A-217 Associations among Symptom Validity Tests in Combat Veterans
Abstract Objective The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) is a 22-item self-report measure of non-specific cognitive and somatic symptoms, which contains an embedded measure of symptom validity (Validity 10 scale [V-10]). The mild brain injury atypical symptom (mBIAS) is a separate 5-item measu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.1012-1012 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1012 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1012 |
container_title | Archives of clinical neuropsychology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | R, Shura P, Armistead-Jehle J, Rowland K, Taber D, Cooper |
description | Abstract
Objective
The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) is a 22-item self-report measure of non-specific cognitive and somatic symptoms, which contains an embedded measure of symptom validity (Validity 10 scale [V-10]). The mild brain injury atypical symptom (mBIAS) is a separate 5-item measure of symptom validity designed for use in mild traumatic brain injury evaluation. The current study evaluated the NSI V-10 and mBIAS in relation to the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) Total score and subtest scores.
Method
Participants were 338 veterans who completed a parent study at a VA Medical Center. All participants deployed to Iraq and/or Afghanistan, did not have a history of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, and did not have significant neurological or psychiatric conditions. Participants completed the SIMS and the NSI with mBIAS as part of a larger battery. The sample was 86% male and 57% White, with a mean age of 42 years and education of 15 years.
Results
AUC values using a higher SIMS Total cutoff score were .887 for the V-10 and .735 for the mBIAS; diagnostic accuracy data at various cutoff scores are presented. For SIMS subscales, the mBIAS had higher correlations to the Psychosis (r = .48) and Low Intelligence (r = .31) scales, whereas the V-10 had higher correlations to the Neurologic Impairment (r = .73), Amnestic Disorders (r = .66), and Affective Disorders (r = .59) scales.
Conclusion
Current data suggest that the V-10 and mBIAS measure different symptom validity constructs and could therefore be employed in a complimentary manner. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/arclin/acaa068.217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acaa068_217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/arclin/acaa068.217</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/arclin/acaa068.217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1257-710c6a8054159d4e64a8576c09f0594bf7ce410b52088af55a9a479bddb69f433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM9OhDAYxBujievqC3jqC7D7FVraHpH4L9nEg-teyUcppgYoofXA24thDx49zRxmJpkfIfcMdgx0tsfJdG7Yo0GEXO1SJi_IhimZJULx7PKPvyY3IXwBgGAs3ZCHIlnCtAjBG4fR-SFQ7P3wSd_nfoy-pyfsXOPiTI82xEDdQEvf1xjpyUY74RBuyVWLXbB3Z92Sj6fHY_mSHN6eX8vikBiWCplIBiZHBYIzoRtuc45KyNyAbkFoXrfSWM6gFikoha0QqJFLXTdNneuWZ9mWpOuumXwIk22rcXI9TnPFoPqlUK0UqjOFajm2lJK15L_H_-R_AFiXYMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A-217 Associations among Symptom Validity Tests in Combat Veterans</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>R, Shura ; P, Armistead-Jehle ; J, Rowland ; K, Taber ; D, Cooper</creator><creatorcontrib>R, Shura ; P, Armistead-Jehle ; J, Rowland ; K, Taber ; D, Cooper</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Objective
The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) is a 22-item self-report measure of non-specific cognitive and somatic symptoms, which contains an embedded measure of symptom validity (Validity 10 scale [V-10]). The mild brain injury atypical symptom (mBIAS) is a separate 5-item measure of symptom validity designed for use in mild traumatic brain injury evaluation. The current study evaluated the NSI V-10 and mBIAS in relation to the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) Total score and subtest scores.
Method
Participants were 338 veterans who completed a parent study at a VA Medical Center. All participants deployed to Iraq and/or Afghanistan, did not have a history of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, and did not have significant neurological or psychiatric conditions. Participants completed the SIMS and the NSI with mBIAS as part of a larger battery. The sample was 86% male and 57% White, with a mean age of 42 years and education of 15 years.
Results
AUC values using a higher SIMS Total cutoff score were .887 for the V-10 and .735 for the mBIAS; diagnostic accuracy data at various cutoff scores are presented. For SIMS subscales, the mBIAS had higher correlations to the Psychosis (r = .48) and Low Intelligence (r = .31) scales, whereas the V-10 had higher correlations to the Neurologic Impairment (r = .73), Amnestic Disorders (r = .66), and Affective Disorders (r = .59) scales.
Conclusion
Current data suggest that the V-10 and mBIAS measure different symptom validity constructs and could therefore be employed in a complimentary manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acaa068.217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.1012-1012</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>R, Shura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P, Armistead-Jehle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J, Rowland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>K, Taber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D, Cooper</creatorcontrib><title>A-217 Associations among Symptom Validity Tests in Combat Veterans</title><title>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title><description>Abstract
Objective
The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) is a 22-item self-report measure of non-specific cognitive and somatic symptoms, which contains an embedded measure of symptom validity (Validity 10 scale [V-10]). The mild brain injury atypical symptom (mBIAS) is a separate 5-item measure of symptom validity designed for use in mild traumatic brain injury evaluation. The current study evaluated the NSI V-10 and mBIAS in relation to the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) Total score and subtest scores.
Method
Participants were 338 veterans who completed a parent study at a VA Medical Center. All participants deployed to Iraq and/or Afghanistan, did not have a history of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, and did not have significant neurological or psychiatric conditions. Participants completed the SIMS and the NSI with mBIAS as part of a larger battery. The sample was 86% male and 57% White, with a mean age of 42 years and education of 15 years.
Results
AUC values using a higher SIMS Total cutoff score were .887 for the V-10 and .735 for the mBIAS; diagnostic accuracy data at various cutoff scores are presented. For SIMS subscales, the mBIAS had higher correlations to the Psychosis (r = .48) and Low Intelligence (r = .31) scales, whereas the V-10 had higher correlations to the Neurologic Impairment (r = .73), Amnestic Disorders (r = .66), and Affective Disorders (r = .59) scales.
Conclusion
Current data suggest that the V-10 and mBIAS measure different symptom validity constructs and could therefore be employed in a complimentary manner.</description><issn>1873-5843</issn><issn>1873-5843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM9OhDAYxBujievqC3jqC7D7FVraHpH4L9nEg-teyUcppgYoofXA24thDx49zRxmJpkfIfcMdgx0tsfJdG7Yo0GEXO1SJi_IhimZJULx7PKPvyY3IXwBgGAs3ZCHIlnCtAjBG4fR-SFQ7P3wSd_nfoy-pyfsXOPiTI82xEDdQEvf1xjpyUY74RBuyVWLXbB3Z92Sj6fHY_mSHN6eX8vikBiWCplIBiZHBYIzoRtuc45KyNyAbkFoXrfSWM6gFikoha0QqJFLXTdNneuWZ9mWpOuumXwIk22rcXI9TnPFoPqlUK0UqjOFajm2lJK15L_H_-R_AFiXYMo</recordid><startdate>20200828</startdate><enddate>20200828</enddate><creator>R, Shura</creator><creator>P, Armistead-Jehle</creator><creator>J, Rowland</creator><creator>K, Taber</creator><creator>D, Cooper</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200828</creationdate><title>A-217 Associations among Symptom Validity Tests in Combat Veterans</title><author>R, Shura ; P, Armistead-Jehle ; J, Rowland ; K, Taber ; D, Cooper</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1257-710c6a8054159d4e64a8576c09f0594bf7ce410b52088af55a9a479bddb69f433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>R, Shura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P, Armistead-Jehle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J, Rowland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>K, Taber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D, Cooper</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>R, Shura</au><au>P, Armistead-Jehle</au><au>J, Rowland</au><au>K, Taber</au><au>D, Cooper</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A-217 Associations among Symptom Validity Tests in Combat Veterans</atitle><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle><date>2020-08-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1012</spage><epage>1012</epage><pages>1012-1012</pages><issn>1873-5843</issn><eissn>1873-5843</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Objective
The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) is a 22-item self-report measure of non-specific cognitive and somatic symptoms, which contains an embedded measure of symptom validity (Validity 10 scale [V-10]). The mild brain injury atypical symptom (mBIAS) is a separate 5-item measure of symptom validity designed for use in mild traumatic brain injury evaluation. The current study evaluated the NSI V-10 and mBIAS in relation to the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) Total score and subtest scores.
Method
Participants were 338 veterans who completed a parent study at a VA Medical Center. All participants deployed to Iraq and/or Afghanistan, did not have a history of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, and did not have significant neurological or psychiatric conditions. Participants completed the SIMS and the NSI with mBIAS as part of a larger battery. The sample was 86% male and 57% White, with a mean age of 42 years and education of 15 years.
Results
AUC values using a higher SIMS Total cutoff score were .887 for the V-10 and .735 for the mBIAS; diagnostic accuracy data at various cutoff scores are presented. For SIMS subscales, the mBIAS had higher correlations to the Psychosis (r = .48) and Low Intelligence (r = .31) scales, whereas the V-10 had higher correlations to the Neurologic Impairment (r = .73), Amnestic Disorders (r = .66), and Affective Disorders (r = .59) scales.
Conclusion
Current data suggest that the V-10 and mBIAS measure different symptom validity constructs and could therefore be employed in a complimentary manner.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/arclin/acaa068.217</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1873-5843 |
ispartof | Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.1012-1012 |
issn | 1873-5843 1873-5843 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acaa068_217 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | A-217 Associations among Symptom Validity Tests in Combat Veterans |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A58%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A-217%20Associations%20among%20Symptom%20Validity%20Tests%20in%20Combat%20Veterans&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20clinical%20neuropsychology&rft.au=R,%20Shura&rft.date=2020-08-28&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1012&rft.epage=1012&rft.pages=1012-1012&rft.issn=1873-5843&rft.eissn=1873-5843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/arclin/acaa068.217&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/arclin/acaa068.217%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/arclin/acaa068.217&rfr_iscdi=true |