Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality

Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research letters 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.25001
Hauptverfasser: Dunn, Christopher J, O'Connor, Christopher D, Abrams, Jesse, Thompson, Matthew P, Calkin, Dave E, Johnston, James D, Stratton, Rick, Gilbertson-Day, Julie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 25001
container_title Environmental research letters
container_volume 15
creator Dunn, Christopher J
O'Connor, Christopher D
Abrams, Jesse
Thompson, Matthew P
Calkin, Dave E
Johnston, James D
Stratton, Rick
Gilbertson-Day, Julie
description Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs. We use fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary risk-based analytic tools-quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations-can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of non-wildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly. We explicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ab6498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2602728429f142ebbe3a44ea3a6d221a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2548691678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-95e84f702ea28186b6a1343976786300d8099a68b7d4c073bc16037bcdd111b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1LHjEQh5eiUL_uHgM9eOlqvjYfxyLVCkIviscwm8zavI2bbbJS3v_efbtFPZSeMgzPPJnh1zSnjJ4zaswF09K0VnB1Ab2S1nxoDl5be-_qj81hrRtKO9lpc9Ckh5jCEAuSEutPUn3E0SMZwMcUZ5ixEggwLVXMI8kD2bHtVPKIpGYfIbXoc8qP0UMidVtnfKpkzmT-gWTE32R1Iyy27XGzP0CqePL3PWrur77eXX5rb79f31x-uW29tGxubYdGDppyBG6YUb0CJqSwWmmjBKXBUGtBmV4H6akWvWeKCt37EBhjvRVHzc3qDRk2birxCcrWZYjuTyOXRwdljj6h44pyzY3kdmCSY9-jACkRBKjAOYPF9Wl1LTf_esY6u01-LuOyvuOdNMqyZauFoivlS6614PD6K6Nul4_bBeB2Abg1n2Xk8zoS8_Tm_A9-9g8cS3Ksc9xR3lHK3BQG8QITo52W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548691678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dunn, Christopher J ; O'Connor, Christopher D ; Abrams, Jesse ; Thompson, Matthew P ; Calkin, Dave E ; Johnston, James D ; Stratton, Rick ; Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Christopher J ; O'Connor, Christopher D ; Abrams, Jesse ; Thompson, Matthew P ; Calkin, Dave E ; Johnston, James D ; Stratton, Rick ; Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs. We use fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary risk-based analytic tools-quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations-can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of non-wildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly. We explicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; adaptive co-management ; Adaptive control ; analytics ; Aridity ; decision support ; Ecology ; Environmental risk ; Land management ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; shared stewardship ; Social-ecological systems ; wildfire management ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.25001</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-95e84f702ea28186b6a1343976786300d8099a68b7d4c073bc16037bcdd111b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-95e84f702ea28186b6a1343976786300d8099a68b7d4c073bc16037bcdd111b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calkin, Dave E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs. We use fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary risk-based analytic tools-quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations-can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of non-wildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly. We explicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>adaptive co-management</subject><subject>Adaptive control</subject><subject>analytics</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>decision support</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>shared stewardship</subject><subject>Social-ecological systems</subject><subject>wildfire management</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1LHjEQh5eiUL_uHgM9eOlqvjYfxyLVCkIviscwm8zavI2bbbJS3v_efbtFPZSeMgzPPJnh1zSnjJ4zaswF09K0VnB1Ab2S1nxoDl5be-_qj81hrRtKO9lpc9Ckh5jCEAuSEutPUn3E0SMZwMcUZ5ixEggwLVXMI8kD2bHtVPKIpGYfIbXoc8qP0UMidVtnfKpkzmT-gWTE32R1Iyy27XGzP0CqePL3PWrur77eXX5rb79f31x-uW29tGxubYdGDppyBG6YUb0CJqSwWmmjBKXBUGtBmV4H6akWvWeKCt37EBhjvRVHzc3qDRk2birxCcrWZYjuTyOXRwdljj6h44pyzY3kdmCSY9-jACkRBKjAOYPF9Wl1LTf_esY6u01-LuOyvuOdNMqyZauFoivlS6614PD6K6Nul4_bBeB2Abg1n2Xk8zoS8_Tm_A9-9g8cS3Ksc9xR3lHK3BQG8QITo52W</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Dunn, Christopher J</creator><creator>O'Connor, Christopher D</creator><creator>Abrams, Jesse</creator><creator>Thompson, Matthew P</creator><creator>Calkin, Dave E</creator><creator>Johnston, James D</creator><creator>Stratton, Rick</creator><creator>Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality</title><author>Dunn, Christopher J ; O'Connor, Christopher D ; Abrams, Jesse ; Thompson, Matthew P ; Calkin, Dave E ; Johnston, James D ; Stratton, Rick ; Gilbertson-Day, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-95e84f702ea28186b6a1343976786300d8099a68b7d4c073bc16037bcdd111b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>adaptive co-management</topic><topic>Adaptive control</topic><topic>analytics</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>decision support</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>shared stewardship</topic><topic>Social-ecological systems</topic><topic>wildfire management</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calkin, Dave E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunn, Christopher J</au><au>O'Connor, Christopher D</au><au>Abrams, Jesse</au><au>Thompson, Matthew P</au><au>Calkin, Dave E</au><au>Johnston, James D</au><au>Stratton, Rick</au><au>Gilbertson-Day, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>25001</spage><pages>25001-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs. We use fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary risk-based analytic tools-quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations-can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of non-wildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly. We explicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-9326
ispartof Environmental research letters, 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.25001
issn 1748-9326
1748-9326
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ab6498
source IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IOPscience extra; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adaptation
adaptive co-management
Adaptive control
analytics
Aridity
decision support
Ecology
Environmental risk
Land management
Risk analysis
Risk assessment
Risk management
Risk reduction
shared stewardship
Social-ecological systems
wildfire management
Wildfires
title Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wildfire%20risk%20science%20facilitates%20adaptation%20of%20fire-prone%20social-ecological%20systems%20to%20the%20new%20fire%20reality&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Dunn,%20Christopher%20J&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=25001&rft.pages=25001-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548691678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548691678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2602728429f142ebbe3a44ea3a6d221a&rfr_iscdi=true