Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates
Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis. Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2014-06, Vol.35 (6), p.667-673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 673 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 667 |
container_title | Infection control and hospital epidemiology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Koo, Hoonmo L. Van, John N. Zhao, Meina Ye, Xunyan Revell, Paula A. Jiang, Zhi-Dong Grimes, Carolyn Z. Koo, Diana C. Lasco, Todd Kozinetz, Claudia A. Garey, Kevin W. DuPont, Herbert L. |
description | Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis.
Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design.
Setting. Large university-based hospital.
Participants. Hospitalized adult patients.
Methods. CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture.
Results. CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization.
Conclusions. The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/676433 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_676433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/676433</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/676433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9dba2926f34adaacc36569a93ba73aeeaacadd55e70ffde7a0f98a1b0354e0083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKw0AUhgdRbK36AoLMRnepk0wyySxL6g0KSqngLpzORackmZJJF3XlO_QNfRKnprarc_v-88OP0GVIhiHJ2B1LWUzpEeqHScIDltH4GPVJxnmQRfS9h86cWxBCUs7DU9SLYt94QR9tpgrKYGYqhV9tua5UA07h_BNMjf1JtMbWeKxa1XVW45FbV8vWVtAagfPSurYx0qwqLI3WRpjSy21pa_MFfxKoJZ4aZ-oPnA8P0M_3ZuScFQZaJfHYOLU1nvrJnaMTDaVTF7s6QG8P97P8KZi8PD7no0kgaMTbgMs5RDximsYgAYSgLGEcOJ1DSkEpvwIpk0SlRGupUiCaZxDOCU1iRUhGB-i2-ysa61yjdLFsTAXNughJsU216FL14HUHLlfzSsk99h-jB252ADgBpW6gFsYduCxhccq2jlcdt3Ctbfb3nc0v1b2MaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Koo, Hoonmo L. ; Van, John N. ; Zhao, Meina ; Ye, Xunyan ; Revell, Paula A. ; Jiang, Zhi-Dong ; Grimes, Carolyn Z. ; Koo, Diana C. ; Lasco, Todd ; Kozinetz, Claudia A. ; Garey, Kevin W. ; DuPont, Herbert L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koo, Hoonmo L. ; Van, John N. ; Zhao, Meina ; Ye, Xunyan ; Revell, Paula A. ; Jiang, Zhi-Dong ; Grimes, Carolyn Z. ; Koo, Diana C. ; Lasco, Todd ; Kozinetz, Claudia A. ; Garey, Kevin W. ; DuPont, Herbert L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis.
Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design.
Setting. Large university-based hospital.
Participants. Hospitalized adult patients.
Methods. CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture.
Results. CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization.
Conclusions. The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/676433</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24799643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antibiotics ; Asymptomatic diseases ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clostridium difficile ; Clostridium difficile - genetics ; Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification ; Cross Infection - diagnosis ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Cytotoxicity ; Diarrhea ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - diagnosis ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - epidemiology ; Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Hospitals, University ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Legal consent ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Original Article ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Population Surveillance ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Toxins</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014-06, Vol.35 (6), p.667-673</ispartof><rights>2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9dba2926f34adaacc36569a93ba73aeeaacadd55e70ffde7a0f98a1b0354e0083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9dba2926f34adaacc36569a93ba73aeeaacadd55e70ffde7a0f98a1b0354e0083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28564768$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24799643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koo, Hoonmo L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Meina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Xunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revell, Paula A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhi-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Carolyn Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Diana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasco, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozinetz, Claudia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garey, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Herbert L.</creatorcontrib><title>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis.
Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design.
Setting. Large university-based hospital.
Participants. Hospitalized adult patients.
Methods. CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture.
Results. CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization.
Conclusions. The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Asymptomatic diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - genetics</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Cross Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - diagnosis</subject><subject>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - epidemiology</subject><subject>Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Legal consent</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtKw0AUhgdRbK36AoLMRnepk0wyySxL6g0KSqngLpzORackmZJJF3XlO_QNfRKnprarc_v-88OP0GVIhiHJ2B1LWUzpEeqHScIDltH4GPVJxnmQRfS9h86cWxBCUs7DU9SLYt94QR9tpgrKYGYqhV9tua5UA07h_BNMjf1JtMbWeKxa1XVW45FbV8vWVtAagfPSurYx0qwqLI3WRpjSy21pa_MFfxKoJZ4aZ-oPnA8P0M_3ZuScFQZaJfHYOLU1nvrJnaMTDaVTF7s6QG8P97P8KZi8PD7no0kgaMTbgMs5RDximsYgAYSgLGEcOJ1DSkEpvwIpk0SlRGupUiCaZxDOCU1iRUhGB-i2-ysa61yjdLFsTAXNughJsU216FL14HUHLlfzSsk99h-jB252ADgBpW6gFsYduCxhccq2jlcdt3Ctbfb3nc0v1b2MaQ</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Koo, Hoonmo L.</creator><creator>Van, John N.</creator><creator>Zhao, Meina</creator><creator>Ye, Xunyan</creator><creator>Revell, Paula A.</creator><creator>Jiang, Zhi-Dong</creator><creator>Grimes, Carolyn Z.</creator><creator>Koo, Diana C.</creator><creator>Lasco, Todd</creator><creator>Kozinetz, Claudia A.</creator><creator>Garey, Kevin W.</creator><creator>DuPont, Herbert L.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates</title><author>Koo, Hoonmo L. ; Van, John N. ; Zhao, Meina ; Ye, Xunyan ; Revell, Paula A. ; Jiang, Zhi-Dong ; Grimes, Carolyn Z. ; Koo, Diana C. ; Lasco, Todd ; Kozinetz, Claudia A. ; Garey, Kevin W. ; DuPont, Herbert L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9dba2926f34adaacc36569a93ba73aeeaacadd55e70ffde7a0f98a1b0354e0083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Asymptomatic diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - genetics</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Cross Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - diagnosis</topic><topic>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - epidemiology</topic><topic>Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Legal consent</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koo, Hoonmo L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Meina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Xunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revell, Paula A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhi-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Carolyn Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Diana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasco, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozinetz, Claudia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garey, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Herbert L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koo, Hoonmo L.</au><au>Van, John N.</au><au>Zhao, Meina</au><au>Ye, Xunyan</au><au>Revell, Paula A.</au><au>Jiang, Zhi-Dong</au><au>Grimes, Carolyn Z.</au><au>Koo, Diana C.</au><au>Lasco, Todd</au><au>Kozinetz, Claudia A.</au><au>Garey, Kevin W.</au><au>DuPont, Herbert L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>667</spage><epage>673</epage><pages>667-673</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis.
Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design.
Setting. Large university-based hospital.
Participants. Hospitalized adult patients.
Methods. CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture.
Results. CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization.
Conclusions. The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>24799643</pmid><doi>10.1086/676433</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-823X |
ispartof | Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014-06, Vol.35 (6), p.667-673 |
issn | 0899-823X 1559-6834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_676433 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Antibiotics Asymptomatic diseases Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen Biological and medical sciences Clostridium difficile Clostridium difficile - genetics Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification Cross Infection - diagnosis Cross Infection - epidemiology Cytotoxicity Diarrhea Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - diagnosis Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - epidemiology Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay Epidemiology Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Hospitals, University Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases Legal consent Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Original Article Other diseases. Semiology Polymerase chain reaction Population Surveillance Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards Reproducibility of Results Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Toxins |
title | Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-Time%20Polymerase%20Chain%20Reaction%20Detection%20of%20Asymptomatic%20Clostridium%20difficile%20Colonization%20and%20Rising%20C.%20difficile%E2%80%93Associated%20Disease%20Rates&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Koo,%20Hoonmo%20L.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=667&rft.epage=673&rft.pages=667-673&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/676433&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/676433%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/24799643&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/676433&rfr_iscdi=true |