Direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Meta-analysis, includes all published trials

Abstract Introduction Warfarin, despite its limitations, is still used as standard treatment in patients with Atrial Fibrillation, but it has been demonstrated that Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) offer many advantages over warfarin in the prevention of strokes. Purpose The goal was to determinate the safety and effectiveness in reducing systemic thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage and cardiovascular mortalityof the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, conducting an analysis of the studies of DOACs, including the ENGAGE study on the use of edoxaban, affirming its safety including the pivotal essays available. Method A systematic search of PubMed's bibliographic database was made for the selection of the articles.Clinical essays from less than 10 years, in phase III and multicentric studies were selected. Results The main objective was the significant reduction in the incidence of stroke/systemic thromboembolism with the use of DOACs vs. Warfarin (2,73% vs. 3,24%), the reduction of hemorrhagic stroke was (0.41% vs. 0.94%), ischemic stroke (3.12% vs. 3.5%), cardiovascular death with DOACs was 6.02% vs. Warfarin 6.84%, (compared with previous studies that demonstrated effectiveness with max doses affirming safety and effectiveness). Conclusion Our meta-analysis is the first to date to evaluate all the pivotal trials published,we include the ENGAGE trial. In non-valvular atrial fibrillation, the use of DOACs, in comparison with Warfarin, significantly reduced the risk of stroke/systemic thromboembolism by 16.3%, ischemic stroke by 11.1%, hemorrhagic stroke by 54.6%, cardiovascular mortality by 12.9%. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.