Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings

Abstract Background Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of epidemiology 2022-02, Vol.51 (1), p.88-98
Hauptverfasser: Xiao, Xiang, Gao, Meng, Zhou, Yang, Xu, Shu-Li, Knibbs, Luke D, Heinrich, Joachim, Dharmage, Shyamali C, Morawska, Lidia, Lin, Shao, Jalaludin, Bin, Shen, Xubo, Zhou, Yuanzhong, Dong, Guang-Hui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 98
container_issue 1
container_start_page 88
container_title International journal of epidemiology
container_volume 51
creator Xiao, Xiang
Gao, Meng
Zhou, Yang
Xu, Shu-Li
Knibbs, Luke D
Heinrich, Joachim
Dharmage, Shyamali C
Morawska, Lidia
Lin, Shao
Jalaludin, Bin
Shen, Xubo
Zhou, Yuanzhong
Dong, Guang-Hui
description Abstract Background Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings. Methods From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates. Results A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed ‘U-shaped’ associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population. Conclusions Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ije/dyab164
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ije_dyab164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ije/dyab164</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ije/dyab164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-bd63e85b1bd6cf1366759eda8aa5e2a56d79572471f33e6bd61888fe1090a0373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsSNPLCjUrj8zoario1IlFpgjO7kUV9Su7ESo_x6XFEamu3vv0Ts8CF1Tck9JyaZuA9NmbyyV_ASNKZe8YFKLUzQmjJBCKEVH6CKlDSGUc16eoxHjnEimyRi5ZcLrCOAhYgtdB_EBz1MKtTOdCz4dwq_8HiAPKWHjG2xd7D5w6Ls6bCFh57ENOeijNf4H8MEXw5Vyq_PrdInOWvOZ4Oo4J-j96fFt8VKsXp-Xi_mqqJlQXWEbyUALS_NSt5RJqUQJjdHGCJgZIRtVCjXjiraMgcwU1Vq3kFUQQ5hiE3Q39NYxpBShrXbRbU3cV5RUB2FVFlYdhWX6ZqB3vd1C88f-GsrA7QCEfvdv0zfVOHZC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Xiao, Xiang ; Gao, Meng ; Zhou, Yang ; Xu, Shu-Li ; Knibbs, Luke D ; Heinrich, Joachim ; Dharmage, Shyamali C ; Morawska, Lidia ; Lin, Shao ; Jalaludin, Bin ; Shen, Xubo ; Zhou, Yuanzhong ; Dong, Guang-Hui</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Xiang ; Gao, Meng ; Zhou, Yang ; Xu, Shu-Li ; Knibbs, Luke D ; Heinrich, Joachim ; Dharmage, Shyamali C ; Morawska, Lidia ; Lin, Shao ; Jalaludin, Bin ; Shen, Xubo ; Zhou, Yuanzhong ; Dong, Guang-Hui</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings. Methods From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates. Results A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed ‘U-shaped’ associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population. Conclusions Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5771</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3685</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab164</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34406380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>International journal of epidemiology, 2022-02, Vol.51 (1), p.88-98</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-bd63e85b1bd6cf1366759eda8aa5e2a56d79572471f33e6bd61888fe1090a0373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-bd63e85b1bd6cf1366759eda8aa5e2a56d79572471f33e6bd61888fe1090a0373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1585,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406380$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shu-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knibbs, Luke D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dharmage, Shyamali C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morawska, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalaludin, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Xubo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yuanzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Guang-Hui</creatorcontrib><title>Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings</title><title>International journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Int J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings. Methods From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates. Results A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed ‘U-shaped’ associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population. Conclusions Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings.</description><issn>0300-5771</issn><issn>1464-3685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsSNPLCjUrj8zoario1IlFpgjO7kUV9Su7ESo_x6XFEamu3vv0Ts8CF1Tck9JyaZuA9NmbyyV_ASNKZe8YFKLUzQmjJBCKEVH6CKlDSGUc16eoxHjnEimyRi5ZcLrCOAhYgtdB_EBz1MKtTOdCz4dwq_8HiAPKWHjG2xd7D5w6Ls6bCFh57ENOeijNf4H8MEXw5Vyq_PrdInOWvOZ4Oo4J-j96fFt8VKsXp-Xi_mqqJlQXWEbyUALS_NSt5RJqUQJjdHGCJgZIRtVCjXjiraMgcwU1Vq3kFUQQ5hiE3Q39NYxpBShrXbRbU3cV5RUB2FVFlYdhWX6ZqB3vd1C88f-GsrA7QCEfvdv0zfVOHZC</recordid><startdate>20220218</startdate><enddate>20220218</enddate><creator>Xiao, Xiang</creator><creator>Gao, Meng</creator><creator>Zhou, Yang</creator><creator>Xu, Shu-Li</creator><creator>Knibbs, Luke D</creator><creator>Heinrich, Joachim</creator><creator>Dharmage, Shyamali C</creator><creator>Morawska, Lidia</creator><creator>Lin, Shao</creator><creator>Jalaludin, Bin</creator><creator>Shen, Xubo</creator><creator>Zhou, Yuanzhong</creator><creator>Dong, Guang-Hui</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220218</creationdate><title>Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings</title><author>Xiao, Xiang ; Gao, Meng ; Zhou, Yang ; Xu, Shu-Li ; Knibbs, Luke D ; Heinrich, Joachim ; Dharmage, Shyamali C ; Morawska, Lidia ; Lin, Shao ; Jalaludin, Bin ; Shen, Xubo ; Zhou, Yuanzhong ; Dong, Guang-Hui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-bd63e85b1bd6cf1366759eda8aa5e2a56d79572471f33e6bd61888fe1090a0373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shu-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knibbs, Luke D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dharmage, Shyamali C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morawska, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalaludin, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Xubo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yuanzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Guang-Hui</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Xiang</au><au>Gao, Meng</au><au>Zhou, Yang</au><au>Xu, Shu-Li</au><au>Knibbs, Luke D</au><au>Heinrich, Joachim</au><au>Dharmage, Shyamali C</au><au>Morawska, Lidia</au><au>Lin, Shao</au><au>Jalaludin, Bin</au><au>Shen, Xubo</au><au>Zhou, Yuanzhong</au><au>Dong, Guang-Hui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings</atitle><jtitle>International journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2022-02-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>88-98</pages><issn>0300-5771</issn><eissn>1464-3685</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings. Methods From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates. Results A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed ‘U-shaped’ associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population. Conclusions Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34406380</pmid><doi>10.1093/ije/dyab164</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5771
ispartof International journal of epidemiology, 2022-02, Vol.51 (1), p.88-98
issn 0300-5771
1464-3685
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ije_dyab164
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T06%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20greener%20better?%20Associations%20between%20greenness%20and%20birth%20outcomes%20in%20both%20urban%20and%20non-urban%20settings&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Xiao,%20Xiang&rft.date=2022-02-18&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=88-98&rft.issn=0300-5771&rft.eissn=1464-3685&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ije/dyab164&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ije/dyab164%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34406380&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ije/dyab164&rfr_iscdi=true