Implementation of a double scattering nozzle for Monte Carlo recalculation of proton plans with variable relative biological effectiveness

A constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is currently used in clinical proton therapy. However, the RBE varies with factors such as dose level, linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type. Multiple RBE models have been developed to account for this biological variation. To enable r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2020-11, Vol.65 (22), p.225033
Hauptverfasser: Fjæra, Lars Fredrik, Indelicato, Daniel J, Stokkevåg, Camilla H, Muren, Ludvig P, Hsi, Wen C, Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 22
container_start_page 225033
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 65
creator Fjæra, Lars Fredrik
Indelicato, Daniel J
Stokkevåg, Camilla H
Muren, Ludvig P
Hsi, Wen C
Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S
description A constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is currently used in clinical proton therapy. However, the RBE varies with factors such as dose level, linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type. Multiple RBE models have been developed to account for this biological variation. To enable recalculation of patients treated with double scattering (DS) proton therapy, including LET and variable RBE, we implemented and commissioned a Monte Carlo (MC) model of a DS treatment nozzle. The main components from the IBA nozzle were implemented in the FLUKA MC code. We calibrated and verified the following entities to experimental measurements: range of pristine Bragg peaks (PBPs) and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs), energy spread, lateral profiles, compensator range degradation, and absolute dose. We recalculated two patients with different field setups, comparing FLUKA vs. treatment planning system (TPS) dose, also obtaining LET and variable RBE doses. We achieved good agreement between FLUKA and measurements. The range differences between FLUKA and measurements were for the PBPs within ±0.9 mm (83% ⩽ 0.5 mm), and for SOBPs ±1.6 mm (82% ⩽ 0.5 mm). The differences in modulation widths were below 5 mm (79% ⩽ 2 mm). The differences in the distal dose fall off (D80%-D20%) were below 0.5 mm for all PBPs and the lateral penumbras diverged from measurements by less than 1 mm. The mean dose difference (RBE = 1.1) in the target between the TPS and FLUKA were below 0.4% in a three-field plan and below 1.4% in a four-field plan. A dose increase of 9.9% and 7.2% occurred when using variable RBE for the two patients, respectively. We presented a method to recalculate DS proton plans in the FLUKA MC code. The implementation was used to obtain LET and variable RBE dose and can be used for investigating variable RBE for previously treated patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/abc12d
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_abc12d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2451381274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f2efa5cecba0f7510a7222e592c14f8dce8a45ac9318cba044c4a5db150bbef63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2PFCEQhonRuOPq3ZPh6MF2KT5meo5m4scma7zomQBdrGzopgV6N-5P8FdLZ9bxogkJpPK8bxVvEfIS2FtgfX8BYgvdVm3ZhbEO-PCIbE6lx2TDmIBuD0qdkWel3DAG0HP5lJwJwZRQXG7Ir8txjjjiVE0NaaLJU0OHtNiItDhTK-YwXdMp3d-3ik-Zfk5TRXowOSaa0ZnolnjSzjnV9pqjmQq9C_U7vTU5mNUt44rdIrUhxXQdmpKi9-jW4oSlPCdPvIkFXzzc5-Tbh_dfD5-6qy8fLw_vrjonAWrnOXqjHDprmN8pYGbHOUe15w6k7weHvZHKuL2AfmWkdNKowYJi1qLfinPy-ujbhv2xYKl6DMVhbDNjWormUoHoge9kQ9kRdTmVktHrOYfR5J8amF43oNe49Rq3Pm6gSV49uC92xOEk-BP53_YhzfomLXlqn9XzaJuN5rwdxYTQ8-Ab-uYf6H9b_wZKUqGC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451381274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a double scattering nozzle for Monte Carlo recalculation of proton plans with variable relative biological effectiveness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Fjæra, Lars Fredrik ; Indelicato, Daniel J ; Stokkevåg, Camilla H ; Muren, Ludvig P ; Hsi, Wen C ; Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S</creator><creatorcontrib>Fjæra, Lars Fredrik ; Indelicato, Daniel J ; Stokkevåg, Camilla H ; Muren, Ludvig P ; Hsi, Wen C ; Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S</creatorcontrib><description>A constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is currently used in clinical proton therapy. However, the RBE varies with factors such as dose level, linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type. Multiple RBE models have been developed to account for this biological variation. To enable recalculation of patients treated with double scattering (DS) proton therapy, including LET and variable RBE, we implemented and commissioned a Monte Carlo (MC) model of a DS treatment nozzle. The main components from the IBA nozzle were implemented in the FLUKA MC code. We calibrated and verified the following entities to experimental measurements: range of pristine Bragg peaks (PBPs) and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs), energy spread, lateral profiles, compensator range degradation, and absolute dose. We recalculated two patients with different field setups, comparing FLUKA vs. treatment planning system (TPS) dose, also obtaining LET and variable RBE doses. We achieved good agreement between FLUKA and measurements. The range differences between FLUKA and measurements were for the PBPs within ±0.9 mm (83% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 0.5 mm), and for SOBPs ±1.6 mm (82% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 0.5 mm). The differences in modulation widths were below 5 mm (79% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 2 mm). The differences in the distal dose fall off (D80%-D20%) were below 0.5 mm for all PBPs and the lateral penumbras diverged from measurements by less than 1 mm. The mean dose difference (RBE = 1.1) in the target between the TPS and FLUKA were below 0.4% in a three-field plan and below 1.4% in a four-field plan. A dose increase of 9.9% and 7.2% occurred when using variable RBE for the two patients, respectively. We presented a method to recalculate DS proton plans in the FLUKA MC code. The implementation was used to obtain LET and variable RBE dose and can be used for investigating variable RBE for previously treated patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc12d</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33053524</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>double scattering ; Humans ; Monte Carlo ; Proton Therapy ; Protons ; Relative Biological Effectiveness</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2020-11, Vol.65 (22), p.225033</ispartof><rights>2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><rights>Creative Commons Attribution license.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f2efa5cecba0f7510a7222e592c14f8dce8a45ac9318cba044c4a5db150bbef63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f2efa5cecba0f7510a7222e592c14f8dce8a45ac9318cba044c4a5db150bbef63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3597-1611 ; 0000-0001-6521-506X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/abc12d/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fjæra, Lars Fredrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Indelicato, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokkevåg, Camilla H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muren, Ludvig P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsi, Wen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a double scattering nozzle for Monte Carlo recalculation of proton plans with variable relative biological effectiveness</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>A constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is currently used in clinical proton therapy. However, the RBE varies with factors such as dose level, linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type. Multiple RBE models have been developed to account for this biological variation. To enable recalculation of patients treated with double scattering (DS) proton therapy, including LET and variable RBE, we implemented and commissioned a Monte Carlo (MC) model of a DS treatment nozzle. The main components from the IBA nozzle were implemented in the FLUKA MC code. We calibrated and verified the following entities to experimental measurements: range of pristine Bragg peaks (PBPs) and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs), energy spread, lateral profiles, compensator range degradation, and absolute dose. We recalculated two patients with different field setups, comparing FLUKA vs. treatment planning system (TPS) dose, also obtaining LET and variable RBE doses. We achieved good agreement between FLUKA and measurements. The range differences between FLUKA and measurements were for the PBPs within ±0.9 mm (83% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 0.5 mm), and for SOBPs ±1.6 mm (82% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 0.5 mm). The differences in modulation widths were below 5 mm (79% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 2 mm). The differences in the distal dose fall off (D80%-D20%) were below 0.5 mm for all PBPs and the lateral penumbras diverged from measurements by less than 1 mm. The mean dose difference (RBE = 1.1) in the target between the TPS and FLUKA were below 0.4% in a three-field plan and below 1.4% in a four-field plan. A dose increase of 9.9% and 7.2% occurred when using variable RBE for the two patients, respectively. We presented a method to recalculate DS proton plans in the FLUKA MC code. The implementation was used to obtain LET and variable RBE dose and can be used for investigating variable RBE for previously treated patients.</description><subject>double scattering</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Proton Therapy</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Relative Biological Effectiveness</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2PFCEQhonRuOPq3ZPh6MF2KT5meo5m4scma7zomQBdrGzopgV6N-5P8FdLZ9bxogkJpPK8bxVvEfIS2FtgfX8BYgvdVm3ZhbEO-PCIbE6lx2TDmIBuD0qdkWel3DAG0HP5lJwJwZRQXG7Ir8txjjjiVE0NaaLJU0OHtNiItDhTK-YwXdMp3d-3ik-Zfk5TRXowOSaa0ZnolnjSzjnV9pqjmQq9C_U7vTU5mNUt44rdIrUhxXQdmpKi9-jW4oSlPCdPvIkFXzzc5-Tbh_dfD5-6qy8fLw_vrjonAWrnOXqjHDprmN8pYGbHOUe15w6k7weHvZHKuL2AfmWkdNKowYJi1qLfinPy-ujbhv2xYKl6DMVhbDNjWormUoHoge9kQ9kRdTmVktHrOYfR5J8amF43oNe49Rq3Pm6gSV49uC92xOEk-BP53_YhzfomLXlqn9XzaJuN5rwdxYTQ8-Ab-uYf6H9b_wZKUqGC</recordid><startdate>20201119</startdate><enddate>20201119</enddate><creator>Fjæra, Lars Fredrik</creator><creator>Indelicato, Daniel J</creator><creator>Stokkevåg, Camilla H</creator><creator>Muren, Ludvig P</creator><creator>Hsi, Wen C</creator><creator>Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-1611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6521-506X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201119</creationdate><title>Implementation of a double scattering nozzle for Monte Carlo recalculation of proton plans with variable relative biological effectiveness</title><author>Fjæra, Lars Fredrik ; Indelicato, Daniel J ; Stokkevåg, Camilla H ; Muren, Ludvig P ; Hsi, Wen C ; Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f2efa5cecba0f7510a7222e592c14f8dce8a45ac9318cba044c4a5db150bbef63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>double scattering</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Proton Therapy</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Relative Biological Effectiveness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fjæra, Lars Fredrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Indelicato, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokkevåg, Camilla H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muren, Ludvig P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsi, Wen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fjæra, Lars Fredrik</au><au>Indelicato, Daniel J</au><au>Stokkevåg, Camilla H</au><au>Muren, Ludvig P</au><au>Hsi, Wen C</au><au>Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a double scattering nozzle for Monte Carlo recalculation of proton plans with variable relative biological effectiveness</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2020-11-19</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>225033</spage><pages>225033-</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>A constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is currently used in clinical proton therapy. However, the RBE varies with factors such as dose level, linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type. Multiple RBE models have been developed to account for this biological variation. To enable recalculation of patients treated with double scattering (DS) proton therapy, including LET and variable RBE, we implemented and commissioned a Monte Carlo (MC) model of a DS treatment nozzle. The main components from the IBA nozzle were implemented in the FLUKA MC code. We calibrated and verified the following entities to experimental measurements: range of pristine Bragg peaks (PBPs) and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs), energy spread, lateral profiles, compensator range degradation, and absolute dose. We recalculated two patients with different field setups, comparing FLUKA vs. treatment planning system (TPS) dose, also obtaining LET and variable RBE doses. We achieved good agreement between FLUKA and measurements. The range differences between FLUKA and measurements were for the PBPs within ±0.9 mm (83% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 0.5 mm), and for SOBPs ±1.6 mm (82% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 0.5 mm). The differences in modulation widths were below 5 mm (79% &amp;LessSlantEqual; 2 mm). The differences in the distal dose fall off (D80%-D20%) were below 0.5 mm for all PBPs and the lateral penumbras diverged from measurements by less than 1 mm. The mean dose difference (RBE = 1.1) in the target between the TPS and FLUKA were below 0.4% in a three-field plan and below 1.4% in a four-field plan. A dose increase of 9.9% and 7.2% occurred when using variable RBE for the two patients, respectively. We presented a method to recalculate DS proton plans in the FLUKA MC code. The implementation was used to obtain LET and variable RBE dose and can be used for investigating variable RBE for previously treated patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>33053524</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/abc12d</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-1611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6521-506X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2020-11, Vol.65 (22), p.225033
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_abc12d
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects double scattering
Humans
Monte Carlo
Proton Therapy
Protons
Relative Biological Effectiveness
title Implementation of a double scattering nozzle for Monte Carlo recalculation of proton plans with variable relative biological effectiveness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A34%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20double%20scattering%20nozzle%20for%20Monte%20Carlo%20recalculation%20of%20proton%20plans%20with%20variable%20relative%20biological%20effectiveness&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Fj%C3%A6ra,%20Lars%20Fredrik&rft.date=2020-11-19&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=225033&rft.pages=225033-&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/abc12d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2451381274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451381274&rft_id=info:pmid/33053524&rfr_iscdi=true