Amikacin Dosing for MDR Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review to Establish or Revise the Current Recommended Dose for Tuberculosis Treatment
Abstract Background Amikacin has been used for over 40 years in multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but there is still debate on the right dose. The aim of this review was to search relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) literature for the optimal dose and dosing frequency of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical infectious diseases 2018-11, Vol.67 (suppl_3), p.S303-S307 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S307 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl_3 |
container_start_page | S303 |
container_title | Clinical infectious diseases |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Sturkenboom, Marieke G G Simbar, Noviana Akkerman, Onno W Ghimire, Samiksha Bolhuis, Mathieu S Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C |
description | Abstract
Background
Amikacin has been used for over 40 years in multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but there is still debate on the right dose. The aim of this review was to search relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) literature for the optimal dose and dosing frequency of amikacin in MDR-TB regimens trying to optimize efficacy while minimizing toxicity.
Methods
A systematic review on the value of amikacin as second-line drug in the treatment of MDR-TB was performed.
Results
Five articles were identified with data on PK, hollow-fiber system model for TB and or early bactericidal activity of amikacin. Despite the long period in which amikacin has been available for the treatment of MDR-TB, very little PK data is available. This highlights the need for more research.
Conclusions
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of amikacin related to MIC proved to be the most important PK/PD index for efficacy. The target Cmax/MIC ratio should be 10 at site of infection. Cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) corresponding with cumulative days of treatment was associated with an increased risk of toxicity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cid/ciy613 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciy613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cid/ciy613</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cid/ciy613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2f79241f654b6bb0f64600ce8729a12df98e0ff69b1496a48dd4865fcfccaa43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoVqsbH0CycSOMJpNMmnFX2voDFaHW9ZDJ3Nhop1OSjNI38LFNHRVXLsINH-ceuB9CJ5RcUJKzS22r-DaCsh10QDM2SESW0934J5lMuGSyhw69fyGEUkmyfdRjhOeCC3GAPoa1fVXarvC48Xb1jE3j8P14hudtCU63y5j6KzzEjxsfoFbBajyDNwvvODR44oMql9YvcNzaxh5wWAAetc7BKsRIN3UNqwqqrR--7H_NeO5AhUiEI7Rn1NLD8ffso6fryXx0m0wfbu5Gw2miWcZCAqkZ5CmnRmS8FGVJTLyDEA1ykOaKppXJJRBjRF7SeKPisqq4FJnRRmulOOuj886rXeO9A1Osna2V2xSUFNs6i1hn0dUZ4dMOXrdlDdUv-tNfBM46oGnX_4k-AYPKgGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amikacin Dosing for MDR Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review to Establish or Revise the Current Recommended Dose for Tuberculosis Treatment</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sturkenboom, Marieke G G ; Simbar, Noviana ; Akkerman, Onno W ; Ghimire, Samiksha ; Bolhuis, Mathieu S ; Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C</creator><creatorcontrib>Sturkenboom, Marieke G G ; Simbar, Noviana ; Akkerman, Onno W ; Ghimire, Samiksha ; Bolhuis, Mathieu S ; Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Amikacin has been used for over 40 years in multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but there is still debate on the right dose. The aim of this review was to search relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) literature for the optimal dose and dosing frequency of amikacin in MDR-TB regimens trying to optimize efficacy while minimizing toxicity.
Methods
A systematic review on the value of amikacin as second-line drug in the treatment of MDR-TB was performed.
Results
Five articles were identified with data on PK, hollow-fiber system model for TB and or early bactericidal activity of amikacin. Despite the long period in which amikacin has been available for the treatment of MDR-TB, very little PK data is available. This highlights the need for more research.
Conclusions
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of amikacin related to MIC proved to be the most important PK/PD index for efficacy. The target Cmax/MIC ratio should be 10 at site of infection. Cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) corresponding with cumulative days of treatment was associated with an increased risk of toxicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy613</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30496466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2018-11, Vol.67 (suppl_3), p.S303-S307</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2f79241f654b6bb0f64600ce8729a12df98e0ff69b1496a48dd4865fcfccaa43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2f79241f654b6bb0f64600ce8729a12df98e0ff69b1496a48dd4865fcfccaa43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1583,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30496466$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sturkenboom, Marieke G G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simbar, Noviana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkerman, Onno W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghimire, Samiksha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolhuis, Mathieu S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C</creatorcontrib><title>Amikacin Dosing for MDR Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review to Establish or Revise the Current Recommended Dose for Tuberculosis Treatment</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Amikacin has been used for over 40 years in multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but there is still debate on the right dose. The aim of this review was to search relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) literature for the optimal dose and dosing frequency of amikacin in MDR-TB regimens trying to optimize efficacy while minimizing toxicity.
Methods
A systematic review on the value of amikacin as second-line drug in the treatment of MDR-TB was performed.
Results
Five articles were identified with data on PK, hollow-fiber system model for TB and or early bactericidal activity of amikacin. Despite the long period in which amikacin has been available for the treatment of MDR-TB, very little PK data is available. This highlights the need for more research.
Conclusions
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of amikacin related to MIC proved to be the most important PK/PD index for efficacy. The target Cmax/MIC ratio should be 10 at site of infection. Cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) corresponding with cumulative days of treatment was associated with an increased risk of toxicity.</description><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoVqsbH0CycSOMJpNMmnFX2voDFaHW9ZDJ3Nhop1OSjNI38LFNHRVXLsINH-ceuB9CJ5RcUJKzS22r-DaCsh10QDM2SESW0934J5lMuGSyhw69fyGEUkmyfdRjhOeCC3GAPoa1fVXarvC48Xb1jE3j8P14hudtCU63y5j6KzzEjxsfoFbBajyDNwvvODR44oMql9YvcNzaxh5wWAAetc7BKsRIN3UNqwqqrR--7H_NeO5AhUiEI7Rn1NLD8ffso6fryXx0m0wfbu5Gw2miWcZCAqkZ5CmnRmS8FGVJTLyDEA1ykOaKppXJJRBjRF7SeKPisqq4FJnRRmulOOuj886rXeO9A1Osna2V2xSUFNs6i1hn0dUZ4dMOXrdlDdUv-tNfBM46oGnX_4k-AYPKgGo</recordid><startdate>20181128</startdate><enddate>20181128</enddate><creator>Sturkenboom, Marieke G G</creator><creator>Simbar, Noviana</creator><creator>Akkerman, Onno W</creator><creator>Ghimire, Samiksha</creator><creator>Bolhuis, Mathieu S</creator><creator>Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181128</creationdate><title>Amikacin Dosing for MDR Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review to Establish or Revise the Current Recommended Dose for Tuberculosis Treatment</title><author>Sturkenboom, Marieke G G ; Simbar, Noviana ; Akkerman, Onno W ; Ghimire, Samiksha ; Bolhuis, Mathieu S ; Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2f79241f654b6bb0f64600ce8729a12df98e0ff69b1496a48dd4865fcfccaa43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sturkenboom, Marieke G G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simbar, Noviana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkerman, Onno W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghimire, Samiksha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolhuis, Mathieu S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sturkenboom, Marieke G G</au><au>Simbar, Noviana</au><au>Akkerman, Onno W</au><au>Ghimire, Samiksha</au><au>Bolhuis, Mathieu S</au><au>Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amikacin Dosing for MDR Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review to Establish or Revise the Current Recommended Dose for Tuberculosis Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2018-11-28</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>suppl_3</issue><spage>S303</spage><epage>S307</epage><pages>S303-S307</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Amikacin has been used for over 40 years in multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but there is still debate on the right dose. The aim of this review was to search relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) literature for the optimal dose and dosing frequency of amikacin in MDR-TB regimens trying to optimize efficacy while minimizing toxicity.
Methods
A systematic review on the value of amikacin as second-line drug in the treatment of MDR-TB was performed.
Results
Five articles were identified with data on PK, hollow-fiber system model for TB and or early bactericidal activity of amikacin. Despite the long period in which amikacin has been available for the treatment of MDR-TB, very little PK data is available. This highlights the need for more research.
Conclusions
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of amikacin related to MIC proved to be the most important PK/PD index for efficacy. The target Cmax/MIC ratio should be 10 at site of infection. Cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) corresponding with cumulative days of treatment was associated with an increased risk of toxicity.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30496466</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciy613</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-4838 |
ispartof | Clinical infectious diseases, 2018-11, Vol.67 (suppl_3), p.S303-S307 |
issn | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciy613 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Amikacin Dosing for MDR Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review to Establish or Revise the Current Recommended Dose for Tuberculosis Treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A52%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amikacin%20Dosing%20for%20MDR%20Tuberculosis:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20to%20Establish%20or%20Revise%20the%20Current%20Recommended%20Dose%20for%20Tuberculosis%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Sturkenboom,%20Marieke%20G%20G&rft.date=2018-11-28&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=suppl_3&rft.spage=S303&rft.epage=S307&rft.pages=S303-S307&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciy613&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/cid/ciy613%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30496466&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cid/ciy613&rfr_iscdi=true |