Dose compensation for decreased biological effective dose due to intrafractional interruption during radiotherapy: integration with a commercial treatment planning system
While the biological effective dose (BED) has been used to estimate the damage to tumor cells in radiotherapy, BED does not consider intrafractional interruption (IFI) occurring during irradiation. We aim to develop a framework to evaluate the decrease in BED [ΔBED] and to create a plan compensating...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biomedical physics & engineering express 2025-01, Vol.11 (1), p.15019 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15019 |
container_title | Biomedical physics & engineering express |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Yamaguchi, Hikaru Kawahara, Daisuke Koganezawa, Akito S Imano, Nobuki Murakami, Yuji Nishibuchi, Ikuno Shiba, Eiji Nagata, Yasushi |
description | While the biological effective dose (BED) has been used to estimate the damage to tumor cells in radiotherapy, BED does not consider intrafractional interruption (IFI) occurring during irradiation. We aim to develop a framework to evaluate the decrease in BED [ΔBED] and to create a plan compensating for the decrease by IFI. Approach. ΔBED was calculated using a model based on the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) for four brain tumor cases treated using a volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Four biologically compensated plans (BCPs) were created in the treatment planning system by a single-time optimization using a base plan considering ΔBED created in in-house software and optimization objectives for the original clinically delivered plan to achieve a homogeneous BED distribution within the planning target volume (PTV). The BED-volume histogram was evaluated for non-compensated plan and BCP with different timepoint of interruption, a percentage of gantry rotation angle (GRA) before interruption in planned GRA,
and duration of interruption
. Characteristics of the dose accumulation were analyzed for different collimator angle sets, Plan A (10°, 85°) and Plan B (45° and 315°), for the first case. Main Results. Hot spots in the ΔBED distribution for
= 25%, 50%, and 75% were observed at superior-and-interior ends, central region, and peripheral region in PTV, respectively. These behaviors could be understood by characteristics of the MKM-based model producing maximum ΔBED at 50% of the dose accumulation. ΔBED
ranged 4.5-6.6%, 5.0-7.3%, and 5.3-7.7% for
= 60, 90, and 120 mins, respectively. Plan A showed fast dose accumulation at superior and inferior edges while slow on peripheries in the lateral dose profile. Plan B showed more homogeneous PD distributions than Plan A during irradiation. Significance. The developed framework successfully evaluated and compensated for the decreased BED distribution.
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/2057-1976/ad9280 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_ad9280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3128824465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-924490b659cbc4cee447270a4afbdd77a3df61249b671ddf48c17f90adbd14373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vFSEUxYnR2KZ278qwdOGzwDAwuDP1b9LEja4JA5dXmpkBgVHfV_JTyvTV6kJXwM3vnHPDQegpJS8pGYYLRnq5o0qKC-MUG8gDdHo_evjX_QSdl3JDCKGCCaH6x-ikUz2ngrBT9PNNLIBtnBMsxdQQF-xjxg5sBlPA4THEKe6DNRMG78HW8A2w20RuBVwjDkvNxmdjN3Gj2htyXtOtl1tzWPY4GxdivYZs0uHVLbHPx7DvoV5jsy0wQ7ah6WsLrjMsFafJLMsmL4dSYX6CHnkzFTi_O8_Ql3dvP19-2F19ev_x8vXVzrKe1Z1inCsyil7Z0XILwLlkkhhu_OiclKZzXlDG1Sgkdc7zwVLpFTFudJR3sjtDz4--KcevK5Sq51AsTG0biGvRHWXD0EJE31ByRG2OpWTwOuUwm3zQlOitJL21oLcW9LGkJnl2576OM7h7we9K_sSHmPRNXHP71KLHBD80pZpqQntClU7ON_TFP9D_Rv8CJo-t2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128824465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose compensation for decreased biological effective dose due to intrafractional interruption during radiotherapy: integration with a commercial treatment planning system</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Yamaguchi, Hikaru ; Kawahara, Daisuke ; Koganezawa, Akito S ; Imano, Nobuki ; Murakami, Yuji ; Nishibuchi, Ikuno ; Shiba, Eiji ; Nagata, Yasushi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Hikaru ; Kawahara, Daisuke ; Koganezawa, Akito S ; Imano, Nobuki ; Murakami, Yuji ; Nishibuchi, Ikuno ; Shiba, Eiji ; Nagata, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><description>While the biological effective dose (BED) has been used to estimate the damage to tumor cells in radiotherapy, BED does not consider intrafractional interruption (IFI) occurring during irradiation. We aim to develop a framework to evaluate the decrease in BED [ΔBED] and to create a plan compensating for the decrease by IFI. Approach. ΔBED was calculated using a model based on the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) for four brain tumor cases treated using a volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Four biologically compensated plans (BCPs) were created in the treatment planning system by a single-time optimization using a base plan considering ΔBED created in in-house software and optimization objectives for the original clinically delivered plan to achieve a homogeneous BED distribution within the planning target volume (PTV). The BED-volume histogram was evaluated for non-compensated plan and BCP with different timepoint of interruption, a percentage of gantry rotation angle (GRA) before interruption in planned GRA,
and duration of interruption
. Characteristics of the dose accumulation were analyzed for different collimator angle sets, Plan A (10°, 85°) and Plan B (45° and 315°), for the first case. Main Results. Hot spots in the ΔBED distribution for
= 25%, 50%, and 75% were observed at superior-and-interior ends, central region, and peripheral region in PTV, respectively. These behaviors could be understood by characteristics of the MKM-based model producing maximum ΔBED at 50% of the dose accumulation. ΔBED
ranged 4.5-6.6%, 5.0-7.3%, and 5.3-7.7% for
= 60, 90, and 120 mins, respectively. Plan A showed fast dose accumulation at superior and inferior edges while slow on peripheries in the lateral dose profile. Plan B showed more homogeneous PD distributions than Plan A during irradiation. Significance. The developed framework successfully evaluated and compensated for the decreased BED distribution.&#xD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad9280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39541602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>biological adaptive radiotherapy ; biological compensation ; treatment interruption</subject><ispartof>Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2025-01, Vol.11 (1), p.15019</ispartof><rights>2024 IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-924490b659cbc4cee447270a4afbdd77a3df61249b671ddf48c17f90adbd14373</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3596-3010 ; 0000-0002-8472-9821 ; 0009-0001-7830-5985 ; 0000-0002-4744-7075 ; 0009-0008-3678-0420 ; 0000-0002-7823-5884 ; 0000-0001-5873-4822 ; 0000-0002-7668-1506</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2057-1976/ad9280/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,53845,53892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39541602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Hikaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koganezawa, Akito S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imano, Nobuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishibuchi, Ikuno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiba, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><title>Dose compensation for decreased biological effective dose due to intrafractional interruption during radiotherapy: integration with a commercial treatment planning system</title><title>Biomedical physics & engineering express</title><addtitle>BPEX</addtitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><description>While the biological effective dose (BED) has been used to estimate the damage to tumor cells in radiotherapy, BED does not consider intrafractional interruption (IFI) occurring during irradiation. We aim to develop a framework to evaluate the decrease in BED [ΔBED] and to create a plan compensating for the decrease by IFI. Approach. ΔBED was calculated using a model based on the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) for four brain tumor cases treated using a volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Four biologically compensated plans (BCPs) were created in the treatment planning system by a single-time optimization using a base plan considering ΔBED created in in-house software and optimization objectives for the original clinically delivered plan to achieve a homogeneous BED distribution within the planning target volume (PTV). The BED-volume histogram was evaluated for non-compensated plan and BCP with different timepoint of interruption, a percentage of gantry rotation angle (GRA) before interruption in planned GRA,
and duration of interruption
. Characteristics of the dose accumulation were analyzed for different collimator angle sets, Plan A (10°, 85°) and Plan B (45° and 315°), for the first case. Main Results. Hot spots in the ΔBED distribution for
= 25%, 50%, and 75% were observed at superior-and-interior ends, central region, and peripheral region in PTV, respectively. These behaviors could be understood by characteristics of the MKM-based model producing maximum ΔBED at 50% of the dose accumulation. ΔBED
ranged 4.5-6.6%, 5.0-7.3%, and 5.3-7.7% for
= 60, 90, and 120 mins, respectively. Plan A showed fast dose accumulation at superior and inferior edges while slow on peripheries in the lateral dose profile. Plan B showed more homogeneous PD distributions than Plan A during irradiation. Significance. The developed framework successfully evaluated and compensated for the decreased BED distribution.&#xD.</description><subject>biological adaptive radiotherapy</subject><subject>biological compensation</subject><subject>treatment interruption</subject><issn>2057-1976</issn><issn>2057-1976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9vFSEUxYnR2KZ278qwdOGzwDAwuDP1b9LEja4JA5dXmpkBgVHfV_JTyvTV6kJXwM3vnHPDQegpJS8pGYYLRnq5o0qKC-MUG8gDdHo_evjX_QSdl3JDCKGCCaH6x-ikUz2ngrBT9PNNLIBtnBMsxdQQF-xjxg5sBlPA4THEKe6DNRMG78HW8A2w20RuBVwjDkvNxmdjN3Gj2htyXtOtl1tzWPY4GxdivYZs0uHVLbHPx7DvoV5jsy0wQ7ah6WsLrjMsFafJLMsmL4dSYX6CHnkzFTi_O8_Ql3dvP19-2F19ev_x8vXVzrKe1Z1inCsyil7Z0XILwLlkkhhu_OiclKZzXlDG1Sgkdc7zwVLpFTFudJR3sjtDz4--KcevK5Sq51AsTG0biGvRHWXD0EJE31ByRG2OpWTwOuUwm3zQlOitJL21oLcW9LGkJnl2576OM7h7we9K_sSHmPRNXHP71KLHBD80pZpqQntClU7ON_TFP9D_Rv8CJo-t2Q</recordid><startdate>20250131</startdate><enddate>20250131</enddate><creator>Yamaguchi, Hikaru</creator><creator>Kawahara, Daisuke</creator><creator>Koganezawa, Akito S</creator><creator>Imano, Nobuki</creator><creator>Murakami, Yuji</creator><creator>Nishibuchi, Ikuno</creator><creator>Shiba, Eiji</creator><creator>Nagata, Yasushi</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3596-3010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-9821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7830-5985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-7075</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3678-0420</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-5884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-4822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-1506</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250131</creationdate><title>Dose compensation for decreased biological effective dose due to intrafractional interruption during radiotherapy: integration with a commercial treatment planning system</title><author>Yamaguchi, Hikaru ; Kawahara, Daisuke ; Koganezawa, Akito S ; Imano, Nobuki ; Murakami, Yuji ; Nishibuchi, Ikuno ; Shiba, Eiji ; Nagata, Yasushi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-924490b659cbc4cee447270a4afbdd77a3df61249b671ddf48c17f90adbd14373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>biological adaptive radiotherapy</topic><topic>biological compensation</topic><topic>treatment interruption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Hikaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koganezawa, Akito S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imano, Nobuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishibuchi, Ikuno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiba, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biomedical physics & engineering express</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamaguchi, Hikaru</au><au>Kawahara, Daisuke</au><au>Koganezawa, Akito S</au><au>Imano, Nobuki</au><au>Murakami, Yuji</au><au>Nishibuchi, Ikuno</au><au>Shiba, Eiji</au><au>Nagata, Yasushi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose compensation for decreased biological effective dose due to intrafractional interruption during radiotherapy: integration with a commercial treatment planning system</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical physics & engineering express</jtitle><stitle>BPEX</stitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><date>2025-01-31</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15019</spage><pages>15019-</pages><issn>2057-1976</issn><eissn>2057-1976</eissn><abstract>While the biological effective dose (BED) has been used to estimate the damage to tumor cells in radiotherapy, BED does not consider intrafractional interruption (IFI) occurring during irradiation. We aim to develop a framework to evaluate the decrease in BED [ΔBED] and to create a plan compensating for the decrease by IFI. Approach. ΔBED was calculated using a model based on the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) for four brain tumor cases treated using a volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Four biologically compensated plans (BCPs) were created in the treatment planning system by a single-time optimization using a base plan considering ΔBED created in in-house software and optimization objectives for the original clinically delivered plan to achieve a homogeneous BED distribution within the planning target volume (PTV). The BED-volume histogram was evaluated for non-compensated plan and BCP with different timepoint of interruption, a percentage of gantry rotation angle (GRA) before interruption in planned GRA,
and duration of interruption
. Characteristics of the dose accumulation were analyzed for different collimator angle sets, Plan A (10°, 85°) and Plan B (45° and 315°), for the first case. Main Results. Hot spots in the ΔBED distribution for
= 25%, 50%, and 75% were observed at superior-and-interior ends, central region, and peripheral region in PTV, respectively. These behaviors could be understood by characteristics of the MKM-based model producing maximum ΔBED at 50% of the dose accumulation. ΔBED
ranged 4.5-6.6%, 5.0-7.3%, and 5.3-7.7% for
= 60, 90, and 120 mins, respectively. Plan A showed fast dose accumulation at superior and inferior edges while slow on peripheries in the lateral dose profile. Plan B showed more homogeneous PD distributions than Plan A during irradiation. Significance. The developed framework successfully evaluated and compensated for the decreased BED distribution.&#xD.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>39541602</pmid><doi>10.1088/2057-1976/ad9280</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3596-3010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-9821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7830-5985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-7075</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3678-0420</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-5884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-4822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-1506</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2057-1976 |
ispartof | Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2025-01, Vol.11 (1), p.15019 |
issn | 2057-1976 2057-1976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_ad9280 |
source | IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
subjects | biological adaptive radiotherapy biological compensation treatment interruption |
title | Dose compensation for decreased biological effective dose due to intrafractional interruption during radiotherapy: integration with a commercial treatment planning system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A10%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%20compensation%20for%20decreased%20biological%20effective%20dose%20due%20to%20intrafractional%20interruption%20during%20radiotherapy:%20integration%20with%20a%20commercial%20treatment%20planning%20system&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20physics%20&%20engineering%20express&rft.au=Yamaguchi,%20Hikaru&rft.date=2025-01-31&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15019&rft.pages=15019-&rft.issn=2057-1976&rft.eissn=2057-1976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2057-1976/ad9280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3128824465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128824465&rft_id=info:pmid/39541602&rfr_iscdi=true |