Did Alexander Utendal really compose the motet Angelus Domini a23 in A-Wn, HAN Cod. 9814?

The collection HAN Cod. 9814 in the Austrian National Library contains the motet Angelus Domini a23 attributed to the composer Alexander Utendal (after 1530–1581), copied by the scribe Georg Khues (fl.1579–1621) apparently as a gift for Emperor Matthias (1557–1619) on his 60th birthday on 24 Februar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Early music 2024-09, Vol.52 (1), p.49-61
1. Verfasser: Rainer, Bernhard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title Early music
container_volume 52
creator Rainer, Bernhard
description The collection HAN Cod. 9814 in the Austrian National Library contains the motet Angelus Domini a23 attributed to the composer Alexander Utendal (after 1530–1581), copied by the scribe Georg Khues (fl.1579–1621) apparently as a gift for Emperor Matthias (1557–1619) on his 60th birthday on 24 February 1617. Although the very unusual scoring of the composition, with 23 voices in four choirs, immediately raises doubts, the attribution of the work to Utendal has not been questioned in the literature so far. After a thorough compositional and textual analysis, the present study will suggest that Angelus Domini was not written by Utendal, but by a representative of the Venetian polychoral school around 1600. Furthermore, the compositional device of two low voices in unison in tutti sections, used in Angelus Dominus a23, is taken as a reference point to place the motet in the vicinity of similar works known to have been written by composers active at the court of Ferdinand II (1578–1637) in Graz.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/em/caae002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_em_caae002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_em_caae002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c120t-87db401ee71e4d6d69a1a44bff6cc19c0c85e4ec4088a1d42cb589f9e9e9deab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1Lw0AUABdRMFYv_oJ3Frd9L9lmNycJabVC0YtFPIXN7otG8lGyEey_V7HMYW5zGCGuCeeEWbLgbuGsZcT4RESkFUkdp3gqIkwwlYTanIuLED4RkWKNkXhbNR7ylr9t73mE3cS9ty2MbNv2AG7o9kNgmD4YumHiCfL-nduvAKuha_oGbJxA00MuX_tb2ORPUAx-DpkhdXcpzmrbBr46eiZ29-uXYiO3zw-PRb6VjmKcpNG-UkjMmlj51KeZJatUVdepc5Q5dGbJip1CYyx5FbtqabI641882yqZiZv_rhuHEEauy_3YdHY8lITl35SSu_I4JfkB011UMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Did Alexander Utendal really compose the motet Angelus Domini a23 in A-Wn, HAN Cod. 9814?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Rainer, Bernhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Rainer, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><description>The collection HAN Cod. 9814 in the Austrian National Library contains the motet Angelus Domini a23 attributed to the composer Alexander Utendal (after 1530–1581), copied by the scribe Georg Khues (fl.1579–1621) apparently as a gift for Emperor Matthias (1557–1619) on his 60th birthday on 24 February 1617. Although the very unusual scoring of the composition, with 23 voices in four choirs, immediately raises doubts, the attribution of the work to Utendal has not been questioned in the literature so far. After a thorough compositional and textual analysis, the present study will suggest that Angelus Domini was not written by Utendal, but by a representative of the Venetian polychoral school around 1600. Furthermore, the compositional device of two low voices in unison in tutti sections, used in Angelus Dominus a23, is taken as a reference point to place the motet in the vicinity of similar works known to have been written by composers active at the court of Ferdinand II (1578–1637) in Graz.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-7260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/em/caae002</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Early music, 2024-09, Vol.52 (1), p.49-61</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-0596-9382</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rainer, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><title>Did Alexander Utendal really compose the motet Angelus Domini a23 in A-Wn, HAN Cod. 9814?</title><title>Early music</title><description>The collection HAN Cod. 9814 in the Austrian National Library contains the motet Angelus Domini a23 attributed to the composer Alexander Utendal (after 1530–1581), copied by the scribe Georg Khues (fl.1579–1621) apparently as a gift for Emperor Matthias (1557–1619) on his 60th birthday on 24 February 1617. Although the very unusual scoring of the composition, with 23 voices in four choirs, immediately raises doubts, the attribution of the work to Utendal has not been questioned in the literature so far. After a thorough compositional and textual analysis, the present study will suggest that Angelus Domini was not written by Utendal, but by a representative of the Venetian polychoral school around 1600. Furthermore, the compositional device of two low voices in unison in tutti sections, used in Angelus Dominus a23, is taken as a reference point to place the motet in the vicinity of similar works known to have been written by composers active at the court of Ferdinand II (1578–1637) in Graz.</description><issn>0306-1078</issn><issn>1741-7260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1Lw0AUABdRMFYv_oJ3Frd9L9lmNycJabVC0YtFPIXN7otG8lGyEey_V7HMYW5zGCGuCeeEWbLgbuGsZcT4RESkFUkdp3gqIkwwlYTanIuLED4RkWKNkXhbNR7ylr9t73mE3cS9ty2MbNv2AG7o9kNgmD4YumHiCfL-nduvAKuha_oGbJxA00MuX_tb2ORPUAx-DpkhdXcpzmrbBr46eiZ29-uXYiO3zw-PRb6VjmKcpNG-UkjMmlj51KeZJatUVdepc5Q5dGbJip1CYyx5FbtqabI641882yqZiZv_rhuHEEauy_3YdHY8lITl35SSu_I4JfkB011UMA</recordid><startdate>20240903</startdate><enddate>20240903</enddate><creator>Rainer, Bernhard</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0596-9382</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240903</creationdate><title>Did Alexander Utendal really compose the motet Angelus Domini a23 in A-Wn, HAN Cod. 9814?</title><author>Rainer, Bernhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c120t-87db401ee71e4d6d69a1a44bff6cc19c0c85e4ec4088a1d42cb589f9e9e9deab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rainer, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Early music</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rainer, Bernhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Did Alexander Utendal really compose the motet Angelus Domini a23 in A-Wn, HAN Cod. 9814?</atitle><jtitle>Early music</jtitle><date>2024-09-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>49-61</pages><issn>0306-1078</issn><eissn>1741-7260</eissn><abstract>The collection HAN Cod. 9814 in the Austrian National Library contains the motet Angelus Domini a23 attributed to the composer Alexander Utendal (after 1530–1581), copied by the scribe Georg Khues (fl.1579–1621) apparently as a gift for Emperor Matthias (1557–1619) on his 60th birthday on 24 February 1617. Although the very unusual scoring of the composition, with 23 voices in four choirs, immediately raises doubts, the attribution of the work to Utendal has not been questioned in the literature so far. After a thorough compositional and textual analysis, the present study will suggest that Angelus Domini was not written by Utendal, but by a representative of the Venetian polychoral school around 1600. Furthermore, the compositional device of two low voices in unison in tutti sections, used in Angelus Dominus a23, is taken as a reference point to place the motet in the vicinity of similar works known to have been written by composers active at the court of Ferdinand II (1578–1637) in Graz.</abstract><doi>10.1093/em/caae002</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0596-9382</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-1078
ispartof Early music, 2024-09, Vol.52 (1), p.49-61
issn 0306-1078
1741-7260
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_em_caae002
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Did Alexander Utendal really compose the motet Angelus Domini a23 in A-Wn, HAN Cod. 9814?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A26%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Did%20Alexander%20Utendal%20really%20compose%20the%20motet%20Angelus%20Domini%20a23%20in%20A-Wn,%20HAN%20Cod.%209814?&rft.jtitle=Early%20music&rft.au=Rainer,%20Bernhard&rft.date=2024-09-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=49-61&rft.issn=0306-1078&rft.eissn=1741-7260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/em/caae002&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_em_caae002%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true