Flood damage reduction benefits and costs in Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan
The State of Louisiana faces a substantial planning challenge in addressing the joint problems of rapid coastal land loss and storm surge flood risk, exacerbated by rising sea levels and land subsidence. To address these twin challenges, Louisiana has developed a series of coastwide master plans tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental Research Communications 2019-12, Vol.1 (11), p.111001 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 111001 |
container_title | Environmental Research Communications |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Fischbach, Jordan R Johnson, David R Groves, David G |
description | The State of Louisiana faces a substantial planning challenge in addressing the joint problems of rapid coastal land loss and storm surge flood risk, exacerbated by rising sea levels and land subsidence. To address these twin challenges, Louisiana has developed a series of coastwide master plans that include substantial investments in coastal restoration and hurricane flood risk reduction, with the most recent update in 2017 that includes about $50 billion in projects to be implemented over 50 years (approximately 2016-2065). This research builds on the integrated modeling analysis conducted in support of Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan. We use the Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment (CLARA) model to project coastal flood damage over time under different scenarios, either in a future without action or with the master plan implemented according to its intended schedule. Analysis results suggest positive, notable benefits from risk reduction investments over a range of assumptions about future conditions and economic considerations. We estimate a 50-year net economic benefit from master plan risk reduction investments of $39.6 to $59.8 billion (benefit-cost ratios of 3.0 to 4.1) across several future scenarios with a 3% assumed discount rate, for instance. Scenarios with higher sea level rise (SLR) and coastal subsidence rates generally yield greater net economic benefit from flood risk reduction investments. Net benefit from risk reduction investments is negative only with the highest discount rate assumption (7%) and if costs are somewhat higher than initially estimated for structural or nonstructural projects. In general, implementing the master plan could yield considerable net economic benefit from damage reduction investment for coastal Louisiana in many plausible future scenarios if implemented as planned. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/2515-7620/ab4b25 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2515_7620_ab4b25</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548135691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8ebc5da0253e95da8d45d31cf9b6932d27a7cd12d2c1aea989310e3e2bdf42203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhYMouKx79xjwsBfrziTNtj3K4qqwooKeQ5qkkqXb1KQ9-O9tqagHEQbex_DeDDxCzhGuEPJ8xQSKJFszWKkyLZk4IrPv1fEvPiWLGPcAwLIiBUxn5Hlbe2-oUQf1Zmmwpted8w0tbWMr10WqGkO1jwO5hu5876JTjVpGygAzuvEqdqqmD4PYQJ9q1ZyRk0rV0S6-dE5etzcvm7tk93h7v7neJZrnrEtyW2phFDDBbTFAblJhOOqqKNcFZ4ZlKtMGB9CorCrygiNYbllpqpQx4HNyMd1tg3_vbezk3vehGV5KJtIcuVgXOLhgcungYwy2km1wBxU-JIIcu5NjOXIsR07dDZHLKeJ8-3PzH_vyD7sNWqLEcRAAZWsq_glUP3tC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548135691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flood damage reduction benefits and costs in Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Fischbach, Jordan R ; Johnson, David R ; Groves, David G</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischbach, Jordan R ; Johnson, David R ; Groves, David G</creatorcontrib><description>The State of Louisiana faces a substantial planning challenge in addressing the joint problems of rapid coastal land loss and storm surge flood risk, exacerbated by rising sea levels and land subsidence. To address these twin challenges, Louisiana has developed a series of coastwide master plans that include substantial investments in coastal restoration and hurricane flood risk reduction, with the most recent update in 2017 that includes about $50 billion in projects to be implemented over 50 years (approximately 2016-2065). This research builds on the integrated modeling analysis conducted in support of Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan. We use the Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment (CLARA) model to project coastal flood damage over time under different scenarios, either in a future without action or with the master plan implemented according to its intended schedule. Analysis results suggest positive, notable benefits from risk reduction investments over a range of assumptions about future conditions and economic considerations. We estimate a 50-year net economic benefit from master plan risk reduction investments of $39.6 to $59.8 billion (benefit-cost ratios of 3.0 to 4.1) across several future scenarios with a 3% assumed discount rate, for instance. Scenarios with higher sea level rise (SLR) and coastal subsidence rates generally yield greater net economic benefit from flood risk reduction investments. Net benefit from risk reduction investments is negative only with the highest discount rate assumption (7%) and if costs are somewhat higher than initially estimated for structural or nonstructural projects. In general, implementing the master plan could yield considerable net economic benefit from damage reduction investment for coastal Louisiana in many plausible future scenarios if implemented as planned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-7620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-7620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ab4b25</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>benefit cost analysis ; coastal flooding ; Costs ; Discount rates ; Economics ; Environmental risk ; Flood control ; Flood damage ; Floods ; Hurricanes ; Investments ; Land subsidence ; Louisiana ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; scenario analysis ; Schedules ; Sea level rise ; Storm surges ; Subsidence</subject><ispartof>Environmental Research Communications, 2019-12, Vol.1 (11), p.111001</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8ebc5da0253e95da8d45d31cf9b6932d27a7cd12d2c1aea989310e3e2bdf42203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8ebc5da0253e95da8d45d31cf9b6932d27a7cd12d2c1aea989310e3e2bdf42203</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1302-3802 ; 0000-0002-2364-340X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/ab4b25/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27915,27916,38881,53858</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischbach, Jordan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, David G</creatorcontrib><title>Flood damage reduction benefits and costs in Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan</title><title>Environmental Research Communications</title><addtitle>ERC</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Commun</addtitle><description>The State of Louisiana faces a substantial planning challenge in addressing the joint problems of rapid coastal land loss and storm surge flood risk, exacerbated by rising sea levels and land subsidence. To address these twin challenges, Louisiana has developed a series of coastwide master plans that include substantial investments in coastal restoration and hurricane flood risk reduction, with the most recent update in 2017 that includes about $50 billion in projects to be implemented over 50 years (approximately 2016-2065). This research builds on the integrated modeling analysis conducted in support of Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan. We use the Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment (CLARA) model to project coastal flood damage over time under different scenarios, either in a future without action or with the master plan implemented according to its intended schedule. Analysis results suggest positive, notable benefits from risk reduction investments over a range of assumptions about future conditions and economic considerations. We estimate a 50-year net economic benefit from master plan risk reduction investments of $39.6 to $59.8 billion (benefit-cost ratios of 3.0 to 4.1) across several future scenarios with a 3% assumed discount rate, for instance. Scenarios with higher sea level rise (SLR) and coastal subsidence rates generally yield greater net economic benefit from flood risk reduction investments. Net benefit from risk reduction investments is negative only with the highest discount rate assumption (7%) and if costs are somewhat higher than initially estimated for structural or nonstructural projects. In general, implementing the master plan could yield considerable net economic benefit from damage reduction investment for coastal Louisiana in many plausible future scenarios if implemented as planned.</description><subject>benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>coastal flooding</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Flood damage</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Land subsidence</subject><subject>Louisiana</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>scenario analysis</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Sea level rise</subject><subject>Storm surges</subject><subject>Subsidence</subject><issn>2515-7620</issn><issn>2515-7620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhYMouKx79xjwsBfrziTNtj3K4qqwooKeQ5qkkqXb1KQ9-O9tqagHEQbex_DeDDxCzhGuEPJ8xQSKJFszWKkyLZk4IrPv1fEvPiWLGPcAwLIiBUxn5Hlbe2-oUQf1Zmmwpted8w0tbWMr10WqGkO1jwO5hu5876JTjVpGygAzuvEqdqqmD4PYQJ9q1ZyRk0rV0S6-dE5etzcvm7tk93h7v7neJZrnrEtyW2phFDDBbTFAblJhOOqqKNcFZ4ZlKtMGB9CorCrygiNYbllpqpQx4HNyMd1tg3_vbezk3vehGV5KJtIcuVgXOLhgcungYwy2km1wBxU-JIIcu5NjOXIsR07dDZHLKeJ8-3PzH_vyD7sNWqLEcRAAZWsq_glUP3tC</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Fischbach, Jordan R</creator><creator>Johnson, David R</creator><creator>Groves, David G</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-3802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-340X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Flood damage reduction benefits and costs in Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan</title><author>Fischbach, Jordan R ; Johnson, David R ; Groves, David G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8ebc5da0253e95da8d45d31cf9b6932d27a7cd12d2c1aea989310e3e2bdf42203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>coastal flooding</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Flood damage</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Land subsidence</topic><topic>Louisiana</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>scenario analysis</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Sea level rise</topic><topic>Storm surges</topic><topic>Subsidence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischbach, Jordan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, David G</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Environmental Research Communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischbach, Jordan R</au><au>Johnson, David R</au><au>Groves, David G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flood damage reduction benefits and costs in Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan</atitle><jtitle>Environmental Research Communications</jtitle><stitle>ERC</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Commun</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>111001</spage><pages>111001-</pages><issn>2515-7620</issn><eissn>2515-7620</eissn><abstract>The State of Louisiana faces a substantial planning challenge in addressing the joint problems of rapid coastal land loss and storm surge flood risk, exacerbated by rising sea levels and land subsidence. To address these twin challenges, Louisiana has developed a series of coastwide master plans that include substantial investments in coastal restoration and hurricane flood risk reduction, with the most recent update in 2017 that includes about $50 billion in projects to be implemented over 50 years (approximately 2016-2065). This research builds on the integrated modeling analysis conducted in support of Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan. We use the Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment (CLARA) model to project coastal flood damage over time under different scenarios, either in a future without action or with the master plan implemented according to its intended schedule. Analysis results suggest positive, notable benefits from risk reduction investments over a range of assumptions about future conditions and economic considerations. We estimate a 50-year net economic benefit from master plan risk reduction investments of $39.6 to $59.8 billion (benefit-cost ratios of 3.0 to 4.1) across several future scenarios with a 3% assumed discount rate, for instance. Scenarios with higher sea level rise (SLR) and coastal subsidence rates generally yield greater net economic benefit from flood risk reduction investments. Net benefit from risk reduction investments is negative only with the highest discount rate assumption (7%) and if costs are somewhat higher than initially estimated for structural or nonstructural projects. In general, implementing the master plan could yield considerable net economic benefit from damage reduction investment for coastal Louisiana in many plausible future scenarios if implemented as planned.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2515-7620/ab4b25</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-3802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-340X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2515-7620 |
ispartof | Environmental Research Communications, 2019-12, Vol.1 (11), p.111001 |
issn | 2515-7620 2515-7620 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2515_7620_ab4b25 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | benefit cost analysis coastal flooding Costs Discount rates Economics Environmental risk Flood control Flood damage Floods Hurricanes Investments Land subsidence Louisiana Risk assessment Risk management Risk reduction scenario analysis Schedules Sea level rise Storm surges Subsidence |
title | Flood damage reduction benefits and costs in Louisiana's 2017 Coastal Master Plan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flood%20damage%20reduction%20benefits%20and%20costs%20in%20Louisiana's%202017%20Coastal%20Master%20Plan&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20Research%20Communications&rft.au=Fischbach,%20Jordan%20R&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=111001&rft.pages=111001-&rft.issn=2515-7620&rft.eissn=2515-7620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2515-7620/ab4b25&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548135691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548135691&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |