The timing and mechanism of high-grade AV block post-TAVI: knowing your enemy

Abstract Background Complete atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) is still a major limitation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. Although right-bundle branch block (RBBB), membranous septum (MS) length and self-expandable prothesis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Gomes, D, Felix Oliveira, A, Campante Teles, R, Gama, F, Carmo, P, Brito, J, De Araujo Goncalves, P, Cavaco, D, Sousa Almeida, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page
container_title European heart journal
container_volume 42
creator Gomes, D
Felix Oliveira, A
Campante Teles, R
Gama, F
Carmo, P
Brito, J
De Araujo Goncalves, P
Cavaco, D
Sousa Almeida, M
description Abstract Background Complete atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) is still a major limitation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. Although right-bundle branch block (RBBB), membranous septum (MS) length and self-expandable prothesis are recognizable risk factors, their predictability to PPMI is far from satisfactory. While some patients develop persistent intra-procedure high-grade AVB (H-AVB), others present much later with severe bradycardia. Purpose This study aims to describe and compare the characteristics of patients who develop AVB during or after TAVI. Methods Single centre prospective registry of 506 consecutive patients submitted to TAVI with no previous pacemaker between 2017 and 2020. Post-procedure PPMI (up to 30 days after discharge) was studied and divided into two groups according to the development of persistent intra-procedure H-AVB (Group A) or post procedure H-AVB (Group B). Baseline ECG, computed tomography and TAVI-related characteristics were analyzed. Results A total of 88 patients (17,3%), aging 83±6 years, 36.4% male, underwent post-TAVI PPMI (6 after discharge). Previous conduction disturbances were present in 50 (56.8%) patients and 25 (28.4%) had RBBB. 83% were submitted to self-expandable TAVI. Forty-two patients (47.7%) had persistent intra-procedure H-AVB (Group A) whereas 52.3% had post-procedure H-AVB (Group B). In patients with persistent intra procedure H-AVB previous RBBB was significantly more frequent (45.2%, n=19) when compared to patients with post-procedure H-AVB (13%, n=6; p=0.001). Contrarily, AF and previous left-bundle branch block (LBBB) were more likely in Group B. No difference in valvular calcification, MS length, prosthesis type or implantation technique was noted (picture 1). In the group with post-procedure H-AVB, 21.7% had transient AVB during TAVI and all developed de novo LBBB or first-degree AVB post-TAVI. Among these, 33 patients (71.7%) developed delayed H-AVB (>48h post-procedure) while the remaining presented earlier. Conclusions In patients with PPMI post-TAVI, those with persistent intra-procedure H-AVB had higher rates of previous RBBB, while those with post-procedure H-AVB frequently had a normal baseline ECG. Anatomical and procedural characteristics did not differ between groups. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2186
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehab724_2186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2186</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1376-8a96074a1e317b5a07592b66c1ff2ddf1969a41f911772660dd9f0ccc53dc17d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0M1OAjEYheHGaCKit2B6A4V-nZmvU3eE-EOCcYPE3aTTH2aAmZIWYrh7JRDXrs7qOYuXkEfgI-AqG7tDbJyO-_XYNbqWIh8JKPGKDKAQginMi2sy4KAKhlh-3ZK7lNac8xIBB-R90Ti6b7u2X1HdW9o50-i-TR0NnjbtqmGrqK2jkyWtt8Fs6C6kPVtMlrMnuunD98kdwyFS17vueE9uvN4m93DZIfl8eV5M39j843U2ncyZgUwiK7VCLnMNLgNZF5rLQoka0YD3wloPCpXOwSsAKQUit1Z5bowpMmtA2mxI8PxrYkgpOl_tYtvpeKyAV6co1V-U6hKlOkX5hXCG4bD7r_kBBu1pxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The timing and mechanism of high-grade AV block post-TAVI: knowing your enemy</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gomes, D ; Felix Oliveira, A ; Campante Teles, R ; Gama, F ; Carmo, P ; Brito, J ; De Araujo Goncalves, P ; Cavaco, D ; Sousa Almeida, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes, D ; Felix Oliveira, A ; Campante Teles, R ; Gama, F ; Carmo, P ; Brito, J ; De Araujo Goncalves, P ; Cavaco, D ; Sousa Almeida, M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Complete atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) is still a major limitation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. Although right-bundle branch block (RBBB), membranous septum (MS) length and self-expandable prothesis are recognizable risk factors, their predictability to PPMI is far from satisfactory. While some patients develop persistent intra-procedure high-grade AVB (H-AVB), others present much later with severe bradycardia. Purpose This study aims to describe and compare the characteristics of patients who develop AVB during or after TAVI. Methods Single centre prospective registry of 506 consecutive patients submitted to TAVI with no previous pacemaker between 2017 and 2020. Post-procedure PPMI (up to 30 days after discharge) was studied and divided into two groups according to the development of persistent intra-procedure H-AVB (Group A) or post procedure H-AVB (Group B). Baseline ECG, computed tomography and TAVI-related characteristics were analyzed. Results A total of 88 patients (17,3%), aging 83±6 years, 36.4% male, underwent post-TAVI PPMI (6 after discharge). Previous conduction disturbances were present in 50 (56.8%) patients and 25 (28.4%) had RBBB. 83% were submitted to self-expandable TAVI. Forty-two patients (47.7%) had persistent intra-procedure H-AVB (Group A) whereas 52.3% had post-procedure H-AVB (Group B). In patients with persistent intra procedure H-AVB previous RBBB was significantly more frequent (45.2%, n=19) when compared to patients with post-procedure H-AVB (13%, n=6; p=0.001). Contrarily, AF and previous left-bundle branch block (LBBB) were more likely in Group B. No difference in valvular calcification, MS length, prosthesis type or implantation technique was noted (picture 1). In the group with post-procedure H-AVB, 21.7% had transient AVB during TAVI and all developed de novo LBBB or first-degree AVB post-TAVI. Among these, 33 patients (71.7%) developed delayed H-AVB (&gt;48h post-procedure) while the remaining presented earlier. Conclusions In patients with PPMI post-TAVI, those with persistent intra-procedure H-AVB had higher rates of previous RBBB, while those with post-procedure H-AVB frequently had a normal baseline ECG. Anatomical and procedural characteristics did not differ between groups. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>European heart journal, 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1)</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felix Oliveira, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campante Teles, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gama, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmo, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Araujo Goncalves, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavaco, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa Almeida, M</creatorcontrib><title>The timing and mechanism of high-grade AV block post-TAVI: knowing your enemy</title><title>European heart journal</title><description>Abstract Background Complete atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) is still a major limitation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. Although right-bundle branch block (RBBB), membranous septum (MS) length and self-expandable prothesis are recognizable risk factors, their predictability to PPMI is far from satisfactory. While some patients develop persistent intra-procedure high-grade AVB (H-AVB), others present much later with severe bradycardia. Purpose This study aims to describe and compare the characteristics of patients who develop AVB during or after TAVI. Methods Single centre prospective registry of 506 consecutive patients submitted to TAVI with no previous pacemaker between 2017 and 2020. Post-procedure PPMI (up to 30 days after discharge) was studied and divided into two groups according to the development of persistent intra-procedure H-AVB (Group A) or post procedure H-AVB (Group B). Baseline ECG, computed tomography and TAVI-related characteristics were analyzed. Results A total of 88 patients (17,3%), aging 83±6 years, 36.4% male, underwent post-TAVI PPMI (6 after discharge). Previous conduction disturbances were present in 50 (56.8%) patients and 25 (28.4%) had RBBB. 83% were submitted to self-expandable TAVI. Forty-two patients (47.7%) had persistent intra-procedure H-AVB (Group A) whereas 52.3% had post-procedure H-AVB (Group B). In patients with persistent intra procedure H-AVB previous RBBB was significantly more frequent (45.2%, n=19) when compared to patients with post-procedure H-AVB (13%, n=6; p=0.001). Contrarily, AF and previous left-bundle branch block (LBBB) were more likely in Group B. No difference in valvular calcification, MS length, prosthesis type or implantation technique was noted (picture 1). In the group with post-procedure H-AVB, 21.7% had transient AVB during TAVI and all developed de novo LBBB or first-degree AVB post-TAVI. Among these, 33 patients (71.7%) developed delayed H-AVB (&gt;48h post-procedure) while the remaining presented earlier. Conclusions In patients with PPMI post-TAVI, those with persistent intra-procedure H-AVB had higher rates of previous RBBB, while those with post-procedure H-AVB frequently had a normal baseline ECG. Anatomical and procedural characteristics did not differ between groups. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.</description><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0M1OAjEYheHGaCKit2B6A4V-nZmvU3eE-EOCcYPE3aTTH2aAmZIWYrh7JRDXrs7qOYuXkEfgI-AqG7tDbJyO-_XYNbqWIh8JKPGKDKAQginMi2sy4KAKhlh-3ZK7lNac8xIBB-R90Ti6b7u2X1HdW9o50-i-TR0NnjbtqmGrqK2jkyWtt8Fs6C6kPVtMlrMnuunD98kdwyFS17vueE9uvN4m93DZIfl8eV5M39j843U2ncyZgUwiK7VCLnMNLgNZF5rLQoka0YD3wloPCpXOwSsAKQUit1Z5bowpMmtA2mxI8PxrYkgpOl_tYtvpeKyAV6co1V-U6hKlOkX5hXCG4bD7r_kBBu1pxw</recordid><startdate>20211012</startdate><enddate>20211012</enddate><creator>Gomes, D</creator><creator>Felix Oliveira, A</creator><creator>Campante Teles, R</creator><creator>Gama, F</creator><creator>Carmo, P</creator><creator>Brito, J</creator><creator>De Araujo Goncalves, P</creator><creator>Cavaco, D</creator><creator>Sousa Almeida, M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211012</creationdate><title>The timing and mechanism of high-grade AV block post-TAVI: knowing your enemy</title><author>Gomes, D ; Felix Oliveira, A ; Campante Teles, R ; Gama, F ; Carmo, P ; Brito, J ; De Araujo Goncalves, P ; Cavaco, D ; Sousa Almeida, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1376-8a96074a1e317b5a07592b66c1ff2ddf1969a41f911772660dd9f0ccc53dc17d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felix Oliveira, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campante Teles, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gama, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmo, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Araujo Goncalves, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavaco, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa Almeida, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes, D</au><au>Felix Oliveira, A</au><au>Campante Teles, R</au><au>Gama, F</au><au>Carmo, P</au><au>Brito, J</au><au>De Araujo Goncalves, P</au><au>Cavaco, D</au><au>Sousa Almeida, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The timing and mechanism of high-grade AV block post-TAVI: knowing your enemy</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><date>2021-10-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Complete atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) is still a major limitation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. Although right-bundle branch block (RBBB), membranous septum (MS) length and self-expandable prothesis are recognizable risk factors, their predictability to PPMI is far from satisfactory. While some patients develop persistent intra-procedure high-grade AVB (H-AVB), others present much later with severe bradycardia. Purpose This study aims to describe and compare the characteristics of patients who develop AVB during or after TAVI. Methods Single centre prospective registry of 506 consecutive patients submitted to TAVI with no previous pacemaker between 2017 and 2020. Post-procedure PPMI (up to 30 days after discharge) was studied and divided into two groups according to the development of persistent intra-procedure H-AVB (Group A) or post procedure H-AVB (Group B). Baseline ECG, computed tomography and TAVI-related characteristics were analyzed. Results A total of 88 patients (17,3%), aging 83±6 years, 36.4% male, underwent post-TAVI PPMI (6 after discharge). Previous conduction disturbances were present in 50 (56.8%) patients and 25 (28.4%) had RBBB. 83% were submitted to self-expandable TAVI. Forty-two patients (47.7%) had persistent intra-procedure H-AVB (Group A) whereas 52.3% had post-procedure H-AVB (Group B). In patients with persistent intra procedure H-AVB previous RBBB was significantly more frequent (45.2%, n=19) when compared to patients with post-procedure H-AVB (13%, n=6; p=0.001). Contrarily, AF and previous left-bundle branch block (LBBB) were more likely in Group B. No difference in valvular calcification, MS length, prosthesis type or implantation technique was noted (picture 1). In the group with post-procedure H-AVB, 21.7% had transient AVB during TAVI and all developed de novo LBBB or first-degree AVB post-TAVI. Among these, 33 patients (71.7%) developed delayed H-AVB (&gt;48h post-procedure) while the remaining presented earlier. Conclusions In patients with PPMI post-TAVI, those with persistent intra-procedure H-AVB had higher rates of previous RBBB, while those with post-procedure H-AVB frequently had a normal baseline ECG. Anatomical and procedural characteristics did not differ between groups. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2186</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-668X
ispartof European heart journal, 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1)
issn 0195-668X
1522-9645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehab724_2186
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title The timing and mechanism of high-grade AV block post-TAVI: knowing your enemy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20timing%20and%20mechanism%20of%20high-grade%20AV%20block%20post-TAVI:%20knowing%20your%20enemy&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Gomes,%20D&rft.date=2021-10-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2186&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2186%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2186&rfr_iscdi=true