Community-mobilized soil and water conservation and farmers' preferences for mitigating land degradation

Various soil and water conservation (SWC) practices have been constructed through campaign-based integrated watershed management in Ethiopia since 2011. However, not all SWC measures were implemented across the country and preferred by the farmers equally. Hence, this research aimed to evaluate the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental Research Communications 2024-12, Vol.6 (12), p.125016
Hauptverfasser: Addis, Hailu Kendie, Tamir, Simegnew, Belay, Beyene, Mekuriaw, Shigdaf, Birehanu, Tadesse, Wuletaw, Yismaw
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 125016
container_title Environmental Research Communications
container_volume 6
creator Addis, Hailu Kendie
Tamir, Simegnew
Belay, Beyene
Mekuriaw, Shigdaf
Birehanu, Tadesse
Wuletaw, Yismaw
description Various soil and water conservation (SWC) practices have been constructed through campaign-based integrated watershed management in Ethiopia since 2011. However, not all SWC measures were implemented across the country and preferred by the farmers equally. Hence, this research aimed to evaluate the trends of community-mobilized SWC practice and farmers’ SWC preference to combat land degradation in Amhara region, Ethiopia. The study utilized primary and secondary data from 92 selected watersheds across 13 zones, 45 woredas, and 1,739 households. Extensive household interviews that include elders, women, and youth, as well as focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The result showed that 128,726.28 hectares of gully rehabilitation had been carried out, 4,436,096.3033 hectares of cultivated fields have received SWC measures, and SWC measures were done on 817,104.7 hectares of communal land. Despite these commendable initiatives, it was found that 46% of the community-mobilized SWC structures built on cultivated land have been partially or entirely removed, additionally, 66% of the constructed SWC structures lack support by biological measures. Furthermore, the survey revealed that 20% of the respondents’ land holdings were affected by gullies, and a 43% decrease trend in efforts to combat gully erosion since 2011. This study demonstrates the significance of implementing SWC measures for the sustainability of the watershed. It also underscores the vital role of regular maintenance in enhancing the effectiveness of the structures, along with the imperative need to reinforce the SWC structures using biological measures. Moreover, the research stresses the importance of rehabilitating communal lands through enclosure and improving cropland soil fertility by applying organic compost.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2515-7620/ad9c1e
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2515_7620_ad9c1e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_17f18315107441d78f201d9cfb56789e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3148838219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2a8bb199584b693ea4487ea79216f68c7b5ac11325afdcab4f61306906e3cb9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxU1JoSHJvUdDD7nUjUaS9XEsS9MGArmkZyFLo60W23Ilb0L618e7LkkPDQgkHr_3Rrypqo9AvgBR6oq20DZSUHJlvXaA76rTF-nkn_eH6qKUHSGESs0J8NPq1yYNw36M81MzpC728Q_6uqTY13b09aOdMdcujQXzg51jGo9ysHnAXC7rKWPAjKPDUoeU6yHOcbtw47buD6DHbbb-aDyv3gfbF7z4e59VP6-_3W9-NLd33282X28bxxjMDbWq60DrVvFOaIaWcyXRSk1BBKGc7FrrABhtbfDOdjwIYERoIpC5TiM7q27WXJ_szkw5DjY_mWSjOQopb43Nc3Q9GpABFIMWiOQcvFSBElj6C10rpDpmfVqzppx-77HMZpf2eVy-bxhwpZiioBeKrJTLqZSlkZepQMxhPebQvzn0b9b1LJbL1RLT9JqJ2RlhgC6nJSDM5MNCfv4P-WbwM5gbnnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3148838219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community-mobilized soil and water conservation and farmers' preferences for mitigating land degradation</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Addis, Hailu Kendie ; Tamir, Simegnew ; Belay, Beyene ; Mekuriaw, Shigdaf ; Birehanu, Tadesse ; Wuletaw, Yismaw</creator><creatorcontrib>Addis, Hailu Kendie ; Tamir, Simegnew ; Belay, Beyene ; Mekuriaw, Shigdaf ; Birehanu, Tadesse ; Wuletaw, Yismaw</creatorcontrib><description>Various soil and water conservation (SWC) practices have been constructed through campaign-based integrated watershed management in Ethiopia since 2011. However, not all SWC measures were implemented across the country and preferred by the farmers equally. Hence, this research aimed to evaluate the trends of community-mobilized SWC practice and farmers’ SWC preference to combat land degradation in Amhara region, Ethiopia. The study utilized primary and secondary data from 92 selected watersheds across 13 zones, 45 woredas, and 1,739 households. Extensive household interviews that include elders, women, and youth, as well as focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The result showed that 128,726.28 hectares of gully rehabilitation had been carried out, 4,436,096.3033 hectares of cultivated fields have received SWC measures, and SWC measures were done on 817,104.7 hectares of communal land. Despite these commendable initiatives, it was found that 46% of the community-mobilized SWC structures built on cultivated land have been partially or entirely removed, additionally, 66% of the constructed SWC structures lack support by biological measures. Furthermore, the survey revealed that 20% of the respondents’ land holdings were affected by gullies, and a 43% decrease trend in efforts to combat gully erosion since 2011. This study demonstrates the significance of implementing SWC measures for the sustainability of the watershed. It also underscores the vital role of regular maintenance in enhancing the effectiveness of the structures, along with the imperative need to reinforce the SWC structures using biological measures. Moreover, the research stresses the importance of rehabilitating communal lands through enclosure and improving cropland soil fertility by applying organic compost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-7620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-7620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad9c1e</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; amhara region ; Biological effects ; Cultivated lands ; erosion ; Farmers ; Gullies ; Gully erosion ; household survey ; Households ; Land conservation ; Land degradation ; Organic soils ; Soil conservation ; Soil degradation ; Soil fertility ; Soil improvement ; Soil stresses ; Soil structure ; Soil water ; sustainability ; Water conservation ; watershed ; Watershed management ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental Research Communications, 2024-12, Vol.6 (12), p.125016</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2a8bb199584b693ea4487ea79216f68c7b5ac11325afdcab4f61306906e3cb9e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0265-0261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/ad9c1e/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27903,27904,38869,53845</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Addis, Hailu Kendie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamir, Simegnew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belay, Beyene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mekuriaw, Shigdaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birehanu, Tadesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuletaw, Yismaw</creatorcontrib><title>Community-mobilized soil and water conservation and farmers' preferences for mitigating land degradation</title><title>Environmental Research Communications</title><addtitle>ERC</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Commun</addtitle><description>Various soil and water conservation (SWC) practices have been constructed through campaign-based integrated watershed management in Ethiopia since 2011. However, not all SWC measures were implemented across the country and preferred by the farmers equally. Hence, this research aimed to evaluate the trends of community-mobilized SWC practice and farmers’ SWC preference to combat land degradation in Amhara region, Ethiopia. The study utilized primary and secondary data from 92 selected watersheds across 13 zones, 45 woredas, and 1,739 households. Extensive household interviews that include elders, women, and youth, as well as focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The result showed that 128,726.28 hectares of gully rehabilitation had been carried out, 4,436,096.3033 hectares of cultivated fields have received SWC measures, and SWC measures were done on 817,104.7 hectares of communal land. Despite these commendable initiatives, it was found that 46% of the community-mobilized SWC structures built on cultivated land have been partially or entirely removed, additionally, 66% of the constructed SWC structures lack support by biological measures. Furthermore, the survey revealed that 20% of the respondents’ land holdings were affected by gullies, and a 43% decrease trend in efforts to combat gully erosion since 2011. This study demonstrates the significance of implementing SWC measures for the sustainability of the watershed. It also underscores the vital role of regular maintenance in enhancing the effectiveness of the structures, along with the imperative need to reinforce the SWC structures using biological measures. Moreover, the research stresses the importance of rehabilitating communal lands through enclosure and improving cropland soil fertility by applying organic compost.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>amhara region</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Cultivated lands</subject><subject>erosion</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Gully erosion</subject><subject>household survey</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Land conservation</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil degradation</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil stresses</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>watershed</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2515-7620</issn><issn>2515-7620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxU1JoSHJvUdDD7nUjUaS9XEsS9MGArmkZyFLo60W23Ilb0L618e7LkkPDQgkHr_3Rrypqo9AvgBR6oq20DZSUHJlvXaA76rTF-nkn_eH6qKUHSGESs0J8NPq1yYNw36M81MzpC728Q_6uqTY13b09aOdMdcujQXzg51jGo9ysHnAXC7rKWPAjKPDUoeU6yHOcbtw47buD6DHbbb-aDyv3gfbF7z4e59VP6-_3W9-NLd33282X28bxxjMDbWq60DrVvFOaIaWcyXRSk1BBKGc7FrrABhtbfDOdjwIYERoIpC5TiM7q27WXJ_szkw5DjY_mWSjOQopb43Nc3Q9GpABFIMWiOQcvFSBElj6C10rpDpmfVqzppx-77HMZpf2eVy-bxhwpZiioBeKrJTLqZSlkZepQMxhPebQvzn0b9b1LJbL1RLT9JqJ2RlhgC6nJSDM5MNCfv4P-WbwM5gbnnw</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Addis, Hailu Kendie</creator><creator>Tamir, Simegnew</creator><creator>Belay, Beyene</creator><creator>Mekuriaw, Shigdaf</creator><creator>Birehanu, Tadesse</creator><creator>Wuletaw, Yismaw</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0265-0261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Community-mobilized soil and water conservation and farmers' preferences for mitigating land degradation</title><author>Addis, Hailu Kendie ; Tamir, Simegnew ; Belay, Beyene ; Mekuriaw, Shigdaf ; Birehanu, Tadesse ; Wuletaw, Yismaw</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2a8bb199584b693ea4487ea79216f68c7b5ac11325afdcab4f61306906e3cb9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>amhara region</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Cultivated lands</topic><topic>erosion</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Gully erosion</topic><topic>household survey</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Land conservation</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil degradation</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil stresses</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>watershed</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Addis, Hailu Kendie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamir, Simegnew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belay, Beyene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mekuriaw, Shigdaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birehanu, Tadesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuletaw, Yismaw</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental Research Communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Addis, Hailu Kendie</au><au>Tamir, Simegnew</au><au>Belay, Beyene</au><au>Mekuriaw, Shigdaf</au><au>Birehanu, Tadesse</au><au>Wuletaw, Yismaw</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community-mobilized soil and water conservation and farmers' preferences for mitigating land degradation</atitle><jtitle>Environmental Research Communications</jtitle><stitle>ERC</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Commun</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>125016</spage><pages>125016-</pages><issn>2515-7620</issn><eissn>2515-7620</eissn><abstract>Various soil and water conservation (SWC) practices have been constructed through campaign-based integrated watershed management in Ethiopia since 2011. However, not all SWC measures were implemented across the country and preferred by the farmers equally. Hence, this research aimed to evaluate the trends of community-mobilized SWC practice and farmers’ SWC preference to combat land degradation in Amhara region, Ethiopia. The study utilized primary and secondary data from 92 selected watersheds across 13 zones, 45 woredas, and 1,739 households. Extensive household interviews that include elders, women, and youth, as well as focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The result showed that 128,726.28 hectares of gully rehabilitation had been carried out, 4,436,096.3033 hectares of cultivated fields have received SWC measures, and SWC measures were done on 817,104.7 hectares of communal land. Despite these commendable initiatives, it was found that 46% of the community-mobilized SWC structures built on cultivated land have been partially or entirely removed, additionally, 66% of the constructed SWC structures lack support by biological measures. Furthermore, the survey revealed that 20% of the respondents’ land holdings were affected by gullies, and a 43% decrease trend in efforts to combat gully erosion since 2011. This study demonstrates the significance of implementing SWC measures for the sustainability of the watershed. It also underscores the vital role of regular maintenance in enhancing the effectiveness of the structures, along with the imperative need to reinforce the SWC structures using biological measures. Moreover, the research stresses the importance of rehabilitating communal lands through enclosure and improving cropland soil fertility by applying organic compost.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2515-7620/ad9c1e</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0265-0261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2515-7620
ispartof Environmental Research Communications, 2024-12, Vol.6 (12), p.125016
issn 2515-7620
2515-7620
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2515_7620_ad9c1e
source IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural land
amhara region
Biological effects
Cultivated lands
erosion
Farmers
Gullies
Gully erosion
household survey
Households
Land conservation
Land degradation
Organic soils
Soil conservation
Soil degradation
Soil fertility
Soil improvement
Soil stresses
Soil structure
Soil water
sustainability
Water conservation
watershed
Watershed management
Watersheds
title Community-mobilized soil and water conservation and farmers' preferences for mitigating land degradation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A50%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community-mobilized%20soil%20and%20water%20conservation%20and%20farmers'%20preferences%20for%20mitigating%20land%20degradation&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20Research%20Communications&rft.au=Addis,%20Hailu%20Kendie&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=125016&rft.pages=125016-&rft.issn=2515-7620&rft.eissn=2515-7620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2515-7620/ad9c1e&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3148838219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3148838219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_17f18315107441d78f201d9cfb56789e&rfr_iscdi=true