Family-managed Firms and Labor Demand Size Matters-but Only the Small Ones Are Different

Abstract This article analyzes the differences in labor demand between family and nonfamily-managed firms. The majority of firms in modern economies are still family-controlled. In addition, these firms seem to have better employment performance than other companies. Therefore, this study estimates...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CESifo economic studies 2019-03, Vol.65 (1), p.108-129
1. Verfasser: Kölling, Arnd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 129
container_issue 1
container_start_page 108
container_title CESifo economic studies
container_volume 65
creator Kölling, Arnd
description Abstract This article analyzes the differences in labor demand between family and nonfamily-managed firms. The majority of firms in modern economies are still family-controlled. In addition, these firms seem to have better employment performance than other companies. Therefore, this study estimates a labor demand model with German establishment panel data to control for differences among these firms. The results of random effects and fractional panel probit estimations indicate that own-wage and output elasticities are lower in absolute values, thus supporting the assumption that family-managed firms offer some kind of implicit employment contracts with a larger job safety. However, this result does not hold if the investigation is restricted to establishments with 20 or more employees. There is no evidence of different behavior in larger family-managed firms. (JEL codes: J23, D22, G32, C23)
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cesifo/ify012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_cesifo_ify012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cesifo/ify012</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cesifo/ify012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-94d5ef2253f069729abacbdb4c62d78b6801e1df83a69d5782a16187f3f90bc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEiUwsntkMbWdxHbGqqWAVNShIHWL7PgMRvmo7HQIv56UIDEy3b3Sc690D0K3jN4zWqTzCqJ33dy7gTJ-hmZMME5kTtn5z04Jz9j-El3F-Ekpz3JJZ2i_1o2vB9LoVr-DxWsfmoh1a_FGmy7gFTSnsPNfgF9030OIxBx7vG3rAfcfgHeNrusxQsSLAHjlnYMAbX-NLpyuI9z8zgS9rR9el09ks318Xi42pOIy70mR2Rwc53nqqCgkL7TRlbEmqwS3UhmhKANmnUq1KGwuFdfjK0q61BXUVCpNEJl6q9DFGMCVh-AbHYaS0fKkpZy0lJOWkccTD1XX-vhHC8VSKeR4kaC7CemOh3_avgGsgG_u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family-managed Firms and Labor Demand Size Matters-but Only the Small Ones Are Different</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Kölling, Arnd</creator><creatorcontrib>Kölling, Arnd</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This article analyzes the differences in labor demand between family and nonfamily-managed firms. The majority of firms in modern economies are still family-controlled. In addition, these firms seem to have better employment performance than other companies. Therefore, this study estimates a labor demand model with German establishment panel data to control for differences among these firms. The results of random effects and fractional panel probit estimations indicate that own-wage and output elasticities are lower in absolute values, thus supporting the assumption that family-managed firms offer some kind of implicit employment contracts with a larger job safety. However, this result does not hold if the investigation is restricted to establishments with 20 or more employees. There is no evidence of different behavior in larger family-managed firms. (JEL codes: J23, D22, G32, C23)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1610-241X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-7501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ify012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>CESifo economic studies, 2019-03, Vol.65 (1), p.108-129</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Ifo Institute, Munich. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-94d5ef2253f069729abacbdb4c62d78b6801e1df83a69d5782a16187f3f90bc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-94d5ef2253f069729abacbdb4c62d78b6801e1df83a69d5782a16187f3f90bc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kölling, Arnd</creatorcontrib><title>Family-managed Firms and Labor Demand Size Matters-but Only the Small Ones Are Different</title><title>CESifo economic studies</title><description>Abstract This article analyzes the differences in labor demand between family and nonfamily-managed firms. The majority of firms in modern economies are still family-controlled. In addition, these firms seem to have better employment performance than other companies. Therefore, this study estimates a labor demand model with German establishment panel data to control for differences among these firms. The results of random effects and fractional panel probit estimations indicate that own-wage and output elasticities are lower in absolute values, thus supporting the assumption that family-managed firms offer some kind of implicit employment contracts with a larger job safety. However, this result does not hold if the investigation is restricted to establishments with 20 or more employees. There is no evidence of different behavior in larger family-managed firms. (JEL codes: J23, D22, G32, C23)</description><issn>1610-241X</issn><issn>1612-7501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEiUwsntkMbWdxHbGqqWAVNShIHWL7PgMRvmo7HQIv56UIDEy3b3Sc690D0K3jN4zWqTzCqJ33dy7gTJ-hmZMME5kTtn5z04Jz9j-El3F-Ekpz3JJZ2i_1o2vB9LoVr-DxWsfmoh1a_FGmy7gFTSnsPNfgF9030OIxBx7vG3rAfcfgHeNrusxQsSLAHjlnYMAbX-NLpyuI9z8zgS9rR9el09ks318Xi42pOIy70mR2Rwc53nqqCgkL7TRlbEmqwS3UhmhKANmnUq1KGwuFdfjK0q61BXUVCpNEJl6q9DFGMCVh-AbHYaS0fKkpZy0lJOWkccTD1XX-vhHC8VSKeR4kaC7CemOh3_avgGsgG_u</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Kölling, Arnd</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Family-managed Firms and Labor Demand Size Matters-but Only the Small Ones Are Different</title><author>Kölling, Arnd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-94d5ef2253f069729abacbdb4c62d78b6801e1df83a69d5782a16187f3f90bc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kölling, Arnd</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>CESifo economic studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kölling, Arnd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family-managed Firms and Labor Demand Size Matters-but Only the Small Ones Are Different</atitle><jtitle>CESifo economic studies</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>108-129</pages><issn>1610-241X</issn><eissn>1612-7501</eissn><abstract>Abstract This article analyzes the differences in labor demand between family and nonfamily-managed firms. The majority of firms in modern economies are still family-controlled. In addition, these firms seem to have better employment performance than other companies. Therefore, this study estimates a labor demand model with German establishment panel data to control for differences among these firms. The results of random effects and fractional panel probit estimations indicate that own-wage and output elasticities are lower in absolute values, thus supporting the assumption that family-managed firms offer some kind of implicit employment contracts with a larger job safety. However, this result does not hold if the investigation is restricted to establishments with 20 or more employees. There is no evidence of different behavior in larger family-managed firms. (JEL codes: J23, D22, G32, C23)</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/cesifo/ify012</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1610-241X
ispartof CESifo economic studies, 2019-03, Vol.65 (1), p.108-129
issn 1610-241X
1612-7501
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_cesifo_ify012
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Family-managed Firms and Labor Demand Size Matters-but Only the Small Ones Are Different
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family-managed%20Firms%20and%20Labor%20Demand%20Size%20Matters-but%20Only%20the%20Small%20Ones%20Are%20Different&rft.jtitle=CESifo%20economic%20studies&rft.au=K%C3%B6lling,%20Arnd&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=108-129&rft.issn=1610-241X&rft.eissn=1612-7501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cesifo/ify012&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/cesifo/ify012%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cesifo/ify012&rfr_iscdi=true