Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography: combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode placement

SUMMARY Within geoelectrical imaging, the choice of measurement configurations and electrode locations is known to control the image resolution. Previous work has shown that optimized survey designs can provide a model resolution that is superior to standard survey designs. This paper demonstrates a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical journal international 2018-07, Vol.214 (1), p.108-121
Hauptverfasser: Uhlemann, Sebastian, Wilkinson, Paul B, Maurer, Hansruedi, Wagner, Florian M, Johnson, Timothy C, Chambers, Jonathan E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 1
container_start_page 108
container_title Geophysical journal international
container_volume 214
creator Uhlemann, Sebastian
Wilkinson, Paul B
Maurer, Hansruedi
Wagner, Florian M
Johnson, Timothy C
Chambers, Jonathan E
description SUMMARY Within geoelectrical imaging, the choice of measurement configurations and electrode locations is known to control the image resolution. Previous work has shown that optimized survey designs can provide a model resolution that is superior to standard survey designs. This paper demonstrates a methodology to optimize resolution within a target area, while limiting the number of required electrodes, thereby selecting optimal electrode locations. This is achieved by extending previous work on the ‘Compare-R’ algorithm, which by calculating updates to the resolution matrix optimizes the model resolution in a target area. Here, an additional weighting factor is introduced that allows to preferentially adding measurement configurations that can be acquired on a given set of electrodes. The performance of the optimization is tested on two synthetic examples and verified with a laboratory study. The effect of the weighting factor is investigated using an acquisition layout comprising a single line of electrodes. The results show that an increasing weight decreases the area of improved resolution, but leads to a smaller number of electrode positions. Imaging results superior to a standard survey design were achieved using 56 per cent fewer electrodes. The performance was also tested on a 3-D acquisition grid, where superior resolution within a target at the base of an embankment was achieved using 22 per cent fewer electrodes than a comparable standard survey. The effect of the underlying resistivity distribution on the performance of the optimization was investigated and it was shown that even strong resistivity contrasts only have minor impact. The synthetic results were verified in a laboratory tank experiment, where notable image improvements were achieved. This work shows that optimized surveys can be designed that have a resolution superior to standard survey designs, while requiring significantly fewer electrodes. This methodology thereby provides a means for improving the efficiency of geoelectrical imaging.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/gji/ggy128
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_gji_ggy128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/gji/ggy128</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/gji/ggy128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-badd48d51d494c64833a89a10a76a5514e0df6529b88fd1f4788b3db496cbfc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUQC0EEqWw8AVeWJBC7fhRhw1VFJAqdQGpW-T4EVwlcWS7lcIf8NcE0pnpSveee4YDwC1GDxgVZFHv3aKuB5yLMzDDhLMsp3x3DmaoYDxjFO0uwVWMe4QwxVTMwPe2T651X0bDeAhHM0Btoqs7aH2ApjEqBadkA8O4jckdXRpg8q2vg-w_h0eofFu5bvz2k0cm5zvoLWyNHIWmNV0aoc66-hCmo-z0yey1gX0j1R91DS6sbKK5Oc05-Fg_v69es8325W31tMkkyVHKKqk1FZphTQuqOBWESFFIjOSSS8YwNUhbzvKiEsJqbOlSiIroihZcVVYRMgf3k1cFH2MwtuyDa2UYSozK34jlGLGcIo7w3QT7Q_8f9wMflXhz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography: combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode placement</title><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Uhlemann, Sebastian ; Wilkinson, Paul B ; Maurer, Hansruedi ; Wagner, Florian M ; Johnson, Timothy C ; Chambers, Jonathan E</creator><creatorcontrib>Uhlemann, Sebastian ; Wilkinson, Paul B ; Maurer, Hansruedi ; Wagner, Florian M ; Johnson, Timothy C ; Chambers, Jonathan E</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Within geoelectrical imaging, the choice of measurement configurations and electrode locations is known to control the image resolution. Previous work has shown that optimized survey designs can provide a model resolution that is superior to standard survey designs. This paper demonstrates a methodology to optimize resolution within a target area, while limiting the number of required electrodes, thereby selecting optimal electrode locations. This is achieved by extending previous work on the ‘Compare-R’ algorithm, which by calculating updates to the resolution matrix optimizes the model resolution in a target area. Here, an additional weighting factor is introduced that allows to preferentially adding measurement configurations that can be acquired on a given set of electrodes. The performance of the optimization is tested on two synthetic examples and verified with a laboratory study. The effect of the weighting factor is investigated using an acquisition layout comprising a single line of electrodes. The results show that an increasing weight decreases the area of improved resolution, but leads to a smaller number of electrode positions. Imaging results superior to a standard survey design were achieved using 56 per cent fewer electrodes. The performance was also tested on a 3-D acquisition grid, where superior resolution within a target at the base of an embankment was achieved using 22 per cent fewer electrodes than a comparable standard survey. The effect of the underlying resistivity distribution on the performance of the optimization was investigated and it was shown that even strong resistivity contrasts only have minor impact. The synthetic results were verified in a laboratory tank experiment, where notable image improvements were achieved. This work shows that optimized surveys can be designed that have a resolution superior to standard survey designs, while requiring significantly fewer electrodes. This methodology thereby provides a means for improving the efficiency of geoelectrical imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-540X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-246X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Geophysical journal international, 2018-07, Vol.214 (1), p.108-121</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-badd48d51d494c64833a89a10a76a5514e0df6529b88fd1f4788b3db496cbfc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-badd48d51d494c64833a89a10a76a5514e0df6529b88fd1f4788b3db496cbfc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7407-9741 ; 0000-0002-7673-7346</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uhlemann, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Hansruedi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Florian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Jonathan E</creatorcontrib><title>Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography: combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode placement</title><title>Geophysical journal international</title><description>SUMMARY Within geoelectrical imaging, the choice of measurement configurations and electrode locations is known to control the image resolution. Previous work has shown that optimized survey designs can provide a model resolution that is superior to standard survey designs. This paper demonstrates a methodology to optimize resolution within a target area, while limiting the number of required electrodes, thereby selecting optimal electrode locations. This is achieved by extending previous work on the ‘Compare-R’ algorithm, which by calculating updates to the resolution matrix optimizes the model resolution in a target area. Here, an additional weighting factor is introduced that allows to preferentially adding measurement configurations that can be acquired on a given set of electrodes. The performance of the optimization is tested on two synthetic examples and verified with a laboratory study. The effect of the weighting factor is investigated using an acquisition layout comprising a single line of electrodes. The results show that an increasing weight decreases the area of improved resolution, but leads to a smaller number of electrode positions. Imaging results superior to a standard survey design were achieved using 56 per cent fewer electrodes. The performance was also tested on a 3-D acquisition grid, where superior resolution within a target at the base of an embankment was achieved using 22 per cent fewer electrodes than a comparable standard survey. The effect of the underlying resistivity distribution on the performance of the optimization was investigated and it was shown that even strong resistivity contrasts only have minor impact. The synthetic results were verified in a laboratory tank experiment, where notable image improvements were achieved. This work shows that optimized surveys can be designed that have a resolution superior to standard survey designs, while requiring significantly fewer electrodes. This methodology thereby provides a means for improving the efficiency of geoelectrical imaging.</description><issn>0956-540X</issn><issn>1365-246X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUQC0EEqWw8AVeWJBC7fhRhw1VFJAqdQGpW-T4EVwlcWS7lcIf8NcE0pnpSveee4YDwC1GDxgVZFHv3aKuB5yLMzDDhLMsp3x3DmaoYDxjFO0uwVWMe4QwxVTMwPe2T651X0bDeAhHM0Btoqs7aH2ApjEqBadkA8O4jckdXRpg8q2vg-w_h0eofFu5bvz2k0cm5zvoLWyNHIWmNV0aoc66-hCmo-z0yey1gX0j1R91DS6sbKK5Oc05-Fg_v69es8325W31tMkkyVHKKqk1FZphTQuqOBWESFFIjOSSS8YwNUhbzvKiEsJqbOlSiIroihZcVVYRMgf3k1cFH2MwtuyDa2UYSozK34jlGLGcIo7w3QT7Q_8f9wMflXhz</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Uhlemann, Sebastian</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Paul B</creator><creator>Maurer, Hansruedi</creator><creator>Wagner, Florian M</creator><creator>Johnson, Timothy C</creator><creator>Chambers, Jonathan E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-9741</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7673-7346</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography: combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode placement</title><author>Uhlemann, Sebastian ; Wilkinson, Paul B ; Maurer, Hansruedi ; Wagner, Florian M ; Johnson, Timothy C ; Chambers, Jonathan E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-badd48d51d494c64833a89a10a76a5514e0df6529b88fd1f4788b3db496cbfc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uhlemann, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Hansruedi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Florian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Jonathan E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geophysical journal international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uhlemann, Sebastian</au><au>Wilkinson, Paul B</au><au>Maurer, Hansruedi</au><au>Wagner, Florian M</au><au>Johnson, Timothy C</au><au>Chambers, Jonathan E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography: combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode placement</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical journal international</jtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>108-121</pages><issn>0956-540X</issn><eissn>1365-246X</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY Within geoelectrical imaging, the choice of measurement configurations and electrode locations is known to control the image resolution. Previous work has shown that optimized survey designs can provide a model resolution that is superior to standard survey designs. This paper demonstrates a methodology to optimize resolution within a target area, while limiting the number of required electrodes, thereby selecting optimal electrode locations. This is achieved by extending previous work on the ‘Compare-R’ algorithm, which by calculating updates to the resolution matrix optimizes the model resolution in a target area. Here, an additional weighting factor is introduced that allows to preferentially adding measurement configurations that can be acquired on a given set of electrodes. The performance of the optimization is tested on two synthetic examples and verified with a laboratory study. The effect of the weighting factor is investigated using an acquisition layout comprising a single line of electrodes. The results show that an increasing weight decreases the area of improved resolution, but leads to a smaller number of electrode positions. Imaging results superior to a standard survey design were achieved using 56 per cent fewer electrodes. The performance was also tested on a 3-D acquisition grid, where superior resolution within a target at the base of an embankment was achieved using 22 per cent fewer electrodes than a comparable standard survey. The effect of the underlying resistivity distribution on the performance of the optimization was investigated and it was shown that even strong resistivity contrasts only have minor impact. The synthetic results were verified in a laboratory tank experiment, where notable image improvements were achieved. This work shows that optimized surveys can be designed that have a resolution superior to standard survey designs, while requiring significantly fewer electrodes. This methodology thereby provides a means for improving the efficiency of geoelectrical imaging.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/gji/ggy128</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-9741</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7673-7346</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-540X
ispartof Geophysical journal international, 2018-07, Vol.214 (1), p.108-121
issn 0956-540X
1365-246X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_gji_ggy128
source Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)
title Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography: combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode placement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A59%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimized%20survey%20design%20for%20electrical%20resistivity%20tomography:%20combined%20optimization%20of%20measurement%20configuration%20and%20electrode%20placement&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20journal%20international&rft.au=Uhlemann,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=108-121&rft.issn=0956-540X&rft.eissn=1365-246X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/gji/ggy128&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/gji/ggy128%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/gji/ggy128&rfr_iscdi=true