A comparison of European countries FBDG in the light of their contribution to tackle diet-related health inequalities
Abstract Background The purpose of this article is to report on a comparative analysis of the official food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) that were applicable in 2015 in 25 EU Member States. We assess FBDG in relation to the main guidelines established by the FAO/WHO, the EURODIET project and the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of public health 2020-04, Vol.30 (2), p.346-353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 346 |
container_title | European journal of public health |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Carrillo-Álvarez, Elena Boeckx, Hilde Penne, Tess Palma Linares, Imma Storms, Berénice Goedemé, Tim |
description | Abstract
Background
The purpose of this article is to report on a comparative analysis of the official food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) that were applicable in 2015 in 25 EU Member States. We assess FBDG in relation to the main guidelines established by the FAO/WHO, the EURODIET project and the EFSA, with a particular focus on identifying strengths and limitations of current FBDG in Europe towards addressing diet-related health inequalities.
Methods
This is a review research, in which a mixed-methods sequenced procedure was utilized. In each EU country key informants, including sociologists, economists, dietitians and nutritionists were asked to provide data regarding: (i) current dietary guidelines and national health priorities, (ii) model of health promotion currently available, (iii) results of the latest food consumption survey. All documents were reviewed by the coordinating team. Full data were analysed by two nutritionists, using a tabulated sheet to organize and compare the results.
Results
While all countries have national FBDG, the level of detail and quality varies substantially with regard to: time of last update; availability of recommendations for specific target groups; specification of frequency and portion size; the graphical representation; recommended amounts and limits of foods consumed; and recommendations regarding physical activity.
Conclusions
European countries have great opportunities to improve FBDG to better serve Public Health policy through a more consistent foundation of how these guidelines are developed, the inclusion of different population subgroups as a target for recommendations and the implementation of monitoring systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/ckz139 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurpub_ckz139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckz139</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2430184337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-57f187373c02184f39a5bb0703e837b528ac83071d33e56e9170574c09aeebc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq0KVOi2x16RJS6VUIrtSWLnSLdAKyH10krcIsc76RqycfCHqvbX4zRApV7g5LH1-J2xH0Lec_aRswZOMfkpdafm9g-H5hU55GVdFlCz671cc8YLLmpxQN6EcMMYq6QSr8kBcJBSNvUhSWfUuN2kvQ1upK6n58m7CfWYj9MYvcVALz59vqR2pHGLdLA_t3Hm8sb6DM1Ml6LNt6OjUZvbAenGYiw8Djrihm5RD3GbA_Au6cHGHPmW7Pd6CPjuYV2RHxfn39dfiqtvl1_XZ1eFgQZiUcmeKwkSDBNclT00uuo6JhmgAtlVQmmjgEm-AcCqxobL_MLSsEYjdqaCFfmw5E7e3SUMsd3ZYHAY9IguhVaIWlWy4gwyevwfeuOSH_N0rSiB5faQB1mRYqGMdyF47NvJ2532v1vO2tlHu_hoFx-ZP3pITd0ON0_0o4AMnCzAL-xcH4zF0eATNhvLXVUp2N9yRdTL6bWNevaynkX--wqXpmeGvgdbcra4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430184337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of European countries FBDG in the light of their contribution to tackle diet-related health inequalities</title><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Carrillo-Álvarez, Elena ; Boeckx, Hilde ; Penne, Tess ; Palma Linares, Imma ; Storms, Berénice ; Goedemé, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Carrillo-Álvarez, Elena ; Boeckx, Hilde ; Penne, Tess ; Palma Linares, Imma ; Storms, Berénice ; Goedemé, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
The purpose of this article is to report on a comparative analysis of the official food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) that were applicable in 2015 in 25 EU Member States. We assess FBDG in relation to the main guidelines established by the FAO/WHO, the EURODIET project and the EFSA, with a particular focus on identifying strengths and limitations of current FBDG in Europe towards addressing diet-related health inequalities.
Methods
This is a review research, in which a mixed-methods sequenced procedure was utilized. In each EU country key informants, including sociologists, economists, dietitians and nutritionists were asked to provide data regarding: (i) current dietary guidelines and national health priorities, (ii) model of health promotion currently available, (iii) results of the latest food consumption survey. All documents were reviewed by the coordinating team. Full data were analysed by two nutritionists, using a tabulated sheet to organize and compare the results.
Results
While all countries have national FBDG, the level of detail and quality varies substantially with regard to: time of last update; availability of recommendations for specific target groups; specification of frequency and portion size; the graphical representation; recommended amounts and limits of foods consumed; and recommendations regarding physical activity.
Conclusions
European countries have great opportunities to improve FBDG to better serve Public Health policy through a more consistent foundation of how these guidelines are developed, the inclusion of different population subgroups as a target for recommendations and the implementation of monitoring systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31377796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Diet ; Dietary guidelines ; Food ; Food consumption ; Graphical representations ; Guidelines ; Health care policy ; Health disparities ; Health education ; Health policy ; Health promotion ; Inequalities ; Inequality ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Nutritionists ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Public health ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Science & Technology ; Subgroups</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2020-04, Vol.30 (2), p.346-353</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>4</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000537384200005</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-57f187373c02184f39a5bb0703e837b528ac83071d33e56e9170574c09aeebc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-57f187373c02184f39a5bb0703e837b528ac83071d33e56e9170574c09aeebc53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3834-7101 ; 0000-0002-2985-4320 ; 0000-0001-6088-4088</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1605,27871,27929,27930,28253,28254</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz139$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carrillo-Álvarez, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeckx, Hilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penne, Tess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma Linares, Imma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storms, Berénice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goedemé, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of European countries FBDG in the light of their contribution to tackle diet-related health inequalities</title><title>European journal of public health</title><addtitle>EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Public Health</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
The purpose of this article is to report on a comparative analysis of the official food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) that were applicable in 2015 in 25 EU Member States. We assess FBDG in relation to the main guidelines established by the FAO/WHO, the EURODIET project and the EFSA, with a particular focus on identifying strengths and limitations of current FBDG in Europe towards addressing diet-related health inequalities.
Methods
This is a review research, in which a mixed-methods sequenced procedure was utilized. In each EU country key informants, including sociologists, economists, dietitians and nutritionists were asked to provide data regarding: (i) current dietary guidelines and national health priorities, (ii) model of health promotion currently available, (iii) results of the latest food consumption survey. All documents were reviewed by the coordinating team. Full data were analysed by two nutritionists, using a tabulated sheet to organize and compare the results.
Results
While all countries have national FBDG, the level of detail and quality varies substantially with regard to: time of last update; availability of recommendations for specific target groups; specification of frequency and portion size; the graphical representation; recommended amounts and limits of foods consumed; and recommendations regarding physical activity.
Conclusions
European countries have great opportunities to improve FBDG to better serve Public Health policy through a more consistent foundation of how these guidelines are developed, the inclusion of different population subgroups as a target for recommendations and the implementation of monitoring systems.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary guidelines</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Graphical representations</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Inequalities</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Nutritionists</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public, Environmental & Occupational Health</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq0KVOi2x16RJS6VUIrtSWLnSLdAKyH10krcIsc76RqycfCHqvbX4zRApV7g5LH1-J2xH0Lec_aRswZOMfkpdafm9g-H5hU55GVdFlCz671cc8YLLmpxQN6EcMMYq6QSr8kBcJBSNvUhSWfUuN2kvQ1upK6n58m7CfWYj9MYvcVALz59vqR2pHGLdLA_t3Hm8sb6DM1Ml6LNt6OjUZvbAenGYiw8Djrihm5RD3GbA_Au6cHGHPmW7Pd6CPjuYV2RHxfn39dfiqtvl1_XZ1eFgQZiUcmeKwkSDBNclT00uuo6JhmgAtlVQmmjgEm-AcCqxobL_MLSsEYjdqaCFfmw5E7e3SUMsd3ZYHAY9IguhVaIWlWy4gwyevwfeuOSH_N0rSiB5faQB1mRYqGMdyF47NvJ2532v1vO2tlHu_hoFx-ZP3pITd0ON0_0o4AMnCzAL-xcH4zF0eATNhvLXVUp2N9yRdTL6bWNevaynkX--wqXpmeGvgdbcra4</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Carrillo-Álvarez, Elena</creator><creator>Boeckx, Hilde</creator><creator>Penne, Tess</creator><creator>Palma Linares, Imma</creator><creator>Storms, Berénice</creator><creator>Goedemé, Tim</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Univ Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-7101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-4320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-4088</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>A comparison of European countries FBDG in the light of their contribution to tackle diet-related health inequalities</title><author>Carrillo-Álvarez, Elena ; Boeckx, Hilde ; Penne, Tess ; Palma Linares, Imma ; Storms, Berénice ; Goedemé, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-57f187373c02184f39a5bb0703e837b528ac83071d33e56e9170574c09aeebc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary guidelines</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Graphical representations</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Inequalities</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Nutritionists</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public, Environmental & Occupational Health</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carrillo-Álvarez, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeckx, Hilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penne, Tess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma Linares, Imma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storms, Berénice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goedemé, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carrillo-Álvarez, Elena</au><au>Boeckx, Hilde</au><au>Penne, Tess</au><au>Palma Linares, Imma</au><au>Storms, Berénice</au><au>Goedemé, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of European countries FBDG in the light of their contribution to tackle diet-related health inequalities</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><stitle>EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>346-353</pages><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
The purpose of this article is to report on a comparative analysis of the official food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) that were applicable in 2015 in 25 EU Member States. We assess FBDG in relation to the main guidelines established by the FAO/WHO, the EURODIET project and the EFSA, with a particular focus on identifying strengths and limitations of current FBDG in Europe towards addressing diet-related health inequalities.
Methods
This is a review research, in which a mixed-methods sequenced procedure was utilized. In each EU country key informants, including sociologists, economists, dietitians and nutritionists were asked to provide data regarding: (i) current dietary guidelines and national health priorities, (ii) model of health promotion currently available, (iii) results of the latest food consumption survey. All documents were reviewed by the coordinating team. Full data were analysed by two nutritionists, using a tabulated sheet to organize and compare the results.
Results
While all countries have national FBDG, the level of detail and quality varies substantially with regard to: time of last update; availability of recommendations for specific target groups; specification of frequency and portion size; the graphical representation; recommended amounts and limits of foods consumed; and recommendations regarding physical activity.
Conclusions
European countries have great opportunities to improve FBDG to better serve Public Health policy through a more consistent foundation of how these guidelines are developed, the inclusion of different population subgroups as a target for recommendations and the implementation of monitoring systems.</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31377796</pmid><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckz139</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-7101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-4320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-4088</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
ispartof | European journal of public health, 2020-04, Vol.30 (2), p.346-353 |
issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurpub_ckz139 |
source | Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Comparative analysis Diet Dietary guidelines Food Food consumption Graphical representations Guidelines Health care policy Health disparities Health education Health policy Health promotion Inequalities Inequality Life Sciences & Biomedicine Nutritionists Physical activity Physical fitness Public health Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology Subgroups |
title | A comparison of European countries FBDG in the light of their contribution to tackle diet-related health inequalities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T16%3A15%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20European%20countries%20FBDG%20in%20the%20light%20of%20their%20contribution%20to%20tackle%20diet-related%20health%20inequalities&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Carrillo-%C3%81lvarez,%20Elena&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=346-353&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckz139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2430184337%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430184337&rft_id=info:pmid/31377796&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckz139&rfr_iscdi=true |