Long-term outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair in prohibitive risk patients: futility or benefit?

Abstract Background Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is an emerging treatment option in inoperable patients. However, patient selection is challenging, and mostly predetermined by comorbidities and non-specific surgical risk scores. Current guidelines (1) distinguish between high-risk (HR) and prohibitive risk (PR) patients, in order to avoid clinical and procedural futility. Therefore, the aim of this study was to understand if PR patients can benefit from TTVR long-term. Methods Forty-one consecutive patients with severe TR were assessed by the heart team, considered inoperable, and underwent edge-to-edge TTVR at our institution between November 2020 and January 2022. They were divided into a PR (n=23) and an HR group (n=18), in accordance with the latest guidelines (1). Subgroup allocation took into account STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) risk score, and several comorbidities (Figure 1A). Mean age was 82.2±5.9 (PR) vs 81.1±3.5 years (HR), with mean STS-Score 14.3±6.7% vs 6.2±1.6% (Figure 1B). Results The primary efficacy endpoint of at least one-grade TR reduction by 30 days was recorded in 92.7% of all patients, with no device related complications. By 12 months, 6 patients died, 5 PR and 1 HR, and MACE rate was 18.1%. Secondary endpoints addressed symptoms, quality of life and multiorgan function, which improved in both groups (Figure 2). More precisely, at inclusion, all patients in the PR group were in NYHA class III and IV, while after 12 months only 27.7%. In comparison, there were no more HR patients in NYHA stage III and IV, after one year. Similarly, self-reported quality of life increased, as assessed by the "Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire" (KCCQ) score, which increased by 23±18.2 (p