Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
Abstract Background Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2023-11, Vol.44 (Supplement_2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | European heart journal |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Baimbetov, A Jukenova, A Bozshagulov, T Bigeldiyev, N Tursunkhanov, Z H Yakupova, I |
description | Abstract
Background
Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited.
The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using cryoballoon "single shot" technology in two randomized groups.
Materials and methods
Traditional PV cryoballoon isolation was performed in two groups of patients with persistent AF. In the first group of patients (n = 35) underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. In the second group of patients (n = 33), cryoballoon isolation of the PV and cryoablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) was performed. Patients after ablation were followed up for 15.6 (2.7–3.5) months for AF recurrence, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters.
Results
The study included 68 patients with persistent AF in the last six months before inclusion, for whom at least two antiarrhythmic drugs of class I-III were ineffective. By random distribution, 35 patients were included in group 1 - (PVI), and they underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. Group 2 - (PVI+PWA) included 33 patients who underwent PV cryoballoon isolation and additional LA posterior wall cryoablation. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 11 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (Kaplan-Meier survival, 31.4% and 18.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval. Undesirable events occurred in 3.8% of each group (p = 1.00). On multivariate analysis, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon (PVI+PWA) was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.57; 95% confidence interval: 1, 39–8.93, p = 0.007).
Conclusions
In patients with persistent AF, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrence. Nevertheless, safety is similar compared to patients with only PV isolation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehad655_506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1346-139b8f87f960c519bd94281e090dad97087d804a74f531471515630003ccc9ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9KwzAUh4MoOKePIOQFuiVNkyaXMvwHA0EUvCtpmrCMNClJ69gL-NxmdHjt1TlwzncOvw-Ae4xWGAmy1lPcaRnH_VrvZMcoXVHELsAC07IsBKvoJVggLGjBGP-6Bjcp7RFCnGG2AD_vOk1uTDAYmGyfW-l1mBJU8Rhk6-Rogz8Nh8n1wct4hN_a-gSl76DTZoRyjHbq4RDSqKMNER6kc9B6OGRW-3z6YMcdHHRMNq_4mZAOGttG6-YPt-DKSJf03bkuwefT48fmpdi-Pb9uHraFwqRiBSai5YbXRjCkKBZtJ6qSY40E6mQnasTrjqNK1pWhBFc1ppgyksMSpZTQiiwBne-qGFKK2jRDtH1O1WDUnGQ2fzKbs8wmy8wcmrkwDf9EfgG71oDB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baimbetov, A ; Jukenova, A ; Bozshagulov, T ; Bigeldiyev, N ; Tursunkhanov, Z H ; Yakupova, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Baimbetov, A ; Jukenova, A ; Bozshagulov, T ; Bigeldiyev, N ; Tursunkhanov, Z H ; Yakupova, I</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited.
The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using cryoballoon "single shot" technology in two randomized groups.
Materials and methods
Traditional PV cryoballoon isolation was performed in two groups of patients with persistent AF. In the first group of patients (n = 35) underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. In the second group of patients (n = 33), cryoballoon isolation of the PV and cryoablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) was performed. Patients after ablation were followed up for 15.6 (2.7–3.5) months for AF recurrence, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters.
Results
The study included 68 patients with persistent AF in the last six months before inclusion, for whom at least two antiarrhythmic drugs of class I-III were ineffective. By random distribution, 35 patients were included in group 1 - (PVI), and they underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. Group 2 - (PVI+PWA) included 33 patients who underwent PV cryoballoon isolation and additional LA posterior wall cryoablation. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 11 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (Kaplan-Meier survival, 31.4% and 18.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval. Undesirable events occurred in 3.8% of each group (p = 1.00). On multivariate analysis, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon (PVI+PWA) was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.57; 95% confidence interval: 1, 39–8.93, p = 0.007).
Conclusions
In patients with persistent AF, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrence. Nevertheless, safety is similar compared to patients with only PV isolation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>European heart journal, 2023-11, Vol.44 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baimbetov, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jukenova, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozshagulov, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigeldiyev, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tursunkhanov, Z H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakupova, I</creatorcontrib><title>Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation</title><title>European heart journal</title><description>Abstract
Background
Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited.
The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using cryoballoon "single shot" technology in two randomized groups.
Materials and methods
Traditional PV cryoballoon isolation was performed in two groups of patients with persistent AF. In the first group of patients (n = 35) underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. In the second group of patients (n = 33), cryoballoon isolation of the PV and cryoablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) was performed. Patients after ablation were followed up for 15.6 (2.7–3.5) months for AF recurrence, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters.
Results
The study included 68 patients with persistent AF in the last six months before inclusion, for whom at least two antiarrhythmic drugs of class I-III were ineffective. By random distribution, 35 patients were included in group 1 - (PVI), and they underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. Group 2 - (PVI+PWA) included 33 patients who underwent PV cryoballoon isolation and additional LA posterior wall cryoablation. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 11 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (Kaplan-Meier survival, 31.4% and 18.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval. Undesirable events occurred in 3.8% of each group (p = 1.00). On multivariate analysis, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon (PVI+PWA) was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.57; 95% confidence interval: 1, 39–8.93, p = 0.007).
Conclusions
In patients with persistent AF, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrence. Nevertheless, safety is similar compared to patients with only PV isolation.</description><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN9KwzAUh4MoOKePIOQFuiVNkyaXMvwHA0EUvCtpmrCMNClJ69gL-NxmdHjt1TlwzncOvw-Ae4xWGAmy1lPcaRnH_VrvZMcoXVHELsAC07IsBKvoJVggLGjBGP-6Bjcp7RFCnGG2AD_vOk1uTDAYmGyfW-l1mBJU8Rhk6-Rogz8Nh8n1wct4hN_a-gSl76DTZoRyjHbq4RDSqKMNER6kc9B6OGRW-3z6YMcdHHRMNq_4mZAOGttG6-YPt-DKSJf03bkuwefT48fmpdi-Pb9uHraFwqRiBSai5YbXRjCkKBZtJ6qSY40E6mQnasTrjqNK1pWhBFc1ppgyksMSpZTQiiwBne-qGFKK2jRDtH1O1WDUnGQ2fzKbs8wmy8wcmrkwDf9EfgG71oDB</recordid><startdate>20231109</startdate><enddate>20231109</enddate><creator>Baimbetov, A</creator><creator>Jukenova, A</creator><creator>Bozshagulov, T</creator><creator>Bigeldiyev, N</creator><creator>Tursunkhanov, Z H</creator><creator>Yakupova, I</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231109</creationdate><title>Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation</title><author>Baimbetov, A ; Jukenova, A ; Bozshagulov, T ; Bigeldiyev, N ; Tursunkhanov, Z H ; Yakupova, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1346-139b8f87f960c519bd94281e090dad97087d804a74f531471515630003ccc9ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baimbetov, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jukenova, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozshagulov, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigeldiyev, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tursunkhanov, Z H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakupova, I</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baimbetov, A</au><au>Jukenova, A</au><au>Bozshagulov, T</au><au>Bigeldiyev, N</au><au>Tursunkhanov, Z H</au><au>Yakupova, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><date>2023-11-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Recent studies suggest a clinical benefit associated with posterior wall isolation as an adjunct to the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety and efficacy of this cryoballoon ablation approach are limited.
The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using cryoballoon "single shot" technology in two randomized groups.
Materials and methods
Traditional PV cryoballoon isolation was performed in two groups of patients with persistent AF. In the first group of patients (n = 35) underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. In the second group of patients (n = 33), cryoballoon isolation of the PV and cryoablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) was performed. Patients after ablation were followed up for 15.6 (2.7–3.5) months for AF recurrence, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters.
Results
The study included 68 patients with persistent AF in the last six months before inclusion, for whom at least two antiarrhythmic drugs of class I-III were ineffective. By random distribution, 35 patients were included in group 1 - (PVI), and they underwent only PV cryoballoon isolation. Group 2 - (PVI+PWA) included 33 patients who underwent PV cryoballoon isolation and additional LA posterior wall cryoablation. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 11 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (Kaplan-Meier survival, 31.4% and 18.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval. Undesirable events occurred in 3.8% of each group (p = 1.00). On multivariate analysis, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon (PVI+PWA) was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.57; 95% confidence interval: 1, 39–8.93, p = 0.007).
Conclusions
In patients with persistent AF, posterior wall ablation and PV isolation using a cryoballoon significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrence. Nevertheless, safety is similar compared to patients with only PV isolation.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-668X |
ispartof | European heart journal, 2023-11, Vol.44 (Supplement_2) |
issn | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehad655_506 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Results of simultaneous cryoablation of pulmonary veins and left atrium posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A16%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20simultaneous%20cryoablation%20of%20pulmonary%20veins%20and%20left%20atrium%20posterior%20wall%20in%20patients%20with%20persistent%20atrial%20fibrillation&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Baimbetov,%20A&rft.date=2023-11-09&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.506&rfr_iscdi=true |