How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60

Abstract Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important finding...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Economic journal (London) 2022-10, Vol.132 (647), p.2366-2391
Hauptverfasser: Geloso, Vincent J, Magness, Phillip, Moore, John, Schlosser, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2391
container_issue 647
container_start_page 2366
container_title The Economic journal (London)
container_volume 132
creator Geloso, Vincent J
Magness, Phillip
Moore, John
Schlosser, Philip
description Abstract Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during World War II was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than World War II, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to re-evaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘great levelling’, as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ej/ueac020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ej_ueac020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ej/ueac020</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ej/ueac020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1768f69edcdddb16aeb92dc310a9859c40766cacf09ebfc05566e877784dd5bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsbnyAbN-LYm_nJJCuRorZQUNSuXAyZ5I6mtJM6yVS68x18Q5_EkSm488DlLO53zuIQcsrgkoFMRrgYtag0xLBHBizlIoJY5vtkAMCSqLvkkBx5v4BOcZIOyMvEfdCHxtWurTUaaj0Nb0jn0bhtNnhFH3FjvQ22fqXTWrsVdobvrVrasKW27uHahi76FFRAf0GZZPn35xeHY3JQqaXHk50Pyfz25nk8iWb3d9Px9SzSCZMhYjkXFZdotDGmZFxhKWPT_UBJkUmdQs65VroCiWWlIcs4R5HnuUiNyUqTDMl536sb532DVbFu7Eo124JB8TtLgYtiN0sH0x5G7Wrr_1DBZJLGqUg75KxHXLv-r-oH-Gltyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Geloso, Vincent J ; Magness, Phillip ; Moore, John ; Schlosser, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Geloso, Vincent J ; Magness, Phillip ; Moore, John ; Schlosser, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during World War II was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than World War II, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to re-evaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘great levelling’, as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ej/ueac020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Economic journal (London), 2022-10, Vol.132 (647), p.2366-2391</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Economic Society. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1768f69edcdddb16aeb92dc310a9859c40766cacf09ebfc05566e877784dd5bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1768f69edcdddb16aeb92dc310a9859c40766cacf09ebfc05566e877784dd5bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geloso, Vincent J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magness, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlosser, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60</title><title>The Economic journal (London)</title><description>Abstract Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during World War II was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than World War II, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to re-evaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘great levelling’, as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.</description><issn>0013-0133</issn><issn>1468-0297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsbnyAbN-LYm_nJJCuRorZQUNSuXAyZ5I6mtJM6yVS68x18Q5_EkSm488DlLO53zuIQcsrgkoFMRrgYtag0xLBHBizlIoJY5vtkAMCSqLvkkBx5v4BOcZIOyMvEfdCHxtWurTUaaj0Nb0jn0bhtNnhFH3FjvQ22fqXTWrsVdobvrVrasKW27uHahi76FFRAf0GZZPn35xeHY3JQqaXHk50Pyfz25nk8iWb3d9Px9SzSCZMhYjkXFZdotDGmZFxhKWPT_UBJkUmdQs65VroCiWWlIcs4R5HnuUiNyUqTDMl536sb532DVbFu7Eo124JB8TtLgYtiN0sH0x5G7Wrr_1DBZJLGqUg75KxHXLv-r-oH-Gltyg</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Geloso, Vincent J</creator><creator>Magness, Phillip</creator><creator>Moore, John</creator><creator>Schlosser, Philip</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60</title><author>Geloso, Vincent J ; Magness, Phillip ; Moore, John ; Schlosser, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1768f69edcdddb16aeb92dc310a9859c40766cacf09ebfc05566e877784dd5bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geloso, Vincent J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magness, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlosser, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geloso, Vincent J</au><au>Magness, Phillip</au><au>Moore, John</au><au>Schlosser, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60</atitle><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>647</issue><spage>2366</spage><epage>2391</epage><pages>2366-2391</pages><issn>0013-0133</issn><eissn>1468-0297</eissn><abstract>Abstract Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during World War II was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than World War II, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to re-evaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘great levelling’, as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ej/ueac020</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-0133
ispartof The Economic journal (London), 2022-10, Vol.132 (647), p.2366-2391
issn 0013-0133
1468-0297
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ej_ueac020
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Business Source Complete
title How Pronounced is the U-Curve? Revisiting Income Inequality in the United States, 1917–60
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A49%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Pronounced%20is%20the%20U-Curve?%20Revisiting%20Income%20Inequality%20in%20the%20United%20States,%201917%E2%80%9360&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20journal%20(London)&rft.au=Geloso,%20Vincent%20J&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=647&rft.spage=2366&rft.epage=2391&rft.pages=2366-2391&rft.issn=0013-0133&rft.eissn=1468-0297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ej/ueac020&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ej/ueac020%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ej/ueac020&rfr_iscdi=true