In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020
Abstract What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes mea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Chinese journal of international politics 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.1-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The Chinese journal of international politics |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Parent, Joseph M MacDonald, Paul K |
description | Abstract
What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes measuring it difficult. We aim to address definitional and measurement problems by using text as data from United Nations General Debates speeches, 1970–2020. This allows one to see the language China uses to refer to itself, the language by which others refer to China, and how that compares to the USA. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that China is not more status obsessed than its peer, is not more status obsessed over time, and is not gaining in status over time. The implications for world politics are complex but suggest that status will not be a primary cause of conflict in the foreseeable future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cjip/poae001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_cjip_poae001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cjip/poae001</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cjip/poae001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-be14973588aeeb3c776b0ba9ebcfb807a220fd92fd4e804dd2bb78491f52335e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqWw8QDeWBp6bSd1zFZFFCpVZQiZI_9cK6kgiWJ3YOMdeEOeBKpWjEzfNxyd4RByy-CegRJzu2uH-dBrBGBnZMJkBkmueHr-99niklyFsAPIhOJiQrbrjpaoR9vQ3tMy6rgPD7Ro2k5T3TkaG6RVuaRtR6uujejoVse27wItB0TbYJhRpiR8f35x4HBNLrx-C3hz2impVo-vxXOyeXlaF8tNYpniMTHIUiVFluca0Qgr5cKA0QqN9SYHqTkH7xT3LsUcUue4MTJPFfMZFyJDMSWzo9eOfQgj-noY23c9ftQM6kOL-tCiPrX4xe-OeL8f_id_AFrUX7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Parent, Joseph M ; MacDonald, Paul K</creator><creatorcontrib>Parent, Joseph M ; MacDonald, Paul K</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes measuring it difficult. We aim to address definitional and measurement problems by using text as data from United Nations General Debates speeches, 1970–2020. This allows one to see the language China uses to refer to itself, the language by which others refer to China, and how that compares to the USA. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that China is not more status obsessed than its peer, is not more status obsessed over time, and is not gaining in status over time. The implications for world politics are complex but suggest that status will not be a primary cause of conflict in the foreseeable future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1750-8916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-8924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cjip/poae001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Chinese journal of international politics, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.1-27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Institute of International Relations, Tsinghua University. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0009-0000-3747-7396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parent, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Paul K</creatorcontrib><title>In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020</title><title>The Chinese journal of international politics</title><description>Abstract
What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes measuring it difficult. We aim to address definitional and measurement problems by using text as data from United Nations General Debates speeches, 1970–2020. This allows one to see the language China uses to refer to itself, the language by which others refer to China, and how that compares to the USA. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that China is not more status obsessed than its peer, is not more status obsessed over time, and is not gaining in status over time. The implications for world politics are complex but suggest that status will not be a primary cause of conflict in the foreseeable future.</description><issn>1750-8916</issn><issn>1750-8924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqWw8QDeWBp6bSd1zFZFFCpVZQiZI_9cK6kgiWJ3YOMdeEOeBKpWjEzfNxyd4RByy-CegRJzu2uH-dBrBGBnZMJkBkmueHr-99niklyFsAPIhOJiQrbrjpaoR9vQ3tMy6rgPD7Ro2k5T3TkaG6RVuaRtR6uujejoVse27wItB0TbYJhRpiR8f35x4HBNLrx-C3hz2impVo-vxXOyeXlaF8tNYpniMTHIUiVFluca0Qgr5cKA0QqN9SYHqTkH7xT3LsUcUue4MTJPFfMZFyJDMSWzo9eOfQgj-noY23c9ftQM6kOL-tCiPrX4xe-OeL8f_id_AFrUX7c</recordid><startdate>20240209</startdate><enddate>20240209</enddate><creator>Parent, Joseph M</creator><creator>MacDonald, Paul K</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3747-7396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240209</creationdate><title>In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020</title><author>Parent, Joseph M ; MacDonald, Paul K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-be14973588aeeb3c776b0ba9ebcfb807a220fd92fd4e804dd2bb78491f52335e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parent, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Paul K</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Chinese journal of international politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parent, Joseph M</au><au>MacDonald, Paul K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020</atitle><jtitle>The Chinese journal of international politics</jtitle><date>2024-02-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>1-27</pages><issn>1750-8916</issn><eissn>1750-8924</eissn><abstract>Abstract
What is China’s status? The answer has major repercussions for China’s rights, responsibilities, and risk acceptance in international disputes. Although definitions of status are contested, there is broad agreement that it is socially constructed and relative to peer states, which makes measuring it difficult. We aim to address definitional and measurement problems by using text as data from United Nations General Debates speeches, 1970–2020. This allows one to see the language China uses to refer to itself, the language by which others refer to China, and how that compares to the USA. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that China is not more status obsessed than its peer, is not more status obsessed over time, and is not gaining in status over time. The implications for world politics are complex but suggest that status will not be a primary cause of conflict in the foreseeable future.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/cjip/poae001</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3747-7396</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1750-8916 |
ispartof | The Chinese journal of international politics, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.1-27 |
issn | 1750-8916 1750-8924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_cjip_poae001 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | In Search of Status: China and the USA in United Nations Speeches, 1970–2020 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Search%20of%20Status:%20China%20and%20the%20USA%20in%20United%20Nations%20Speeches,%201970%E2%80%932020&rft.jtitle=The%20Chinese%20journal%20of%20international%20politics&rft.au=Parent,%20Joseph%20M&rft.date=2024-02-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=1-27&rft.issn=1750-8916&rft.eissn=1750-8924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cjip/poae001&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/cjip/poae001%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cjip/poae001&rfr_iscdi=true |