nuclear weapons</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Security management</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Onderco, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joosen, Rik</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><jtitle>Global Studies Quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Onderco, Michal</au><au>Joosen, Rik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation</atitle><jtitle>Global Studies Quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-07-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>2634-3797</issn><eissn>2634-3797</eissn><abstract>US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House of Representatives, held forty-four votes related to nuclear weapons in the last two parliamentary periods alone. Although parliament's powers are restricted, these votes can oblige government to pursue a certain policy and ultimately put soft constraints on government's freedom of action. Yet, the extent of the contestation of nuclear weapons in European parliaments is almost unknown. Using the Dutch case and spatial modeling methods, we offer three lessons: first, that security policy does not stand above the parliamentary politics; second, that cross-bench voting happens but the activity originates in partisan silos; and third, that there is a strong partisan element to the debates about nuclear weapons in Europe.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/isagsq/ksac028</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-3782</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2634-3797
ispartof Global Studies Quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.2 (3)
issn 2634-3797
2634-3797
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_isagsq_ksac028
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Analysis
Nuclear weapons
Political aspects
Security management
Voting
title Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A25%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nuclear%20Weapons%20in%20the%20Tweede%20Kamer:%20Analysis%20of%20Nuclear%20Motions%20in%20the%20Dutch%20House%20of%20Representatives%20in%20Times%20of%20Contestation&rft.jtitle=Global%20Studies%20Quarterly&rft.au=Onderco,%20Michal&rft.date=2022-07-20&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=2634-3797&rft.eissn=2634-3797&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/isagsq/ksac028&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA777680243%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A777680243&rft_oup_id=10.1093/isagsq/ksac028&rfr_iscdi=true