Photodynamic Diagnosis with Oral 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: A Prospective Clinical Trial

In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) of upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) using oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Consecutive adult patients with suspected UTUC based on imaging and urine cytology findings were prospectively enrolled from May...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2020-04, Vol.34 (4), p.509-515
Hauptverfasser: Yoshida, Takashi, Setsuda, Shohei, Ishizuka, Masahiro, Inoue, Takaaki, Kinoshita, Hidefumi, Matsuda, Tadashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 515
container_issue 4
container_start_page 509
container_title Journal of endourology
container_volume 34
creator Yoshida, Takashi
Setsuda, Shohei
Ishizuka, Masahiro
Inoue, Takaaki
Kinoshita, Hidefumi
Matsuda, Tadashi
description In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) of upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) using oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Consecutive adult patients with suspected UTUC based on imaging and urine cytology findings were prospectively enrolled from May 2018 to January 2019. 5-ALA (20 mg/kg) was orally administered 2 to 3 hours before diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS). Sixty-three biopsy samples were collected from 20 eligible patients using white light (WL) and PDD-URS. The primary endpoint was sensitivity, and the secondary endpoints were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and safety. The sensitivity of photodynamic URS was significantly higher than that of WL-URS (93.8% 62.5%,  = 0.0025). Although the specificity and PPV were not different between the two procedures, PDD-URS showed a significantly higher NPV (92.3% 69.2%,  = 0.027) and accuracy (0.86 0.75,  = 0.0297) than WL-URS. With respect to safety, no grade ≥3 adverse events related to 5-ALA administration occurred in any patients. We found that PDD-URS with oral 5-ALA is a safe and superior diagnostic tool for detection of UTUC compared with conventional WL-URS.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/end.2019.0725
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2019_0725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31964177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-c3ee56d8eda65f7036af73370cfb598fddfc4554ef791ad47098375397269dfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWwZIv8Aw52HMcxuyg8pUrtopXYRa4f1Cgv2WlR_x6XApuZxZy5ujoA3BKcEFyIe9PpJMVEJJin7AxMCWMcCYzfz8E03lPEucATcBXCJ8aE5oReggklIs8I51OwX277sdeHTrZOwUcnP7o-uAC_3LiFCy8byFDZuq5vzH7XuC5CpXIa2t7D9TCYOL3rpD_AlZdqhJX0KtKtfIAlXPo-DEaNbm9g9fMc81beyeYaXFjZBHPzu2dg_fy0ql7RfPHyVpVzpFJBR6SoMSzXhdEyZ5ZjmkvLKeVY2Q0ThdXaqoyxzFguiNQZx6KgnFHB01xoa-gMoFOuilWCN7YevGtj3Zrg-uivjv7qo7_66C_ydyd-2G1ao__pP2H0G_13bVo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Photodynamic Diagnosis with Oral 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: A Prospective Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yoshida, Takashi ; Setsuda, Shohei ; Ishizuka, Masahiro ; Inoue, Takaaki ; Kinoshita, Hidefumi ; Matsuda, Tadashi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Takashi ; Setsuda, Shohei ; Ishizuka, Masahiro ; Inoue, Takaaki ; Kinoshita, Hidefumi ; Matsuda, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) of upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) using oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Consecutive adult patients with suspected UTUC based on imaging and urine cytology findings were prospectively enrolled from May 2018 to January 2019. 5-ALA (20 mg/kg) was orally administered 2 to 3 hours before diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS). Sixty-three biopsy samples were collected from 20 eligible patients using white light (WL) and PDD-URS. The primary endpoint was sensitivity, and the secondary endpoints were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and safety. The sensitivity of photodynamic URS was significantly higher than that of WL-URS (93.8% 62.5%,  = 0.0025). Although the specificity and PPV were not different between the two procedures, PDD-URS showed a significantly higher NPV (92.3% 69.2%,  = 0.027) and accuracy (0.86 0.75,  = 0.0297) than WL-URS. With respect to safety, no grade ≥3 adverse events related to 5-ALA administration occurred in any patients. We found that PDD-URS with oral 5-ALA is a safe and superior diagnostic tool for detection of UTUC compared with conventional WL-URS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-900X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0725</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31964177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aminolevulinic Acid - adverse effects ; Aminolevulinic Acid - therapeutic use ; Carcinoma ; Humans ; Photosensitizing Agents - adverse effects ; Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use ; Prospective Studies ; Urinary Tract ; Urologic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of endourology, 2020-04, Vol.34 (4), p.509-515</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-c3ee56d8eda65f7036af73370cfb598fddfc4554ef791ad47098375397269dfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-c3ee56d8eda65f7036af73370cfb598fddfc4554ef791ad47098375397269dfe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31964177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setsuda, Shohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishizuka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Hidefumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><title>Photodynamic Diagnosis with Oral 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: A Prospective Clinical Trial</title><title>Journal of endourology</title><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><description>In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) of upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) using oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Consecutive adult patients with suspected UTUC based on imaging and urine cytology findings were prospectively enrolled from May 2018 to January 2019. 5-ALA (20 mg/kg) was orally administered 2 to 3 hours before diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS). Sixty-three biopsy samples were collected from 20 eligible patients using white light (WL) and PDD-URS. The primary endpoint was sensitivity, and the secondary endpoints were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and safety. The sensitivity of photodynamic URS was significantly higher than that of WL-URS (93.8% 62.5%,  = 0.0025). Although the specificity and PPV were not different between the two procedures, PDD-URS showed a significantly higher NPV (92.3% 69.2%,  = 0.027) and accuracy (0.86 0.75,  = 0.0297) than WL-URS. With respect to safety, no grade ≥3 adverse events related to 5-ALA administration occurred in any patients. We found that PDD-URS with oral 5-ALA is a safe and superior diagnostic tool for detection of UTUC compared with conventional WL-URS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aminolevulinic Acid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Aminolevulinic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carcinoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Photosensitizing Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Urinary Tract</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0892-7790</issn><issn>1557-900X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWwZIv8Aw52HMcxuyg8pUrtopXYRa4f1Cgv2WlR_x6XApuZxZy5ujoA3BKcEFyIe9PpJMVEJJin7AxMCWMcCYzfz8E03lPEucATcBXCJ8aE5oReggklIs8I51OwX277sdeHTrZOwUcnP7o-uAC_3LiFCy8byFDZuq5vzH7XuC5CpXIa2t7D9TCYOL3rpD_AlZdqhJX0KtKtfIAlXPo-DEaNbm9g9fMc81beyeYaXFjZBHPzu2dg_fy0ql7RfPHyVpVzpFJBR6SoMSzXhdEyZ5ZjmkvLKeVY2Q0ThdXaqoyxzFguiNQZx6KgnFHB01xoa-gMoFOuilWCN7YevGtj3Zrg-uivjv7qo7_66C_ydyd-2G1ao__pP2H0G_13bVo</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Yoshida, Takashi</creator><creator>Setsuda, Shohei</creator><creator>Ishizuka, Masahiro</creator><creator>Inoue, Takaaki</creator><creator>Kinoshita, Hidefumi</creator><creator>Matsuda, Tadashi</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Photodynamic Diagnosis with Oral 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: A Prospective Clinical Trial</title><author>Yoshida, Takashi ; Setsuda, Shohei ; Ishizuka, Masahiro ; Inoue, Takaaki ; Kinoshita, Hidefumi ; Matsuda, Tadashi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-c3ee56d8eda65f7036af73370cfb598fddfc4554ef791ad47098375397269dfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aminolevulinic Acid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Aminolevulinic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carcinoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Photosensitizing Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Urinary Tract</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setsuda, Shohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishizuka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Hidefumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoshida, Takashi</au><au>Setsuda, Shohei</au><au>Ishizuka, Masahiro</au><au>Inoue, Takaaki</au><au>Kinoshita, Hidefumi</au><au>Matsuda, Tadashi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Photodynamic Diagnosis with Oral 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: A Prospective Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>509-515</pages><issn>0892-7790</issn><eissn>1557-900X</eissn><abstract>In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) of upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) using oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Consecutive adult patients with suspected UTUC based on imaging and urine cytology findings were prospectively enrolled from May 2018 to January 2019. 5-ALA (20 mg/kg) was orally administered 2 to 3 hours before diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS). Sixty-three biopsy samples were collected from 20 eligible patients using white light (WL) and PDD-URS. The primary endpoint was sensitivity, and the secondary endpoints were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and safety. The sensitivity of photodynamic URS was significantly higher than that of WL-URS (93.8% 62.5%,  = 0.0025). Although the specificity and PPV were not different between the two procedures, PDD-URS showed a significantly higher NPV (92.3% 69.2%,  = 0.027) and accuracy (0.86 0.75,  = 0.0297) than WL-URS. With respect to safety, no grade ≥3 adverse events related to 5-ALA administration occurred in any patients. We found that PDD-URS with oral 5-ALA is a safe and superior diagnostic tool for detection of UTUC compared with conventional WL-URS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31964177</pmid><doi>10.1089/end.2019.0725</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-7790
ispartof Journal of endourology, 2020-04, Vol.34 (4), p.509-515
issn 0892-7790
1557-900X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2019_0725
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aminolevulinic Acid - adverse effects
Aminolevulinic Acid - therapeutic use
Carcinoma
Humans
Photosensitizing Agents - adverse effects
Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Urinary Tract
Urologic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
title Photodynamic Diagnosis with Oral 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: A Prospective Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A35%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Photodynamic%20Diagnosis%20with%20Oral%205-Aminolevulinic%20Acid%20for%20Upper%20Urinary%20Tract%20Carcinoma:%20A%20Prospective%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endourology&rft.au=Yoshida,%20Takashi&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=509-515&rft.issn=0892-7790&rft.eissn=1557-900X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/end.2019.0725&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E31964177%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31964177&rfr_iscdi=true