Taking international human rights seriously?:- The decision of 'Serra v Lappin' from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

On 9 April 2010 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in the case of 'Serra v Lappin'. The Court of Appeals held that inmates in federal prisons that were paid very low wages for labour they were carrying out as prisoners could neither claim a violati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human rights law review 2010-09, Vol.10 (3), p.569-579
1. Verfasser: Payandeh, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 579
container_issue 3
container_start_page 569
container_title Human rights law review
container_volume 10
creator Payandeh, M.
description On 9 April 2010 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in the case of 'Serra v Lappin'. The Court of Appeals held that inmates in federal prisons that were paid very low wages for labour they were carrying out as prisoners could neither claim a violation of their constitutional rights nor a violation of their rights under international law. While the outcome of the case might be right in light of legal doctrine, its reasoning with regard to the effect of international law within the US legal order raises serious doubts. This is regrettable not only because the Court could have easily dismissed the case without making broad statements about the relationship of international law and municipal law. It is especially regrettable because judicial decisions that comment on the domestic status of international law have the potential for significantly influencing the development of the law in this field that is not fully determined by codified law. The US Constitution regulates the incorporation of international law only in part. Article VI deems international treaties to be part of 'the supreme Law of the Land'. Nevertheless, the relationship between international treaties and domestic statutes is debated. With regard to customary international law and general principles of international law the Constitution is tacit. It also contains no explicit statement as to the effect of decisions of international courts and tribunals within domestic law. At the same time, questions of international law play an increasingly significant role in proceedings before domestic courts. Moreover, the question of the relationship between international and national law does not only arise under the US Constitution but poses similar challenges for judges on domestic courts all around the world.With the rising importance of comparative constitutional law and the establishment of networks of judges exchanging their views on fundamental questions of law, decisions of domestic courts not only influence developments within their own legal order but may also have significance beyond the borders of the nation state. Against this background the Court of Appeals' decision may have significant repercussions for the development of international human rights law and policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/hrlr/ngq029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rmit_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_hrlr_ngq029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20200513030161</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/agispt.20200513030161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-329396fa7ad0c3842c246e3fe5fc698eca332109103d954ee52e2883405dbb903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkD1PwzAURSMEEqUw8Qe8dUCh_sgnC0IRUKQIhraz5SZOYkji8OwgdeWX41CYmJj85Ht0nn0975Lga4JTtmyghWVfv2OaHnkzEgeBTzAlx24OIuLHcUJOvTNjXjFmCUvSmfe5EW-qr5HqrYReWKV70aJm7ESPQNWNNchIUHo07f72xkebRqJSFso4EOkKLdYSQKAPlIthUP0CVaA7ZB21XaNMj2An6m4YpGgNqjR8Z89uXYMyBcWo7Ll3UrlQXvycc2_7cL_JVn7-8viU3eV-4d5qfUZTlkaViEWJ3U1ACxpEklUyrIooTWQhGKOuBYJZmYaBlCGVNElYgMNyt0sxm3tXB28B2hiQFR9AdQL2nGA-1cen-vihPkfnBxo6ZbmolRksb6wdDC-FFVz17jNTpKHmpVaThDES_aIUU4xDwjDDJCJOt_qrM1JA0fxX9QUg9JgH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taking international human rights seriously?:- The decision of 'Serra v Lappin' from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Payandeh, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Payandeh, M.</creatorcontrib><description>On 9 April 2010 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in the case of 'Serra v Lappin'. The Court of Appeals held that inmates in federal prisons that were paid very low wages for labour they were carrying out as prisoners could neither claim a violation of their constitutional rights nor a violation of their rights under international law. While the outcome of the case might be right in light of legal doctrine, its reasoning with regard to the effect of international law within the US legal order raises serious doubts. This is regrettable not only because the Court could have easily dismissed the case without making broad statements about the relationship of international law and municipal law. It is especially regrettable because judicial decisions that comment on the domestic status of international law have the potential for significantly influencing the development of the law in this field that is not fully determined by codified law. The US Constitution regulates the incorporation of international law only in part. Article VI deems international treaties to be part of 'the supreme Law of the Land'. Nevertheless, the relationship between international treaties and domestic statutes is debated. With regard to customary international law and general principles of international law the Constitution is tacit. It also contains no explicit statement as to the effect of decisions of international courts and tribunals within domestic law. At the same time, questions of international law play an increasingly significant role in proceedings before domestic courts. Moreover, the question of the relationship between international and national law does not only arise under the US Constitution but poses similar challenges for judges on domestic courts all around the world.With the rising importance of comparative constitutional law and the establishment of networks of judges exchanging their views on fundamental questions of law, decisions of domestic courts not only influence developments within their own legal order but may also have significance beyond the borders of the nation state. Against this background the Court of Appeals' decision may have significant repercussions for the development of international human rights law and policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-7781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1021</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngq029</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Civil rights ; Court decisions and opinions ; HUMAN RIGHTS ; INTERNATIONAL LAW ; International law and human rights ; JUDGMENTS ; PRISONERS ; PRISONS ; Social aspects ; Wages and labor productivity ; WAGES AND SALARIES</subject><ispartof>Human rights law review, 2010-09, Vol.10 (3), p.569-579</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payandeh, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Taking international human rights seriously?:- The decision of 'Serra v Lappin' from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</title><title>Human rights law review</title><description>On 9 April 2010 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in the case of 'Serra v Lappin'. The Court of Appeals held that inmates in federal prisons that were paid very low wages for labour they were carrying out as prisoners could neither claim a violation of their constitutional rights nor a violation of their rights under international law. While the outcome of the case might be right in light of legal doctrine, its reasoning with regard to the effect of international law within the US legal order raises serious doubts. This is regrettable not only because the Court could have easily dismissed the case without making broad statements about the relationship of international law and municipal law. It is especially regrettable because judicial decisions that comment on the domestic status of international law have the potential for significantly influencing the development of the law in this field that is not fully determined by codified law. The US Constitution regulates the incorporation of international law only in part. Article VI deems international treaties to be part of 'the supreme Law of the Land'. Nevertheless, the relationship between international treaties and domestic statutes is debated. With regard to customary international law and general principles of international law the Constitution is tacit. It also contains no explicit statement as to the effect of decisions of international courts and tribunals within domestic law. At the same time, questions of international law play an increasingly significant role in proceedings before domestic courts. Moreover, the question of the relationship between international and national law does not only arise under the US Constitution but poses similar challenges for judges on domestic courts all around the world.With the rising importance of comparative constitutional law and the establishment of networks of judges exchanging their views on fundamental questions of law, decisions of domestic courts not only influence developments within their own legal order but may also have significance beyond the borders of the nation state. Against this background the Court of Appeals' decision may have significant repercussions for the development of international human rights law and policy.</description><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Court decisions and opinions</subject><subject>HUMAN RIGHTS</subject><subject>INTERNATIONAL LAW</subject><subject>International law and human rights</subject><subject>JUDGMENTS</subject><subject>PRISONERS</subject><subject>PRISONS</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Wages and labor productivity</subject><subject>WAGES AND SALARIES</subject><issn>1461-7781</issn><issn>1744-1021</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkD1PwzAURSMEEqUw8Qe8dUCh_sgnC0IRUKQIhraz5SZOYkji8OwgdeWX41CYmJj85Ht0nn0975Lga4JTtmyghWVfv2OaHnkzEgeBTzAlx24OIuLHcUJOvTNjXjFmCUvSmfe5EW-qr5HqrYReWKV70aJm7ESPQNWNNchIUHo07f72xkebRqJSFso4EOkKLdYSQKAPlIthUP0CVaA7ZB21XaNMj2An6m4YpGgNqjR8Z89uXYMyBcWo7Ll3UrlQXvycc2_7cL_JVn7-8viU3eV-4d5qfUZTlkaViEWJ3U1ACxpEklUyrIooTWQhGKOuBYJZmYaBlCGVNElYgMNyt0sxm3tXB28B2hiQFR9AdQL2nGA-1cen-vihPkfnBxo6ZbmolRksb6wdDC-FFVz17jNTpKHmpVaThDES_aIUU4xDwjDDJCJOt_qrM1JA0fxX9QUg9JgH</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Payandeh, M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Taking international human rights seriously?:- The decision of 'Serra v Lappin' from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</title><author>Payandeh, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-329396fa7ad0c3842c246e3fe5fc698eca332109103d954ee52e2883405dbb903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Court decisions and opinions</topic><topic>HUMAN RIGHTS</topic><topic>INTERNATIONAL LAW</topic><topic>International law and human rights</topic><topic>JUDGMENTS</topic><topic>PRISONERS</topic><topic>PRISONS</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Wages and labor productivity</topic><topic>WAGES AND SALARIES</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payandeh, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Human rights law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payandeh, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taking international human rights seriously?:- The decision of 'Serra v Lappin' from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</atitle><jtitle>Human rights law review</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>569-579</pages><issn>1461-7781</issn><eissn>1744-1021</eissn><abstract>On 9 April 2010 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in the case of 'Serra v Lappin'. The Court of Appeals held that inmates in federal prisons that were paid very low wages for labour they were carrying out as prisoners could neither claim a violation of their constitutional rights nor a violation of their rights under international law. While the outcome of the case might be right in light of legal doctrine, its reasoning with regard to the effect of international law within the US legal order raises serious doubts. This is regrettable not only because the Court could have easily dismissed the case without making broad statements about the relationship of international law and municipal law. It is especially regrettable because judicial decisions that comment on the domestic status of international law have the potential for significantly influencing the development of the law in this field that is not fully determined by codified law. The US Constitution regulates the incorporation of international law only in part. Article VI deems international treaties to be part of 'the supreme Law of the Land'. Nevertheless, the relationship between international treaties and domestic statutes is debated. With regard to customary international law and general principles of international law the Constitution is tacit. It also contains no explicit statement as to the effect of decisions of international courts and tribunals within domestic law. At the same time, questions of international law play an increasingly significant role in proceedings before domestic courts. Moreover, the question of the relationship between international and national law does not only arise under the US Constitution but poses similar challenges for judges on domestic courts all around the world.With the rising importance of comparative constitutional law and the establishment of networks of judges exchanging their views on fundamental questions of law, decisions of domestic courts not only influence developments within their own legal order but may also have significance beyond the borders of the nation state. Against this background the Court of Appeals' decision may have significant repercussions for the development of international human rights law and policy.</abstract><doi>10.1093/hrlr/ngq029</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-7781
ispartof Human rights law review, 2010-09, Vol.10 (3), p.569-579
issn 1461-7781
1744-1021
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_hrlr_ngq029
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Political Science Complete
subjects Civil rights
Court decisions and opinions
HUMAN RIGHTS
INTERNATIONAL LAW
International law and human rights
JUDGMENTS
PRISONERS
PRISONS
Social aspects
Wages and labor productivity
WAGES AND SALARIES
title Taking international human rights seriously?:- The decision of 'Serra v Lappin' from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A29%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taking%20international%20human%20rights%20seriously?:-%20The%20decision%20of%20'Serra%20v%20Lappin'%20from%20the%20US%20Court%20of%20Appeals%20for%20the%20Ninth%20Circuit&rft.jtitle=Human%20rights%20law%20review&rft.au=Payandeh,%20M.&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=569-579&rft.issn=1461-7781&rft.eissn=1744-1021&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngq029&rft_dat=%3Crmit_cross%3E10.3316/agispt.20200513030161%3C/rmit_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20200513030161&rfr_iscdi=true