“The Mound of His Back”: The Profession of Literature and the Fear of the Mob

Recent novels respond to the current crisis of democracy by invoking literary fiction as a means to cultivate empathy and as a model for more inclusive forms of community. But such novels also often defend the mission of literature by casting service workers and popular voters as foils and by defini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American literary history 2023-02, Vol.35 (1), p.350-363
1. Verfasser: McCann, Sean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 363
container_issue 1
container_start_page 350
container_title American literary history
container_volume 35
creator McCann, Sean
description Recent novels respond to the current crisis of democracy by invoking literary fiction as a means to cultivate empathy and as a model for more inclusive forms of community. But such novels also often defend the mission of literature by casting service workers and popular voters as foils and by defining those figures as ignorant and irrational. Reflecting the educational cleavage that shapes both literary culture and the current political environment, such defenses of literature point toward the class limitations of contemporary liberalism and, in this respect, are not good models of democracy.This is a sentence that expresses a judgment about the characters it depicts, and the judgment is clear: they are poor, ugly, and stupid.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/alh/ajac161
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>projectmuse_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_alh_ajac161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>884159_S1468436523100767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-42dece7aaf25b8c931bf1bd22c25c4273e13d62ee10b0e4a50c33b61d81d06f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFOwzAQRS0EEqWw4gLZo1CP7TgOO6goRSoCRFlbjjNRE9qkspMFux4ELteT4NCuZvHf_xo9Qq6B3gLN-MSsVxNTGwsSTsgIhFSx4DI5JSOqMhmnINQ5ufC-ppQKmfIRed_vfpYrjF7avimitozmlY8ejP3a737voiF5c22J3ldtM8SLqkNnut5hZEKhC8AMjRui7n8mvyRnpVl7vDreMfmcPS6n83jx-vQ8vV_ElqW8iwUr0GJqTMmSXNmMQ15CXjBmWWJFQBB4IRki0JyiMAm1nOcSCgUFlSXwMbk57FrXeu-w1FtXbYz71kD1YEMHG_poI9DiQG9dW6PtNr1HXbe9a8KPWikBSaY_BmODMMaB0jQI-gMUG2Tz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>“The Mound of His Back”: The Profession of Literature and the Fear of the Mob</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>McCann, Sean</creator><creatorcontrib>McCann, Sean</creatorcontrib><description>Recent novels respond to the current crisis of democracy by invoking literary fiction as a means to cultivate empathy and as a model for more inclusive forms of community. But such novels also often defend the mission of literature by casting service workers and popular voters as foils and by defining those figures as ignorant and irrational. Reflecting the educational cleavage that shapes both literary culture and the current political environment, such defenses of literature point toward the class limitations of contemporary liberalism and, in this respect, are not good models of democracy.This is a sentence that expresses a judgment about the characters it depicts, and the judgment is clear: they are poor, ugly, and stupid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0896-7148</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-4365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/alh/ajac161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>American literary history, 2023-02, Vol.35 (1), p.350-363</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Oxford University Press and the Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-42dece7aaf25b8c931bf1bd22c25c4273e13d62ee10b0e4a50c33b61d81d06f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCann, Sean</creatorcontrib><title>“The Mound of His Back”: The Profession of Literature and the Fear of the Mob</title><title>American literary history</title><description>Recent novels respond to the current crisis of democracy by invoking literary fiction as a means to cultivate empathy and as a model for more inclusive forms of community. But such novels also often defend the mission of literature by casting service workers and popular voters as foils and by defining those figures as ignorant and irrational. Reflecting the educational cleavage that shapes both literary culture and the current political environment, such defenses of literature point toward the class limitations of contemporary liberalism and, in this respect, are not good models of democracy.This is a sentence that expresses a judgment about the characters it depicts, and the judgment is clear: they are poor, ugly, and stupid.</description><issn>0896-7148</issn><issn>1468-4365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEFOwzAQRS0EEqWw4gLZo1CP7TgOO6goRSoCRFlbjjNRE9qkspMFux4ELteT4NCuZvHf_xo9Qq6B3gLN-MSsVxNTGwsSTsgIhFSx4DI5JSOqMhmnINQ5ufC-ppQKmfIRed_vfpYrjF7avimitozmlY8ejP3a737voiF5c22J3ldtM8SLqkNnut5hZEKhC8AMjRui7n8mvyRnpVl7vDreMfmcPS6n83jx-vQ8vV_ElqW8iwUr0GJqTMmSXNmMQ15CXjBmWWJFQBB4IRki0JyiMAm1nOcSCgUFlSXwMbk57FrXeu-w1FtXbYz71kD1YEMHG_poI9DiQG9dW6PtNr1HXbe9a8KPWikBSaY_BmODMMaB0jQI-gMUG2Tz</recordid><startdate>20230220</startdate><enddate>20230220</enddate><creator>McCann, Sean</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230220</creationdate><title>“The Mound of His Back”: The Profession of Literature and the Fear of the Mob</title><author>McCann, Sean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-42dece7aaf25b8c931bf1bd22c25c4273e13d62ee10b0e4a50c33b61d81d06f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCann, Sean</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American literary history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCann, Sean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“The Mound of His Back”: The Profession of Literature and the Fear of the Mob</atitle><jtitle>American literary history</jtitle><date>2023-02-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>350-363</pages><issn>0896-7148</issn><eissn>1468-4365</eissn><abstract>Recent novels respond to the current crisis of democracy by invoking literary fiction as a means to cultivate empathy and as a model for more inclusive forms of community. But such novels also often defend the mission of literature by casting service workers and popular voters as foils and by defining those figures as ignorant and irrational. Reflecting the educational cleavage that shapes both literary culture and the current political environment, such defenses of literature point toward the class limitations of contemporary liberalism and, in this respect, are not good models of democracy.This is a sentence that expresses a judgment about the characters it depicts, and the judgment is clear: they are poor, ugly, and stupid.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/alh/ajac161</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0896-7148
ispartof American literary history, 2023-02, Vol.35 (1), p.350-363
issn 0896-7148
1468-4365
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_alh_ajac161
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title “The Mound of His Back”: The Profession of Literature and the Fear of the Mob
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-projectmuse_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CThe%20Mound%20of%20His%20Back%E2%80%9D:%20The%20Profession%20of%20Literature%20and%20the%20Fear%20of%20the%20Mob&rft.jtitle=American%20literary%20history&rft.au=McCann,%20Sean&rft.date=2023-02-20&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=350-363&rft.issn=0896-7148&rft.eissn=1468-4365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/alh/ajac161&rft_dat=%3Cprojectmuse_cross%3E884159_S1468436523100767%3C/projectmuse_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true