How Does Stalking Wrong the Victim?

Much stalking consists in behavior which would normally be permissible; indeed, many stalking behaviors are protected liberties. How, then, does the stalker wrong the victim? I consider and reject different answers as failing to identify the essential wrong of stalking: stalking perpetuates gender o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Ethics 2023-10, Vol.134 (1), p.4-31
1. Verfasser:	Brake, Elizabeth
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Autonomy Behavior Oppression Privacy Protective factors Stalking Victims
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	31
container_issue	1
container_start_page	4
container_title	Ethics
container_volume	134
creator	Brake, Elizabeth
description	Much stalking consists in behavior which would normally be permissible; indeed, many stalking behaviors are protected liberties. How, then, does the stalker wrong the victim? I consider and reject different answers as failing to identify the essential wrong of stalking: stalking perpetuates gender oppression; it threatens or coerces, disrespects autonomy, or violates privacy. I argue that the stalker forces a personal relationship on the target and that our interest in being able to refuse such relationships is strong enough to ground a right. It is a benefit if my account changes the standards of which intimacy-seeking behaviors we consider permissible.
doi_str_mv	10.1086/725815
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_725815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2865014567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-c66ec0b6f452a0a76368c08ea685e0a7b2816debe9a47e9b74077e229e4586cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLw0AUhQdRMFb9DYGKu-idyTxXIq1aoeDC5y5MpjdtatuJMwnivzeSgpt7uPBxDucQck7hioKW14oJTcUBSajITcaM-jgkCQDlGVXAj8lJjGsAMILqhIxn_judeozpc2s3n_Vumb4H3992helb7dp6e3NKjiq7iXi21xF5vb97mcyy-dPD4-R2njmq8jZzUqKDUlZcMAtWyVxqBxqt1AL7v2SaygWWaCxXaErFQSlkzCAXWrpFPiLjwbcJ_qvD2BZr34VdH1kwLUXfQEjVU5cD5YKPMWBVNKHe2vBTUCj-BiiGAXrwYgA7t6qdXfomYIz_nnvsF0iiVr4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2865014567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Does Stalking Wrong the Victim?</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Brake, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Brake, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Much stalking consists in behavior which would normally be permissible; indeed, many stalking behaviors are protected liberties. How, then, does the stalker wrong the victim? I consider and reject different answers as failing to identify the essential wrong of stalking: stalking perpetuates gender oppression; it threatens or coerces, disrespects autonomy, or violates privacy. I argue that the stalker forces a personal relationship on the target and that our interest in being able to refuse such relationships is strong enough to ground a right. It is a benefit if my account changes the standards of which intimacy-seeking behaviors we consider permissible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-1704</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-297X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/725815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Autonomy ; Behavior ; Oppression ; Privacy ; Protective factors ; Stalking ; Victims</subject><ispartof>Ethics, 2023-10, Vol.134 (1), p.4-31</ispartof><rights>2023 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Oct 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-c66ec0b6f452a0a76368c08ea685e0a7b2816debe9a47e9b74077e229e4586cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brake, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>How Does Stalking Wrong the Victim?</title><title>Ethics</title><description>Much stalking consists in behavior which would normally be permissible; indeed, many stalking behaviors are protected liberties. How, then, does the stalker wrong the victim? I consider and reject different answers as failing to identify the essential wrong of stalking: stalking perpetuates gender oppression; it threatens or coerces, disrespects autonomy, or violates privacy. I argue that the stalker forces a personal relationship on the target and that our interest in being able to refuse such relationships is strong enough to ground a right. It is a benefit if my account changes the standards of which intimacy-seeking behaviors we consider permissible.</description><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Protective factors</subject><subject>Stalking</subject><subject>Victims</subject><issn>0014-1704</issn><issn>1539-297X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLw0AUhQdRMFb9DYGKu-idyTxXIq1aoeDC5y5MpjdtatuJMwnivzeSgpt7uPBxDucQck7hioKW14oJTcUBSajITcaM-jgkCQDlGVXAj8lJjGsAMILqhIxn_judeozpc2s3n_Vumb4H3992helb7dp6e3NKjiq7iXi21xF5vb97mcyy-dPD4-R2njmq8jZzUqKDUlZcMAtWyVxqBxqt1AL7v2SaygWWaCxXaErFQSlkzCAXWrpFPiLjwbcJ_qvD2BZr34VdH1kwLUXfQEjVU5cD5YKPMWBVNKHe2vBTUCj-BiiGAXrwYgA7t6qdXfomYIz_nnvsF0iiVr4</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Brake, Elizabeth</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>How Does Stalking Wrong the Victim?</title><author>Brake, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-c66ec0b6f452a0a76368c08ea685e0a7b2816debe9a47e9b74077e229e4586cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Protective factors</topic><topic>Stalking</topic><topic>Victims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brake, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brake, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Does Stalking Wrong the Victim?</atitle><jtitle>Ethics</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>4-31</pages><issn>0014-1704</issn><eissn>1539-297X</eissn><abstract>Much stalking consists in behavior which would normally be permissible; indeed, many stalking behaviors are protected liberties. How, then, does the stalker wrong the victim? I consider and reject different answers as failing to identify the essential wrong of stalking: stalking perpetuates gender oppression; it threatens or coerces, disrespects autonomy, or violates privacy. I argue that the stalker forces a personal relationship on the target and that our interest in being able to refuse such relationships is strong enough to ground a right. It is a benefit if my account changes the standards of which intimacy-seeking behaviors we consider permissible.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/725815</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0014-1704
ispartof	Ethics, 2023-10, Vol.134 (1), p.4-31
issn	0014-1704 1539-297X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_725815
source	EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects	Autonomy Behavior Oppression Privacy Protective factors Stalking Victims
title	How Does Stalking Wrong the Victim?
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A35%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Does%20Stalking%20Wrong%20the%20Victim?&rft.jtitle=Ethics&rft.au=Brake,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=4-31&rft.issn=0014-1704&rft.eissn=1539-297X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/725815&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2865014567%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2865014567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true