Percutaneous bioprosthetic aortic valve durability: results a single center after ten years of follow-up ago

Abstract   The durability of transcatheter heart valves and long-term clinical outcomes are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and hemodynamic outcomes 10 years after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Methods Between April 2008 and December 2011, 230 patients under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Munoz-Garcia, M, Munoz-Garcia, E, Munoz Garcia, A J, Dominguez-Franco, A J, Alonso-Briales, J H, Jimenez-Navarro, M F, Hernandez-Garcia, J M, Gomez-Doblas, J J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page
container_title European heart journal
container_volume 42
creator Munoz-Garcia, M
Munoz-Garcia, E
Munoz Garcia, A J
Dominguez-Franco, A J
Alonso-Briales, J H
Jimenez-Navarro, M F
Hernandez-Garcia, J M
Gomez-Doblas, J J
description Abstract   The durability of transcatheter heart valves and long-term clinical outcomes are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and hemodynamic outcomes 10 years after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Methods Between April 2008 and December 2011, 230 patients underwent TAVI for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with the auto-expandable prosthesis. Results The mean age, logistic EuroSCORE and STS score were 79.3±6.4 years, 19.8±13% and 6.8±5% respectively. Mean aortic valve gradient decreased from 49.8±15 mm Hg to 8.6±3.8 mmHg after TAVI, to 11.1±9 mm Hg at 5 years, and 25.7±12 mmHg at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.03). Mean aortic valve area increased from 0.63±0.16 cm2 to 1.57±0.3cm2 after TAVI to 1.48±0.2 at 5 years and 0.87±0.3 cm2 at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.01). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 61.1±15% to 65.5±11% after TAVI, to 58.2±17% at 5 years and 57.2±8% at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.001). The total mortality after a mean of 53±34 months was 73% and 34.4% was cardiovascular mortality. Survival rates at 1 to 10 years were at 86%, 75.4%, 64.9%, 59.6%, 52.6%, 33.1%, 24.9%, 20.7%, 10.4% and 10.4% respectively. Only 4 patients had severe prosthetic valve dysfunction (severe stenosis and moderate-severe transvalvular regurgitation). Median survival time after TAVI was 6 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.89 to 6.28), and the risk of death was significantly increased in patients with frailty (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.874; 95% CI: 1.028 to 3.418), p=0.040, Charlson index [HR=1.212 (95% CI: 1.094–1.341), p
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1575
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehab724_1575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1575</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1375-9343d5fc9978580f0f3bfe596bed8be2f4d41cca2df9c120f86f55e423f7da483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KAzEUhYMoWH9eQfIC0yaZJJO4k-IfFHSh4G7IZG7aKXEyJJlK394OLa7dnLP6Lvd8CN1RMqdElwsY4wZMzNsFbExTMT6nohJnaEYFY4WWXJyjGaFaFFKqr0t0ldKWEKIklTPk3yHaMZsewphw04UhhpQ3kDuLTYhT7YzfAW7HaJrOd3l_jyOk0eeEDU5dv_aALfQZIjZuygw93h8eSjg47IL34acYB2zW4QZdOOMT3J76Gn0-PX4sX4rV2_Pr8mFVWFpWotAlL1vhrNaVEoo44srGgdCygVY1wBxvObXWsNZpSxlxSjohgLPSVa3hqrxG8njXHsakCK4eYvdt4r6mpJ6c1X_O6pOzenJ2AOkRDOPwX-YXhjN4NA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous bioprosthetic aortic valve durability: results a single center after ten years of follow-up ago</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Munoz-Garcia, M ; Munoz-Garcia, E ; Munoz Garcia, A J ; Dominguez-Franco, A J ; Alonso-Briales, J H ; Jimenez-Navarro, M F ; Hernandez-Garcia, J M ; Gomez-Doblas, J J</creator><creatorcontrib>Munoz-Garcia, M ; Munoz-Garcia, E ; Munoz Garcia, A J ; Dominguez-Franco, A J ; Alonso-Briales, J H ; Jimenez-Navarro, M F ; Hernandez-Garcia, J M ; Gomez-Doblas, J J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract   The durability of transcatheter heart valves and long-term clinical outcomes are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and hemodynamic outcomes 10 years after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Methods Between April 2008 and December 2011, 230 patients underwent TAVI for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with the auto-expandable prosthesis. Results The mean age, logistic EuroSCORE and STS score were 79.3±6.4 years, 19.8±13% and 6.8±5% respectively. Mean aortic valve gradient decreased from 49.8±15 mm Hg to 8.6±3.8 mmHg after TAVI, to 11.1±9 mm Hg at 5 years, and 25.7±12 mmHg at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.03). Mean aortic valve area increased from 0.63±0.16 cm2 to 1.57±0.3cm2 after TAVI to 1.48±0.2 at 5 years and 0.87±0.3 cm2 at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.01). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 61.1±15% to 65.5±11% after TAVI, to 58.2±17% at 5 years and 57.2±8% at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.001). The total mortality after a mean of 53±34 months was 73% and 34.4% was cardiovascular mortality. Survival rates at 1 to 10 years were at 86%, 75.4%, 64.9%, 59.6%, 52.6%, 33.1%, 24.9%, 20.7%, 10.4% and 10.4% respectively. Only 4 patients had severe prosthetic valve dysfunction (severe stenosis and moderate-severe transvalvular regurgitation). Median survival time after TAVI was 6 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.89 to 6.28), and the risk of death was significantly increased in patients with frailty (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.874; 95% CI: 1.028 to 3.418), p=0.040, Charlson index [HR=1.212 (95% CI: 1.094–1.341), p&lt;0.001], and age [HR=1.03; (95% CI: 1.001–1.062), p=0.049]. Conclusions In our center, the transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at high surgical risk, presented favourable clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance after ten years of follow-up. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>European heart journal, 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1)</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munoz-Garcia, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munoz-Garcia, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munoz Garcia, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez-Franco, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Briales, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Navarro, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Garcia, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Doblas, J J</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous bioprosthetic aortic valve durability: results a single center after ten years of follow-up ago</title><title>European heart journal</title><description>Abstract   The durability of transcatheter heart valves and long-term clinical outcomes are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and hemodynamic outcomes 10 years after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Methods Between April 2008 and December 2011, 230 patients underwent TAVI for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with the auto-expandable prosthesis. Results The mean age, logistic EuroSCORE and STS score were 79.3±6.4 years, 19.8±13% and 6.8±5% respectively. Mean aortic valve gradient decreased from 49.8±15 mm Hg to 8.6±3.8 mmHg after TAVI, to 11.1±9 mm Hg at 5 years, and 25.7±12 mmHg at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.03). Mean aortic valve area increased from 0.63±0.16 cm2 to 1.57±0.3cm2 after TAVI to 1.48±0.2 at 5 years and 0.87±0.3 cm2 at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.01). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 61.1±15% to 65.5±11% after TAVI, to 58.2±17% at 5 years and 57.2±8% at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.001). The total mortality after a mean of 53±34 months was 73% and 34.4% was cardiovascular mortality. Survival rates at 1 to 10 years were at 86%, 75.4%, 64.9%, 59.6%, 52.6%, 33.1%, 24.9%, 20.7%, 10.4% and 10.4% respectively. Only 4 patients had severe prosthetic valve dysfunction (severe stenosis and moderate-severe transvalvular regurgitation). Median survival time after TAVI was 6 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.89 to 6.28), and the risk of death was significantly increased in patients with frailty (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.874; 95% CI: 1.028 to 3.418), p=0.040, Charlson index [HR=1.212 (95% CI: 1.094–1.341), p&lt;0.001], and age [HR=1.03; (95% CI: 1.001–1.062), p=0.049]. Conclusions In our center, the transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at high surgical risk, presented favourable clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance after ten years of follow-up. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.</description><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1KAzEUhYMoWH9eQfIC0yaZJJO4k-IfFHSh4G7IZG7aKXEyJJlK394OLa7dnLP6Lvd8CN1RMqdElwsY4wZMzNsFbExTMT6nohJnaEYFY4WWXJyjGaFaFFKqr0t0ldKWEKIklTPk3yHaMZsewphw04UhhpQ3kDuLTYhT7YzfAW7HaJrOd3l_jyOk0eeEDU5dv_aALfQZIjZuygw93h8eSjg47IL34acYB2zW4QZdOOMT3J76Gn0-PX4sX4rV2_Pr8mFVWFpWotAlL1vhrNaVEoo44srGgdCygVY1wBxvObXWsNZpSxlxSjohgLPSVa3hqrxG8njXHsakCK4eYvdt4r6mpJ6c1X_O6pOzenJ2AOkRDOPwX-YXhjN4NA</recordid><startdate>20211012</startdate><enddate>20211012</enddate><creator>Munoz-Garcia, M</creator><creator>Munoz-Garcia, E</creator><creator>Munoz Garcia, A J</creator><creator>Dominguez-Franco, A J</creator><creator>Alonso-Briales, J H</creator><creator>Jimenez-Navarro, M F</creator><creator>Hernandez-Garcia, J M</creator><creator>Gomez-Doblas, J J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211012</creationdate><title>Percutaneous bioprosthetic aortic valve durability: results a single center after ten years of follow-up ago</title><author>Munoz-Garcia, M ; Munoz-Garcia, E ; Munoz Garcia, A J ; Dominguez-Franco, A J ; Alonso-Briales, J H ; Jimenez-Navarro, M F ; Hernandez-Garcia, J M ; Gomez-Doblas, J J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1375-9343d5fc9978580f0f3bfe596bed8be2f4d41cca2df9c120f86f55e423f7da483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munoz-Garcia, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munoz-Garcia, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munoz Garcia, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez-Franco, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Briales, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Navarro, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Garcia, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Doblas, J J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munoz-Garcia, M</au><au>Munoz-Garcia, E</au><au>Munoz Garcia, A J</au><au>Dominguez-Franco, A J</au><au>Alonso-Briales, J H</au><au>Jimenez-Navarro, M F</au><au>Hernandez-Garcia, J M</au><au>Gomez-Doblas, J J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous bioprosthetic aortic valve durability: results a single center after ten years of follow-up ago</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><date>2021-10-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>Abstract   The durability of transcatheter heart valves and long-term clinical outcomes are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and hemodynamic outcomes 10 years after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Methods Between April 2008 and December 2011, 230 patients underwent TAVI for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with the auto-expandable prosthesis. Results The mean age, logistic EuroSCORE and STS score were 79.3±6.4 years, 19.8±13% and 6.8±5% respectively. Mean aortic valve gradient decreased from 49.8±15 mm Hg to 8.6±3.8 mmHg after TAVI, to 11.1±9 mm Hg at 5 years, and 25.7±12 mmHg at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.03). Mean aortic valve area increased from 0.63±0.16 cm2 to 1.57±0.3cm2 after TAVI to 1.48±0.2 at 5 years and 0.87±0.3 cm2 at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.01). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 61.1±15% to 65.5±11% after TAVI, to 58.2±17% at 5 years and 57.2±8% at 7 years (p for post-TAVI trend 0.001). The total mortality after a mean of 53±34 months was 73% and 34.4% was cardiovascular mortality. Survival rates at 1 to 10 years were at 86%, 75.4%, 64.9%, 59.6%, 52.6%, 33.1%, 24.9%, 20.7%, 10.4% and 10.4% respectively. Only 4 patients had severe prosthetic valve dysfunction (severe stenosis and moderate-severe transvalvular regurgitation). Median survival time after TAVI was 6 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.89 to 6.28), and the risk of death was significantly increased in patients with frailty (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.874; 95% CI: 1.028 to 3.418), p=0.040, Charlson index [HR=1.212 (95% CI: 1.094–1.341), p&lt;0.001], and age [HR=1.03; (95% CI: 1.001–1.062), p=0.049]. Conclusions In our center, the transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at high surgical risk, presented favourable clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance after ten years of follow-up. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1575</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-668X
ispartof European heart journal, 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1)
issn 0195-668X
1522-9645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehab724_1575
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Percutaneous bioprosthetic aortic valve durability: results a single center after ten years of follow-up ago
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T02%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20bioprosthetic%20aortic%20valve%20durability:%20results%20a%20single%20center%20after%20ten%20years%20of%20follow-up%20ago&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Munoz-Garcia,%20M&rft.date=2021-10-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1575&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1575%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1575&rfr_iscdi=true