Long-term follow-up after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Abstract Introduction Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia (AF / AT) is established treatment in selected population. Only limited data, including long-term results, exist in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Recently published prospective multicentric trial showe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2024-10, Vol.45 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Dusik, M, Fingrova, Z, Wichterle, D, Jansa, P, Ambroz, D, Dytrych, V, Linhart, A, Havranek, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia (AF / AT) is established treatment in selected population. Only limited data, including long-term results, exist in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Recently published prospective multicentric trial showed that more extensive radiofrequency catheter ablation of the bi-atrial arrhythmogenic substrate instead of clinical arrhythmia ablation alone is not beneficial in terms of arrhythmia recurrence in patients with AF / AT and PH. Now, we present the results of an extended, long-term follow-up from one of the study centres. Methods Patients with combined post- and pre-capillary or isolated pre-capillary PH and AF / AT indicated to catheter ablation were enrolled and randomised 1:1 into two parallel treatment arms. Patients underwent either clinical arrhythmia ablation only (Limited ablation group) or clinical arrhythmia plus substrate-based ablation (Extended ablation group). The primary endpoint was arrhythmia recurrence >30 s without antiarrhythmic drugs after the 3-month blanking period. Results A total of 52 patients (median age 71 years (IQR 62-75); 27 males) were enrolled. The presumable clinical arrhythmia was AF in 20 and AT in 32 patients, including typical AFL in 22 patients. Limited and extended ablation group included 28 and 24 patients, respectively. During the extended follow-up period of median 31 (IQR: 18; 46) months, the primary endpoint occurred in 17 patients (71 %) vs. 13 patients (46 %) in the Extended vs. Limited ablation group (p = 0.096). In parallel, overall mortality was comparable between groups (9 [38 %] vs. 11 [39 %]). Only 2 patients had recurrence of AFL during the extended follow-up. However, new different arrhythmia was documented in another 7 patients after the AFL ablation. Conclusion In PH patients, recurrence of AF / AT after a catheter ablation is frequent and the recurrence rate increases with the duration of follow-up. Ablation strategy seems to have no impact on arrhythmia free survival. Patients with typical atrial flutter have significantly higher chance to maintain sinus rhythm after a catheter ablation compared to AF or other AT. Short- and long-term follow-up results.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.396