Virtual Empathy

This article offers a theoretical response to the recent interest in virtual reality (VR) as a technology for enhancing empathy. It argues that the version of empathy envisioned by the champions of the technology—one in which care for the other is a function of being able to collapse the other’s exp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communication, culture & critique culture & critique, 2020-09, Vol.13 (3), p.295-310
Hauptverfasser: Andrejevic, Mark, Volcic, Zala
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 3
container_start_page 295
container_title Communication, culture & critique
container_volume 13
creator Andrejevic, Mark
Volcic, Zala
description This article offers a theoretical response to the recent interest in virtual reality (VR) as a technology for enhancing empathy. It argues that the version of empathy envisioned by the champions of the technology—one in which care for the other is a function of being able to collapse the other’s experience into one’s own—runs counter to the very concept of empathy, as originally construed, which preserves otherness in its alterity. The point is not simply to invoke a historical concept of empathy to contrast with the VR version, but to emphasize its enduring salience in response to recent technological developments. There is little doubt regarding the need for empathy, in the sense explored in this article, as we confront the pathologies of political fragmentation and social polarization facilitated by the current iteration of social media. However, this article argues that the VR version is more likely to exacerbate than redress these concerns.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ccc/tcz035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ccc_tcz035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_ccc_tcz035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-f95fdba24730029ce5069090724bb3cd067e3ed25b5145f27457ac35948299503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9z01LAzEQxvEgFay1CH4Cz8LayUxm4xyl1BcoeFGvITub0EqLJVkP9dOrVHp6_qcHfsZcWbi1IDRT1dmg30B8YsbWMzViyY-OjXJmzmv9AGgtAo_N5fu6DF9xc73Y7uKw2l-Y0xw3NU3_d2LeHhav86dm-fL4PL9fNopkhyYL576L6DwBoGhiaAUEPLquI-2h9YlSj9yxdZzRO_ZRicXdoQgDTczN4VfLZ60l5bAr620s-2Ah_FHCLyUcKPQDzUk6Zg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virtual Empathy</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Andrejevic, Mark ; Volcic, Zala</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrejevic, Mark ; Volcic, Zala</creatorcontrib><description>This article offers a theoretical response to the recent interest in virtual reality (VR) as a technology for enhancing empathy. It argues that the version of empathy envisioned by the champions of the technology—one in which care for the other is a function of being able to collapse the other’s experience into one’s own—runs counter to the very concept of empathy, as originally construed, which preserves otherness in its alterity. The point is not simply to invoke a historical concept of empathy to contrast with the VR version, but to emphasize its enduring salience in response to recent technological developments. There is little doubt regarding the need for empathy, in the sense explored in this article, as we confront the pathologies of political fragmentation and social polarization facilitated by the current iteration of social media. However, this article argues that the VR version is more likely to exacerbate than redress these concerns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-9137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ccc/tcz035</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Communication, culture &amp; critique, 2020-09, Vol.13 (3), p.295-310</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-f95fdba24730029ce5069090724bb3cd067e3ed25b5145f27457ac35948299503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-f95fdba24730029ce5069090724bb3cd067e3ed25b5145f27457ac35948299503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6096-1060</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrejevic, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volcic, Zala</creatorcontrib><title>Virtual Empathy</title><title>Communication, culture &amp; critique</title><description>This article offers a theoretical response to the recent interest in virtual reality (VR) as a technology for enhancing empathy. It argues that the version of empathy envisioned by the champions of the technology—one in which care for the other is a function of being able to collapse the other’s experience into one’s own—runs counter to the very concept of empathy, as originally construed, which preserves otherness in its alterity. The point is not simply to invoke a historical concept of empathy to contrast with the VR version, but to emphasize its enduring salience in response to recent technological developments. There is little doubt regarding the need for empathy, in the sense explored in this article, as we confront the pathologies of political fragmentation and social polarization facilitated by the current iteration of social media. However, this article argues that the VR version is more likely to exacerbate than redress these concerns.</description><issn>1753-9129</issn><issn>1753-9137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9z01LAzEQxvEgFay1CH4Cz8LayUxm4xyl1BcoeFGvITub0EqLJVkP9dOrVHp6_qcHfsZcWbi1IDRT1dmg30B8YsbWMzViyY-OjXJmzmv9AGgtAo_N5fu6DF9xc73Y7uKw2l-Y0xw3NU3_d2LeHhav86dm-fL4PL9fNopkhyYL576L6DwBoGhiaAUEPLquI-2h9YlSj9yxdZzRO_ZRicXdoQgDTczN4VfLZ60l5bAr620s-2Ah_FHCLyUcKPQDzUk6Zg</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Andrejevic, Mark</creator><creator>Volcic, Zala</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6096-1060</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Virtual Empathy</title><author>Andrejevic, Mark ; Volcic, Zala</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-f95fdba24730029ce5069090724bb3cd067e3ed25b5145f27457ac35948299503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrejevic, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volcic, Zala</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communication, culture &amp; critique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrejevic, Mark</au><au>Volcic, Zala</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virtual Empathy</atitle><jtitle>Communication, culture &amp; critique</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>295-310</pages><issn>1753-9129</issn><eissn>1753-9137</eissn><abstract>This article offers a theoretical response to the recent interest in virtual reality (VR) as a technology for enhancing empathy. It argues that the version of empathy envisioned by the champions of the technology—one in which care for the other is a function of being able to collapse the other’s experience into one’s own—runs counter to the very concept of empathy, as originally construed, which preserves otherness in its alterity. The point is not simply to invoke a historical concept of empathy to contrast with the VR version, but to emphasize its enduring salience in response to recent technological developments. There is little doubt regarding the need for empathy, in the sense explored in this article, as we confront the pathologies of political fragmentation and social polarization facilitated by the current iteration of social media. However, this article argues that the VR version is more likely to exacerbate than redress these concerns.</abstract><doi>10.1093/ccc/tcz035</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6096-1060</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1753-9129
ispartof Communication, culture & critique, 2020-09, Vol.13 (3), p.295-310
issn 1753-9129
1753-9137
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ccc_tcz035
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Virtual Empathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A13%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virtual%20Empathy&rft.jtitle=Communication,%20culture%20&%20critique&rft.au=Andrejevic,%20Mark&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=295-310&rft.issn=1753-9129&rft.eissn=1753-9137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ccc/tcz035&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_ccc_tcz035%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true