Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget

The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research letters 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.64071
Hauptverfasser: van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar, Hof, Andries F, van Vuuren, Detlef P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 64071
container_title Environmental research letters
container_volume 16
creator van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar
Hof, Andries F
van Vuuren, Detlef P
description The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ac03d9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4eb11522326a47fdbe643403bf494ab2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2540834883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-2297d4a78ae83a7351e98c1f3180d2774cfd502e2e0cca43cb380fc609b3017c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQxoMoWKt3jwsevBg7-0h2cxGk-CgUvOh52ewjbGmzdTcp-N-bGqke9DDMMHzzm5kvyy4x3GIQYoY5E3lFSTlTGqipjrLJoXX8qz7NzlJaARSs4GKS3c1D6hIKDqld8Ma3DWptN0SjOr-zyG58Sj60CfWtsREppFWsQ4vq3jS2O89OnFone_Gdp9nb48Pr_Dlfvjwt5vfLXBeAu5yQihumuFBWUMVpgW0lNHYUCzCEc6adKYBYYkFrxaiuqQCnS6hqCphrOs0WI9cEtZLb6DcqfsigvPxqhNhIFTuv11YyW2NcEDL8qhh3prYlowxo7VjFVE0G1tXI2sbw3tvUyVXoYzucL0nBQFAmBB1UMKp0DClF6w5bMci943JvqdxbKkfHh5HrccSH7Q_TxrXEpSwllAw4llvjBuXNH8p_wZ-unI0q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540834883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget</title><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>IOP Journals (Institute Of Physics)</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar ; Hof, Andries F ; van Vuuren, Detlef P</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar ; Hof, Andries F ; van Vuuren, Detlef P</creatorcontrib><description>The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Climate change ; climate damages ; Costs ; damage reversibility ; economic costs and benefits ; Emissions ; IAMs ; Mitigation ; Mitigation costs ; Optimization ; Paris Agreement ; Temperature ; temperature overshoot</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.64071</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-2297d4a78ae83a7351e98c1f3180d2774cfd502e2e0cca43cb380fc609b3017c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-2297d4a78ae83a7351e98c1f3180d2774cfd502e2e0cca43cb380fc609b3017c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0398-2831 ; v000-0002-7568-5038 ; 0000-0002-9588-7059 ; 0000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,27923,27924,38867,38889,53839,53866</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Andries F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P</creatorcontrib><title>Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate damages</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>damage reversibility</subject><subject>economic costs and benefits</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>IAMs</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Mitigation costs</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Paris Agreement</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>temperature overshoot</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQxoMoWKt3jwsevBg7-0h2cxGk-CgUvOh52ewjbGmzdTcp-N-bGqke9DDMMHzzm5kvyy4x3GIQYoY5E3lFSTlTGqipjrLJoXX8qz7NzlJaARSs4GKS3c1D6hIKDqld8Ma3DWptN0SjOr-zyG58Sj60CfWtsREppFWsQ4vq3jS2O89OnFone_Gdp9nb48Pr_Dlfvjwt5vfLXBeAu5yQihumuFBWUMVpgW0lNHYUCzCEc6adKYBYYkFrxaiuqQCnS6hqCphrOs0WI9cEtZLb6DcqfsigvPxqhNhIFTuv11YyW2NcEDL8qhh3prYlowxo7VjFVE0G1tXI2sbw3tvUyVXoYzucL0nBQFAmBB1UMKp0DClF6w5bMci943JvqdxbKkfHh5HrccSH7Q_TxrXEpSwllAw4llvjBuXNH8p_wZ-unI0q</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar</creator><creator>Hof, Andries F</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Detlef P</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-2831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/v000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-7059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget</title><author>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar ; Hof, Andries F ; van Vuuren, Detlef P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-2297d4a78ae83a7351e98c1f3180d2774cfd502e2e0cca43cb380fc609b3017c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate damages</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>damage reversibility</topic><topic>economic costs and benefits</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>IAMs</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Mitigation costs</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Paris Agreement</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>temperature overshoot</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Andries F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Journals (Institute Of Physics)</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar</au><au>Hof, Andries F</au><au>van Vuuren, Detlef P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>64071</spage><pages>64071-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>The 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-2831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/v000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-7059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-5038</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-9326
ispartof Environmental research letters, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.64071
issn 1748-9326
1748-9326
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ac03d9
source Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; IOP Journals (Institute Of Physics); Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Climate change
climate damages
Costs
damage reversibility
economic costs and benefits
Emissions
IAMs
Mitigation
Mitigation costs
Optimization
Paris Agreement
Temperature
temperature overshoot
title Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A54%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Costs%20of%20avoiding%20net%20negative%20emissions%20under%20a%20carbon%20budget&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=van%20der%20Wijst,%20Kaj-Ivar&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=64071&rft.pages=64071-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2540834883%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540834883&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4eb11522326a47fdbe643403bf494ab2&rfr_iscdi=true