4D printing of shape memory polymers: A comparative study of programming methodologies on various material properties
The emergence of 4D printing has enabled the fabrication of various components that can change in response to external stimuli. Fused filament fabrication is one of the methods for creating shape-changing components using shape-memory polymer (SMP) filament. In order to exhibit the phenomenon of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Smart materials and structures 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.74003 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 74003 |
container_title | Smart materials and structures |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Samal, Bijaya Bikram Jena, Anita Varshney, Shailendra Kumar Kumar, Cheruvu Siva |
description | The emergence of 4D printing has enabled the fabrication of various components that can change in response to external stimuli. Fused filament fabrication is one of the methods for creating shape-changing components using shape-memory polymer (SMP) filament. In order to exhibit the phenomenon of the shape memory effect, programming plays a crucial role. This article discusses two programming concepts, programming during printing (PDP) and programming after printing (PAP), for SMP processed by fused deposition modeling (FDM). We investigated the shape memory properties and other material behavior of PAP and PDP samples considering different thicknesses. We observe that PDP outperforms PAP in terms of shape memory properties based on various characterization tools like Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), which are used for macro and microstructural features. Whereas, PAP shows better mechanical properties based on Nanoindentation analysis. The PDP samples achieved a maximum shape recovery of 99.25%, which is 44% higher than PAP for a 4 mm thick sample, and showed a 28% improvement in recovery compared to PAP for a 2 mm thick sample. Statistical analysis reveals significant differences in the means of recovery ratio and shape memory index between PAP and PDP, and no statistically significant difference is found for the fixation ratio. A shape recovery cycle life measurement has been carried out for a PDP bending actuator, which showed recovery until 140 cycles before complete failure. Finally, a working prototype demonstrating effectiveness of PDP and PAP for programming the same SMP in two different ways has been presented. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1361-665X/acda6e |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_665X_acda6e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>smsacda6e</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-c58fbe973a87214dd1792f5eaddc99f9288bb028ffb30eb6ee7d9e4070485363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwM3pjIWDHSeywVeVTqsTSgc1y4nObKo4tO6mUf0-iIiaYTrp73tPdg9AtJQ-UCPFIWUGTosi_HlWtVQFnaPHbOkcLUhZZQnlaXKKrGA-EUCoYXaAhe8Y-NF3fdDvsDI575QFbsC6M2Lt2tBDiE17h2lmvguqbI-DYD3qcaR_cLihr57CFfu-0a92ugYhdh48qNG6I2KoeQqPamfYQ-ml8jS6MaiPc_NQl2r6-bNfvyebz7WO92iQ1o2mf1LkwFZScKcFTmmlNeZmaHJTWdVmaMhWiqkgqjKkYgaoA4LqEjHCSiZwVbInIaW0dXIwBjJxetSqMkhI5W5OzIjkrkidrU-TuFGmclwc3hG66T0YbJUsll4RnhDDptZnI-z_Ifxd_A-hjgFc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>4D printing of shape memory polymers: A comparative study of programming methodologies on various material properties</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Samal, Bijaya Bikram ; Jena, Anita ; Varshney, Shailendra Kumar ; Kumar, Cheruvu Siva</creator><creatorcontrib>Samal, Bijaya Bikram ; Jena, Anita ; Varshney, Shailendra Kumar ; Kumar, Cheruvu Siva</creatorcontrib><description>The emergence of 4D printing has enabled the fabrication of various components that can change in response to external stimuli. Fused filament fabrication is one of the methods for creating shape-changing components using shape-memory polymer (SMP) filament. In order to exhibit the phenomenon of the shape memory effect, programming plays a crucial role. This article discusses two programming concepts, programming during printing (PDP) and programming after printing (PAP), for SMP processed by fused deposition modeling (FDM). We investigated the shape memory properties and other material behavior of PAP and PDP samples considering different thicknesses. We observe that PDP outperforms PAP in terms of shape memory properties based on various characterization tools like Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), which are used for macro and microstructural features. Whereas, PAP shows better mechanical properties based on Nanoindentation analysis. The PDP samples achieved a maximum shape recovery of 99.25%, which is 44% higher than PAP for a 4 mm thick sample, and showed a 28% improvement in recovery compared to PAP for a 2 mm thick sample. Statistical analysis reveals significant differences in the means of recovery ratio and shape memory index between PAP and PDP, and no statistically significant difference is found for the fixation ratio. A shape recovery cycle life measurement has been carried out for a PDP bending actuator, which showed recovery until 140 cycles before complete failure. Finally, a working prototype demonstrating effectiveness of PDP and PAP for programming the same SMP in two different ways has been presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-1726</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-665X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/acda6e</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMSTER</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>4D printing ; four dimensional printing ; fused deposition modeling ; material characterization ; material programming ; shape memory properties ; smart materials</subject><ispartof>Smart materials and structures, 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.74003</ispartof><rights>2023 IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-c58fbe973a87214dd1792f5eaddc99f9288bb028ffb30eb6ee7d9e4070485363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-c58fbe973a87214dd1792f5eaddc99f9288bb028ffb30eb6ee7d9e4070485363</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5217-7041</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-665X/acda6e/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,53848,53895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samal, Bijaya Bikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jena, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varshney, Shailendra Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Cheruvu Siva</creatorcontrib><title>4D printing of shape memory polymers: A comparative study of programming methodologies on various material properties</title><title>Smart materials and structures</title><addtitle>SMS</addtitle><addtitle>Smart Mater. Struct</addtitle><description>The emergence of 4D printing has enabled the fabrication of various components that can change in response to external stimuli. Fused filament fabrication is one of the methods for creating shape-changing components using shape-memory polymer (SMP) filament. In order to exhibit the phenomenon of the shape memory effect, programming plays a crucial role. This article discusses two programming concepts, programming during printing (PDP) and programming after printing (PAP), for SMP processed by fused deposition modeling (FDM). We investigated the shape memory properties and other material behavior of PAP and PDP samples considering different thicknesses. We observe that PDP outperforms PAP in terms of shape memory properties based on various characterization tools like Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), which are used for macro and microstructural features. Whereas, PAP shows better mechanical properties based on Nanoindentation analysis. The PDP samples achieved a maximum shape recovery of 99.25%, which is 44% higher than PAP for a 4 mm thick sample, and showed a 28% improvement in recovery compared to PAP for a 2 mm thick sample. Statistical analysis reveals significant differences in the means of recovery ratio and shape memory index between PAP and PDP, and no statistically significant difference is found for the fixation ratio. A shape recovery cycle life measurement has been carried out for a PDP bending actuator, which showed recovery until 140 cycles before complete failure. Finally, a working prototype demonstrating effectiveness of PDP and PAP for programming the same SMP in two different ways has been presented.</description><subject>4D printing</subject><subject>four dimensional printing</subject><subject>fused deposition modeling</subject><subject>material characterization</subject><subject>material programming</subject><subject>shape memory properties</subject><subject>smart materials</subject><issn>0964-1726</issn><issn>1361-665X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwM3pjIWDHSeywVeVTqsTSgc1y4nObKo4tO6mUf0-iIiaYTrp73tPdg9AtJQ-UCPFIWUGTosi_HlWtVQFnaPHbOkcLUhZZQnlaXKKrGA-EUCoYXaAhe8Y-NF3fdDvsDI575QFbsC6M2Lt2tBDiE17h2lmvguqbI-DYD3qcaR_cLihr57CFfu-0a92ugYhdh48qNG6I2KoeQqPamfYQ-ml8jS6MaiPc_NQl2r6-bNfvyebz7WO92iQ1o2mf1LkwFZScKcFTmmlNeZmaHJTWdVmaMhWiqkgqjKkYgaoA4LqEjHCSiZwVbInIaW0dXIwBjJxetSqMkhI5W5OzIjkrkidrU-TuFGmclwc3hG66T0YbJUsll4RnhDDptZnI-z_Ifxd_A-hjgFc</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Samal, Bijaya Bikram</creator><creator>Jena, Anita</creator><creator>Varshney, Shailendra Kumar</creator><creator>Kumar, Cheruvu Siva</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5217-7041</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>4D printing of shape memory polymers: A comparative study of programming methodologies on various material properties</title><author>Samal, Bijaya Bikram ; Jena, Anita ; Varshney, Shailendra Kumar ; Kumar, Cheruvu Siva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-c58fbe973a87214dd1792f5eaddc99f9288bb028ffb30eb6ee7d9e4070485363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>4D printing</topic><topic>four dimensional printing</topic><topic>fused deposition modeling</topic><topic>material characterization</topic><topic>material programming</topic><topic>shape memory properties</topic><topic>smart materials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samal, Bijaya Bikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jena, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varshney, Shailendra Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Cheruvu Siva</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Smart materials and structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samal, Bijaya Bikram</au><au>Jena, Anita</au><au>Varshney, Shailendra Kumar</au><au>Kumar, Cheruvu Siva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>4D printing of shape memory polymers: A comparative study of programming methodologies on various material properties</atitle><jtitle>Smart materials and structures</jtitle><stitle>SMS</stitle><addtitle>Smart Mater. Struct</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>74003</spage><pages>74003-</pages><issn>0964-1726</issn><eissn>1361-665X</eissn><coden>SMSTER</coden><abstract>The emergence of 4D printing has enabled the fabrication of various components that can change in response to external stimuli. Fused filament fabrication is one of the methods for creating shape-changing components using shape-memory polymer (SMP) filament. In order to exhibit the phenomenon of the shape memory effect, programming plays a crucial role. This article discusses two programming concepts, programming during printing (PDP) and programming after printing (PAP), for SMP processed by fused deposition modeling (FDM). We investigated the shape memory properties and other material behavior of PAP and PDP samples considering different thicknesses. We observe that PDP outperforms PAP in terms of shape memory properties based on various characterization tools like Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), which are used for macro and microstructural features. Whereas, PAP shows better mechanical properties based on Nanoindentation analysis. The PDP samples achieved a maximum shape recovery of 99.25%, which is 44% higher than PAP for a 4 mm thick sample, and showed a 28% improvement in recovery compared to PAP for a 2 mm thick sample. Statistical analysis reveals significant differences in the means of recovery ratio and shape memory index between PAP and PDP, and no statistically significant difference is found for the fixation ratio. A shape recovery cycle life measurement has been carried out for a PDP bending actuator, which showed recovery until 140 cycles before complete failure. Finally, a working prototype demonstrating effectiveness of PDP and PAP for programming the same SMP in two different ways has been presented.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1361-665X/acda6e</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5217-7041</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-1726 |
ispartof | Smart materials and structures, 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.74003 |
issn | 0964-1726 1361-665X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_665X_acda6e |
source | IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
subjects | 4D printing four dimensional printing fused deposition modeling material characterization material programming shape memory properties smart materials |
title | 4D printing of shape memory polymers: A comparative study of programming methodologies on various material properties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=4D%20printing%20of%20shape%20memory%20polymers:%20A%20comparative%20study%20of%20programming%20methodologies%20on%20various%20material%20properties&rft.jtitle=Smart%20materials%20and%20structures&rft.au=Samal,%20Bijaya%20Bikram&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=74003&rft.pages=74003-&rft.issn=0964-1726&rft.eissn=1361-665X&rft.coden=SMSTER&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-665X/acda6e&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Esmsacda6e%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |