Drivers of alloparental provisioning of fledglings in a colonially breeding bird

Abstract Reproduction is costly. Despite this, evidence suggests that parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. Several hypotheses could explain this puzzling phenomenon. Adults could feed unrelated offspring that are 1) of their close social associates to facilitate these juveniles’ integration i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology 2021-03, Vol.32 (2), p.316-326
Hauptverfasser: Ogino, Mina, Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A, Farine, Damien R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 326
container_issue 2
container_start_page 316
container_title Behavioral ecology
container_volume 32
creator Ogino, Mina
Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A
Farine, Damien R
description Abstract Reproduction is costly. Despite this, evidence suggests that parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. Several hypotheses could explain this puzzling phenomenon. Adults could feed unrelated offspring that are 1) of their close social associates to facilitate these juveniles’ integration into their social network (the social inheritance hypothesis), 2) potential extrapair offspring, 3) at a similar developmental stage as their own, 4) coercing feeding by begging, or 5) less-developed (to enhance their survival, which could benefit the adult or its offspring; the group augmentation hypothesis). Colonial breeders are ideal for investigating the relative importance of these hypotheses because offspring are often kept in crèches where adults can exhibit allofeeding. Using automated monitoring of replicated captive zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) colonies, we found that while parents selectively fed their own offspring, they also consistently fed unrelated offspring (32.48% of feeding events). Social relationships among adults prior to breeding did not predict allofeeding, nor was allofeeding directed toward potential genetic offspring. Instead, adults with more-developed offspring preferentially fed less-developed non-offspring over non-offspring at a similar developmental stage as their own offspring, and this tendency was not explained by differences in begging behavior. Our study suggests that allofeeding is consistent with group augmentation, potentially benefiting adults through colony maintenance or increased offspring survival. Having offspring is costly. Yet, in social species, parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. We studied provisioning of nonoffspring in zebra finch colonies to test whether allofeeding is an adaptive strategy or a case of mistaken identity. We found that adults preferentially fed less-developed nonoffspring, suggesting that allofeeding might represent an adaptive strategy that benefits adults through colony maintenance (if failed breeders leave) or offspring through survival (by maintaining a larger cohort size).
doi_str_mv 10.1093/beheco/araa137
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_araa137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/beheco/araa137</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/beheco/araa137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-349c8ce3f1ad09403dec79972a386c53400f8ddb4965a99e19c206166f6f33543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMntlSGvnHCceUfmUKsEAc-TY52Jk4sgulfrvSZTuTHen931ueAi55WzFmYJ1h19o4lonrTnUZ2TBhayKuqzV-bgzURVlKdQlucr5mzHGlZAL8v6Q_AFTptFRHUIcdMJ-rwMdUjz47GPv-90UuoB2F8YjU99TTU0MYzYiR9olRDvVOp_sNblwOmS8Oc0l-Xx6_Ni8FNu359fN_bYwwGFfgFCmMQiOa8uUYGDR1ErVpYZGmgoEY66xthNKVlop5MqUTHIpnXQAlYAlWc1_TYo5J3TtkPyPTseWs3by0c4-2pOPEbibgfg7_Nf9AyAZZJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drivers of alloparental provisioning of fledglings in a colonially breeding bird</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ogino, Mina ; Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A ; Farine, Damien R</creator><contributor>Naguib, Marc</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ogino, Mina ; Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A ; Farine, Damien R ; Naguib, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Reproduction is costly. Despite this, evidence suggests that parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. Several hypotheses could explain this puzzling phenomenon. Adults could feed unrelated offspring that are 1) of their close social associates to facilitate these juveniles’ integration into their social network (the social inheritance hypothesis), 2) potential extrapair offspring, 3) at a similar developmental stage as their own, 4) coercing feeding by begging, or 5) less-developed (to enhance their survival, which could benefit the adult or its offspring; the group augmentation hypothesis). Colonial breeders are ideal for investigating the relative importance of these hypotheses because offspring are often kept in crèches where adults can exhibit allofeeding. Using automated monitoring of replicated captive zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) colonies, we found that while parents selectively fed their own offspring, they also consistently fed unrelated offspring (32.48% of feeding events). Social relationships among adults prior to breeding did not predict allofeeding, nor was allofeeding directed toward potential genetic offspring. Instead, adults with more-developed offspring preferentially fed less-developed non-offspring over non-offspring at a similar developmental stage as their own offspring, and this tendency was not explained by differences in begging behavior. Our study suggests that allofeeding is consistent with group augmentation, potentially benefiting adults through colony maintenance or increased offspring survival. Having offspring is costly. Yet, in social species, parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. We studied provisioning of nonoffspring in zebra finch colonies to test whether allofeeding is an adaptive strategy or a case of mistaken identity. We found that adults preferentially fed less-developed nonoffspring, suggesting that allofeeding might represent an adaptive strategy that benefits adults through colony maintenance (if failed breeders leave) or offspring through survival (by maintaining a larger cohort size).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/beheco/araa137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Behavioral ecology, 2021-03, Vol.32 (2), p.316-326</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-349c8ce3f1ad09403dec79972a386c53400f8ddb4965a99e19c206166f6f33543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-349c8ce3f1ad09403dec79972a386c53400f8ddb4965a99e19c206166f6f33543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3780-2942 ; 0000-0003-2208-7613</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1579,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Naguib, Marc</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ogino, Mina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farine, Damien R</creatorcontrib><title>Drivers of alloparental provisioning of fledglings in a colonially breeding bird</title><title>Behavioral ecology</title><description>Abstract Reproduction is costly. Despite this, evidence suggests that parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. Several hypotheses could explain this puzzling phenomenon. Adults could feed unrelated offspring that are 1) of their close social associates to facilitate these juveniles’ integration into their social network (the social inheritance hypothesis), 2) potential extrapair offspring, 3) at a similar developmental stage as their own, 4) coercing feeding by begging, or 5) less-developed (to enhance their survival, which could benefit the adult or its offspring; the group augmentation hypothesis). Colonial breeders are ideal for investigating the relative importance of these hypotheses because offspring are often kept in crèches where adults can exhibit allofeeding. Using automated monitoring of replicated captive zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) colonies, we found that while parents selectively fed their own offspring, they also consistently fed unrelated offspring (32.48% of feeding events). Social relationships among adults prior to breeding did not predict allofeeding, nor was allofeeding directed toward potential genetic offspring. Instead, adults with more-developed offspring preferentially fed less-developed non-offspring over non-offspring at a similar developmental stage as their own offspring, and this tendency was not explained by differences in begging behavior. Our study suggests that allofeeding is consistent with group augmentation, potentially benefiting adults through colony maintenance or increased offspring survival. Having offspring is costly. Yet, in social species, parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. We studied provisioning of nonoffspring in zebra finch colonies to test whether allofeeding is an adaptive strategy or a case of mistaken identity. We found that adults preferentially fed less-developed nonoffspring, suggesting that allofeeding might represent an adaptive strategy that benefits adults through colony maintenance (if failed breeders leave) or offspring through survival (by maintaining a larger cohort size).</description><issn>1045-2249</issn><issn>1465-7279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMntlSGvnHCceUfmUKsEAc-TY52Jk4sgulfrvSZTuTHen931ueAi55WzFmYJ1h19o4lonrTnUZ2TBhayKuqzV-bgzURVlKdQlucr5mzHGlZAL8v6Q_AFTptFRHUIcdMJ-rwMdUjz47GPv-90UuoB2F8YjU99TTU0MYzYiR9olRDvVOp_sNblwOmS8Oc0l-Xx6_Ni8FNu359fN_bYwwGFfgFCmMQiOa8uUYGDR1ErVpYZGmgoEY66xthNKVlop5MqUTHIpnXQAlYAlWc1_TYo5J3TtkPyPTseWs3by0c4-2pOPEbibgfg7_Nf9AyAZZJ0</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Ogino, Mina</creator><creator>Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A</creator><creator>Farine, Damien R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3780-2942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2208-7613</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Drivers of alloparental provisioning of fledglings in a colonially breeding bird</title><author>Ogino, Mina ; Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A ; Farine, Damien R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-349c8ce3f1ad09403dec79972a386c53400f8ddb4965a99e19c206166f6f33543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogino, Mina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farine, Damien R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogino, Mina</au><au>Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A</au><au>Farine, Damien R</au><au>Naguib, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drivers of alloparental provisioning of fledglings in a colonially breeding bird</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>316-326</pages><issn>1045-2249</issn><eissn>1465-7279</eissn><abstract>Abstract Reproduction is costly. Despite this, evidence suggests that parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. Several hypotheses could explain this puzzling phenomenon. Adults could feed unrelated offspring that are 1) of their close social associates to facilitate these juveniles’ integration into their social network (the social inheritance hypothesis), 2) potential extrapair offspring, 3) at a similar developmental stage as their own, 4) coercing feeding by begging, or 5) less-developed (to enhance their survival, which could benefit the adult or its offspring; the group augmentation hypothesis). Colonial breeders are ideal for investigating the relative importance of these hypotheses because offspring are often kept in crèches where adults can exhibit allofeeding. Using automated monitoring of replicated captive zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) colonies, we found that while parents selectively fed their own offspring, they also consistently fed unrelated offspring (32.48% of feeding events). Social relationships among adults prior to breeding did not predict allofeeding, nor was allofeeding directed toward potential genetic offspring. Instead, adults with more-developed offspring preferentially fed less-developed non-offspring over non-offspring at a similar developmental stage as their own offspring, and this tendency was not explained by differences in begging behavior. Our study suggests that allofeeding is consistent with group augmentation, potentially benefiting adults through colony maintenance or increased offspring survival. Having offspring is costly. Yet, in social species, parents sometimes feed unrelated offspring. We studied provisioning of nonoffspring in zebra finch colonies to test whether allofeeding is an adaptive strategy or a case of mistaken identity. We found that adults preferentially fed less-developed nonoffspring, suggesting that allofeeding might represent an adaptive strategy that benefits adults through colony maintenance (if failed breeders leave) or offspring through survival (by maintaining a larger cohort size).</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/beheco/araa137</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3780-2942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2208-7613</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-2249
ispartof Behavioral ecology, 2021-03, Vol.32 (2), p.316-326
issn 1045-2249
1465-7279
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_araa137
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Drivers of alloparental provisioning of fledglings in a colonially breeding bird
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A51%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drivers%20of%20alloparental%20provisioning%20of%20fledglings%20in%20a%20colonially%20breeding%20bird&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology&rft.au=Ogino,%20Mina&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=316-326&rft.issn=1045-2249&rft.eissn=1465-7279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/beheco/araa137&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/beheco/araa137%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/beheco/araa137&rfr_iscdi=true