A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report

A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report

Abstract Objective Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive cognitive appraisal towards pain, where exaggerated negative schemas about pain are associated with greater likelihood of pain persisting (Chaves & Brown, 1987). We hypothesized that similar mechanisms might underlie the development of per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2024-10, Vol.39 (7), p.991-991
Hauptverfasser: Rasooly, Tali, Ignacio, Daniel, Vaughan, Christopher, Babikian, Talin, Chrisman, Sara, Gioia, Gerard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 991
container_issue 7
container_start_page 991
container_title Archives of clinical neuropsychology
container_volume 39
creator Rasooly, Tali
Ignacio, Daniel
Vaughan, Christopher
Babikian, Talin
Chrisman, Sara
Gioia, Gerard
description Abstract Objective Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive cognitive appraisal towards pain, where exaggerated negative schemas about pain are associated with greater likelihood of pain persisting (Chaves & Brown, 1987). We hypothesized that similar mechanisms might underlie the development of persistent concussion symptoms. We adapted a measure of pain catastrophizing to assess concussion symptom catastrophizing and examined its psychometric properties. Method Participants included 292 youth with diagnosed concussions, 57% female and mean age 14.5 years (SD 1.8) in the Care4Kids national study. First administration (T1) and second administration (T2) were about 1 and 3 months post-injury, respectively. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) – Child version was adapted with concussion symptoms, and named the Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS). Results At T1, the original PCS three-dimension structure (Rumination, Magnification, and Helplessness) was supported with goodness of fit statistic as follows: χ2 (51) = 144.96, p 0.57, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1093/arclin/acae067.067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acae067_067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/arclin/acae067.067</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/arclin/acae067.067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c817-bc7848b826af500f780d4a6ad57916cea15098ef1f73d610195834b5a0dbed5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKtcKtjtZGma9HKU-QEDh9t9OU0TF-maknTg_PV2bBdeevFyPjjvC-ch5J7BhEHOpxh049opajSQycmgCzJiSvJEqJRf_umvyU2MXwAgGJuNSDWnCRWcroJp3M61GA50FQ9663emD07TxTce173zLfWWFr7V-xiPU4E9xj74but-XPtJ1xobQx-KYv34RNemsfTDdD70t-TKYhPN3bmOyeZ5sSlek-X7y1sxXyZaMZlUWqpUVWqWoRUAViqoU8ywFjJnmTbIBOTKWGYlrzMGLBeKp5VAqCtTC8vHZHaK1cHHGIwtu-B2wz8lg_IIqTxBKs-QykGDKTmZ_L77z_0vvlZsUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><creator>Rasooly, Tali ; Ignacio, Daniel ; Vaughan, Christopher ; Babikian, Talin ; Chrisman, Sara ; Gioia, Gerard</creator><creatorcontrib>Rasooly, Tali ; Ignacio, Daniel ; Vaughan, Christopher ; Babikian, Talin ; Chrisman, Sara ; Gioia, Gerard</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive cognitive appraisal towards pain, where exaggerated negative schemas about pain are associated with greater likelihood of pain persisting (Chaves &amp; Brown, 1987). We hypothesized that similar mechanisms might underlie the development of persistent concussion symptoms. We adapted a measure of pain catastrophizing to assess concussion symptom catastrophizing and examined its psychometric properties. Method Participants included 292 youth with diagnosed concussions, 57% female and mean age 14.5 years (SD 1.8) in the Care4Kids national study. First administration (T1) and second administration (T2) were about 1 and 3 months post-injury, respectively. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) – Child version was adapted with concussion symptoms, and named the Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS). Results At T1, the original PCS three-dimension structure (Rumination, Magnification, and Helplessness) was supported with goodness of fit statistic as follows: χ2 (51) = 144.96, p 0.57, p &lt; 0.001). Internal consistency reliability for the CCS Total score was strong (coefficient alpha =0.91). Test–retest reliability over the 2 month period was moderate (r = 0.45), moderated in part due to individual variability in recovery. At T2, significant decreases were found in the Total CCS score. Conclusion(s) Our results indicate preliminary support for the CCS-Child version as a measure of concussion symptoms catastrophizing in pediatric populations. Additional evidence of reliability and validity is needed prior to clinical use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae067.067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2024-10, Vol.39 (7), p.991-991</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rasooly, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ignacio, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babikian, Talin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrisman, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gioia, Gerard</creatorcontrib><title>A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report</title><title>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title><description>Abstract Objective Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive cognitive appraisal towards pain, where exaggerated negative schemas about pain are associated with greater likelihood of pain persisting (Chaves &amp; Brown, 1987). We hypothesized that similar mechanisms might underlie the development of persistent concussion symptoms. We adapted a measure of pain catastrophizing to assess concussion symptom catastrophizing and examined its psychometric properties. Method Participants included 292 youth with diagnosed concussions, 57% female and mean age 14.5 years (SD 1.8) in the Care4Kids national study. First administration (T1) and second administration (T2) were about 1 and 3 months post-injury, respectively. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) – Child version was adapted with concussion symptoms, and named the Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS). Results At T1, the original PCS three-dimension structure (Rumination, Magnification, and Helplessness) was supported with goodness of fit statistic as follows: χ2 (51) = 144.96, p 0.57, p &lt; 0.001). Internal consistency reliability for the CCS Total score was strong (coefficient alpha =0.91). Test–retest reliability over the 2 month period was moderate (r = 0.45), moderated in part due to individual variability in recovery. At T2, significant decreases were found in the Total CCS score. Conclusion(s) Our results indicate preliminary support for the CCS-Child version as a measure of concussion symptoms catastrophizing in pediatric populations. Additional evidence of reliability and validity is needed prior to clinical use.</description><issn>1873-5843</issn><issn>1873-5843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKtcKtjtZGma9HKU-QEDh9t9OU0TF-maknTg_PV2bBdeevFyPjjvC-ch5J7BhEHOpxh049opajSQycmgCzJiSvJEqJRf_umvyU2MXwAgGJuNSDWnCRWcroJp3M61GA50FQ9663emD07TxTce173zLfWWFr7V-xiPU4E9xj74but-XPtJ1xobQx-KYv34RNemsfTDdD70t-TKYhPN3bmOyeZ5sSlek-X7y1sxXyZaMZlUWqpUVWqWoRUAViqoU8ywFjJnmTbIBOTKWGYlrzMGLBeKp5VAqCtTC8vHZHaK1cHHGIwtu-B2wz8lg_IIqTxBKs-QykGDKTmZ_L77z_0vvlZsUA</recordid><startdate>20241025</startdate><enddate>20241025</enddate><creator>Rasooly, Tali</creator><creator>Ignacio, Daniel</creator><creator>Vaughan, Christopher</creator><creator>Babikian, Talin</creator><creator>Chrisman, Sara</creator><creator>Gioia, Gerard</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241025</creationdate><title>A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report</title><author>Rasooly, Tali ; Ignacio, Daniel ; Vaughan, Christopher ; Babikian, Talin ; Chrisman, Sara ; Gioia, Gerard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c817-bc7848b826af500f780d4a6ad57916cea15098ef1f73d610195834b5a0dbed5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rasooly, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ignacio, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babikian, Talin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrisman, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gioia, Gerard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rasooly, Tali</au><au>Ignacio, Daniel</au><au>Vaughan, Christopher</au><au>Babikian, Talin</au><au>Chrisman, Sara</au><au>Gioia, Gerard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report</atitle><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle><date>2024-10-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>991</spage><epage>991</epage><pages>991-991</pages><issn>1873-5843</issn><eissn>1873-5843</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive cognitive appraisal towards pain, where exaggerated negative schemas about pain are associated with greater likelihood of pain persisting (Chaves &amp; Brown, 1987). We hypothesized that similar mechanisms might underlie the development of persistent concussion symptoms. We adapted a measure of pain catastrophizing to assess concussion symptom catastrophizing and examined its psychometric properties. Method Participants included 292 youth with diagnosed concussions, 57% female and mean age 14.5 years (SD 1.8) in the Care4Kids national study. First administration (T1) and second administration (T2) were about 1 and 3 months post-injury, respectively. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) – Child version was adapted with concussion symptoms, and named the Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS). Results At T1, the original PCS three-dimension structure (Rumination, Magnification, and Helplessness) was supported with goodness of fit statistic as follows: χ2 (51) = 144.96, p 0.57, p &lt; 0.001). Internal consistency reliability for the CCS Total score was strong (coefficient alpha =0.91). Test–retest reliability over the 2 month period was moderate (r = 0.45), moderated in part due to individual variability in recovery. At T2, significant decreases were found in the Total CCS score. Conclusion(s) Our results indicate preliminary support for the CCS-Child version as a measure of concussion symptoms catastrophizing in pediatric populations. Additional evidence of reliability and validity is needed prior to clinical use.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/arclin/acae067.067</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1873-5843
ispartof Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2024-10, Vol.39 (7), p.991-991
issn 1873-5843
1873-5843
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acae067_067
source Oxford University Press Journals
title A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T01%3A40%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20-%2053%20Preliminary%20Psychometric%20Examination%20of%20Concussion%20Catastrophizing%20Scale%20(CCS),%20Self%20Report&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20clinical%20neuropsychology&rft.au=Rasooly,%20Tali&rft.date=2024-10-25&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=991&rft.epage=991&rft.pages=991-991&rft.issn=1873-5843&rft.eissn=1873-5843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/arclin/acae067.067&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/arclin/acae067.067%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/arclin/acae067.067&rfr_iscdi=true