Relating 18 F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner

This work assessed the relationship between image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and total-body noise-equivalent count rate (NECR)-for both non-time-of-flight (TOF) NECR and TOF-NECR-in a long uniform water cylinder and 14 healthy human subjects using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner. A TOF-NEC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2022-06, Vol.67 (12), p.125007
Hauptverfasser: Leung, Edwin K, Abdelhafez, Yasser G, Berg, Eric, Xie, Zhaoheng, Zhang, Xuezhu, Bayerlein, Reimund, Spencer, Benjamin, Li, Elizabeth, Omidvari, Negar, Selfridge, Aaron, Cherry, Simon R, Qi, Jinyi, Badawi, Ramsey D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 125007
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 67
creator Leung, Edwin K
Abdelhafez, Yasser G
Berg, Eric
Xie, Zhaoheng
Zhang, Xuezhu
Bayerlein, Reimund
Spencer, Benjamin
Li, Elizabeth
Omidvari, Negar
Selfridge, Aaron
Cherry, Simon R
Qi, Jinyi
Badawi, Ramsey D
description This work assessed the relationship between image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and total-body noise-equivalent count rate (NECR)-for both non-time-of-flight (TOF) NECR and TOF-NECR-in a long uniform water cylinder and 14 healthy human subjects using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner. A TOF-NEC expression was modified for list-mode PET data, and both the non-TOF NECR and TOF-NECR were compared using datasets from a long uniform water cylinder and 14 human subjects scanned up to 12 h after radiotracer injection. The TOF-NECR for the uniform water cylinder was found to be linearly proportional to the TOF-reconstructed image SNR in the range of radioactivity concentrations studied, but not for non-TOF NECR as indicated by the reduced value. The results suggest that the use of TOF-NECR to estimate the count rate performance of TOF-enabled PET systems may be more appropriate for predicting the SNR of TOF-reconstructed images. Image quality in PET is commonly characterized by image SNR and, correspondingly, the NECR. While the use of NECR for predicting image quality in conventional PET systems is well-studied, the relationship between SNR and NECR has not been examined in detail in long axial field-of-view total-body PET systems, especially for human subjects. Furthermore, the current NEMA NU 2-2018 standard does not account for count rate performance gains due to TOF in the NECR evaluation. The relationship between image SNR and total-body NECR in long axial FOV PET was assessed for the first time using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/ac72f1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ac72f1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35609588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1118-70626899a86afe091ccad715a75f508f4a7602256d33754a0852b18073aabfc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN9LwzAQx4Mobk7ffZL8A3GXZknTR5nbFAYbY4JvJU2TLtK1s2mF_Qn-16ZOB8cd3N33fnwQuqfwSEHKMWWCEsEFjJWOI0sv0PCcukRDAEZJQjkfoBvvPwAoldHkGg1YqCdcyiH63phSta4qMJV4TubPC-z2qjDYu6JSJWlrUtXOG9yErhq3wdzekNoSW7pi1-LfKjGfnftSpalarOsu-NBusKuCoA1Tsjo_4vVsizvfr2p3Bnez9_VytZltsNeqqkxzi66sKr25-4sj9DafbacvZLlavE6flkTTcD6JQURCJomSQlkDCdVa5THlKuaWg7QTFQuIIi5yxmI-USB5lFEJMVMqs5qxEYLTXN3U3jfGpocmvNwcUwppTzXtEaY9wvRENUgeTpJDl-1Nfhb8Y2Q_BflybA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relating 18 F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner</title><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Leung, Edwin K ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G ; Berg, Eric ; Xie, Zhaoheng ; Zhang, Xuezhu ; Bayerlein, Reimund ; Spencer, Benjamin ; Li, Elizabeth ; Omidvari, Negar ; Selfridge, Aaron ; Cherry, Simon R ; Qi, Jinyi ; Badawi, Ramsey D</creator><creatorcontrib>Leung, Edwin K ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G ; Berg, Eric ; Xie, Zhaoheng ; Zhang, Xuezhu ; Bayerlein, Reimund ; Spencer, Benjamin ; Li, Elizabeth ; Omidvari, Negar ; Selfridge, Aaron ; Cherry, Simon R ; Qi, Jinyi ; Badawi, Ramsey D</creatorcontrib><description>This work assessed the relationship between image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and total-body noise-equivalent count rate (NECR)-for both non-time-of-flight (TOF) NECR and TOF-NECR-in a long uniform water cylinder and 14 healthy human subjects using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner. A TOF-NEC expression was modified for list-mode PET data, and both the non-TOF NECR and TOF-NECR were compared using datasets from a long uniform water cylinder and 14 human subjects scanned up to 12 h after radiotracer injection. The TOF-NECR for the uniform water cylinder was found to be linearly proportional to the TOF-reconstructed image SNR in the range of radioactivity concentrations studied, but not for non-TOF NECR as indicated by the reduced value. The results suggest that the use of TOF-NECR to estimate the count rate performance of TOF-enabled PET systems may be more appropriate for predicting the SNR of TOF-reconstructed images. Image quality in PET is commonly characterized by image SNR and, correspondingly, the NECR. While the use of NECR for predicting image quality in conventional PET systems is well-studied, the relationship between SNR and NECR has not been examined in detail in long axial field-of-view total-body PET systems, especially for human subjects. Furthermore, the current NEMA NU 2-2018 standard does not account for count rate performance gains due to TOF in the NECR evaluation. The relationship between image SNR and total-body NECR in long axial FOV PET was assessed for the first time using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac72f1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35609588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Humans ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Water</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2022-06, Vol.67 (12), p.125007</ispartof><rights>2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1118-70626899a86afe091ccad715a75f508f4a7602256d33754a0852b18073aabfc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1118-70626899a86afe091ccad715a75f508f4a7602256d33754a0852b18073aabfc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5428-0322 ; 0000-0003-2365-0594 ; 0000-0002-7589-4745 ; 0000-0002-1597-6482</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35609588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leung, Edwin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelhafez, Yasser G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Zhaoheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xuezhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayerlein, Reimund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omidvari, Negar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selfridge, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Simon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Jinyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badawi, Ramsey D</creatorcontrib><title>Relating 18 F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>This work assessed the relationship between image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and total-body noise-equivalent count rate (NECR)-for both non-time-of-flight (TOF) NECR and TOF-NECR-in a long uniform water cylinder and 14 healthy human subjects using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner. A TOF-NEC expression was modified for list-mode PET data, and both the non-TOF NECR and TOF-NECR were compared using datasets from a long uniform water cylinder and 14 human subjects scanned up to 12 h after radiotracer injection. The TOF-NECR for the uniform water cylinder was found to be linearly proportional to the TOF-reconstructed image SNR in the range of radioactivity concentrations studied, but not for non-TOF NECR as indicated by the reduced value. The results suggest that the use of TOF-NECR to estimate the count rate performance of TOF-enabled PET systems may be more appropriate for predicting the SNR of TOF-reconstructed images. Image quality in PET is commonly characterized by image SNR and, correspondingly, the NECR. While the use of NECR for predicting image quality in conventional PET systems is well-studied, the relationship between SNR and NECR has not been examined in detail in long axial field-of-view total-body PET systems, especially for human subjects. Furthermore, the current NEMA NU 2-2018 standard does not account for count rate performance gains due to TOF in the NECR evaluation. The relationship between image SNR and total-body NECR in long axial FOV PET was assessed for the first time using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner.</description><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN9LwzAQx4Mobk7ffZL8A3GXZknTR5nbFAYbY4JvJU2TLtK1s2mF_Qn-16ZOB8cd3N33fnwQuqfwSEHKMWWCEsEFjJWOI0sv0PCcukRDAEZJQjkfoBvvPwAoldHkGg1YqCdcyiH63phSta4qMJV4TubPC-z2qjDYu6JSJWlrUtXOG9yErhq3wdzekNoSW7pi1-LfKjGfnftSpalarOsu-NBusKuCoA1Tsjo_4vVsizvfr2p3Bnez9_VytZltsNeqqkxzi66sKr25-4sj9DafbacvZLlavE6flkTTcD6JQURCJomSQlkDCdVa5THlKuaWg7QTFQuIIi5yxmI-USB5lFEJMVMqs5qxEYLTXN3U3jfGpocmvNwcUwppTzXtEaY9wvRENUgeTpJDl-1Nfhb8Y2Q_BflybA</recordid><startdate>20220621</startdate><enddate>20220621</enddate><creator>Leung, Edwin K</creator><creator>Abdelhafez, Yasser G</creator><creator>Berg, Eric</creator><creator>Xie, Zhaoheng</creator><creator>Zhang, Xuezhu</creator><creator>Bayerlein, Reimund</creator><creator>Spencer, Benjamin</creator><creator>Li, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Omidvari, Negar</creator><creator>Selfridge, Aaron</creator><creator>Cherry, Simon R</creator><creator>Qi, Jinyi</creator><creator>Badawi, Ramsey D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-0322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-0594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7589-4745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-6482</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220621</creationdate><title>Relating 18 F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner</title><author>Leung, Edwin K ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G ; Berg, Eric ; Xie, Zhaoheng ; Zhang, Xuezhu ; Bayerlein, Reimund ; Spencer, Benjamin ; Li, Elizabeth ; Omidvari, Negar ; Selfridge, Aaron ; Cherry, Simon R ; Qi, Jinyi ; Badawi, Ramsey D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1118-70626899a86afe091ccad715a75f508f4a7602256d33754a0852b18073aabfc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leung, Edwin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelhafez, Yasser G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Zhaoheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xuezhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayerlein, Reimund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omidvari, Negar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selfridge, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Simon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Jinyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badawi, Ramsey D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leung, Edwin K</au><au>Abdelhafez, Yasser G</au><au>Berg, Eric</au><au>Xie, Zhaoheng</au><au>Zhang, Xuezhu</au><au>Bayerlein, Reimund</au><au>Spencer, Benjamin</au><au>Li, Elizabeth</au><au>Omidvari, Negar</au><au>Selfridge, Aaron</au><au>Cherry, Simon R</au><au>Qi, Jinyi</au><au>Badawi, Ramsey D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relating 18 F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2022-06-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>125007</spage><pages>125007-</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><abstract>This work assessed the relationship between image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and total-body noise-equivalent count rate (NECR)-for both non-time-of-flight (TOF) NECR and TOF-NECR-in a long uniform water cylinder and 14 healthy human subjects using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner. A TOF-NEC expression was modified for list-mode PET data, and both the non-TOF NECR and TOF-NECR were compared using datasets from a long uniform water cylinder and 14 human subjects scanned up to 12 h after radiotracer injection. The TOF-NECR for the uniform water cylinder was found to be linearly proportional to the TOF-reconstructed image SNR in the range of radioactivity concentrations studied, but not for non-TOF NECR as indicated by the reduced value. The results suggest that the use of TOF-NECR to estimate the count rate performance of TOF-enabled PET systems may be more appropriate for predicting the SNR of TOF-reconstructed images. Image quality in PET is commonly characterized by image SNR and, correspondingly, the NECR. While the use of NECR for predicting image quality in conventional PET systems is well-studied, the relationship between SNR and NECR has not been examined in detail in long axial field-of-view total-body PET systems, especially for human subjects. Furthermore, the current NEMA NU 2-2018 standard does not account for count rate performance gains due to TOF in the NECR evaluation. The relationship between image SNR and total-body NECR in long axial FOV PET was assessed for the first time using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>35609588</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/ac72f1</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-0322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-0594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7589-4745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-6482</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2022-06, Vol.67 (12), p.125007
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ac72f1
source Institute of Physics Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Water
title Relating 18 F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relating%2018%20F-FDG%20image%20signal-to-noise%20ratio%20to%20time-of-flight%20noise-equivalent%20count%20rate%20in%20total-body%20PET%20using%20the%20uEXPLORER%20scanner&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Leung,%20Edwin%20K&rft.date=2022-06-21&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=125007&rft.pages=125007-&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/ac72f1&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E35609588%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35609588&rfr_iscdi=true