Discrimination by Legal Design? UK Supreme Court in Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake Finds Care Workers are Not Protected by Minimum Wage Law for Sleep-in Shifts

Abstract In Mencap v Tomlinson Blake the Supreme Court finds that the UK’s statutory national minimum wage scheme excludes care workers from protection during sleep-in shifts. UK employment rights thus move further from international labour standards, including ILO Convention 189. This commentary ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial law journal (London) 2022-11, Vol.51 (3), p.696-716
1. Verfasser: Hayes, Ljb
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 716
container_issue 3
container_start_page 696
container_title Industrial law journal (London)
container_volume 51
creator Hayes, Ljb
description Abstract In Mencap v Tomlinson Blake the Supreme Court finds that the UK’s statutory national minimum wage scheme excludes care workers from protection during sleep-in shifts. UK employment rights thus move further from international labour standards, including ILO Convention 189. This commentary argues that Mencap points to discrimination by legal design. The Supreme Court gives expansive and uncritical regard to the wording and circumstances of a 1998 Low Pay Commission report that recommends residential care workers be excluded from protection as a ‘special treatment’. It shows that care workers’ entitlement to statutory protection is dependent on their contractual arrangements and does not consider inequality of bargaining power. The judgment erases caring labour of its cognitive and professional skills and puts care workers at a particular disadvantage. The care sector is notorious for the poor functioning of its labour market as well as for low pay. Care workers are mainly women and are disproportionately black and minority ethnic women. The discriminatory intent of Parliament, as explored by the Supreme Court in Mencap, reveals that the UK’s statutory minimum wage scheme is currently unable to provide workers with the dignity that would come from assigning a minimum value to the full range of care work.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/indlaw/dwac024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_indlaw_dwac024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/indlaw/dwac024</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/indlaw/dwac024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-a7b14936a0a5e35cb161f57fe47c3276c9fa52190840d52d07bd67d604dc75803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9PwjAYxhujiYhePb9XD4Nu3Tp2MgqiRlATIByXrnuHla1d2k3CR_HbOgJ3T-9zeJ8_-RFy69OBTxM2VDovxW6Y74SkQXhGen7IQ49xnpyTHmU08hLGgkty5dw3pZQlIe-R34ly0qpKadEooyHbwww3ooQJOrXR97B6g0VbW6wQxqa1DSgNc9RS1PADS1OVSjujvcdSbBGm3QYHY2ER1sZu0To46HfTwKc1DcoG80PFXGlVtRWsxQZhJnZQGAuLErH2uvjFlyoad00uClE6vDndPllNn5bjF2_28fw6fph5MohZ44k488OEcUFFhCySmc_9IooLDGPJgpjLpBBR4Cd0FNI8CnIaZzmPc07DXMbRiLI-GRxzpTXOWSzSuuMh7D71aXoAmx7BpiewneHuaDBt_d_vH64dfXI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discrimination by Legal Design? UK Supreme Court in Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake Finds Care Workers are Not Protected by Minimum Wage Law for Sleep-in Shifts</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hayes, Ljb</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Ljb</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract In Mencap v Tomlinson Blake the Supreme Court finds that the UK’s statutory national minimum wage scheme excludes care workers from protection during sleep-in shifts. UK employment rights thus move further from international labour standards, including ILO Convention 189. This commentary argues that Mencap points to discrimination by legal design. The Supreme Court gives expansive and uncritical regard to the wording and circumstances of a 1998 Low Pay Commission report that recommends residential care workers be excluded from protection as a ‘special treatment’. It shows that care workers’ entitlement to statutory protection is dependent on their contractual arrangements and does not consider inequality of bargaining power. The judgment erases caring labour of its cognitive and professional skills and puts care workers at a particular disadvantage. The care sector is notorious for the poor functioning of its labour market as well as for low pay. Care workers are mainly women and are disproportionately black and minority ethnic women. The discriminatory intent of Parliament, as explored by the Supreme Court in Mencap, reveals that the UK’s statutory minimum wage scheme is currently unable to provide workers with the dignity that would come from assigning a minimum value to the full range of care work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-9332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwac024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Industrial law journal (London), 2022-11, Vol.51 (3), p.696-716</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Industrial Law Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-a7b14936a0a5e35cb161f57fe47c3276c9fa52190840d52d07bd67d604dc75803</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1581,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Ljb</creatorcontrib><title>Discrimination by Legal Design? UK Supreme Court in Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake Finds Care Workers are Not Protected by Minimum Wage Law for Sleep-in Shifts</title><title>Industrial law journal (London)</title><description>Abstract In Mencap v Tomlinson Blake the Supreme Court finds that the UK’s statutory national minimum wage scheme excludes care workers from protection during sleep-in shifts. UK employment rights thus move further from international labour standards, including ILO Convention 189. This commentary argues that Mencap points to discrimination by legal design. The Supreme Court gives expansive and uncritical regard to the wording and circumstances of a 1998 Low Pay Commission report that recommends residential care workers be excluded from protection as a ‘special treatment’. It shows that care workers’ entitlement to statutory protection is dependent on their contractual arrangements and does not consider inequality of bargaining power. The judgment erases caring labour of its cognitive and professional skills and puts care workers at a particular disadvantage. The care sector is notorious for the poor functioning of its labour market as well as for low pay. Care workers are mainly women and are disproportionately black and minority ethnic women. The discriminatory intent of Parliament, as explored by the Supreme Court in Mencap, reveals that the UK’s statutory minimum wage scheme is currently unable to provide workers with the dignity that would come from assigning a minimum value to the full range of care work.</description><issn>0305-9332</issn><issn>1464-3669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9PwjAYxhujiYhePb9XD4Nu3Tp2MgqiRlATIByXrnuHla1d2k3CR_HbOgJ3T-9zeJ8_-RFy69OBTxM2VDovxW6Y74SkQXhGen7IQ49xnpyTHmU08hLGgkty5dw3pZQlIe-R34ly0qpKadEooyHbwww3ooQJOrXR97B6g0VbW6wQxqa1DSgNc9RS1PADS1OVSjujvcdSbBGm3QYHY2ER1sZu0To46HfTwKc1DcoG80PFXGlVtRWsxQZhJnZQGAuLErH2uvjFlyoad00uClE6vDndPllNn5bjF2_28fw6fph5MohZ44k488OEcUFFhCySmc_9IooLDGPJgpjLpBBR4Cd0FNI8CnIaZzmPc07DXMbRiLI-GRxzpTXOWSzSuuMh7D71aXoAmx7BpiewneHuaDBt_d_vH64dfXI</recordid><startdate>20221120</startdate><enddate>20221120</enddate><creator>Hayes, Ljb</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221120</creationdate><title>Discrimination by Legal Design? UK Supreme Court in Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake Finds Care Workers are Not Protected by Minimum Wage Law for Sleep-in Shifts</title><author>Hayes, Ljb</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-a7b14936a0a5e35cb161f57fe47c3276c9fa52190840d52d07bd67d604dc75803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Ljb</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Industrial law journal (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayes, Ljb</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discrimination by Legal Design? UK Supreme Court in Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake Finds Care Workers are Not Protected by Minimum Wage Law for Sleep-in Shifts</atitle><jtitle>Industrial law journal (London)</jtitle><date>2022-11-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>696</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>696-716</pages><issn>0305-9332</issn><eissn>1464-3669</eissn><abstract>Abstract In Mencap v Tomlinson Blake the Supreme Court finds that the UK’s statutory national minimum wage scheme excludes care workers from protection during sleep-in shifts. UK employment rights thus move further from international labour standards, including ILO Convention 189. This commentary argues that Mencap points to discrimination by legal design. The Supreme Court gives expansive and uncritical regard to the wording and circumstances of a 1998 Low Pay Commission report that recommends residential care workers be excluded from protection as a ‘special treatment’. It shows that care workers’ entitlement to statutory protection is dependent on their contractual arrangements and does not consider inequality of bargaining power. The judgment erases caring labour of its cognitive and professional skills and puts care workers at a particular disadvantage. The care sector is notorious for the poor functioning of its labour market as well as for low pay. Care workers are mainly women and are disproportionately black and minority ethnic women. The discriminatory intent of Parliament, as explored by the Supreme Court in Mencap, reveals that the UK’s statutory minimum wage scheme is currently unable to provide workers with the dignity that would come from assigning a minimum value to the full range of care work.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/indlaw/dwac024</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-9332
ispartof Industrial law journal (London), 2022-11, Vol.51 (3), p.696-716
issn 0305-9332
1464-3669
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_indlaw_dwac024
source Business Source Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Discrimination by Legal Design? UK Supreme Court in Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake Finds Care Workers are Not Protected by Minimum Wage Law for Sleep-in Shifts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T23%3A38%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discrimination%20by%20Legal%20Design?%20UK%20Supreme%20Court%20in%20Mencap%20v%20Tomlinson-Blake%20Finds%20Care%20Workers%20are%20Not%20Protected%20by%20Minimum%20Wage%20Law%20for%20Sleep-in%20Shifts&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20law%20journal%20(London)&rft.au=Hayes,%20Ljb&rft.date=2022-11-20&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=696&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=696-716&rft.issn=0305-9332&rft.eissn=1464-3669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/indlaw/dwac024&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/indlaw/dwac024%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/indlaw/dwac024&rfr_iscdi=true