Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liab...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of law and information technology 2022-12, Vol.30 (4), p.385-397 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 397 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 385 |
container_title | International journal of law and information technology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Soyer, Baris Tettenborn, Andrew |
description | Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liability to protect the existing values of tort law without acting as a barrier to innovation. To this end, we propose a strict liability regime in respect of personal injury and death, and a bespoke fault-based regime for dignitary or reputational injuries. For other losses, we take the view that there is no justification for introducing any new regime, on the basis that AI applications do not introduce substantial added degrees of risk that would justify departing from the existing scheme of liability arising under the current law of tort. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ijlit/eaad001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ijlit_eaad001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ijlit/eaad001</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ijlit/eaad001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-9533355b1b0323450e29c8e19081eb44a637ba6f9c2ee3ff042d33e4745bcbd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFOwzAUAC0EEqUwsntkCX3Oc5x4QlVFC1IlFpgj23mpXuWmVRKouvERfCFfQqDdmW453XBC3Cq4V2BxwuvI_YScqwDUmRgpbXSCxuK5GIE1eQK5sZfiquvWAJAaVYzEfNr2XHNgFyU3PcXIK2oCSddUMvAHRxnZeR7Kh-_Pr2or9yQbokq6AXvZ0oo39HAtLmoXO7o5cSze5o-vs6dk-bJ4nk2XSUCwfWIzRMwyrzxgijoDSm0oSFkoFHmtncHcO1PbkBJhXYNOK0TSuc588JXFsUiO3dBuu66luty1vHHtoVRQ_k4o_yaUpwmDf3f0t--7f9QfdhdgJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Soyer, Baris ; Tettenborn, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Soyer, Baris ; Tettenborn, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liability to protect the existing values of tort law without acting as a barrier to innovation. To this end, we propose a strict liability regime in respect of personal injury and death, and a bespoke fault-based regime for dignitary or reputational injuries. For other losses, we take the view that there is no justification for introducing any new regime, on the basis that AI applications do not introduce substantial added degrees of risk that would justify departing from the existing scheme of liability arising under the current law of tort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-0769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eaad001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>International journal of law and information technology, 2022-12, Vol.30 (4), p.385-397</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-9533355b1b0323450e29c8e19081eb44a637ba6f9c2ee3ff042d33e4745bcbd93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soyer, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tettenborn, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?</title><title>International journal of law and information technology</title><description>Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liability to protect the existing values of tort law without acting as a barrier to innovation. To this end, we propose a strict liability regime in respect of personal injury and death, and a bespoke fault-based regime for dignitary or reputational injuries. For other losses, we take the view that there is no justification for introducing any new regime, on the basis that AI applications do not introduce substantial added degrees of risk that would justify departing from the existing scheme of liability arising under the current law of tort.</description><issn>0967-0769</issn><issn>1464-3693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFOwzAUAC0EEqUwsntkCX3Oc5x4QlVFC1IlFpgj23mpXuWmVRKouvERfCFfQqDdmW453XBC3Cq4V2BxwuvI_YScqwDUmRgpbXSCxuK5GIE1eQK5sZfiquvWAJAaVYzEfNr2XHNgFyU3PcXIK2oCSddUMvAHRxnZeR7Kh-_Pr2or9yQbokq6AXvZ0oo39HAtLmoXO7o5cSze5o-vs6dk-bJ4nk2XSUCwfWIzRMwyrzxgijoDSm0oSFkoFHmtncHcO1PbkBJhXYNOK0TSuc588JXFsUiO3dBuu66luty1vHHtoVRQ_k4o_yaUpwmDf3f0t--7f9QfdhdgJA</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Soyer, Baris</creator><creator>Tettenborn, Andrew</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?</title><author>Soyer, Baris ; Tettenborn, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-9533355b1b0323450e29c8e19081eb44a637ba6f9c2ee3ff042d33e4745bcbd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soyer, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tettenborn, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of law and information technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soyer, Baris</au><au>Tettenborn, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of law and information technology</jtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>385-397</pages><issn>0967-0769</issn><eissn>1464-3693</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is almost ubiquitous, featuring innumerable facets of daily life. For all its advantages, however, it carries risks of harm. In this article, we discuss how the law of tort should deal with these risks. We take account of the need for any proposed scheme of liability to protect the existing values of tort law without acting as a barrier to innovation. To this end, we propose a strict liability regime in respect of personal injury and death, and a bespoke fault-based regime for dignitary or reputational injuries. For other losses, we take the view that there is no justification for introducing any new regime, on the basis that AI applications do not introduce substantial added degrees of risk that would justify departing from the existing scheme of liability arising under the current law of tort.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ijlit/eaad001</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0967-0769 |
ispartof | International journal of law and information technology, 2022-12, Vol.30 (4), p.385-397 |
issn | 0967-0769 1464-3693 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ijlit_eaad001 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A05%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20intelligence%20and%20civil%20liability%E2%80%94do%20we%20need%20a%20new%20regime?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20law%20and%20information%20technology&rft.au=Soyer,%20Baris&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=385-397&rft.issn=0967-0769&rft.eissn=1464-3693&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ijlit/eaad001&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ijlit/eaad001%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ijlit/eaad001&rfr_iscdi=true |