Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation
US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global Studies Quarterly 2022-07, Vol.2 (3) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Global Studies Quarterly |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Onderco, Michal Joosen, Rik |
description | US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House of Representatives, held forty-four votes related to nuclear weapons in the last two parliamentary periods alone. Although parliament's powers are restricted, these votes can oblige government to pursue a certain policy and ultimately put soft constraints on government's freedom of action. Yet, the extent of the contestation of nuclear weapons in European parliaments is almost unknown. Using the Dutch case and spatial modeling methods, we offer three lessons: first, that security policy does not stand above the parliamentary politics; second, that cross-bench voting happens but the activity originates in partisan silos; and third, that there is a strong partisan element to the debates about nuclear weapons in Europe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/isagsq/ksac028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_isagsq_ksac028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A777680243</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/isagsq/ksac028</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A777680243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1978-188fadc4a846952c59f06773dfd65ec31e735c00b1d4342556ef7938a4b113c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EElXpyuyVIa0dO3HCVpWPIgpIqIgxcp1za0jsECegTvx10g9EN3TDne6e54YXoXNKhpSkbGS8XPqP0buXioTJEeqFMeMBE6k4PphP0cD7N0I6RLCQxz30_diqAmSNX0FWznpsLG5WgOdfADnge1lCfYnHVhZrbzx2Gv8KD64xB8JV26gVnrrWw4Z6hqoGD7aRjfmELTU3JWw_TJxtwG8uzp6hEy0LD4N976OXm-v5ZBrMnm7vJuNZoGgqkoAmiZa54jLhcRqFKko1iYVguc7jCBSjIFikCFnQnDMeRlEMWqQskXxBKVOE9dFw93cpC8iM1a6ppeoqh9IoZ0Gbbj8WQsQJCTn7E1TtvK9BZ1VtSlmvM0qyTeTZLvJsH3knXOwE11b_sT_zSYWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Onderco, Michal ; Joosen, Rik</creator><creatorcontrib>Onderco, Michal ; Joosen, Rik</creatorcontrib><description>US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House of Representatives, held forty-four votes related to nuclear weapons in the last two parliamentary periods alone. Although parliament's powers are restricted, these votes can oblige government to pursue a certain policy and ultimately put soft constraints on government's freedom of action. Yet, the extent of the contestation of nuclear weapons in European parliaments is almost unknown. Using the Dutch case and spatial modeling methods, we offer three lessons: first, that security policy does not stand above the parliamentary politics; second, that cross-bench voting happens but the activity originates in partisan silos; and third, that there is a strong partisan element to the debates about nuclear weapons in Europe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2634-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2634-3797</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksac028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Nuclear weapons ; Political aspects ; Security management ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Global Studies Quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.2 (3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) (2022). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1978-188fadc4a846952c59f06773dfd65ec31e735c00b1d4342556ef7938a4b113c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1978-188fadc4a846952c59f06773dfd65ec31e735c00b1d4342556ef7938a4b113c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9911-3782</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,1599,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Onderco, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joosen, Rik</creatorcontrib><title>Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation</title><title>Global Studies Quarterly</title><description>US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House of Representatives, held forty-four votes related to nuclear weapons in the last two parliamentary periods alone. Although parliament's powers are restricted, these votes can oblige government to pursue a certain policy and ultimately put soft constraints on government's freedom of action. Yet, the extent of the contestation of nuclear weapons in European parliaments is almost unknown. Using the Dutch case and spatial modeling methods, we offer three lessons: first, that security policy does not stand above the parliamentary politics; second, that cross-bench voting happens but the activity originates in partisan silos; and third, that there is a strong partisan element to the debates about nuclear weapons in Europe.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Nuclear weapons</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Security management</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>2634-3797</issn><issn>2634-3797</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EElXpyuyVIa0dO3HCVpWPIgpIqIgxcp1za0jsECegTvx10g9EN3TDne6e54YXoXNKhpSkbGS8XPqP0buXioTJEeqFMeMBE6k4PphP0cD7N0I6RLCQxz30_diqAmSNX0FWznpsLG5WgOdfADnge1lCfYnHVhZrbzx2Gv8KD64xB8JV26gVnrrWw4Z6hqoGD7aRjfmELTU3JWw_TJxtwG8uzp6hEy0LD4N976OXm-v5ZBrMnm7vJuNZoGgqkoAmiZa54jLhcRqFKko1iYVguc7jCBSjIFikCFnQnDMeRlEMWqQskXxBKVOE9dFw93cpC8iM1a6ppeoqh9IoZ0Gbbj8WQsQJCTn7E1TtvK9BZ1VtSlmvM0qyTeTZLvJsH3knXOwE11b_sT_zSYWw</recordid><startdate>20220720</startdate><enddate>20220720</enddate><creator>Onderco, Michal</creator><creator>Joosen, Rik</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-3782</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220720</creationdate><title>Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation</title><author>Onderco, Michal ; Joosen, Rik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1978-188fadc4a846952c59f06773dfd65ec31e735c00b1d4342556ef7938a4b113c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Nuclear weapons</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Security management</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Onderco, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joosen, Rik</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><jtitle>Global Studies Quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Onderco, Michal</au><au>Joosen, Rik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation</atitle><jtitle>Global Studies Quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-07-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>2634-3797</issn><eissn>2634-3797</eissn><abstract>US nuclear weapons are presently hosted in five European countries. In recent years, parliaments in four out of the five countries held debates about these weapons. For most of them, this was the first (or the only) debate in many years. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Tweede Kamer, the House of Representatives, held forty-four votes related to nuclear weapons in the last two parliamentary periods alone. Although parliament's powers are restricted, these votes can oblige government to pursue a certain policy and ultimately put soft constraints on government's freedom of action. Yet, the extent of the contestation of nuclear weapons in European parliaments is almost unknown. Using the Dutch case and spatial modeling methods, we offer three lessons: first, that security policy does not stand above the parliamentary politics; second, that cross-bench voting happens but the activity originates in partisan silos; and third, that there is a strong partisan element to the debates about nuclear weapons in Europe.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/isagsq/ksac028</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-3782</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2634-3797 |
ispartof | Global Studies Quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.2 (3) |
issn | 2634-3797 2634-3797 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_isagsq_ksac028 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection |
subjects | Analysis Nuclear weapons Political aspects Security management Voting |
title | Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of Contestation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A25%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nuclear%20Weapons%20in%20the%20Tweede%20Kamer:%20Analysis%20of%20Nuclear%20Motions%20in%20the%20Dutch%20House%20of%20Representatives%20in%20Times%20of%20Contestation&rft.jtitle=Global%20Studies%20Quarterly&rft.au=Onderco,%20Michal&rft.date=2022-07-20&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=2634-3797&rft.eissn=2634-3797&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/isagsq/ksac028&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA777680243%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A777680243&rft_oup_id=10.1093/isagsq/ksac028&rfr_iscdi=true |