Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality
Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research letters 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.25001 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 25001 |
container_title | Environmental research letters |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Dunn, Christopher J O'Connor, Christopher D Abrams, Jesse Thompson, Matthew P Calkin, Dave E Johnston, James D Stratton, Rick Gilbertson-Day, Julie |
description | Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs. We use fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary risk-based analytic tools-quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations-can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of non-wildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly. We explicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ab6498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2602728429f142ebbe3a44ea3a6d221a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2548691678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-95e84f702ea28186b6a1343976786300d8099a68b7d4c073bc16037bcdd111b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1LHjEQh5eiUL_uHgM9eOlqvjYfxyLVCkIviscwm8zavI2bbbJS3v_efbtFPZSeMgzPPJnh1zSnjJ4zaswF09K0VnB1Ab2S1nxoDl5be-_qj81hrRtKO9lpc9Ckh5jCEAuSEutPUn3E0SMZwMcUZ5ixEggwLVXMI8kD2bHtVPKIpGYfIbXoc8qP0UMidVtnfKpkzmT-gWTE32R1Iyy27XGzP0CqePL3PWrur77eXX5rb79f31x-uW29tGxubYdGDppyBG6YUb0CJqSwWmmjBKXBUGtBmV4H6akWvWeKCt37EBhjvRVHzc3qDRk2birxCcrWZYjuTyOXRwdljj6h44pyzY3kdmCSY9-jACkRBKjAOYPF9Wl1LTf_esY6u01-LuOyvuOdNMqyZauFoivlS6614PD6K6Nul4_bBeB2Abg1n2Xk8zoS8_Tm_A9-9g8cS3Ksc9xR3lHK3BQG8QITo52W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548691678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dunn, Christopher J ; O'Connor, Christopher D ; Abrams, Jesse ; Thompson, Matthew P ; Calkin, Dave E ; Johnston, James D ; Stratton, Rick ; Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Christopher J ; O'Connor, Christopher D ; Abrams, Jesse ; Thompson, Matthew P ; Calkin, Dave E ; Johnston, James D ; Stratton, Rick ; Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs. We use fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary risk-based analytic tools-quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations-can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of non-wildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly. We explicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; adaptive co-management ; Adaptive control ; analytics ; Aridity ; decision support ; Ecology ; Environmental risk ; Land management ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; shared stewardship ; Social-ecological systems ; wildfire management ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.25001</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-95e84f702ea28186b6a1343976786300d8099a68b7d4c073bc16037bcdd111b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-95e84f702ea28186b6a1343976786300d8099a68b7d4c073bc16037bcdd111b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calkin, Dave E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs. We use fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary risk-based analytic tools-quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations-can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of non-wildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly. We explicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>adaptive co-management</subject><subject>Adaptive control</subject><subject>analytics</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>decision support</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>shared stewardship</subject><subject>Social-ecological systems</subject><subject>wildfire management</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1LHjEQh5eiUL_uHgM9eOlqvjYfxyLVCkIviscwm8zavI2bbbJS3v_efbtFPZSeMgzPPJnh1zSnjJ4zaswF09K0VnB1Ab2S1nxoDl5be-_qj81hrRtKO9lpc9Ckh5jCEAuSEutPUn3E0SMZwMcUZ5ixEggwLVXMI8kD2bHtVPKIpGYfIbXoc8qP0UMidVtnfKpkzmT-gWTE32R1Iyy27XGzP0CqePL3PWrur77eXX5rb79f31x-uW29tGxubYdGDppyBG6YUb0CJqSwWmmjBKXBUGtBmV4H6akWvWeKCt37EBhjvRVHzc3qDRk2birxCcrWZYjuTyOXRwdljj6h44pyzY3kdmCSY9-jACkRBKjAOYPF9Wl1LTf_esY6u01-LuOyvuOdNMqyZauFoivlS6614PD6K6Nul4_bBeB2Abg1n2Xk8zoS8_Tm_A9-9g8cS3Ksc9xR3lHK3BQG8QITo52W</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Dunn, Christopher J</creator><creator>O'Connor, Christopher D</creator><creator>Abrams, Jesse</creator><creator>Thompson, Matthew P</creator><creator>Calkin, Dave E</creator><creator>Johnston, James D</creator><creator>Stratton, Rick</creator><creator>Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality</title><author>Dunn, Christopher J ; O'Connor, Christopher D ; Abrams, Jesse ; Thompson, Matthew P ; Calkin, Dave E ; Johnston, James D ; Stratton, Rick ; Gilbertson-Day, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-95e84f702ea28186b6a1343976786300d8099a68b7d4c073bc16037bcdd111b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>adaptive co-management</topic><topic>Adaptive control</topic><topic>analytics</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>decision support</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>shared stewardship</topic><topic>Social-ecological systems</topic><topic>wildfire management</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calkin, Dave E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbertson-Day, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunn, Christopher J</au><au>O'Connor, Christopher D</au><au>Abrams, Jesse</au><au>Thompson, Matthew P</au><au>Calkin, Dave E</au><au>Johnston, James D</au><au>Stratton, Rick</au><au>Gilbertson-Day, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>25001</spage><pages>25001-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs. We use fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary risk-based analytic tools-quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations-can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of non-wildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly. We explicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-9326 |
ispartof | Environmental research letters, 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.25001 |
issn | 1748-9326 1748-9326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ab6498 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IOPscience extra; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adaptation adaptive co-management Adaptive control analytics Aridity decision support Ecology Environmental risk Land management Risk analysis Risk assessment Risk management Risk reduction shared stewardship Social-ecological systems wildfire management Wildfires |
title | Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wildfire%20risk%20science%20facilitates%20adaptation%20of%20fire-prone%20social-ecological%20systems%20to%20the%20new%20fire%20reality&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Dunn,%20Christopher%20J&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=25001&rft.pages=25001-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548691678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548691678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2602728429f142ebbe3a44ea3a6d221a&rfr_iscdi=true |