Differential impact of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory patterns on incident heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in late-life

Abstract Background Subclinical pulmonary dysfunction predicts cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, especially heart failure (HF). However, the impact of reduced percent predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) and forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FVC on different incident HF phenotypes in late-life...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Ramalho, S, Claggett, B.L, Kitzman, D.W, Chang, P.P, Cipriano Junior, G, Solomon, S.D, Skali, H, Shah, A.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page
container_title European heart journal
container_volume 41
creator Ramalho, S
Claggett, B.L
Kitzman, D.W
Chang, P.P
Cipriano Junior, G
Solomon, S.D
Skali, H
Shah, A.M
description Abstract Background Subclinical pulmonary dysfunction predicts cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, especially heart failure (HF). However, the impact of reduced percent predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) and forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FVC on different incident HF phenotypes in late-life is unclear. Purpose Determine the associations of FEV1/FVC and ppFVC with incident HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction in late-life. Methods In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities longitudinal cohort study, 3,854 HF-free participants who underwent echocardiography and spirometry at the fifth study visit (2011–2013). The relation between pulmonary function and incident adjudicated HFpEF and HFrEF were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographics, body mass index, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and NT-proBNP. Results Mean age was 75±5 years, 40% were male, 19% black, and 6% current smokers. Mean FEV1/FVC was 72±8, and ppFVC was 98±17%. At a median follow-up of 5.6 years, lower ppFVC was independently associated with incident HFpEF, but not HFrEF (Table). Lower FEV1/FVC ratio was associated with higher risk of incident HFrEF but not HFpEF in models adjusted for demographics, which did not persist after further adjustment for clinical risk factors. Conclusion The relationships of reduced ppFVC and FEV1/FVC with incident HF differ significantly by HF phenotype. Table 1. Lung dysfunction and incident HF Spirometry variable Outcomes Incident HFpEF (98 events) Incident HFrEF (76 events) HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value FEV1/FVC Model 1 1.18 (0.94–1.48) 0.15 1.34 (1.06–1.69) 0.01 Model 2 1.11 (0.87–1.42) 0.42 1.24 (0.97–1.56) 0.09 ppFVC Model 1 1.32 (1.15–1.51)
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3239
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ehjci_ehaa946_3239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3239</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c819-3da9d96ea6c5a221dde388c00595b6dff477077cdbd484b5de8e1c7a5b28dbd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVa-QIqdxE68ROVXqsSmC3bRxB6rrtIksp2iXoaz4hIOwGZm3sy8b_EIuedsxZkqHnC31y5VAFXKVZEX6oIsuMjzTMlSXJIF40pkUtaf1-QmhD1jrJZcLsj3k7MWPfbRQUfdYQQd6WDp0IboJx3dESn0hnpM2s36eP7uIA7-REeIEX0f6NBT12tn0o3uEHykFlw3eaRfLu7omADoj2iS24cpJKCZdJK4x0RNbuthHlxPExyzzlm8JVcWuoB3f31Jti_P2_Vbtvl4fV8_bjJdc5UVBpRREkFqAXnOjcGirjVjQolWGmvLqmJVpU1ryrpshcEaua5AtHmddqxYknzGaj-E4NE2o3cH8KeGs-YccPMbcPMXcHMOOJmy2TRM43_-fwBnLoay</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential impact of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory patterns on incident heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in late-life</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ramalho, S ; Claggett, B.L ; Kitzman, D.W ; Chang, P.P ; Cipriano Junior, G ; Solomon, S.D ; Skali, H ; Shah, A.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramalho, S ; Claggett, B.L ; Kitzman, D.W ; Chang, P.P ; Cipriano Junior, G ; Solomon, S.D ; Skali, H ; Shah, A.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Subclinical pulmonary dysfunction predicts cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, especially heart failure (HF). However, the impact of reduced percent predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) and forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FVC on different incident HF phenotypes in late-life is unclear. Purpose Determine the associations of FEV1/FVC and ppFVC with incident HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction in late-life. Methods In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities longitudinal cohort study, 3,854 HF-free participants who underwent echocardiography and spirometry at the fifth study visit (2011–2013). The relation between pulmonary function and incident adjudicated HFpEF and HFrEF were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographics, body mass index, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and NT-proBNP. Results Mean age was 75±5 years, 40% were male, 19% black, and 6% current smokers. Mean FEV1/FVC was 72±8, and ppFVC was 98±17%. At a median follow-up of 5.6 years, lower ppFVC was independently associated with incident HFpEF, but not HFrEF (Table). Lower FEV1/FVC ratio was associated with higher risk of incident HFrEF but not HFpEF in models adjusted for demographics, which did not persist after further adjustment for clinical risk factors. Conclusion The relationships of reduced ppFVC and FEV1/FVC with incident HF differ significantly by HF phenotype. Table 1. Lung dysfunction and incident HF Spirometry variable Outcomes Incident HFpEF (98 events) Incident HFrEF (76 events) HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value FEV1/FVC Model 1 1.18 (0.94–1.48) 0.15 1.34 (1.06–1.69) 0.01 Model 2 1.11 (0.87–1.42) 0.42 1.24 (0.97–1.56) 0.09 ppFVC Model 1 1.32 (1.15–1.51) &lt;0.001 1.00 (0.86–1.16) 0.96 Model 2 1.19 (1.03–1.39) 0.02 0.90 (0.76–1.05) 0.18 Legend: Hazard ratio (HR) is expressed per 10 units of the spirometry variable decrease. Model 1: adjusted for age, gender and race; Model 2: additionally adjusted for body mass index, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and log(NT-proBNP). Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>European heart journal, 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramalho, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claggett, B.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitzman, D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, P.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cipriano Junior, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, S.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skali, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, A.M</creatorcontrib><title>Differential impact of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory patterns on incident heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in late-life</title><title>European heart journal</title><description>Abstract Background Subclinical pulmonary dysfunction predicts cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, especially heart failure (HF). However, the impact of reduced percent predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) and forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FVC on different incident HF phenotypes in late-life is unclear. Purpose Determine the associations of FEV1/FVC and ppFVC with incident HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction in late-life. Methods In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities longitudinal cohort study, 3,854 HF-free participants who underwent echocardiography and spirometry at the fifth study visit (2011–2013). The relation between pulmonary function and incident adjudicated HFpEF and HFrEF were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographics, body mass index, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and NT-proBNP. Results Mean age was 75±5 years, 40% were male, 19% black, and 6% current smokers. Mean FEV1/FVC was 72±8, and ppFVC was 98±17%. At a median follow-up of 5.6 years, lower ppFVC was independently associated with incident HFpEF, but not HFrEF (Table). Lower FEV1/FVC ratio was associated with higher risk of incident HFrEF but not HFpEF in models adjusted for demographics, which did not persist after further adjustment for clinical risk factors. Conclusion The relationships of reduced ppFVC and FEV1/FVC with incident HF differ significantly by HF phenotype. Table 1. Lung dysfunction and incident HF Spirometry variable Outcomes Incident HFpEF (98 events) Incident HFrEF (76 events) HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value FEV1/FVC Model 1 1.18 (0.94–1.48) 0.15 1.34 (1.06–1.69) 0.01 Model 2 1.11 (0.87–1.42) 0.42 1.24 (0.97–1.56) 0.09 ppFVC Model 1 1.32 (1.15–1.51) &lt;0.001 1.00 (0.86–1.16) 0.96 Model 2 1.19 (1.03–1.39) 0.02 0.90 (0.76–1.05) 0.18 Legend: Hazard ratio (HR) is expressed per 10 units of the spirometry variable decrease. Model 1: adjusted for age, gender and race; Model 2: additionally adjusted for body mass index, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and log(NT-proBNP). Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services</description><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVa-QIqdxE68ROVXqsSmC3bRxB6rrtIksp2iXoaz4hIOwGZm3sy8b_EIuedsxZkqHnC31y5VAFXKVZEX6oIsuMjzTMlSXJIF40pkUtaf1-QmhD1jrJZcLsj3k7MWPfbRQUfdYQQd6WDp0IboJx3dESn0hnpM2s36eP7uIA7-REeIEX0f6NBT12tn0o3uEHykFlw3eaRfLu7omADoj2iS24cpJKCZdJK4x0RNbuthHlxPExyzzlm8JVcWuoB3f31Jti_P2_Vbtvl4fV8_bjJdc5UVBpRREkFqAXnOjcGirjVjQolWGmvLqmJVpU1ryrpshcEaua5AtHmddqxYknzGaj-E4NE2o3cH8KeGs-YccPMbcPMXcHMOOJmy2TRM43_-fwBnLoay</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Ramalho, S</creator><creator>Claggett, B.L</creator><creator>Kitzman, D.W</creator><creator>Chang, P.P</creator><creator>Cipriano Junior, G</creator><creator>Solomon, S.D</creator><creator>Skali, H</creator><creator>Shah, A.M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Differential impact of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory patterns on incident heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in late-life</title><author>Ramalho, S ; Claggett, B.L ; Kitzman, D.W ; Chang, P.P ; Cipriano Junior, G ; Solomon, S.D ; Skali, H ; Shah, A.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c819-3da9d96ea6c5a221dde388c00595b6dff477077cdbd484b5de8e1c7a5b28dbd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramalho, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claggett, B.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitzman, D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, P.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cipriano Junior, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, S.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skali, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, A.M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramalho, S</au><au>Claggett, B.L</au><au>Kitzman, D.W</au><au>Chang, P.P</au><au>Cipriano Junior, G</au><au>Solomon, S.D</au><au>Skali, H</au><au>Shah, A.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential impact of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory patterns on incident heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in late-life</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Subclinical pulmonary dysfunction predicts cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, especially heart failure (HF). However, the impact of reduced percent predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) and forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FVC on different incident HF phenotypes in late-life is unclear. Purpose Determine the associations of FEV1/FVC and ppFVC with incident HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction in late-life. Methods In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities longitudinal cohort study, 3,854 HF-free participants who underwent echocardiography and spirometry at the fifth study visit (2011–2013). The relation between pulmonary function and incident adjudicated HFpEF and HFrEF were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographics, body mass index, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and NT-proBNP. Results Mean age was 75±5 years, 40% were male, 19% black, and 6% current smokers. Mean FEV1/FVC was 72±8, and ppFVC was 98±17%. At a median follow-up of 5.6 years, lower ppFVC was independently associated with incident HFpEF, but not HFrEF (Table). Lower FEV1/FVC ratio was associated with higher risk of incident HFrEF but not HFpEF in models adjusted for demographics, which did not persist after further adjustment for clinical risk factors. Conclusion The relationships of reduced ppFVC and FEV1/FVC with incident HF differ significantly by HF phenotype. Table 1. Lung dysfunction and incident HF Spirometry variable Outcomes Incident HFpEF (98 events) Incident HFrEF (76 events) HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value FEV1/FVC Model 1 1.18 (0.94–1.48) 0.15 1.34 (1.06–1.69) 0.01 Model 2 1.11 (0.87–1.42) 0.42 1.24 (0.97–1.56) 0.09 ppFVC Model 1 1.32 (1.15–1.51) &lt;0.001 1.00 (0.86–1.16) 0.96 Model 2 1.19 (1.03–1.39) 0.02 0.90 (0.76–1.05) 0.18 Legend: Hazard ratio (HR) is expressed per 10 units of the spirometry variable decrease. Model 1: adjusted for age, gender and race; Model 2: additionally adjusted for body mass index, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and log(NT-proBNP). Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3239</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-668X
ispartof European heart journal, 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)
issn 0195-668X
1522-9645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ehjci_ehaa946_3239
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Differential impact of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory patterns on incident heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in late-life
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A47%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20impact%20of%20obstructive%20and%20restrictive%20ventilatory%20patterns%20on%20incident%20heart%20failure%20with%20preserved%20versus%20reduced%20ejection%20fraction%20in%20late-life&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Ramalho,%20S&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3239&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3239%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3239&rfr_iscdi=true