Long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of off-pump strategy

Long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of off-pump strategy

Abstract Background The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Barili, F, D'Errigo, P, Rosato, S, Grossi, C, D'Ovidio, M, Pagano, E, Seccareccia, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page
container_title European heart journal
container_volume 41
creator Barili, F
D'Errigo, P
Rosato, S
Grossi, C
D'Ovidio, M
Pagano, E
Seccareccia, F
description Abstract Background The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002–2004 and 2007–2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze outcomes. Results The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB) that were divided into development and validation datasets. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 7.6–10 years) and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, nonetheless the adjustment did not confirm OPCAB as a risk factor for mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85–1.03, p=0.19). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACE at 10 years (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23, p=0.001). Inside the MACEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI), (adjusted HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16–1.53, p
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2674
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ehjci_ehaa946_2674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2674</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c814-321b6bc82f79e8d987734e5851ecd24a9e242eb02adfae9acf676f12ceb6cb7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFKxDAURYMoOI7-gKv8QMYkTdPEnQzqCAU3sxBclDR96XRom5K0SP_ejjMfIDzeW7x7L5eD0COjG0Z18gSHo22WbYwWcsNlJq7QiqWcEy1Feo1WlOmUSKm-btFdjEdKqZJMrtB37vuajBA67KfR-g4idr5t_U_T19j64HsTZmzCIplxOQ8mRlwH48bl_4zHA-DgW8DeLePIMHUDjmMwI9TzPbpxpo3wcLlrtH973W93JP98_9i-5MQqJkjCWSlLq7jLNKhKqyxLBKQqZWArLowGLjiUlJvKGdDGOplJx7iFUtoys8ka8XOsDT7GAK4YQtMtrQtGixOd4o9OcaFTnOgsJnI2-Wn4j_4XA0tslw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of off-pump strategy</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Barili, F ; D'Errigo, P ; Rosato, S ; Grossi, C ; D'Ovidio, M ; Pagano, E ; Seccareccia, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Barili, F ; D'Errigo, P ; Rosato, S ; Grossi, C ; D'Ovidio, M ; Pagano, E ; Seccareccia, F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002–2004 and 2007–2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze outcomes. Results The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB) that were divided into development and validation datasets. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 7.6–10 years) and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, nonetheless the adjustment did not confirm OPCAB as a risk factor for mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85–1.03, p=0.19). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACE at 10 years (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23, p=0.001). Inside the MACEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI), (adjusted HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16–1.53, p&lt;0.001), demonstrating to be an independent risk factor for PCI with an hazard that is 33% higher than on-pump CABG. Conclusions OPCAB did not affect long-term mortality but is associated with an increased long-term risk of repeat PCI. These findings may have important implications towards health resources allocation, particularly in a climate of cost containment of healthcare expenditures. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Minister of Health</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>European heart journal, 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barili, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Errigo, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosato, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Ovidio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagano, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seccareccia, F</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of off-pump strategy</title><title>European heart journal</title><description>Abstract Background The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002–2004 and 2007–2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze outcomes. Results The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB) that were divided into development and validation datasets. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 7.6–10 years) and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, nonetheless the adjustment did not confirm OPCAB as a risk factor for mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85–1.03, p=0.19). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACE at 10 years (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23, p=0.001). Inside the MACEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI), (adjusted HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16–1.53, p&lt;0.001), demonstrating to be an independent risk factor for PCI with an hazard that is 33% higher than on-pump CABG. Conclusions OPCAB did not affect long-term mortality but is associated with an increased long-term risk of repeat PCI. These findings may have important implications towards health resources allocation, particularly in a climate of cost containment of healthcare expenditures. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Minister of Health</description><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFKxDAURYMoOI7-gKv8QMYkTdPEnQzqCAU3sxBclDR96XRom5K0SP_ejjMfIDzeW7x7L5eD0COjG0Z18gSHo22WbYwWcsNlJq7QiqWcEy1Feo1WlOmUSKm-btFdjEdKqZJMrtB37vuajBA67KfR-g4idr5t_U_T19j64HsTZmzCIplxOQ8mRlwH48bl_4zHA-DgW8DeLePIMHUDjmMwI9TzPbpxpo3wcLlrtH973W93JP98_9i-5MQqJkjCWSlLq7jLNKhKqyxLBKQqZWArLowGLjiUlJvKGdDGOplJx7iFUtoys8ka8XOsDT7GAK4YQtMtrQtGixOd4o9OcaFTnOgsJnI2-Wn4j_4XA0tslw</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Barili, F</creator><creator>D'Errigo, P</creator><creator>Rosato, S</creator><creator>Grossi, C</creator><creator>D'Ovidio, M</creator><creator>Pagano, E</creator><creator>Seccareccia, F</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of off-pump strategy</title><author>Barili, F ; D'Errigo, P ; Rosato, S ; Grossi, C ; D'Ovidio, M ; Pagano, E ; Seccareccia, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c814-321b6bc82f79e8d987734e5851ecd24a9e242eb02adfae9acf676f12ceb6cb7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barili, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Errigo, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosato, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Ovidio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagano, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seccareccia, F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barili, F</au><au>D'Errigo, P</au><au>Rosato, S</au><au>Grossi, C</au><au>D'Ovidio, M</au><au>Pagano, E</au><au>Seccareccia, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of off-pump strategy</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002–2004 and 2007–2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze outcomes. Results The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB) that were divided into development and validation datasets. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 7.6–10 years) and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, nonetheless the adjustment did not confirm OPCAB as a risk factor for mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85–1.03, p=0.19). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACE at 10 years (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23, p=0.001). Inside the MACEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI), (adjusted HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16–1.53, p&lt;0.001), demonstrating to be an independent risk factor for PCI with an hazard that is 33% higher than on-pump CABG. Conclusions OPCAB did not affect long-term mortality but is associated with an increased long-term risk of repeat PCI. These findings may have important implications towards health resources allocation, particularly in a climate of cost containment of healthcare expenditures. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Minister of Health</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2674</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-668X
ispartof European heart journal, 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)
issn 0195-668X
1522-9645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ehjci_ehaa946_2674
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of off-pump strategy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A28%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20outcomes%20following%20coronary%20artery%20bypass%20grafting:%20the%20role%20of%20off-pump%20strategy&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Barili,%20F&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2674&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2674%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2674&rfr_iscdi=true