In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020

Abstract What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes mea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Chinese journal of international politics 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.1-27
Hauptverfasser: Parent, Joseph M, MacDonald, Paul K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title The Chinese journal of international politics
container_volume 17
creator Parent, Joseph M
MacDonald, Paul K
description Abstract What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes measuring it difficult. We aim to address definitional and measurement problems by using text as data from United Nations General Debates speeches, 1970–2020. This allows one to see the language China uses to refer to itself, the language by which others refer to China, and how that compares to the USA. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that China is not more status obsessed than its peer, is not more status obsessed over time, and is not gaining in status over time. The implications for world politics are complex but suggest that status will not be a primary cause of conflict in the foreseeable future.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cjip/poae001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_cjip_poae001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cjip/poae001</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cjip/poae001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-be14973588aeeb3c776b0ba9ebcfb807a220fd92fd4e804dd2bb78491f52335e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqWw8QDeWBp6bSd1zFZFFCpVZQiZI_9cK6kgiWJ3YOMdeEOeBKpWjEzfNxyd4RByy-CegRJzu2uH-dBrBGBnZMJkBkmueHr-99niklyFsAPIhOJiQrbrjpaoR9vQ3tMy6rgPD7Ro2k5T3TkaG6RVuaRtR6uujejoVse27wItB0TbYJhRpiR8f35x4HBNLrx-C3hz2impVo-vxXOyeXlaF8tNYpniMTHIUiVFluca0Qgr5cKA0QqN9SYHqTkH7xT3LsUcUue4MTJPFfMZFyJDMSWzo9eOfQgj-noY23c9ftQM6kOL-tCiPrX4xe-OeL8f_id_AFrUX7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Parent, Joseph M ; MacDonald, Paul K</creator><creatorcontrib>Parent, Joseph M ; MacDonald, Paul K</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes measuring it difficult. We aim to address definitional and measurement problems by using text as data from United Nations General Debates speeches, 1970–2020. This allows one to see the language China uses to refer to itself, the language by which others refer to China, and how that compares to the USA. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that China is not more status obsessed than its peer, is not more status obsessed over time, and is not gaining in status over time. The implications for world politics are complex but suggest that status will not be a primary cause of conflict in the foreseeable future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1750-8916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-8924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cjip/poae001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Chinese journal of international politics, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.1-27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Institute of International Relations, Tsinghua University. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0009-0000-3747-7396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parent, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Paul K</creatorcontrib><title>In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020</title><title>The Chinese journal of international politics</title><description>Abstract What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes measuring it difficult. We aim to address definitional and measurement problems by using text as data from United Nations General Debates speeches, 1970–2020. This allows one to see the language China uses to refer to itself, the language by which others refer to China, and how that compares to the USA. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that China is not more status obsessed than its peer, is not more status obsessed over time, and is not gaining in status over time. The implications for world politics are complex but suggest that status will not be a primary cause of conflict in the foreseeable future.</description><issn>1750-8916</issn><issn>1750-8924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqWw8QDeWBp6bSd1zFZFFCpVZQiZI_9cK6kgiWJ3YOMdeEOeBKpWjEzfNxyd4RByy-CegRJzu2uH-dBrBGBnZMJkBkmueHr-99niklyFsAPIhOJiQrbrjpaoR9vQ3tMy6rgPD7Ro2k5T3TkaG6RVuaRtR6uujejoVse27wItB0TbYJhRpiR8f35x4HBNLrx-C3hz2impVo-vxXOyeXlaF8tNYpniMTHIUiVFluca0Qgr5cKA0QqN9SYHqTkH7xT3LsUcUue4MTJPFfMZFyJDMSWzo9eOfQgj-noY23c9ftQM6kOL-tCiPrX4xe-OeL8f_id_AFrUX7c</recordid><startdate>20240209</startdate><enddate>20240209</enddate><creator>Parent, Joseph M</creator><creator>MacDonald, Paul K</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3747-7396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240209</creationdate><title>In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020</title><author>Parent, Joseph M ; MacDonald, Paul K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-be14973588aeeb3c776b0ba9ebcfb807a220fd92fd4e804dd2bb78491f52335e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parent, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Paul K</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Chinese journal of international politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parent, Joseph M</au><au>MacDonald, Paul K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020</atitle><jtitle>The Chinese journal of international politics</jtitle><date>2024-02-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>1-27</pages><issn>1750-8916</issn><eissn>1750-8924</eissn><abstract>Abstract What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes measuring it difficult. We aim to address definitional and measurement problems by using text as data from United Nations General Debates speeches, 1970–2020. This allows one to see the language China uses to refer to itself, the language by which others refer to China, and how that compares to the USA. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that China is not more status obsessed than its peer, is not more status obsessed over time, and is not gaining in status over time. The implications for world politics are complex but suggest that status will not be a primary cause of conflict in the foreseeable future.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/cjip/poae001</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3747-7396</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1750-8916
ispartof The Chinese journal of international politics, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.1-27
issn 1750-8916
1750-8924
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_cjip_poae001
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Search%20of%20Status:%20China%20and%20the%20USA%20in%20United%20Nations%20Speeches,%201970%E2%80%932020&rft.jtitle=The%20Chinese%20journal%20of%20international%20politics&rft.au=Parent,%20Joseph%20M&rft.date=2024-02-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=1-27&rft.issn=1750-8916&rft.eissn=1750-8924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cjip/poae001&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/cjip/poae001%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cjip/poae001&rfr_iscdi=true