Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience

Abstract Background Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Inflammatory bowel diseases 2021-07, Vol.27 (8), p.1248-1255
Hauptverfasser: Halloran, Brendan P, Jamil, Laith H, Lo, Simon K, Reeson, Matt, Vasiliauskas, Eric A, Targan, Stephan, Ippoliti, Andrew, Mann, Neel K, Melmed, Gil Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1255
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1248
container_title Inflammatory bowel diseases
container_volume 27
creator Halloran, Brendan P
Jamil, Laith H
Lo, Simon K
Reeson, Matt
Vasiliauskas, Eric A
Targan, Stephan
Ippoliti, Andrew
Mann, Neel K
Melmed, Gil Y
description Abstract Background Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD. Methods From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery). Results A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations. Conclusions We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ibd/izaa287
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ibd_izaa287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ibd/izaa287</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2458035099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-45d40a4a9b8240fbbfda1d6f33e2316b0a92788ff0f224c8b1bc403d0d751e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1P3DAQxS0E4qs99V75hCqhwPgjWac3CNuChERV7T2yk7EwytqpnYjSvx7T3dIbQnOYOfzm6b1HyCcGZwxqce5Mf-7-aM3VYoccslJUhVRS7uYbFqqAulYH5CilBwCep94nB0KwsqykOCQ_rsJsBiwu9TCE4OnS9yF1YXyiztMmhntPr1xCnfArvaArjJPT8Yn-RIsx6oE26CeMdPl7xOjQd_iB7Fk9JPy43cdk9W25aq6L27vvN83FbdEJDlMhy16Clro2ikuwxthes76yQiAXrDKga75QylqwnMtOGWY6CaKHflEyZOKYfNnIjjH8mjFN7dqlDodBewxzarksFYgyh8_o6QbtYkgpom3H6NY5RcugfWmwzQ222wYz_XkrPJs19q_sv8oyoDbAI5pgU_c39SsGAJWSjFdVvljZuElPLvgmzH767-Q9r5k-2dBhHt-0_AzWn5pO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2458035099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Halloran, Brendan P ; Jamil, Laith H ; Lo, Simon K ; Reeson, Matt ; Vasiliauskas, Eric A ; Targan, Stephan ; Ippoliti, Andrew ; Mann, Neel K ; Melmed, Gil Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brendan P ; Jamil, Laith H ; Lo, Simon K ; Reeson, Matt ; Vasiliauskas, Eric A ; Targan, Stephan ; Ippoliti, Andrew ; Mann, Neel K ; Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD. Methods From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery). Results A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations. Conclusions We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33155643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology ; Crohn Disease - therapy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastroenterology &amp; Hepatology ; Humans ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Science &amp; Technology ; Tertiary Care Centers</subject><ispartof>Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2021-07, Vol.27 (8), p.1248-1255</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s &amp; Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2020</rights><rights>2020 Crohn’s &amp; Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000684126600015</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-45d40a4a9b8240fbbfda1d6f33e2316b0a92788ff0f224c8b1bc403d0d751e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-45d40a4a9b8240fbbfda1d6f33e2316b0a92788ff0f224c8b1bc403d0d751e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2591-5165 ; 0000-0002-5036-6604</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1586,27931,27932,39265</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33155643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brendan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamil, Laith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Simon K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeson, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasiliauskas, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Targan, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ippoliti, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Neel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><title>Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience</title><title>Inflammatory bowel diseases</title><addtitle>INFLAMM BOWEL DIS</addtitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD. Methods From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery). Results A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations. Conclusions We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period.</description><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Gastroenterology &amp; Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1P3DAQxS0E4qs99V75hCqhwPgjWac3CNuChERV7T2yk7EwytqpnYjSvx7T3dIbQnOYOfzm6b1HyCcGZwxqce5Mf-7-aM3VYoccslJUhVRS7uYbFqqAulYH5CilBwCep94nB0KwsqykOCQ_rsJsBiwu9TCE4OnS9yF1YXyiztMmhntPr1xCnfArvaArjJPT8Yn-RIsx6oE26CeMdPl7xOjQd_iB7Fk9JPy43cdk9W25aq6L27vvN83FbdEJDlMhy16Clro2ikuwxthes76yQiAXrDKga75QylqwnMtOGWY6CaKHflEyZOKYfNnIjjH8mjFN7dqlDodBewxzarksFYgyh8_o6QbtYkgpom3H6NY5RcugfWmwzQ222wYz_XkrPJs19q_sv8oyoDbAI5pgU_c39SsGAJWSjFdVvljZuElPLvgmzH767-Q9r5k-2dBhHt-0_AzWn5pO</recordid><startdate>20210727</startdate><enddate>20210727</enddate><creator>Halloran, Brendan P</creator><creator>Jamil, Laith H</creator><creator>Lo, Simon K</creator><creator>Reeson, Matt</creator><creator>Vasiliauskas, Eric A</creator><creator>Targan, Stephan</creator><creator>Ippoliti, Andrew</creator><creator>Mann, Neel K</creator><creator>Melmed, Gil Y</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Univ Press</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-5165</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-6604</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210727</creationdate><title>Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience</title><author>Halloran, Brendan P ; Jamil, Laith H ; Lo, Simon K ; Reeson, Matt ; Vasiliauskas, Eric A ; Targan, Stephan ; Ippoliti, Andrew ; Mann, Neel K ; Melmed, Gil Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-45d40a4a9b8240fbbfda1d6f33e2316b0a92788ff0f224c8b1bc403d0d751e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Gastroenterology &amp; Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brendan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamil, Laith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Simon K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeson, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasiliauskas, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Targan, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ippoliti, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Neel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halloran, Brendan P</au><au>Jamil, Laith H</au><au>Lo, Simon K</au><au>Reeson, Matt</au><au>Vasiliauskas, Eric A</au><au>Targan, Stephan</au><au>Ippoliti, Andrew</au><au>Mann, Neel K</au><au>Melmed, Gil Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience</atitle><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle><stitle>INFLAMM BOWEL DIS</stitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><date>2021-07-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1248</spage><epage>1255</epage><pages>1248-1255</pages><issn>1078-0998</issn><eissn>1536-4844</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD. Methods From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery). Results A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations. Conclusions We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33155643</pmid><doi>10.1093/ibd/izaa287</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-5165</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-6604</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0998
ispartof Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2021-07, Vol.27 (8), p.1248-1255
issn 1078-0998
1536-4844
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ibd_izaa287
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Constriction, Pathologic - etiology
Crohn Disease - therapy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Humans
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Retrospective Studies
Science & Technology
Tertiary Care Centers
title Double-Balloon Endoscopy in Crohn Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T07%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Double-Balloon%20Endoscopy%20in%20Crohn%20Disease:%20A%20Tertiary%20Referral%20Center%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Inflammatory%20bowel%20diseases&rft.au=Halloran,%20Brendan%20P&rft.date=2021-07-27&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1248&rft.epage=1255&rft.pages=1248-1255&rft.issn=1078-0998&rft.eissn=1536-4844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ibd/izaa287&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2458035099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2458035099&rft_id=info:pmid/33155643&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ibd/izaa287&rfr_iscdi=true