Echocardiographic profiles of patients with CPCPH and IPCPH in HFpEF: insights from the PHHF study
Abstract Background The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines changed the definition of post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (pcPH) in heart failure (HF) by lowering the level of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Yet, the echocardiographic profile of HF with preserv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2024-10, Vol.45 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines changed the definition of post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (pcPH) in heart failure (HF) by lowering the level of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Yet, the echocardiographic profile of HF with preserved ejection fraction (PEF) patients according to their mPAP and RVP is not known.
Objectives
To investigate the echocardiographic profile of HFPEF patients according to their mPAP and RVP.
Methods
Stable HF patients with the need for right heart catheterization were enrolled from 2010 to 2018 and prospectively followed-up in this multicenter study. All patients had a right heart catheterization and an echocardiography within the 24 hours. PcPH was characterized by a pulmonary wedge pressure exceeding 20 mm Hg and mean mPAP greater than 20 mm Hg, from an isolated state when PVR was less than 2 Wood units (WU, IpcPH) to a combined form when PVR exceeded 2 WU (CpcPH).
Results
Out of 662 HF patients included in PHHF study, 268 (40%) were classified as having HFpEF (35% male, median age 71 yo). Compared to IpcPH patients, CpcPH patients had higher tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity (sPAP, 3.53 vs 3.00 m/s, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.791 |