Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget
The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research letters 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.64071 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 64071 |
container_title | Environmental research letters |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar Hof, Andries F van Vuuren, Detlef P |
description | The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ac03d9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4eb11522326a47fdbe643403bf494ab2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2540834883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-2297d4a78ae83a7351e98c1f3180d2774cfd502e2e0cca43cb380fc609b3017c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQxoMoWKt3jwsevBg7-0h2cxGk-CgUvOh52ewjbGmzdTcp-N-bGqke9DDMMHzzm5kvyy4x3GIQYoY5E3lFSTlTGqipjrLJoXX8qz7NzlJaARSs4GKS3c1D6hIKDqld8Ma3DWptN0SjOr-zyG58Sj60CfWtsREppFWsQ4vq3jS2O89OnFone_Gdp9nb48Pr_Dlfvjwt5vfLXBeAu5yQihumuFBWUMVpgW0lNHYUCzCEc6adKYBYYkFrxaiuqQCnS6hqCphrOs0WI9cEtZLb6DcqfsigvPxqhNhIFTuv11YyW2NcEDL8qhh3prYlowxo7VjFVE0G1tXI2sbw3tvUyVXoYzucL0nBQFAmBB1UMKp0DClF6w5bMci943JvqdxbKkfHh5HrccSH7Q_TxrXEpSwllAw4llvjBuXNH8p_wZ-unI0q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540834883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget</title><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>IOP Journals (Institute Of Physics)</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar ; Hof, Andries F ; van Vuuren, Detlef P</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar ; Hof, Andries F ; van Vuuren, Detlef P</creatorcontrib><description>The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Climate change ; climate damages ; Costs ; damage reversibility ; economic costs and benefits ; Emissions ; IAMs ; Mitigation ; Mitigation costs ; Optimization ; Paris Agreement ; Temperature ; temperature overshoot</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.64071</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-2297d4a78ae83a7351e98c1f3180d2774cfd502e2e0cca43cb380fc609b3017c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-2297d4a78ae83a7351e98c1f3180d2774cfd502e2e0cca43cb380fc609b3017c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0398-2831 ; v000-0002-7568-5038 ; 0000-0002-9588-7059 ; 0000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,27923,27924,38867,38889,53839,53866</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Andries F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P</creatorcontrib><title>Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate damages</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>damage reversibility</subject><subject>economic costs and benefits</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>IAMs</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Mitigation costs</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Paris Agreement</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>temperature overshoot</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQxoMoWKt3jwsevBg7-0h2cxGk-CgUvOh52ewjbGmzdTcp-N-bGqke9DDMMHzzm5kvyy4x3GIQYoY5E3lFSTlTGqipjrLJoXX8qz7NzlJaARSs4GKS3c1D6hIKDqld8Ma3DWptN0SjOr-zyG58Sj60CfWtsREppFWsQ4vq3jS2O89OnFone_Gdp9nb48Pr_Dlfvjwt5vfLXBeAu5yQihumuFBWUMVpgW0lNHYUCzCEc6adKYBYYkFrxaiuqQCnS6hqCphrOs0WI9cEtZLb6DcqfsigvPxqhNhIFTuv11YyW2NcEDL8qhh3prYlowxo7VjFVE0G1tXI2sbw3tvUyVXoYzucL0nBQFAmBB1UMKp0DClF6w5bMci943JvqdxbKkfHh5HrccSH7Q_TxrXEpSwllAw4llvjBuXNH8p_wZ-unI0q</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar</creator><creator>Hof, Andries F</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Detlef P</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-2831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/v000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-7059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget</title><author>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar ; Hof, Andries F ; van Vuuren, Detlef P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-2297d4a78ae83a7351e98c1f3180d2774cfd502e2e0cca43cb380fc609b3017c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate damages</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>damage reversibility</topic><topic>economic costs and benefits</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>IAMs</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Mitigation costs</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Paris Agreement</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>temperature overshoot</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Andries F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Journals (Institute Of Physics)</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar</au><au>Hof, Andries F</au><au>van Vuuren, Detlef P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>64071</spage><pages>64071-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-2831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/v000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-7059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-9326 |
ispartof | Environmental research letters, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.64071 |
issn | 1748-9326 1748-9326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ac03d9 |
source | Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; IOP Journals (Institute Of Physics); Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Climate change climate damages Costs damage reversibility economic costs and benefits Emissions IAMs Mitigation Mitigation costs Optimization Paris Agreement Temperature temperature overshoot |
title | Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A54%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Costs%20of%20avoiding%20net%20negative%20emissions%20under%20a%20carbon%20budget&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=van%20der%20Wijst,%20Kaj-Ivar&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=64071&rft.pages=64071-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2540834883%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540834883&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4eb11522326a47fdbe643403bf494ab2&rfr_iscdi=true |