Single patient convolutional neural networks for real-time MR reconstruction: coherent low-resolution versus incoherent undersampling

Accelerated MRI involves undersampling k-space, creating unwanted artifacts when reconstructing the data. While the strategy of incoherent k-space acquisition is proven for techniques such as compressed sensing, it may not be optimal for all techniques. This study compares the use of coherent low-re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2020-04, Vol.65 (8), p.08NT03-08NT03
Hauptverfasser: Dietz, Bryson, Yun, Jihyun, Yip, Eugene, Gabos, Zsolt, Fallone, B Gino, Wachowicz, Keith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 08NT03
container_issue 8
container_start_page 08NT03
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 65
creator Dietz, Bryson
Yun, Jihyun
Yip, Eugene
Gabos, Zsolt
Fallone, B Gino
Wachowicz, Keith
description Accelerated MRI involves undersampling k-space, creating unwanted artifacts when reconstructing the data. While the strategy of incoherent k-space acquisition is proven for techniques such as compressed sensing, it may not be optimal for all techniques. This study compares the use of coherent low-resolution (coherent-LR) and incoherent undersampling phase-encoding for real-time 3D CNN image reconstruction. Data were acquired with our 3 T Philips Achieva system. A retrospective analysis was performed on six non-small cell lung cancer patients who received dynamic acquisitions consisting of 650 free breathing images using a bSSFP sequence. We retrospectively undersampled the data by 5x and 10x acceleration using the two phase-encoding schemes. A quantitative analysis was conducted evaluating the tumor segmentations from the CNN reconstructed data using the Dice coefficient (DC) and centroid displacement. The reconstruction noise was evaluated using the structural similarity index (SSIM). Furthermore, we qualitatively investigated the CNN reconstruction using prospectively undersampled data, where the fully sampled training data set is acquired separately from the accelerated undersampled data. The patient averaged DC, centroid displacement, and SSIM for the tumor segmentation at 5x and 10x was superior using coherent low-resolution undersampling. Furthermore, the patient-specific CNN can be trained in under 6 h and the reconstruction time was 54 ms per image. Both the incoherent and coherent-LR prospective CNN reconstructions yielded qualitatively acceptable images; however, the coherent-LR reconstruction appeared superior to the incoherent reconstruction. We have demonstrated that coherent-LR undersampling for real-time CNN image reconstruction performs quantitatively better for the retrospective case of lung tumor segmentation, and qualitatively better for the prospective case. The tumor segmentation mean DC increased for all six patients at 5x acceleration and the temporal (dynamic) variance of the segmentation was reduced. The reconstruction speed achieved for our current implementation was 54 ms, providing an acceptable frame rate for real-time on-the-fly MR imaging.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/ab7d13
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab7d13</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2374357490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ed8d04554906043c1f3545dea918ca7a1f809304ed325adf72ceab061d9931623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1ERZfCnRPKjR5IOxPHicOtqqCtVIoE5Wx54wmkOHFqx614gL53HXa7J9TTaEbf_2v0MfYO4QhBymPkFeaVqOBYr2uD_AVb7U4v2QqAY96gEPvsdQg3AIiyKF-xfV4gF4Ljij386MdflrJJzz2Nc9a68c7ZOPdu1DYbKfp_Y753_k_IOuczT9rmcz9Q9vV7WlIgzD62S-JTiv8mv_RYd597Ctuq7I58iCHrxx0QR5NuephseuAN2-u0DfR2Ow_Yzy-fr0_P88tvZxenJ5d5yys552SkgVKIsoEKSt5ix0UpDOkGZatrjZ2EhkNJhhdCm64uWtJrqNA0Dceq4AfscNM7eXcbKcxq6ENL1uqRXAyq4HXJRZ36EwobtPUuBE-dmnw_aP9XIahFvlpMq8W02shPkffb9rgeyOwCT7YT8HED9G5SNy765Dg81_fhP_g0rBOlpAJ5dQ1cTabjj2YbnqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2374357490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single patient convolutional neural networks for real-time MR reconstruction: coherent low-resolution versus incoherent undersampling</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Dietz, Bryson ; Yun, Jihyun ; Yip, Eugene ; Gabos, Zsolt ; Fallone, B Gino ; Wachowicz, Keith</creator><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Bryson ; Yun, Jihyun ; Yip, Eugene ; Gabos, Zsolt ; Fallone, B Gino ; Wachowicz, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>Accelerated MRI involves undersampling k-space, creating unwanted artifacts when reconstructing the data. While the strategy of incoherent k-space acquisition is proven for techniques such as compressed sensing, it may not be optimal for all techniques. This study compares the use of coherent low-resolution (coherent-LR) and incoherent undersampling phase-encoding for real-time 3D CNN image reconstruction. Data were acquired with our 3 T Philips Achieva system. A retrospective analysis was performed on six non-small cell lung cancer patients who received dynamic acquisitions consisting of 650 free breathing images using a bSSFP sequence. We retrospectively undersampled the data by 5x and 10x acceleration using the two phase-encoding schemes. A quantitative analysis was conducted evaluating the tumor segmentations from the CNN reconstructed data using the Dice coefficient (DC) and centroid displacement. The reconstruction noise was evaluated using the structural similarity index (SSIM). Furthermore, we qualitatively investigated the CNN reconstruction using prospectively undersampled data, where the fully sampled training data set is acquired separately from the accelerated undersampled data. The patient averaged DC, centroid displacement, and SSIM for the tumor segmentation at 5x and 10x was superior using coherent low-resolution undersampling. Furthermore, the patient-specific CNN can be trained in under 6 h and the reconstruction time was 54 ms per image. Both the incoherent and coherent-LR prospective CNN reconstructions yielded qualitatively acceptable images; however, the coherent-LR reconstruction appeared superior to the incoherent reconstruction. We have demonstrated that coherent-LR undersampling for real-time CNN image reconstruction performs quantitatively better for the retrospective case of lung tumor segmentation, and qualitatively better for the prospective case. The tumor segmentation mean DC increased for all six patients at 5x acceleration and the temporal (dynamic) variance of the segmentation was reduced. The reconstruction speed achieved for our current implementation was 54 ms, providing an acceptable frame rate for real-time on-the-fly MR imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab7d13</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32135531</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>MRI ; neural networks ; reconstruction</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2020-04, Vol.65 (8), p.08NT03-08NT03</ispartof><rights>2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ed8d04554906043c1f3545dea918ca7a1f809304ed325adf72ceab061d9931623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ed8d04554906043c1f3545dea918ca7a1f809304ed325adf72ceab061d9931623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/ab7d13/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,53844,53891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32135531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Bryson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, Jihyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yip, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabos, Zsolt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallone, B Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wachowicz, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Single patient convolutional neural networks for real-time MR reconstruction: coherent low-resolution versus incoherent undersampling</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>Accelerated MRI involves undersampling k-space, creating unwanted artifacts when reconstructing the data. While the strategy of incoherent k-space acquisition is proven for techniques such as compressed sensing, it may not be optimal for all techniques. This study compares the use of coherent low-resolution (coherent-LR) and incoherent undersampling phase-encoding for real-time 3D CNN image reconstruction. Data were acquired with our 3 T Philips Achieva system. A retrospective analysis was performed on six non-small cell lung cancer patients who received dynamic acquisitions consisting of 650 free breathing images using a bSSFP sequence. We retrospectively undersampled the data by 5x and 10x acceleration using the two phase-encoding schemes. A quantitative analysis was conducted evaluating the tumor segmentations from the CNN reconstructed data using the Dice coefficient (DC) and centroid displacement. The reconstruction noise was evaluated using the structural similarity index (SSIM). Furthermore, we qualitatively investigated the CNN reconstruction using prospectively undersampled data, where the fully sampled training data set is acquired separately from the accelerated undersampled data. The patient averaged DC, centroid displacement, and SSIM for the tumor segmentation at 5x and 10x was superior using coherent low-resolution undersampling. Furthermore, the patient-specific CNN can be trained in under 6 h and the reconstruction time was 54 ms per image. Both the incoherent and coherent-LR prospective CNN reconstructions yielded qualitatively acceptable images; however, the coherent-LR reconstruction appeared superior to the incoherent reconstruction. We have demonstrated that coherent-LR undersampling for real-time CNN image reconstruction performs quantitatively better for the retrospective case of lung tumor segmentation, and qualitatively better for the prospective case. The tumor segmentation mean DC increased for all six patients at 5x acceleration and the temporal (dynamic) variance of the segmentation was reduced. The reconstruction speed achieved for our current implementation was 54 ms, providing an acceptable frame rate for real-time on-the-fly MR imaging.</description><subject>MRI</subject><subject>neural networks</subject><subject>reconstruction</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1ERZfCnRPKjR5IOxPHicOtqqCtVIoE5Wx54wmkOHFqx614gL53HXa7J9TTaEbf_2v0MfYO4QhBymPkFeaVqOBYr2uD_AVb7U4v2QqAY96gEPvsdQg3AIiyKF-xfV4gF4Ljij386MdflrJJzz2Nc9a68c7ZOPdu1DYbKfp_Y753_k_IOuczT9rmcz9Q9vV7WlIgzD62S-JTiv8mv_RYd597Ctuq7I58iCHrxx0QR5NuephseuAN2-u0DfR2Ow_Yzy-fr0_P88tvZxenJ5d5yys552SkgVKIsoEKSt5ix0UpDOkGZatrjZ2EhkNJhhdCm64uWtJrqNA0Dceq4AfscNM7eXcbKcxq6ENL1uqRXAyq4HXJRZ36EwobtPUuBE-dmnw_aP9XIahFvlpMq8W02shPkffb9rgeyOwCT7YT8HED9G5SNy765Dg81_fhP_g0rBOlpAJ5dQ1cTabjj2YbnqQ</recordid><startdate>20200423</startdate><enddate>20200423</enddate><creator>Dietz, Bryson</creator><creator>Yun, Jihyun</creator><creator>Yip, Eugene</creator><creator>Gabos, Zsolt</creator><creator>Fallone, B Gino</creator><creator>Wachowicz, Keith</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200423</creationdate><title>Single patient convolutional neural networks for real-time MR reconstruction: coherent low-resolution versus incoherent undersampling</title><author>Dietz, Bryson ; Yun, Jihyun ; Yip, Eugene ; Gabos, Zsolt ; Fallone, B Gino ; Wachowicz, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ed8d04554906043c1f3545dea918ca7a1f809304ed325adf72ceab061d9931623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>MRI</topic><topic>neural networks</topic><topic>reconstruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Bryson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, Jihyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yip, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabos, Zsolt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallone, B Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wachowicz, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dietz, Bryson</au><au>Yun, Jihyun</au><au>Yip, Eugene</au><au>Gabos, Zsolt</au><au>Fallone, B Gino</au><au>Wachowicz, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single patient convolutional neural networks for real-time MR reconstruction: coherent low-resolution versus incoherent undersampling</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2020-04-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>08NT03</spage><epage>08NT03</epage><pages>08NT03-08NT03</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>Accelerated MRI involves undersampling k-space, creating unwanted artifacts when reconstructing the data. While the strategy of incoherent k-space acquisition is proven for techniques such as compressed sensing, it may not be optimal for all techniques. This study compares the use of coherent low-resolution (coherent-LR) and incoherent undersampling phase-encoding for real-time 3D CNN image reconstruction. Data were acquired with our 3 T Philips Achieva system. A retrospective analysis was performed on six non-small cell lung cancer patients who received dynamic acquisitions consisting of 650 free breathing images using a bSSFP sequence. We retrospectively undersampled the data by 5x and 10x acceleration using the two phase-encoding schemes. A quantitative analysis was conducted evaluating the tumor segmentations from the CNN reconstructed data using the Dice coefficient (DC) and centroid displacement. The reconstruction noise was evaluated using the structural similarity index (SSIM). Furthermore, we qualitatively investigated the CNN reconstruction using prospectively undersampled data, where the fully sampled training data set is acquired separately from the accelerated undersampled data. The patient averaged DC, centroid displacement, and SSIM for the tumor segmentation at 5x and 10x was superior using coherent low-resolution undersampling. Furthermore, the patient-specific CNN can be trained in under 6 h and the reconstruction time was 54 ms per image. Both the incoherent and coherent-LR prospective CNN reconstructions yielded qualitatively acceptable images; however, the coherent-LR reconstruction appeared superior to the incoherent reconstruction. We have demonstrated that coherent-LR undersampling for real-time CNN image reconstruction performs quantitatively better for the retrospective case of lung tumor segmentation, and qualitatively better for the prospective case. The tumor segmentation mean DC increased for all six patients at 5x acceleration and the temporal (dynamic) variance of the segmentation was reduced. The reconstruction speed achieved for our current implementation was 54 ms, providing an acceptable frame rate for real-time on-the-fly MR imaging.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>32135531</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/ab7d13</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2020-04, Vol.65 (8), p.08NT03-08NT03
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab7d13
source IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects MRI
neural networks
reconstruction
title Single patient convolutional neural networks for real-time MR reconstruction: coherent low-resolution versus incoherent undersampling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%20patient%20convolutional%20neural%20networks%20for%20real-time%20MR%20reconstruction:%20coherent%20low-resolution%20versus%20incoherent%20undersampling&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Dietz,%20Bryson&rft.date=2020-04-23&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=08NT03&rft.epage=08NT03&rft.pages=08NT03-08NT03&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/ab7d13&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2374357490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2374357490&rft_id=info:pmid/32135531&rfr_iscdi=true