Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience
Abstract Background Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Inflammatory bowel diseases 2021-07, Vol.27 (8), p.1248-1255 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1255 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1248 |
container_title | Inflammatory bowel diseases |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Halloran, Brendan P Jamil, Laith H Lo, Simon K Reeson, Matt Vasiliauskas, Eric A Targan, Stephan Ippoliti, Andrew Mann, Neel K Melmed, Gil Y |
description | Abstract
Background
Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD.
Methods
From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery).
Results
A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations.
Conclusions
We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ibd/izaa287 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ibd_izaa287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ibd/izaa287</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2458035099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-45d40a4a9b8240fbbfda1d6f33e2316b0a92788ff0f224c8b1bc403d0d751e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1P3DAQxS0E4qs99V75hCqhwPgjWac3CNuChERV7T2yk7EwytqpnYjSvx7T3dIbQnOYOfzm6b1HyCcGZwxqce5Mf-7-aM3VYoccslJUhVRS7uYbFqqAulYH5CilBwCep94nB0KwsqykOCQ_rsJsBiwu9TCE4OnS9yF1YXyiztMmhntPr1xCnfArvaArjJPT8Yn-RIsx6oE26CeMdPl7xOjQd_iB7Fk9JPy43cdk9W25aq6L27vvN83FbdEJDlMhy16Clro2ikuwxthes76yQiAXrDKga75QylqwnMtOGWY6CaKHflEyZOKYfNnIjjH8mjFN7dqlDodBewxzarksFYgyh8_o6QbtYkgpom3H6NY5RcugfWmwzQ222wYz_XkrPJs19q_sv8oyoDbAI5pgU_c39SsGAJWSjFdVvljZuElPLvgmzH767-Q9r5k-2dBhHt-0_AzWn5pO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2458035099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Halloran, Brendan P ; Jamil, Laith H ; Lo, Simon K ; Reeson, Matt ; Vasiliauskas, Eric A ; Targan, Stephan ; Ippoliti, Andrew ; Mann, Neel K ; Melmed, Gil Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brendan P ; Jamil, Laith H ; Lo, Simon K ; Reeson, Matt ; Vasiliauskas, Eric A ; Targan, Stephan ; Ippoliti, Andrew ; Mann, Neel K ; Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD.
Methods
From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery).
Results
A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations.
Conclusions
We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33155643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology ; Crohn Disease - therapy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastroenterology & Hepatology ; Humans ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Science & Technology ; Tertiary Care Centers</subject><ispartof>Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2021-07, Vol.27 (8), p.1248-1255</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2020</rights><rights>2020 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000684126600015</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-45d40a4a9b8240fbbfda1d6f33e2316b0a92788ff0f224c8b1bc403d0d751e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-45d40a4a9b8240fbbfda1d6f33e2316b0a92788ff0f224c8b1bc403d0d751e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2591-5165 ; 0000-0002-5036-6604</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1586,27931,27932,39265</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33155643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brendan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamil, Laith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Simon K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeson, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasiliauskas, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Targan, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ippoliti, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Neel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><title>Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience</title><title>Inflammatory bowel diseases</title><addtitle>INFLAMM BOWEL DIS</addtitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD.
Methods
From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery).
Results
A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations.
Conclusions
We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period.</description><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Gastroenterology & Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1P3DAQxS0E4qs99V75hCqhwPgjWac3CNuChERV7T2yk7EwytqpnYjSvx7T3dIbQnOYOfzm6b1HyCcGZwxqce5Mf-7-aM3VYoccslJUhVRS7uYbFqqAulYH5CilBwCep94nB0KwsqykOCQ_rsJsBiwu9TCE4OnS9yF1YXyiztMmhntPr1xCnfArvaArjJPT8Yn-RIsx6oE26CeMdPl7xOjQd_iB7Fk9JPy43cdk9W25aq6L27vvN83FbdEJDlMhy16Clro2ikuwxthes76yQiAXrDKga75QylqwnMtOGWY6CaKHflEyZOKYfNnIjjH8mjFN7dqlDodBewxzarksFYgyh8_o6QbtYkgpom3H6NY5RcugfWmwzQ222wYz_XkrPJs19q_sv8oyoDbAI5pgU_c39SsGAJWSjFdVvljZuElPLvgmzH767-Q9r5k-2dBhHt-0_AzWn5pO</recordid><startdate>20210727</startdate><enddate>20210727</enddate><creator>Halloran, Brendan P</creator><creator>Jamil, Laith H</creator><creator>Lo, Simon K</creator><creator>Reeson, Matt</creator><creator>Vasiliauskas, Eric A</creator><creator>Targan, Stephan</creator><creator>Ippoliti, Andrew</creator><creator>Mann, Neel K</creator><creator>Melmed, Gil Y</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Univ Press</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-5165</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-6604</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210727</creationdate><title>Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience</title><author>Halloran, Brendan P ; Jamil, Laith H ; Lo, Simon K ; Reeson, Matt ; Vasiliauskas, Eric A ; Targan, Stephan ; Ippoliti, Andrew ; Mann, Neel K ; Melmed, Gil Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-45d40a4a9b8240fbbfda1d6f33e2316b0a92788ff0f224c8b1bc403d0d751e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Gastroenterology & Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brendan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamil, Laith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Simon K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeson, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasiliauskas, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Targan, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ippoliti, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Neel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halloran, Brendan P</au><au>Jamil, Laith H</au><au>Lo, Simon K</au><au>Reeson, Matt</au><au>Vasiliauskas, Eric A</au><au>Targan, Stephan</au><au>Ippoliti, Andrew</au><au>Mann, Neel K</au><au>Melmed, Gil Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience</atitle><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle><stitle>INFLAMM BOWEL DIS</stitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><date>2021-07-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1248</spage><epage>1255</epage><pages>1248-1255</pages><issn>1078-0998</issn><eissn>1536-4844</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD.
Methods
From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery).
Results
A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations.
Conclusions
We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33155643</pmid><doi>10.1093/ibd/izaa287</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-5165</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-6604</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0998 |
ispartof | Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2021-07, Vol.27 (8), p.1248-1255 |
issn | 1078-0998 1536-4844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ibd_izaa287 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Constriction, Pathologic - etiology Crohn Disease - therapy Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Gastroenterology & Hepatology Humans Life Sciences & Biomedicine Retrospective Studies Science & Technology Tertiary Care Centers |
title | Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T07%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Double-Balloon%20Endoscopy%20in%20Crohn%20Disease:%20A%20Tertiary%20Referral%20Center%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Inflammatory%20bowel%20diseases&rft.au=Halloran,%20Brendan%20P&rft.date=2021-07-27&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1248&rft.epage=1255&rft.pages=1248-1255&rft.issn=1078-0998&rft.eissn=1536-4844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ibd/izaa287&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2458035099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2458035099&rft_id=info:pmid/33155643&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ibd/izaa287&rfr_iscdi=true |