Statin-associated muscle symptoms in clinical practice: evidence from a 6-year retrospective study
Abstract Introduction There is conflicting evidence regarding the prevalence of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) in clinical practice and randomized clinical trials. Aims We aimed to record SAMS prevalence in the setting of a specialized lipid clinic. Methods This was a retrospective study i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Introduction
There is conflicting evidence regarding the prevalence of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) in clinical practice and randomized clinical trials.
Aims
We aimed to record SAMS prevalence in the setting of a specialized lipid clinic.
Methods
This was a retrospective study including adults with dyslipidemia who were followed-up for ≥3 years (1999–2015) at the outpatient Lipid Clinic of our University General Hospital, Greece. We evaluated subjects' clinical and laboratory data with an emphasis on the prevalence of SAMS (including myalgias, muscle crumps and creatine kinase, CK, increase >10 upper limit of normal values) and recorded the rates of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target attainment according to the current ESC/EAS guidelines.
Results
Among 1,334 dyslipidemic subjects followed-up for 6 years (4–10), the prevalence of SAMS was 3% (n=41); 2% reported myalgias/crumples and 1% exhibited increased CK levels once. Only 7% (n=3) of those were statin intolerant, whereas the rest were able to receive any maximally tolerated statin dose. The corresponding prescription rates for low-, moderate- and high-intensity statins were 12%, 61% and 20%, respectively, whereas 32% received combination treatment with ezetimibe. None of the statin intolerant patients and 12% of those treated with any tolerated statin dose had optimal LDL-C levels.
Conclusions
The prevalence of SAMS is low in the setting of a specialized lipid clinic. Therefore, physicians should cautiously work-up to identify individuals with clinically relevant SAMS to offer alternative therapeutic regimens satisfactorily addressing their cardiovascular risk.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2581 |