Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn

In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of B...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osiris (Bruges) 2014-01, Vol.29 (1), p.63-77
1. Verfasser: Newman, William R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Osiris (Bruges)
container_volume 29
creator Newman, William R.
description In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of Boyle and then transmitted it to the founder of the phlogiston theory, G. E. Stahl. Second, this essay argues that transmutational matter theories were not necessarily opposed to the existence of stable chemical species,paceKuhn. Boyle’s corpuscular theory descended largely from the tradition of “chymical atomism,” which often advocated both chrysopoeia and the reality of robust chemical substances.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/678097
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_678097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/678097</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/678097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3c9fcd345edb4ff271ddcea14e59684ddb9520d30386378fd2265b9d8fa8dd023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk79CRJQxItV89G1iXdzqBMHwpi3lrQ5cR1bU5NW2L83Y1OvBK8OBx7e854HoVNKrikRyU2SCiLTPdSlkvNIMJHuoy7hiYxSwdIOOvJ-QQjhMeOHqMMSSngaiy56m9ocXIPv7HoJfTxzqvKrtlFNaas-VpXGzRzwuPSNdWtsDR7NYRW2sORgrAM8UZ-29CW4WzzEU_C1rTzgxuLndl4dowOjlh5OdrOHXh_uZ6NxNHl5fBoNJ1ERKjYRL6QpNI8HoPPYGJZSrQtQNIaBTESsdS4HjGhOuEh4KoxmLBnkUgujhNaE8R662ubWzn604JsslCxguVQV2NZnNJGUCSa5COjlFi2c9d6ByWpXrpRbZ5RkG5fZ1mUAz3aZbb4C_YN9y_s92hbzslDvtnbgfbawravCs7ucrNYmoBf_QAN2vsUWG99_FfsCcMSUWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691282938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Newman, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Newman, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of Boyle and then transmitted it to the founder of the phlogiston theory, G. E. Stahl. Second, this essay argues that transmutational matter theories were not necessarily opposed to the existence of stable chemical species,paceKuhn. Boyle’s corpuscular theory descended largely from the tradition of “chymical atomism,” which often advocated both chrysopoeia and the reality of robust chemical substances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0369-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1933-8287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/678097</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26103748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Alchemy ; Atomism ; Becher ; Belief ; Boyle ; Chemistry ; Chemistry - history ; Composite particles ; Historiography ; History of medicine and histology ; History, 17th Century ; History, 18th Century ; Metal particles ; Minerals ; Stahl ; Sulfur ; Terminology ; Transmutation</subject><ispartof>Osiris (Bruges), 2014-01, Vol.29 (1), p.63-77</ispartof><rights>2014 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3c9fcd345edb4ff271ddcea14e59684ddb9520d30386378fd2265b9d8fa8dd023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3c9fcd345edb4ff271ddcea14e59684ddb9520d30386378fd2265b9d8fa8dd023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newman, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn</title><title>Osiris (Bruges)</title><addtitle>Osiris</addtitle><description>In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of Boyle and then transmitted it to the founder of the phlogiston theory, G. E. Stahl. Second, this essay argues that transmutational matter theories were not necessarily opposed to the existence of stable chemical species,paceKuhn. Boyle’s corpuscular theory descended largely from the tradition of “chymical atomism,” which often advocated both chrysopoeia and the reality of robust chemical substances.</description><subject>Alchemy</subject><subject>Atomism</subject><subject>Becher</subject><subject>Belief</subject><subject>Boyle</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry - history</subject><subject>Composite particles</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>History of medicine and histology</subject><subject>History, 17th Century</subject><subject>History, 18th Century</subject><subject>Metal particles</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Stahl</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Transmutation</subject><issn>0369-7827</issn><issn>1933-8287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk79CRJQxItV89G1iXdzqBMHwpi3lrQ5cR1bU5NW2L83Y1OvBK8OBx7e854HoVNKrikRyU2SCiLTPdSlkvNIMJHuoy7hiYxSwdIOOvJ-QQjhMeOHqMMSSngaiy56m9ocXIPv7HoJfTxzqvKrtlFNaas-VpXGzRzwuPSNdWtsDR7NYRW2sORgrAM8UZ-29CW4WzzEU_C1rTzgxuLndl4dowOjlh5OdrOHXh_uZ6NxNHl5fBoNJ1ERKjYRL6QpNI8HoPPYGJZSrQtQNIaBTESsdS4HjGhOuEh4KoxmLBnkUgujhNaE8R662ubWzn604JsslCxguVQV2NZnNJGUCSa5COjlFi2c9d6ByWpXrpRbZ5RkG5fZ1mUAz3aZbb4C_YN9y_s92hbzslDvtnbgfbawravCs7ucrNYmoBf_QAN2vsUWG99_FfsCcMSUWw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Newman, William R.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn</title><author>Newman, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3c9fcd345edb4ff271ddcea14e59684ddb9520d30386378fd2265b9d8fa8dd023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alchemy</topic><topic>Atomism</topic><topic>Becher</topic><topic>Belief</topic><topic>Boyle</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry - history</topic><topic>Composite particles</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>History of medicine and histology</topic><topic>History, 17th Century</topic><topic>History, 18th Century</topic><topic>Metal particles</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Stahl</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Transmutation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newman, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osiris (Bruges)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newman, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn</atitle><jtitle>Osiris (Bruges)</jtitle><addtitle>Osiris</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>63-77</pages><issn>0369-7827</issn><eissn>1933-8287</eissn><abstract>In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of Boyle and then transmitted it to the founder of the phlogiston theory, G. E. Stahl. Second, this essay argues that transmutational matter theories were not necessarily opposed to the existence of stable chemical species,paceKuhn. Boyle’s corpuscular theory descended largely from the tradition of “chymical atomism,” which often advocated both chrysopoeia and the reality of robust chemical substances.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>26103748</pmid><doi>10.1086/678097</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0369-7827
ispartof Osiris (Bruges), 2014-01, Vol.29 (1), p.63-77
issn 0369-7827
1933-8287
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_678097
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; MEDLINE
subjects Alchemy
Atomism
Becher
Belief
Boyle
Chemistry
Chemistry - history
Composite particles
Historiography
History of medicine and histology
History, 17th Century
History, 18th Century
Metal particles
Minerals
Stahl
Sulfur
Terminology
Transmutation
title Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A01%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robert%20Boyle,%20Transmutation,%20and%20the%20History%20of%20Chemistry%20before%20Lavoisier:%20A%20Response%20to%20Kuhn&rft.jtitle=Osiris%20(Bruges)&rft.au=Newman,%20William%20R.&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=63-77&rft.issn=0369-7827&rft.eissn=1933-8287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/678097&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/678097%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691282938&rft_id=info:pmid/26103748&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/678097&rfr_iscdi=true