How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60
Abstract Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important finding...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Economic journal (London) 2022-10, Vol.132 (647), p.2366-2391 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2391 |
---|---|
container_issue | 647 |
container_start_page | 2366 |
container_title | The Economic journal (London) |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Geloso, Vincent J Magness, Phillip Moore, John Schlosser, Philip |
description | Abstract
Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during World War II was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than World War II, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to re-evaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘great levelling’, as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ej/ueac020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ej_ueac020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ej/ueac020</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ej/ueac020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1768f69edcdddb16aeb92dc310a9859c40766cacf09ebfc05566e877784dd5bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsbnyAbN-LYm_nJJCuRorZQUNSuXAyZ5I6mtJM6yVS68x18Q5_EkSm488DlLO53zuIQcsrgkoFMRrgYtag0xLBHBizlIoJY5vtkAMCSqLvkkBx5v4BOcZIOyMvEfdCHxtWurTUaaj0Nb0jn0bhtNnhFH3FjvQ22fqXTWrsVdobvrVrasKW27uHahi76FFRAf0GZZPn35xeHY3JQqaXHk50Pyfz25nk8iWb3d9Px9SzSCZMhYjkXFZdotDGmZFxhKWPT_UBJkUmdQs65VroCiWWlIcs4R5HnuUiNyUqTDMl536sb532DVbFu7Eo124JB8TtLgYtiN0sH0x5G7Wrr_1DBZJLGqUg75KxHXLv-r-oH-Gltyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Geloso, Vincent J ; Magness, Phillip ; Moore, John ; Schlosser, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Geloso, Vincent J ; Magness, Phillip ; Moore, John ; Schlosser, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during World War II was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than World War II, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to re-evaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘great levelling’, as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ej/ueac020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Economic journal (London), 2022-10, Vol.132 (647), p.2366-2391</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Economic Society. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1768f69edcdddb16aeb92dc310a9859c40766cacf09ebfc05566e877784dd5bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1768f69edcdddb16aeb92dc310a9859c40766cacf09ebfc05566e877784dd5bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geloso, Vincent J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magness, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlosser, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60</title><title>The Economic journal (London)</title><description>Abstract
Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during World War II was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than World War II, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to re-evaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘great levelling’, as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.</description><issn>0013-0133</issn><issn>1468-0297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsbnyAbN-LYm_nJJCuRorZQUNSuXAyZ5I6mtJM6yVS68x18Q5_EkSm488DlLO53zuIQcsrgkoFMRrgYtag0xLBHBizlIoJY5vtkAMCSqLvkkBx5v4BOcZIOyMvEfdCHxtWurTUaaj0Nb0jn0bhtNnhFH3FjvQ22fqXTWrsVdobvrVrasKW27uHahi76FFRAf0GZZPn35xeHY3JQqaXHk50Pyfz25nk8iWb3d9Px9SzSCZMhYjkXFZdotDGmZFxhKWPT_UBJkUmdQs65VroCiWWlIcs4R5HnuUiNyUqTDMl536sb532DVbFu7Eo124JB8TtLgYtiN0sH0x5G7Wrr_1DBZJLGqUg75KxHXLv-r-oH-Gltyg</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Geloso, Vincent J</creator><creator>Magness, Phillip</creator><creator>Moore, John</creator><creator>Schlosser, Philip</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60</title><author>Geloso, Vincent J ; Magness, Phillip ; Moore, John ; Schlosser, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1768f69edcdddb16aeb92dc310a9859c40766cacf09ebfc05566e877784dd5bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geloso, Vincent J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magness, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlosser, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geloso, Vincent J</au><au>Magness, Phillip</au><au>Moore, John</au><au>Schlosser, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60</atitle><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>647</issue><spage>2366</spage><epage>2391</epage><pages>2366-2391</pages><issn>0013-0133</issn><eissn>1468-0297</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during World War II was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than World War II, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to re-evaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘great levelling’, as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ej/ueac020</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-0133 |
ispartof | The Economic journal (London), 2022-10, Vol.132 (647), p.2366-2391 |
issn | 0013-0133 1468-0297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ej_ueac020 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Business Source Complete |
title | How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A49%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Pronounced%20is%20the%20U-Curve?%20Revisiting%20Income%20Inequality%20in%20the%20United%20States,%201917%E2%80%9360&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20journal%20(London)&rft.au=Geloso,%20Vincent%20J&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=647&rft.spage=2366&rft.epage=2391&rft.pages=2366-2391&rft.issn=0013-0133&rft.eissn=1468-0297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ej/ueac020&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ej/ueac020%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ej/ueac020&rfr_iscdi=true |