A quantitative analysis of overspray in Aerosol Jet (R) printing

As Aerosol Jet (R) (AJ) printing is becoming more attractive to additive manufacturing, printed electronics, among other applications, reducing or minimizing the amount of ink droplets landing in unintended regions-known as the overspray-has been elevated on the agenda for print quality control and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Flexible and printed electronics 2021-12, Vol.6 (4), p.45006, Article 045006
Hauptverfasser: Feng, James Q., Ramm, Alex, Renn, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 45006
container_title Flexible and printed electronics
container_volume 6
creator Feng, James Q.
Ramm, Alex
Renn, Michael J.
description As Aerosol Jet (R) (AJ) printing is becoming more attractive to additive manufacturing, printed electronics, among other applications, reducing or minimizing the amount of ink droplets landing in unintended regions-known as the overspray-has been elevated on the agenda for print quality control and improvement. Many AJ users had discussed the overspray issue associated with AJ printing, while the metrology for quantified evaluation of overspray is still lacking. In this work, the likely physical mechanism for inducing overspray is analyzed along with a set of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. We then present a 2D image processing method for quantitatively evaluating the severity of overspray in terms of its percent area coverage versus a normalized distance from printed line edge. Our results show that the amount of overspray of AJ printing seems to scale with the printed line width (LW), and usually to become negligible (e.g. percent area coverage of overspray < 1%) beyond 30%-40% of LW from line edges. The overspray is shown to often decrease by increasing the jet velocity and sheath-to-mist ratio. Without loss of generality and for concise illustration, herewith we use only one representative ink to print test samples for the quantitative overspray analysis. The results have been found to bear a resemblance to AJ printed features with many other inks.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2058-8585/ac3019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>webofscience_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2058_8585_ac3019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>000739538000001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65a01371540b03d361a54188e88d7a472fdaf2d78f5f8bfab161cf873f36c0f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LxDAQxYMouKx795ijInUnTdPM3lyK6wcLgui5pGkilTVZm-5K_3tTK4tH5zLD8N7w5kfIOYNrBojzFAQmKFDMlebAFkdkclgd_5lPySyEd4AoWUiOMCE3S_q5U65rOtU1e0OVU5s-NIF6S_3etGHbqp42ji5N64Pf0EfT0YvnS7ptm-hyb2fkxKpNMLPfPiWvq9uX4j5ZP909FMt1otOMd0kuFDAumcigAl7znCmRMUSDWEuVydTWyqa1RCssVlZVLGfaouSW5xpsxqcExrs65gitsWVM8KHavmRQDhDK4cty-LIcIUTL1Wj5MpW3QTfGaXOwRQqSL0SkMBSLavy_uvjh5V3hd67j31IEb2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A quantitative analysis of overspray in Aerosol Jet (R) printing</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Feng, James Q. ; Ramm, Alex ; Renn, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Feng, James Q. ; Ramm, Alex ; Renn, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>As Aerosol Jet (R) (AJ) printing is becoming more attractive to additive manufacturing, printed electronics, among other applications, reducing or minimizing the amount of ink droplets landing in unintended regions-known as the overspray-has been elevated on the agenda for print quality control and improvement. Many AJ users had discussed the overspray issue associated with AJ printing, while the metrology for quantified evaluation of overspray is still lacking. In this work, the likely physical mechanism for inducing overspray is analyzed along with a set of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. We then present a 2D image processing method for quantitatively evaluating the severity of overspray in terms of its percent area coverage versus a normalized distance from printed line edge. Our results show that the amount of overspray of AJ printing seems to scale with the printed line width (LW), and usually to become negligible (e.g. percent area coverage of overspray &lt; 1%) beyond 30%-40% of LW from line edges. The overspray is shown to often decrease by increasing the jet velocity and sheath-to-mist ratio. Without loss of generality and for concise illustration, herewith we use only one representative ink to print test samples for the quantitative overspray analysis. The results have been found to bear a resemblance to AJ printed features with many other inks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2058-8585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2058-8585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2058-8585/ac3019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BRISTOL: IOP Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Materials Science ; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary ; Science &amp; Technology ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Flexible and printed electronics, 2021-12, Vol.6 (4), p.45006, Article 045006</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>13</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000739538000001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65a01371540b03d361a54188e88d7a472fdaf2d78f5f8bfab161cf873f36c0f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65a01371540b03d361a54188e88d7a472fdaf2d78f5f8bfab161cf873f36c0f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4041-3179</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,39263</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feng, James Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramm, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renn, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>A quantitative analysis of overspray in Aerosol Jet (R) printing</title><title>Flexible and printed electronics</title><addtitle>FLEX PRINT ELECTRON</addtitle><description>As Aerosol Jet (R) (AJ) printing is becoming more attractive to additive manufacturing, printed electronics, among other applications, reducing or minimizing the amount of ink droplets landing in unintended regions-known as the overspray-has been elevated on the agenda for print quality control and improvement. Many AJ users had discussed the overspray issue associated with AJ printing, while the metrology for quantified evaluation of overspray is still lacking. In this work, the likely physical mechanism for inducing overspray is analyzed along with a set of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. We then present a 2D image processing method for quantitatively evaluating the severity of overspray in terms of its percent area coverage versus a normalized distance from printed line edge. Our results show that the amount of overspray of AJ printing seems to scale with the printed line width (LW), and usually to become negligible (e.g. percent area coverage of overspray &lt; 1%) beyond 30%-40% of LW from line edges. The overspray is shown to often decrease by increasing the jet velocity and sheath-to-mist ratio. Without loss of generality and for concise illustration, herewith we use only one representative ink to print test samples for the quantitative overspray analysis. The results have been found to bear a resemblance to AJ printed features with many other inks.</description><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>2058-8585</issn><issn>2058-8585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1LxDAQxYMouKx795ijInUnTdPM3lyK6wcLgui5pGkilTVZm-5K_3tTK4tH5zLD8N7w5kfIOYNrBojzFAQmKFDMlebAFkdkclgd_5lPySyEd4AoWUiOMCE3S_q5U65rOtU1e0OVU5s-NIF6S_3etGHbqp42ji5N64Pf0EfT0YvnS7ptm-hyb2fkxKpNMLPfPiWvq9uX4j5ZP909FMt1otOMd0kuFDAumcigAl7znCmRMUSDWEuVydTWyqa1RCssVlZVLGfaouSW5xpsxqcExrs65gitsWVM8KHavmRQDhDK4cty-LIcIUTL1Wj5MpW3QTfGaXOwRQqSL0SkMBSLavy_uvjh5V3hd67j31IEb2E</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Feng, James Q.</creator><creator>Ramm, Alex</creator><creator>Renn, Michael J.</creator><general>IOP Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-3179</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>A quantitative analysis of overspray in Aerosol Jet (R) printing</title><author>Feng, James Q. ; Ramm, Alex ; Renn, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65a01371540b03d361a54188e88d7a472fdaf2d78f5f8bfab161cf873f36c0f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, James Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramm, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renn, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Flexible and printed electronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, James Q.</au><au>Ramm, Alex</au><au>Renn, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A quantitative analysis of overspray in Aerosol Jet (R) printing</atitle><jtitle>Flexible and printed electronics</jtitle><stitle>FLEX PRINT ELECTRON</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>45006</spage><pages>45006-</pages><artnum>045006</artnum><issn>2058-8585</issn><eissn>2058-8585</eissn><abstract>As Aerosol Jet (R) (AJ) printing is becoming more attractive to additive manufacturing, printed electronics, among other applications, reducing or minimizing the amount of ink droplets landing in unintended regions-known as the overspray-has been elevated on the agenda for print quality control and improvement. Many AJ users had discussed the overspray issue associated with AJ printing, while the metrology for quantified evaluation of overspray is still lacking. In this work, the likely physical mechanism for inducing overspray is analyzed along with a set of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. We then present a 2D image processing method for quantitatively evaluating the severity of overspray in terms of its percent area coverage versus a normalized distance from printed line edge. Our results show that the amount of overspray of AJ printing seems to scale with the printed line width (LW), and usually to become negligible (e.g. percent area coverage of overspray &lt; 1%) beyond 30%-40% of LW from line edges. The overspray is shown to often decrease by increasing the jet velocity and sheath-to-mist ratio. Without loss of generality and for concise illustration, herewith we use only one representative ink to print test samples for the quantitative overspray analysis. The results have been found to bear a resemblance to AJ printed features with many other inks.</abstract><cop>BRISTOL</cop><pub>IOP Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1088/2058-8585/ac3019</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-3179</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2058-8585
ispartof Flexible and printed electronics, 2021-12, Vol.6 (4), p.45006, Article 045006
issn 2058-8585
2058-8585
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2058_8585_ac3019
source IOP Publishing Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Materials Science
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
Science & Technology
Technology
title A quantitative analysis of overspray in Aerosol Jet (R) printing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T23%3A39%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-webofscience_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20quantitative%20analysis%20of%20overspray%20in%20Aerosol%20Jet%20(R)%20printing&rft.jtitle=Flexible%20and%20printed%20electronics&rft.au=Feng,%20James%20Q.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=45006&rft.pages=45006-&rft.artnum=045006&rft.issn=2058-8585&rft.eissn=2058-8585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2058-8585/ac3019&rft_dat=%3Cwebofscience_cross%3E000739538000001%3C/webofscience_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true