Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings
Abstract Background Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of epidemiology 2022-02, Vol.51 (1), p.88-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 98 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 88 |
container_title | International journal of epidemiology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Xiao, Xiang Gao, Meng Zhou, Yang Xu, Shu-Li Knibbs, Luke D Heinrich, Joachim Dharmage, Shyamali C Morawska, Lidia Lin, Shao Jalaludin, Bin Shen, Xubo Zhou, Yuanzhong Dong, Guang-Hui |
description | Abstract
Background
Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings.
Methods
From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates.
Results
A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed ‘U-shaped’ associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population.
Conclusions
Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ije/dyab164 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ije_dyab164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ije/dyab164</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ije/dyab164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-bd63e85b1bd6cf1366759eda8aa5e2a56d79572471f33e6bd61888fe1090a0373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsSNPLCjUrj8zoario1IlFpgjO7kUV9Su7ESo_x6XFEamu3vv0Ts8CF1Tck9JyaZuA9NmbyyV_ASNKZe8YFKLUzQmjJBCKEVH6CKlDSGUc16eoxHjnEimyRi5ZcLrCOAhYgtdB_EBz1MKtTOdCz4dwq_8HiAPKWHjG2xd7D5w6Ls6bCFh57ENOeijNf4H8MEXw5Vyq_PrdInOWvOZ4Oo4J-j96fFt8VKsXp-Xi_mqqJlQXWEbyUALS_NSt5RJqUQJjdHGCJgZIRtVCjXjiraMgcwU1Vq3kFUQQ5hiE3Q39NYxpBShrXbRbU3cV5RUB2FVFlYdhWX6ZqB3vd1C88f-GsrA7QCEfvdv0zfVOHZC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Xiao, Xiang ; Gao, Meng ; Zhou, Yang ; Xu, Shu-Li ; Knibbs, Luke D ; Heinrich, Joachim ; Dharmage, Shyamali C ; Morawska, Lidia ; Lin, Shao ; Jalaludin, Bin ; Shen, Xubo ; Zhou, Yuanzhong ; Dong, Guang-Hui</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Xiang ; Gao, Meng ; Zhou, Yang ; Xu, Shu-Li ; Knibbs, Luke D ; Heinrich, Joachim ; Dharmage, Shyamali C ; Morawska, Lidia ; Lin, Shao ; Jalaludin, Bin ; Shen, Xubo ; Zhou, Yuanzhong ; Dong, Guang-Hui</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings.
Methods
From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates.
Results
A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed ‘U-shaped’ associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population.
Conclusions
Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5771</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3685</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab164</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34406380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>International journal of epidemiology, 2022-02, Vol.51 (1), p.88-98</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-bd63e85b1bd6cf1366759eda8aa5e2a56d79572471f33e6bd61888fe1090a0373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-bd63e85b1bd6cf1366759eda8aa5e2a56d79572471f33e6bd61888fe1090a0373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1585,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406380$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shu-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knibbs, Luke D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dharmage, Shyamali C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morawska, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalaludin, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Xubo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yuanzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Guang-Hui</creatorcontrib><title>Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings</title><title>International journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Int J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings.
Methods
From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates.
Results
A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed ‘U-shaped’ associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population.
Conclusions
Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings.</description><issn>0300-5771</issn><issn>1464-3685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsSNPLCjUrj8zoario1IlFpgjO7kUV9Su7ESo_x6XFEamu3vv0Ts8CF1Tck9JyaZuA9NmbyyV_ASNKZe8YFKLUzQmjJBCKEVH6CKlDSGUc16eoxHjnEimyRi5ZcLrCOAhYgtdB_EBz1MKtTOdCz4dwq_8HiAPKWHjG2xd7D5w6Ls6bCFh57ENOeijNf4H8MEXw5Vyq_PrdInOWvOZ4Oo4J-j96fFt8VKsXp-Xi_mqqJlQXWEbyUALS_NSt5RJqUQJjdHGCJgZIRtVCjXjiraMgcwU1Vq3kFUQQ5hiE3Q39NYxpBShrXbRbU3cV5RUB2FVFlYdhWX6ZqB3vd1C88f-GsrA7QCEfvdv0zfVOHZC</recordid><startdate>20220218</startdate><enddate>20220218</enddate><creator>Xiao, Xiang</creator><creator>Gao, Meng</creator><creator>Zhou, Yang</creator><creator>Xu, Shu-Li</creator><creator>Knibbs, Luke D</creator><creator>Heinrich, Joachim</creator><creator>Dharmage, Shyamali C</creator><creator>Morawska, Lidia</creator><creator>Lin, Shao</creator><creator>Jalaludin, Bin</creator><creator>Shen, Xubo</creator><creator>Zhou, Yuanzhong</creator><creator>Dong, Guang-Hui</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220218</creationdate><title>Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings</title><author>Xiao, Xiang ; Gao, Meng ; Zhou, Yang ; Xu, Shu-Li ; Knibbs, Luke D ; Heinrich, Joachim ; Dharmage, Shyamali C ; Morawska, Lidia ; Lin, Shao ; Jalaludin, Bin ; Shen, Xubo ; Zhou, Yuanzhong ; Dong, Guang-Hui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-bd63e85b1bd6cf1366759eda8aa5e2a56d79572471f33e6bd61888fe1090a0373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shu-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knibbs, Luke D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dharmage, Shyamali C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morawska, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalaludin, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Xubo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yuanzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Guang-Hui</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Xiang</au><au>Gao, Meng</au><au>Zhou, Yang</au><au>Xu, Shu-Li</au><au>Knibbs, Luke D</au><au>Heinrich, Joachim</au><au>Dharmage, Shyamali C</au><au>Morawska, Lidia</au><au>Lin, Shao</au><au>Jalaludin, Bin</au><au>Shen, Xubo</au><au>Zhou, Yuanzhong</au><au>Dong, Guang-Hui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings</atitle><jtitle>International journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2022-02-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>88-98</pages><issn>0300-5771</issn><eissn>1464-3685</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings.
Methods
From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates.
Results
A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed ‘U-shaped’ associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population.
Conclusions
Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34406380</pmid><doi>10.1093/ije/dyab164</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-5771 |
ispartof | International journal of epidemiology, 2022-02, Vol.51 (1), p.88-98 |
issn | 0300-5771 1464-3685 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ije_dyab164 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T06%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20greener%20better?%20Associations%20between%20greenness%20and%20birth%20outcomes%20in%20both%20urban%20and%20non-urban%20settings&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Xiao,%20Xiang&rft.date=2022-02-18&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=88-98&rft.issn=0300-5771&rft.eissn=1464-3685&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ije/dyab164&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ije/dyab164%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34406380&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ije/dyab164&rfr_iscdi=true |