Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of law and information technology 2022-12, Vol.30 (4), p.385-397
Hauptverfasser: Soyer, Baris, Tettenborn, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 397
container_issue 4
container_start_page 385
container_title International journal of law and information technology
container_volume 30
creator Soyer, Baris
Tettenborn, Andrew
description Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liability to protect the existing values of tort law without acting as a barrier to innovation. To this end, we propose a strict liability regime in respect of personal injury and death, and a bespoke fault-based regime for dignitary or reputational injuries. For other losses, we take the view that there is no justification for introducing any new regime, on the basis that AI applications do not introduce substantial added degrees of risk that would justify departing from the existing scheme of liability arising under the current law of tort.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ijlit/eaad001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ijlit_eaad001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ijlit/eaad001</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ijlit/eaad001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-9533355b1b0323450e29c8e19081eb44a637ba6f9c2ee3ff042d33e4745bcbd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFOwzAUAC0EEqUwsntkCX3Oc5x4QlVFC1IlFpgj23mpXuWmVRKouvERfCFfQqDdmW453XBC3Cq4V2BxwuvI_YScqwDUmRgpbXSCxuK5GIE1eQK5sZfiquvWAJAaVYzEfNr2XHNgFyU3PcXIK2oCSddUMvAHRxnZeR7Kh-_Pr2or9yQbokq6AXvZ0oo39HAtLmoXO7o5cSze5o-vs6dk-bJ4nk2XSUCwfWIzRMwyrzxgijoDSm0oSFkoFHmtncHcO1PbkBJhXYNOK0TSuc588JXFsUiO3dBuu66luty1vHHtoVRQ_k4o_yaUpwmDf3f0t--7f9QfdhdgJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Soyer, Baris ; Tettenborn, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Soyer, Baris ; Tettenborn, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liability to protect the existing values of tort law without acting as a barrier to innovation. To this end, we propose a strict liability regime in respect of personal injury and death, and a bespoke fault-based regime for dignitary or reputational injuries. For other losses, we take the view that there is no justification for introducing any new regime, on the basis that AI applications do not introduce substantial added degrees of risk that would justify departing from the existing scheme of liability arising under the current law of tort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-0769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eaad001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>International journal of law and information technology, 2022-12, Vol.30 (4), p.385-397</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-9533355b1b0323450e29c8e19081eb44a637ba6f9c2ee3ff042d33e4745bcbd93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soyer, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tettenborn, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?</title><title>International journal of law and information technology</title><description>Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liability to protect the existing values of tort law without acting as a barrier to innovation. To this end, we propose a strict liability regime in respect of personal injury and death, and a bespoke fault-based regime for dignitary or reputational injuries. For other losses, we take the view that there is no justification for introducing any new regime, on the basis that AI applications do not introduce substantial added degrees of risk that would justify departing from the existing scheme of liability arising under the current law of tort.</description><issn>0967-0769</issn><issn>1464-3693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFOwzAUAC0EEqUwsntkCX3Oc5x4QlVFC1IlFpgj23mpXuWmVRKouvERfCFfQqDdmW453XBC3Cq4V2BxwuvI_YScqwDUmRgpbXSCxuK5GIE1eQK5sZfiquvWAJAaVYzEfNr2XHNgFyU3PcXIK2oCSddUMvAHRxnZeR7Kh-_Pr2or9yQbokq6AXvZ0oo39HAtLmoXO7o5cSze5o-vs6dk-bJ4nk2XSUCwfWIzRMwyrzxgijoDSm0oSFkoFHmtncHcO1PbkBJhXYNOK0TSuc588JXFsUiO3dBuu66luty1vHHtoVRQ_k4o_yaUpwmDf3f0t--7f9QfdhdgJA</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Soyer, Baris</creator><creator>Tettenborn, Andrew</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?</title><author>Soyer, Baris ; Tettenborn, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-9533355b1b0323450e29c8e19081eb44a637ba6f9c2ee3ff042d33e4745bcbd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soyer, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tettenborn, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of law and information technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soyer, Baris</au><au>Tettenborn, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of law and information technology</jtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>385-397</pages><issn>0967-0769</issn><eissn>1464-3693</eissn><abstract>Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liability to protect the existing values of tort law without acting as a barrier to innovation. To this end, we propose a strict liability regime in respect of personal injury and death, and a bespoke fault-based regime for dignitary or reputational injuries. For other losses, we take the view that there is no justification for introducing any new regime, on the basis that AI applications do not introduce substantial added degrees of risk that would justify departing from the existing scheme of liability arising under the current law of tort.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ijlit/eaad001</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-0769
ispartof International journal of law and information technology, 2022-12, Vol.30 (4), p.385-397
issn 0967-0769
1464-3693
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ijlit_eaad001
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A05%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20intelligence%20and%20civil%20liability%E2%80%94do%20we%20need%20a%20new%20regime?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20law%20and%20information%20technology&rft.au=Soyer,%20Baris&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=385-397&rft.issn=0967-0769&rft.eissn=1464-3693&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ijlit/eaad001&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ijlit/eaad001%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ijlit/eaad001&rfr_iscdi=true