Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn
In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of B...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Osiris (Bruges) 2014-01, Vol.29 (1), p.63-77 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 77 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Osiris (Bruges) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Newman, William R. |
description | In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of Boyle and then transmitted it to the founder of the phlogiston theory, G. E. Stahl. Second, this essay argues that transmutational matter theories were not necessarily opposed to the existence of stable chemical species,paceKuhn. Boyle’s corpuscular theory descended largely from the tradition of “chymical atomism,” which often advocated both chrysopoeia and the reality of robust chemical substances. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/678097 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_678097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/678097</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/678097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3c9fcd345edb4ff271ddcea14e59684ddb9520d30386378fd2265b9d8fa8dd023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk79CRJQxItV89G1iXdzqBMHwpi3lrQ5cR1bU5NW2L83Y1OvBK8OBx7e854HoVNKrikRyU2SCiLTPdSlkvNIMJHuoy7hiYxSwdIOOvJ-QQjhMeOHqMMSSngaiy56m9ocXIPv7HoJfTxzqvKrtlFNaas-VpXGzRzwuPSNdWtsDR7NYRW2sORgrAM8UZ-29CW4WzzEU_C1rTzgxuLndl4dowOjlh5OdrOHXh_uZ6NxNHl5fBoNJ1ERKjYRL6QpNI8HoPPYGJZSrQtQNIaBTESsdS4HjGhOuEh4KoxmLBnkUgujhNaE8R662ubWzn604JsslCxguVQV2NZnNJGUCSa5COjlFi2c9d6ByWpXrpRbZ5RkG5fZ1mUAz3aZbb4C_YN9y_s92hbzslDvtnbgfbawravCs7ucrNYmoBf_QAN2vsUWG99_FfsCcMSUWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691282938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Newman, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Newman, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of Boyle and then transmitted it to the founder of the phlogiston theory, G. E. Stahl. Second, this essay argues that transmutational matter theories were not necessarily opposed to the existence of stable chemical species,paceKuhn. Boyle’s corpuscular theory descended largely from the tradition of “chymical atomism,” which often advocated both chrysopoeia and the reality of robust chemical substances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0369-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1933-8287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/678097</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26103748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Alchemy ; Atomism ; Becher ; Belief ; Boyle ; Chemistry ; Chemistry - history ; Composite particles ; Historiography ; History of medicine and histology ; History, 17th Century ; History, 18th Century ; Metal particles ; Minerals ; Stahl ; Sulfur ; Terminology ; Transmutation</subject><ispartof>Osiris (Bruges), 2014-01, Vol.29 (1), p.63-77</ispartof><rights>2014 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3c9fcd345edb4ff271ddcea14e59684ddb9520d30386378fd2265b9d8fa8dd023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3c9fcd345edb4ff271ddcea14e59684ddb9520d30386378fd2265b9d8fa8dd023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newman, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn</title><title>Osiris (Bruges)</title><addtitle>Osiris</addtitle><description>In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of Boyle and then transmitted it to the founder of the phlogiston theory, G. E. Stahl. Second, this essay argues that transmutational matter theories were not necessarily opposed to the existence of stable chemical species,paceKuhn. Boyle’s corpuscular theory descended largely from the tradition of “chymical atomism,” which often advocated both chrysopoeia and the reality of robust chemical substances.</description><subject>Alchemy</subject><subject>Atomism</subject><subject>Becher</subject><subject>Belief</subject><subject>Boyle</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry - history</subject><subject>Composite particles</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>History of medicine and histology</subject><subject>History, 17th Century</subject><subject>History, 18th Century</subject><subject>Metal particles</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Stahl</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Transmutation</subject><issn>0369-7827</issn><issn>1933-8287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk79CRJQxItV89G1iXdzqBMHwpi3lrQ5cR1bU5NW2L83Y1OvBK8OBx7e854HoVNKrikRyU2SCiLTPdSlkvNIMJHuoy7hiYxSwdIOOvJ-QQjhMeOHqMMSSngaiy56m9ocXIPv7HoJfTxzqvKrtlFNaas-VpXGzRzwuPSNdWtsDR7NYRW2sORgrAM8UZ-29CW4WzzEU_C1rTzgxuLndl4dowOjlh5OdrOHXh_uZ6NxNHl5fBoNJ1ERKjYRL6QpNI8HoPPYGJZSrQtQNIaBTESsdS4HjGhOuEh4KoxmLBnkUgujhNaE8R662ubWzn604JsslCxguVQV2NZnNJGUCSa5COjlFi2c9d6ByWpXrpRbZ5RkG5fZ1mUAz3aZbb4C_YN9y_s92hbzslDvtnbgfbawravCs7ucrNYmoBf_QAN2vsUWG99_FfsCcMSUWw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Newman, William R.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn</title><author>Newman, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3c9fcd345edb4ff271ddcea14e59684ddb9520d30386378fd2265b9d8fa8dd023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alchemy</topic><topic>Atomism</topic><topic>Becher</topic><topic>Belief</topic><topic>Boyle</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry - history</topic><topic>Composite particles</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>History of medicine and histology</topic><topic>History, 17th Century</topic><topic>History, 18th Century</topic><topic>Metal particles</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Stahl</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Transmutation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newman, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osiris (Bruges)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newman, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn</atitle><jtitle>Osiris (Bruges)</jtitle><addtitle>Osiris</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>63-77</pages><issn>0369-7827</issn><eissn>1933-8287</eissn><abstract>In an influential article of 1952, Thomas Kuhn argued that Robert Boyle had little or no influence on the subsequent development of chemistry. This essay challenges Kuhn’s view on two fronts. First, it shows that Johann Joachim Becher developed his hierarchical matter theory under the influence of Boyle and then transmitted it to the founder of the phlogiston theory, G. E. Stahl. Second, this essay argues that transmutational matter theories were not necessarily opposed to the existence of stable chemical species,paceKuhn. Boyle’s corpuscular theory descended largely from the tradition of “chymical atomism,” which often advocated both chrysopoeia and the reality of robust chemical substances.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>26103748</pmid><doi>10.1086/678097</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0369-7827 |
ispartof | Osiris (Bruges), 2014-01, Vol.29 (1), p.63-77 |
issn | 0369-7827 1933-8287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_678097 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; MEDLINE |
subjects | Alchemy Atomism Becher Belief Boyle Chemistry Chemistry - history Composite particles Historiography History of medicine and histology History, 17th Century History, 18th Century Metal particles Minerals Stahl Sulfur Terminology Transmutation |
title | Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A01%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robert%20Boyle,%20Transmutation,%20and%20the%20History%20of%20Chemistry%20before%20Lavoisier:%20A%20Response%20to%20Kuhn&rft.jtitle=Osiris%20(Bruges)&rft.au=Newman,%20William%20R.&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=63-77&rft.issn=0369-7827&rft.eissn=1933-8287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/678097&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/678097%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691282938&rft_id=info:pmid/26103748&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/678097&rfr_iscdi=true |