Cost-Savings Analysis of Routine Hysteroscopy for Early Detection and Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions

Objective: Many uterine procedures cause intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). The standard of care (SOC) for detecting IUAs includes initiating a work-up after a patient reports such symptoms as menstrual irregularity, pelvic pain, or infertility. Routine hysteroscopy (RHSC) is not currently performed aft...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gynecologic surgery 2023-04, Vol.39 (2), p.82-91
Hauptverfasser: Zelivianskaia, Anna, Arcaz, Arthur, Kolm, Paul, Robinson, James K., Hazen, Nicholas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue 2
container_start_page 82
container_title Journal of gynecologic surgery
container_volume 39
creator Zelivianskaia, Anna
Arcaz, Arthur
Kolm, Paul
Robinson, James K.
Hazen, Nicholas
description Objective: Many uterine procedures cause intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). The standard of care (SOC) for detecting IUAs includes initiating a work-up after a patient reports such symptoms as menstrual irregularity, pelvic pain, or infertility. Routine hysteroscopy (RHSC) is not currently performed after an event that may cause an IUA. This study objective was to determine if routine diagnostic HSC following procedures that are high risk for causing IUAs could be a cost-saving alternative to the current SOC from both medical-system and patient perspectives. Materials and Methods: This nonclinical economic-modeling exercise involved a hypothetical cohort of women who received office RHSC after an inciting event, compared to women who received SOC. The model had 4 scenarios for a range of diagnostic work-up costs and costs of HSC lysis of adhesions of varying severity. Each scenario was run with a proportion of IUA formation after an inciting event varying from 1% to 99%. Results: Costs of RHSC became equivalent to the SOC with an IUA incidence rate from 5% to 22%, depending on the cost of the work-ups. For less expensive work-ups, RHSC yielded cost savings of 18%–22%, with an IUA rate depending on the HSC treatment costs. For more expensive work-ups, including full infertility work-ups, RHSC provided cost savings for only 5% of IUAs in a given cohort of patients. Conclusions: The model demonstrated that RHSC after a procedure known to cause IUAs can be cost-saving in many clinical scenarios. Accounting for various infertility work-up cost estimates and gradients of adhesion severity, RHSC costs were equivalent to SOC with an IUA formation rate of 5%–22%. This suggests that RHSC could be considered in reproductive-age women who desire fertility after procedures known to cause IUAs, without expected increased costs to the medical system. Additionally, RHSC may confer health benefits and increase patient satisfaction due to earlier diagnosis and less loss of reproductive years. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)
doi_str_mv 10.1089/gyn.2022.0106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>maryannliebert_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1089_gyn_2022_0106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1089_gyn_2022_0106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-515d5a0440e3e0a1bc48c4f2eb6e884a0b3a36f69260598eb16fd56f17f2ce6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLwzAUgIMoOKdH7_kDmS9pmrbHMacbDASd55K2LzPSJSPJhP57W-bdU97h-x4vHyGPHBYcyurpMLiFACEWwEFdkRnP84IVhZDX4wxSMAmquCV3MX4D8AzyakbsysfEPvSPdYdIl073Q7SRekPf_TlZh3QzxITBx9afBmp8oGsd-oE-Y8I2We-odh3dB9TpiC5N5taloM-jNOnL7gvjiMV7cmN0H_Hh752Tz5f1frVhu7fX7Wq5Y60oeWI5z7tcg5SAGYLmTSvLVhqBjcKylBqaTGfKqEqo8QMlNlyZLleGF0a0qEw2J-yytx2PjgFNfQr2qMNQc6inTvXYqZ461VOnkc8u_MRo53qLDYb0j_ULuxpu-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Savings Analysis of Routine Hysteroscopy for Early Detection and Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zelivianskaia, Anna ; Arcaz, Arthur ; Kolm, Paul ; Robinson, James K. ; Hazen, Nicholas</creator><creatorcontrib>Zelivianskaia, Anna ; Arcaz, Arthur ; Kolm, Paul ; Robinson, James K. ; Hazen, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Many uterine procedures cause intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). The standard of care (SOC) for detecting IUAs includes initiating a work-up after a patient reports such symptoms as menstrual irregularity, pelvic pain, or infertility. Routine hysteroscopy (RHSC) is not currently performed after an event that may cause an IUA. This study objective was to determine if routine diagnostic HSC following procedures that are high risk for causing IUAs could be a cost-saving alternative to the current SOC from both medical-system and patient perspectives. Materials and Methods: This nonclinical economic-modeling exercise involved a hypothetical cohort of women who received office RHSC after an inciting event, compared to women who received SOC. The model had 4 scenarios for a range of diagnostic work-up costs and costs of HSC lysis of adhesions of varying severity. Each scenario was run with a proportion of IUA formation after an inciting event varying from 1% to 99%. Results: Costs of RHSC became equivalent to the SOC with an IUA incidence rate from 5% to 22%, depending on the cost of the work-ups. For less expensive work-ups, RHSC yielded cost savings of 18%–22%, with an IUA rate depending on the HSC treatment costs. For more expensive work-ups, including full infertility work-ups, RHSC provided cost savings for only 5% of IUAs in a given cohort of patients. Conclusions: The model demonstrated that RHSC after a procedure known to cause IUAs can be cost-saving in many clinical scenarios. Accounting for various infertility work-up cost estimates and gradients of adhesion severity, RHSC costs were equivalent to SOC with an IUA formation rate of 5%–22%. This suggests that RHSC could be considered in reproductive-age women who desire fertility after procedures known to cause IUAs, without expected increased costs to the medical system. Additionally, RHSC may confer health benefits and increase patient satisfaction due to earlier diagnosis and less loss of reproductive years. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-4067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2022.0106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</publisher><ispartof>Journal of gynecologic surgery, 2023-04, Vol.39 (2), p.82-91</ispartof><rights>2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-515d5a0440e3e0a1bc48c4f2eb6e884a0b3a36f69260598eb16fd56f17f2ce6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-515d5a0440e3e0a1bc48c4f2eb6e884a0b3a36f69260598eb16fd56f17f2ce6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zelivianskaia, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcaz, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolm, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazen, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Savings Analysis of Routine Hysteroscopy for Early Detection and Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions</title><title>Journal of gynecologic surgery</title><description>Objective: Many uterine procedures cause intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). The standard of care (SOC) for detecting IUAs includes initiating a work-up after a patient reports such symptoms as menstrual irregularity, pelvic pain, or infertility. Routine hysteroscopy (RHSC) is not currently performed after an event that may cause an IUA. This study objective was to determine if routine diagnostic HSC following procedures that are high risk for causing IUAs could be a cost-saving alternative to the current SOC from both medical-system and patient perspectives. Materials and Methods: This nonclinical economic-modeling exercise involved a hypothetical cohort of women who received office RHSC after an inciting event, compared to women who received SOC. The model had 4 scenarios for a range of diagnostic work-up costs and costs of HSC lysis of adhesions of varying severity. Each scenario was run with a proportion of IUA formation after an inciting event varying from 1% to 99%. Results: Costs of RHSC became equivalent to the SOC with an IUA incidence rate from 5% to 22%, depending on the cost of the work-ups. For less expensive work-ups, RHSC yielded cost savings of 18%–22%, with an IUA rate depending on the HSC treatment costs. For more expensive work-ups, including full infertility work-ups, RHSC provided cost savings for only 5% of IUAs in a given cohort of patients. Conclusions: The model demonstrated that RHSC after a procedure known to cause IUAs can be cost-saving in many clinical scenarios. Accounting for various infertility work-up cost estimates and gradients of adhesion severity, RHSC costs were equivalent to SOC with an IUA formation rate of 5%–22%. This suggests that RHSC could be considered in reproductive-age women who desire fertility after procedures known to cause IUAs, without expected increased costs to the medical system. Additionally, RHSC may confer health benefits and increase patient satisfaction due to earlier diagnosis and less loss of reproductive years. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)</description><issn>1042-4067</issn><issn>1557-7724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLwzAUgIMoOKdH7_kDmS9pmrbHMacbDASd55K2LzPSJSPJhP57W-bdU97h-x4vHyGPHBYcyurpMLiFACEWwEFdkRnP84IVhZDX4wxSMAmquCV3MX4D8AzyakbsysfEPvSPdYdIl073Q7SRekPf_TlZh3QzxITBx9afBmp8oGsd-oE-Y8I2We-odh3dB9TpiC5N5taloM-jNOnL7gvjiMV7cmN0H_Hh752Tz5f1frVhu7fX7Wq5Y60oeWI5z7tcg5SAGYLmTSvLVhqBjcKylBqaTGfKqEqo8QMlNlyZLleGF0a0qEw2J-yytx2PjgFNfQr2qMNQc6inTvXYqZ461VOnkc8u_MRo53qLDYb0j_ULuxpu-A</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Zelivianskaia, Anna</creator><creator>Arcaz, Arthur</creator><creator>Kolm, Paul</creator><creator>Robinson, James K.</creator><creator>Hazen, Nicholas</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Cost-Savings Analysis of Routine Hysteroscopy for Early Detection and Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions</title><author>Zelivianskaia, Anna ; Arcaz, Arthur ; Kolm, Paul ; Robinson, James K. ; Hazen, Nicholas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-515d5a0440e3e0a1bc48c4f2eb6e884a0b3a36f69260598eb16fd56f17f2ce6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zelivianskaia, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcaz, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolm, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazen, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of gynecologic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zelivianskaia, Anna</au><au>Arcaz, Arthur</au><au>Kolm, Paul</au><au>Robinson, James K.</au><au>Hazen, Nicholas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Savings Analysis of Routine Hysteroscopy for Early Detection and Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gynecologic surgery</jtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>82-91</pages><issn>1042-4067</issn><eissn>1557-7724</eissn><abstract>Objective: Many uterine procedures cause intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). The standard of care (SOC) for detecting IUAs includes initiating a work-up after a patient reports such symptoms as menstrual irregularity, pelvic pain, or infertility. Routine hysteroscopy (RHSC) is not currently performed after an event that may cause an IUA. This study objective was to determine if routine diagnostic HSC following procedures that are high risk for causing IUAs could be a cost-saving alternative to the current SOC from both medical-system and patient perspectives. Materials and Methods: This nonclinical economic-modeling exercise involved a hypothetical cohort of women who received office RHSC after an inciting event, compared to women who received SOC. The model had 4 scenarios for a range of diagnostic work-up costs and costs of HSC lysis of adhesions of varying severity. Each scenario was run with a proportion of IUA formation after an inciting event varying from 1% to 99%. Results: Costs of RHSC became equivalent to the SOC with an IUA incidence rate from 5% to 22%, depending on the cost of the work-ups. For less expensive work-ups, RHSC yielded cost savings of 18%–22%, with an IUA rate depending on the HSC treatment costs. For more expensive work-ups, including full infertility work-ups, RHSC provided cost savings for only 5% of IUAs in a given cohort of patients. Conclusions: The model demonstrated that RHSC after a procedure known to cause IUAs can be cost-saving in many clinical scenarios. Accounting for various infertility work-up cost estimates and gradients of adhesion severity, RHSC costs were equivalent to SOC with an IUA formation rate of 5%–22%. This suggests that RHSC could be considered in reproductive-age women who desire fertility after procedures known to cause IUAs, without expected increased costs to the medical system. Additionally, RHSC may confer health benefits and increase patient satisfaction due to earlier diagnosis and less loss of reproductive years. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)</abstract><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</pub><doi>10.1089/gyn.2022.0106</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-4067
ispartof Journal of gynecologic surgery, 2023-04, Vol.39 (2), p.82-91
issn 1042-4067
1557-7724
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1089_gyn_2022_0106
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Cost-Savings Analysis of Routine Hysteroscopy for Early Detection and Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A06%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-maryannliebert_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Savings%20Analysis%20of%20Routine%20Hysteroscopy%20for%20Early%20Detection%20and%20Treatment%20of%20Intrauterine%20Adhesions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gynecologic%20surgery&rft.au=Zelivianskaia,%20Anna&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=82-91&rft.issn=1042-4067&rft.eissn=1557-7724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/gyn.2022.0106&rft_dat=%3Cmaryannliebert_cross%3E10_1089_gyn_2022_0106%3C/maryannliebert_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true