Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2023-11, Vol.44 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Baimbetov, A, Jukenova, A, Bozshagulov, T, Bigeldiyev, N, Tursunkhanov, Z H, Yakupova, I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page
container_title European heart journal
container_volume 44
creator Baimbetov, A
Jukenova, A
Bozshagulov, T
Bigeldiyev, N
Tursunkhanov, Z H
Yakupova, I
description Abstract Background Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using cryoballoon "single shot" technology in two randomized groups. Materials and methods Traditional PV cryoballoon isolation was performed in two groups of patients with persistent AF. In the first group of patients (n = 35) underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. In the second group of patients (n = 33), cryoballoon isolation of the PV and cryoablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) was performed. Patients after ablation were followed up for 15.6 (2.7–3.5) months for AF recurrence, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters. Results The study included 68 patients with persistent AF in the last six months before inclusion, for whom at least two antiarrhythmic drugs of class I-III were ineffective. By random distribution, 35 patients were included in group 1 - (PVI), and they underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. Group 2 - (PVI+PWA) included 33 patients who underwent PV cryoballoon isolation and additional LA posterior wall cryoablation. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 11 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (Kaplan-Meier survival, 31.4% and 18.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval. Undesirable events occurred in 3.8% of each group (p = 1.00). On multivariate analysis, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon (PVI+PWA) was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.57; 95% confidence interval: 1, 39–8.93, p = 0.007). Conclusions In patients with persistent AF, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrence. Nevertheless, safety is similar compared to patients with only PV isolation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehad655_506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1346-139b8f87f960c519bd94281e090dad97087d804a74f531471515630003ccc9ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9KwzAUh4MoOKePIOQFuiVNkyaXMvwHA0EUvCtpmrCMNClJ69gL-NxmdHjt1TlwzncOvw-Ae4xWGAmy1lPcaRnH_VrvZMcoXVHELsAC07IsBKvoJVggLGjBGP-6Bjcp7RFCnGG2AD_vOk1uTDAYmGyfW-l1mBJU8Rhk6-Rogz8Nh8n1wct4hN_a-gSl76DTZoRyjHbq4RDSqKMNER6kc9B6OGRW-3z6YMcdHHRMNq_4mZAOGttG6-YPt-DKSJf03bkuwefT48fmpdi-Pb9uHraFwqRiBSai5YbXRjCkKBZtJ6qSY40E6mQnasTrjqNK1pWhBFc1ppgyksMSpZTQiiwBne-qGFKK2jRDtH1O1WDUnGQ2fzKbs8wmy8wcmrkwDf9EfgG71oDB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baimbetov, A ; Jukenova, A ; Bozshagulov, T ; Bigeldiyev, N ; Tursunkhanov, Z H ; Yakupova, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Baimbetov, A ; Jukenova, A ; Bozshagulov, T ; Bigeldiyev, N ; Tursunkhanov, Z H ; Yakupova, I</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using cryoballoon "single shot" technology in two randomized groups. Materials and methods Traditional PV cryoballoon isolation was performed in two groups of patients with persistent AF. In the first group of patients (n = 35) underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. In the second group of patients (n = 33), cryoballoon isolation of the PV and cryoablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) was performed. Patients after ablation were followed up for 15.6 (2.7–3.5) months for AF recurrence, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters. Results The study included 68 patients with persistent AF in the last six months before inclusion, for whom at least two antiarrhythmic drugs of class I-III were ineffective. By random distribution, 35 patients were included in group 1 - (PVI), and they underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. Group 2 - (PVI+PWA) included 33 patients who underwent PV cryoballoon isolation and additional LA posterior wall cryoablation. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 11 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (Kaplan-Meier survival, 31.4% and 18.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval. Undesirable events occurred in 3.8% of each group (p = 1.00). On multivariate analysis, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon (PVI+PWA) was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.57; 95% confidence interval: 1, 39–8.93, p = 0.007). Conclusions In patients with persistent AF, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrence. Nevertheless, safety is similar compared to patients with only PV isolation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>European heart journal, 2023-11, Vol.44 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baimbetov, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jukenova, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozshagulov, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigeldiyev, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tursunkhanov, Z H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakupova, I</creatorcontrib><title>Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation</title><title>European heart journal</title><description>Abstract Background Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using cryoballoon "single shot" technology in two randomized groups. Materials and methods Traditional PV cryoballoon isolation was performed in two groups of patients with persistent AF. In the first group of patients (n = 35) underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. In the second group of patients (n = 33), cryoballoon isolation of the PV and cryoablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) was performed. Patients after ablation were followed up for 15.6 (2.7–3.5) months for AF recurrence, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters. Results The study included 68 patients with persistent AF in the last six months before inclusion, for whom at least two antiarrhythmic drugs of class I-III were ineffective. By random distribution, 35 patients were included in group 1 - (PVI), and they underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. Group 2 - (PVI+PWA) included 33 patients who underwent PV cryoballoon isolation and additional LA posterior wall cryoablation. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 11 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (Kaplan-Meier survival, 31.4% and 18.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval. Undesirable events occurred in 3.8% of each group (p = 1.00). On multivariate analysis, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon (PVI+PWA) was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.57; 95% confidence interval: 1, 39–8.93, p = 0.007). Conclusions In patients with persistent AF, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrence. Nevertheless, safety is similar compared to patients with only PV isolation.</description><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN9KwzAUh4MoOKePIOQFuiVNkyaXMvwHA0EUvCtpmrCMNClJ69gL-NxmdHjt1TlwzncOvw-Ae4xWGAmy1lPcaRnH_VrvZMcoXVHELsAC07IsBKvoJVggLGjBGP-6Bjcp7RFCnGG2AD_vOk1uTDAYmGyfW-l1mBJU8Rhk6-Rogz8Nh8n1wct4hN_a-gSl76DTZoRyjHbq4RDSqKMNER6kc9B6OGRW-3z6YMcdHHRMNq_4mZAOGttG6-YPt-DKSJf03bkuwefT48fmpdi-Pb9uHraFwqRiBSai5YbXRjCkKBZtJ6qSY40E6mQnasTrjqNK1pWhBFc1ppgyksMSpZTQiiwBne-qGFKK2jRDtH1O1WDUnGQ2fzKbs8wmy8wcmrkwDf9EfgG71oDB</recordid><startdate>20231109</startdate><enddate>20231109</enddate><creator>Baimbetov, A</creator><creator>Jukenova, A</creator><creator>Bozshagulov, T</creator><creator>Bigeldiyev, N</creator><creator>Tursunkhanov, Z H</creator><creator>Yakupova, I</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231109</creationdate><title>Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation</title><author>Baimbetov, A ; Jukenova, A ; Bozshagulov, T ; Bigeldiyev, N ; Tursunkhanov, Z H ; Yakupova, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1346-139b8f87f960c519bd94281e090dad97087d804a74f531471515630003ccc9ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baimbetov, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jukenova, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozshagulov, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigeldiyev, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tursunkhanov, Z H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakupova, I</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baimbetov, A</au><au>Jukenova, A</au><au>Bozshagulov, T</au><au>Bigeldiyev, N</au><au>Tursunkhanov, Z H</au><au>Yakupova, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><date>2023-11-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using cryoballoon "single shot" technology in two randomized groups. Materials and methods Traditional PV cryoballoon isolation was performed in two groups of patients with persistent AF. In the first group of patients (n = 35) underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. In the second group of patients (n = 33), cryoballoon isolation of the PV and cryoablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) was performed. Patients after ablation were followed up for 15.6 (2.7–3.5) months for AF recurrence, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters. Results The study included 68 patients with persistent AF in the last six months before inclusion, for whom at least two antiarrhythmic drugs of class I-III were ineffective. By random distribution, 35 patients were included in group 1 - (PVI), and they underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. Group 2 - (PVI+PWA) included 33 patients who underwent PV cryoballoon isolation and additional LA posterior wall cryoablation. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 11 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (Kaplan-Meier survival, 31.4% and 18.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval. Undesirable events occurred in 3.8% of each group (p = 1.00). On multivariate analysis, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon (PVI+PWA) was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.57; 95% confidence interval: 1, 39–8.93, p = 0.007). Conclusions In patients with persistent AF, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrence. Nevertheless, safety is similar compared to patients with only PV isolation.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-668X
ispartof European heart journal, 2023-11, Vol.44 (Supplement_2)
issn 0195-668X
1522-9645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehad655_506
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A16%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20simultaneous%20cryoablation%20of%20pulmonary%20veins%20and%20left%20atrium%20posterior%20wall%20in%20patients%20with%20persistent%20atrial%20fibrillation&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Baimbetov,%20A&rft.date=2023-11-09&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506&rfr_iscdi=true