P606High intermodality variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography in chronic coronary artery disease patients
Abstract Background Clinical treatment strategies are often based on measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). There is limited evidence about variations in LVEF when measured by different imaging modalities. Purpose To investigate the intermodality variability of LVEF measured by tw...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1) |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Supplement_1 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | European heart journal |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Stokke, T M Sarvari, S I Bjerring, A W Haugaa, K H Elahi, M T Hoedemakers, S I Rademakers, F Monaghan, M Sicari, R Engvall, J Nagel, E Zamorano, J L Ukkonen, H D'hooge, J Edvardsen, T |
| description | Abstract
Background
Clinical treatment strategies are often based on measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). There is limited evidence about variations in LVEF when measured by different imaging modalities.
Purpose
To investigate the intermodality variability of LVEF measured by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods
Patients from a multicenter study (DOPPLER-CIP – Determining optimal noninvasive parameters for the prediction of left ventricular remodeling in chronic ischemic patients) with chronic CAD were included. LVEF was measured by CMR and at least one additional modality. In each modality, LVEF was measured by a core laboratory independently of the other modalities. Measurements of LVEF by CMR were compared to 2DE, 3DE and SPECT using correlation and Bland-Altman plots.
Results
A total of 343 patients were included. Mean age was 63.9±8.3 years and 253 (74%) were males. Mean LVEF by CMR was 61.8±11.6%. Correlations between CMR LVEF and other modalities were moderate for 2DE and 3DE, and good for SPECT (Figure A-C). CMR had significantly greater correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. Bland-Altman plots indicated relatively wide limits of agreement between all modalities, ranging from 31% to 42% (Figure, D-F). Mean absolute difference of LVEF between CMR and other modalities were 8.5% for 2DE, 9.0% for 3DE, and 8.3% for SPECT. The percentage of measurements that fell within a range of 5% difference compared to CMR LVEF was 41% for 2DE, 34% for 3DE and 37% for SPECT (all p>0.05).
Conclusions
In a multicenter study with chronic CAD patients, LVEF assessed by CMR had better correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. However, there was considerable variability among all three modalities that were compared to CMR. Awareness of these variations are important in clinical management. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0215 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehz747_0215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0215</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c875-daad5fa037a2d88328de7ea8dba281b11cd5b19758d3a76e28d5df43fedae0c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9KAzEQxoMoWKuPIOQBXJvsNrvpUYpaoaCHHrwts8lsN6WbLEkq1Ff0pUz_4NnTN8Pw_WaGj5B7zh45mxUT3PkOwcfNBLvvalo9spyLCzLiIs-zWTkVl2TE-ExkZSk_r8lNCBvGmCx5OSI_HyUrF2bdUWMj-t5p2Jq4p1_gDTTmWBtLcYMqGmdp6-FU9Ahh51HTZk9RdU6B18atPQzd_oEeO1C0h7XFaBT1GJwFq5CC1TQYu94iHToXEwp7E8KBqVw_7GJiRtefUYflqvPOJoZyScHvafoVk2gT0hEJA9GgjeGWXLWwDXh31jFZvTyv5ots-f76Nn9aZkpWItMAWrTAigpyLWWRS40VgtQN5JI3nCstGj6rhNQFVCWmudDttGhRAzKVF2MiTljlXQge23rwpk931ZzVh0Dqv0DqUyD1IZDkYyef2w3_tPwCpoacOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>P606High intermodality variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography in chronic coronary artery disease patients</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stokke, T M ; Sarvari, S I ; Bjerring, A W ; Haugaa, K H ; Elahi, M T ; Hoedemakers, S I ; Rademakers, F ; Monaghan, M ; Sicari, R ; Engvall, J ; Nagel, E ; Zamorano, J L ; Ukkonen, H ; D'hooge, J ; Edvardsen, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Stokke, T M ; Sarvari, S I ; Bjerring, A W ; Haugaa, K H ; Elahi, M T ; Hoedemakers, S I ; Rademakers, F ; Monaghan, M ; Sicari, R ; Engvall, J ; Nagel, E ; Zamorano, J L ; Ukkonen, H ; D'hooge, J ; Edvardsen, T</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Clinical treatment strategies are often based on measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). There is limited evidence about variations in LVEF when measured by different imaging modalities.
Purpose
To investigate the intermodality variability of LVEF measured by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods
Patients from a multicenter study (DOPPLER-CIP – Determining optimal noninvasive parameters for the prediction of left ventricular remodeling in chronic ischemic patients) with chronic CAD were included. LVEF was measured by CMR and at least one additional modality. In each modality, LVEF was measured by a core laboratory independently of the other modalities. Measurements of LVEF by CMR were compared to 2DE, 3DE and SPECT using correlation and Bland-Altman plots.
Results
A total of 343 patients were included. Mean age was 63.9±8.3 years and 253 (74%) were males. Mean LVEF by CMR was 61.8±11.6%. Correlations between CMR LVEF and other modalities were moderate for 2DE and 3DE, and good for SPECT (Figure A-C). CMR had significantly greater correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. Bland-Altman plots indicated relatively wide limits of agreement between all modalities, ranging from 31% to 42% (Figure, D-F). Mean absolute difference of LVEF between CMR and other modalities were 8.5% for 2DE, 9.0% for 3DE, and 8.3% for SPECT. The percentage of measurements that fell within a range of 5% difference compared to CMR LVEF was 41% for 2DE, 34% for 3DE and 37% for SPECT (all p>0.05).
Conclusions
In a multicenter study with chronic CAD patients, LVEF assessed by CMR had better correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. However, there was considerable variability among all three modalities that were compared to CMR. Awareness of these variations are important in clinical management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>European heart journal, 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1)</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stokke, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarvari, S I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjerring, A W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haugaa, K H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elahi, M T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoedemakers, S I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademakers, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicari, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engvall, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagel, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamorano, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ukkonen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'hooge, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edvardsen, T</creatorcontrib><title>P606High intermodality variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography in chronic coronary artery disease patients</title><title>European heart journal</title><description>Abstract
Background
Clinical treatment strategies are often based on measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). There is limited evidence about variations in LVEF when measured by different imaging modalities.
Purpose
To investigate the intermodality variability of LVEF measured by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods
Patients from a multicenter study (DOPPLER-CIP – Determining optimal noninvasive parameters for the prediction of left ventricular remodeling in chronic ischemic patients) with chronic CAD were included. LVEF was measured by CMR and at least one additional modality. In each modality, LVEF was measured by a core laboratory independently of the other modalities. Measurements of LVEF by CMR were compared to 2DE, 3DE and SPECT using correlation and Bland-Altman plots.
Results
A total of 343 patients were included. Mean age was 63.9±8.3 years and 253 (74%) were males. Mean LVEF by CMR was 61.8±11.6%. Correlations between CMR LVEF and other modalities were moderate for 2DE and 3DE, and good for SPECT (Figure A-C). CMR had significantly greater correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. Bland-Altman plots indicated relatively wide limits of agreement between all modalities, ranging from 31% to 42% (Figure, D-F). Mean absolute difference of LVEF between CMR and other modalities were 8.5% for 2DE, 9.0% for 3DE, and 8.3% for SPECT. The percentage of measurements that fell within a range of 5% difference compared to CMR LVEF was 41% for 2DE, 34% for 3DE and 37% for SPECT (all p>0.05).
Conclusions
In a multicenter study with chronic CAD patients, LVEF assessed by CMR had better correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. However, there was considerable variability among all three modalities that were compared to CMR. Awareness of these variations are important in clinical management.</description><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9KAzEQxoMoWKuPIOQBXJvsNrvpUYpaoaCHHrwts8lsN6WbLEkq1Ff0pUz_4NnTN8Pw_WaGj5B7zh45mxUT3PkOwcfNBLvvalo9spyLCzLiIs-zWTkVl2TE-ExkZSk_r8lNCBvGmCx5OSI_HyUrF2bdUWMj-t5p2Jq4p1_gDTTmWBtLcYMqGmdp6-FU9Ahh51HTZk9RdU6B18atPQzd_oEeO1C0h7XFaBT1GJwFq5CC1TQYu94iHToXEwp7E8KBqVw_7GJiRtefUYflqvPOJoZyScHvafoVk2gT0hEJA9GgjeGWXLWwDXh31jFZvTyv5ots-f76Nn9aZkpWItMAWrTAigpyLWWRS40VgtQN5JI3nCstGj6rhNQFVCWmudDttGhRAzKVF2MiTljlXQge23rwpk931ZzVh0Dqv0DqUyD1IZDkYyef2w3_tPwCpoacOA</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Stokke, T M</creator><creator>Sarvari, S I</creator><creator>Bjerring, A W</creator><creator>Haugaa, K H</creator><creator>Elahi, M T</creator><creator>Hoedemakers, S I</creator><creator>Rademakers, F</creator><creator>Monaghan, M</creator><creator>Sicari, R</creator><creator>Engvall, J</creator><creator>Nagel, E</creator><creator>Zamorano, J L</creator><creator>Ukkonen, H</creator><creator>D'hooge, J</creator><creator>Edvardsen, T</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>P606High intermodality variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography in chronic coronary artery disease patients</title><author>Stokke, T M ; Sarvari, S I ; Bjerring, A W ; Haugaa, K H ; Elahi, M T ; Hoedemakers, S I ; Rademakers, F ; Monaghan, M ; Sicari, R ; Engvall, J ; Nagel, E ; Zamorano, J L ; Ukkonen, H ; D'hooge, J ; Edvardsen, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c875-daad5fa037a2d88328de7ea8dba281b11cd5b19758d3a76e28d5df43fedae0c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stokke, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarvari, S I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjerring, A W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haugaa, K H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elahi, M T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoedemakers, S I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademakers, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicari, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engvall, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagel, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamorano, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ukkonen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'hooge, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edvardsen, T</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stokke, T M</au><au>Sarvari, S I</au><au>Bjerring, A W</au><au>Haugaa, K H</au><au>Elahi, M T</au><au>Hoedemakers, S I</au><au>Rademakers, F</au><au>Monaghan, M</au><au>Sicari, R</au><au>Engvall, J</au><au>Nagel, E</au><au>Zamorano, J L</au><au>Ukkonen, H</au><au>D'hooge, J</au><au>Edvardsen, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P606High intermodality variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography in chronic coronary artery disease patients</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Clinical treatment strategies are often based on measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). There is limited evidence about variations in LVEF when measured by different imaging modalities.
Purpose
To investigate the intermodality variability of LVEF measured by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods
Patients from a multicenter study (DOPPLER-CIP – Determining optimal noninvasive parameters for the prediction of left ventricular remodeling in chronic ischemic patients) with chronic CAD were included. LVEF was measured by CMR and at least one additional modality. In each modality, LVEF was measured by a core laboratory independently of the other modalities. Measurements of LVEF by CMR were compared to 2DE, 3DE and SPECT using correlation and Bland-Altman plots.
Results
A total of 343 patients were included. Mean age was 63.9±8.3 years and 253 (74%) were males. Mean LVEF by CMR was 61.8±11.6%. Correlations between CMR LVEF and other modalities were moderate for 2DE and 3DE, and good for SPECT (Figure A-C). CMR had significantly greater correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. Bland-Altman plots indicated relatively wide limits of agreement between all modalities, ranging from 31% to 42% (Figure, D-F). Mean absolute difference of LVEF between CMR and other modalities were 8.5% for 2DE, 9.0% for 3DE, and 8.3% for SPECT. The percentage of measurements that fell within a range of 5% difference compared to CMR LVEF was 41% for 2DE, 34% for 3DE and 37% for SPECT (all p>0.05).
Conclusions
In a multicenter study with chronic CAD patients, LVEF assessed by CMR had better correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. However, there was considerable variability among all three modalities that were compared to CMR. Awareness of these variations are important in clinical management.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0215</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0195-668X |
| ispartof | European heart journal, 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1) |
| issn | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehz747_0215 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| title | P606High intermodality variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography in chronic coronary artery disease patients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A22%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P606High%20intermodality%20variability%20in%20ejection%20fraction%20measured%20by%20echocardiography,%20cardiac%20magnetic%20resonance%20and%20single%20photon%20emission%20computed%20tomography%20in%20chronic%20coronary%20artery%20disease%20patients&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Stokke,%20T%20M&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0215&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0215%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0215&rfr_iscdi=true |