Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates

Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis. Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2014-06, Vol.35 (6), p.667-673
Hauptverfasser: Koo, Hoonmo L., Van, John N., Zhao, Meina, Ye, Xunyan, Revell, Paula A., Jiang, Zhi-Dong, Grimes, Carolyn Z., Koo, Diana C., Lasco, Todd, Kozinetz, Claudia A., Garey, Kevin W., DuPont, Herbert L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 673
container_issue 6
container_start_page 667
container_title Infection control and hospital epidemiology
container_volume 35
creator Koo, Hoonmo L.
Van, John N.
Zhao, Meina
Ye, Xunyan
Revell, Paula A.
Jiang, Zhi-Dong
Grimes, Carolyn Z.
Koo, Diana C.
Lasco, Todd
Kozinetz, Claudia A.
Garey, Kevin W.
DuPont, Herbert L.
description Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis. Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design. Setting. Large university-based hospital. Participants. Hospitalized adult patients. Methods. CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture. Results. CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. Conclusions. The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/676433
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_676433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/676433</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/676433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9dba2926f34adaacc36569a93ba73aeeaacadd55e70ffde7a0f98a1b0354e0083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKw0AUhgdRbK36AoLMRnepk0wyySxL6g0KSqngLpzORackmZJJF3XlO_QNfRKnprarc_v-88OP0GVIhiHJ2B1LWUzpEeqHScIDltH4GPVJxnmQRfS9h86cWxBCUs7DU9SLYt94QR9tpgrKYGYqhV9tua5UA07h_BNMjf1JtMbWeKxa1XVW45FbV8vWVtAagfPSurYx0qwqLI3WRpjSy21pa_MFfxKoJZ4aZ-oPnA8P0M_3ZuScFQZaJfHYOLU1nvrJnaMTDaVTF7s6QG8P97P8KZi8PD7no0kgaMTbgMs5RDximsYgAYSgLGEcOJ1DSkEpvwIpk0SlRGupUiCaZxDOCU1iRUhGB-i2-ysa61yjdLFsTAXNughJsU216FL14HUHLlfzSsk99h-jB252ADgBpW6gFsYduCxhccq2jlcdt3Ctbfb3nc0v1b2MaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Koo, Hoonmo L. ; Van, John N. ; Zhao, Meina ; Ye, Xunyan ; Revell, Paula A. ; Jiang, Zhi-Dong ; Grimes, Carolyn Z. ; Koo, Diana C. ; Lasco, Todd ; Kozinetz, Claudia A. ; Garey, Kevin W. ; DuPont, Herbert L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koo, Hoonmo L. ; Van, John N. ; Zhao, Meina ; Ye, Xunyan ; Revell, Paula A. ; Jiang, Zhi-Dong ; Grimes, Carolyn Z. ; Koo, Diana C. ; Lasco, Todd ; Kozinetz, Claudia A. ; Garey, Kevin W. ; DuPont, Herbert L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis. Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design. Setting. Large university-based hospital. Participants. Hospitalized adult patients. Methods. CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture. Results. CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. Conclusions. The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/676433</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24799643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antibiotics ; Asymptomatic diseases ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clostridium difficile ; Clostridium difficile - genetics ; Clostridium difficile - isolation &amp; purification ; Cross Infection - diagnosis ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Cytotoxicity ; Diarrhea ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - diagnosis ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - epidemiology ; Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Hospitals, University ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Legal consent ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Original Article ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Population Surveillance ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Toxins</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014-06, Vol.35 (6), p.667-673</ispartof><rights>2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9dba2926f34adaacc36569a93ba73aeeaacadd55e70ffde7a0f98a1b0354e0083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9dba2926f34adaacc36569a93ba73aeeaacadd55e70ffde7a0f98a1b0354e0083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28564768$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24799643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koo, Hoonmo L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Meina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Xunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revell, Paula A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhi-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Carolyn Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Diana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasco, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozinetz, Claudia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garey, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Herbert L.</creatorcontrib><title>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis. Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design. Setting. Large university-based hospital. Participants. Hospitalized adult patients. Methods. CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture. Results. CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. Conclusions. The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Asymptomatic diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - genetics</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Cross Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - diagnosis</subject><subject>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - epidemiology</subject><subject>Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Legal consent</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtKw0AUhgdRbK36AoLMRnepk0wyySxL6g0KSqngLpzORackmZJJF3XlO_QNfRKnprarc_v-88OP0GVIhiHJ2B1LWUzpEeqHScIDltH4GPVJxnmQRfS9h86cWxBCUs7DU9SLYt94QR9tpgrKYGYqhV9tua5UA07h_BNMjf1JtMbWeKxa1XVW45FbV8vWVtAagfPSurYx0qwqLI3WRpjSy21pa_MFfxKoJZ4aZ-oPnA8P0M_3ZuScFQZaJfHYOLU1nvrJnaMTDaVTF7s6QG8P97P8KZi8PD7no0kgaMTbgMs5RDximsYgAYSgLGEcOJ1DSkEpvwIpk0SlRGupUiCaZxDOCU1iRUhGB-i2-ysa61yjdLFsTAXNughJsU216FL14HUHLlfzSsk99h-jB252ADgBpW6gFsYduCxhccq2jlcdt3Ctbfb3nc0v1b2MaQ</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Koo, Hoonmo L.</creator><creator>Van, John N.</creator><creator>Zhao, Meina</creator><creator>Ye, Xunyan</creator><creator>Revell, Paula A.</creator><creator>Jiang, Zhi-Dong</creator><creator>Grimes, Carolyn Z.</creator><creator>Koo, Diana C.</creator><creator>Lasco, Todd</creator><creator>Kozinetz, Claudia A.</creator><creator>Garey, Kevin W.</creator><creator>DuPont, Herbert L.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates</title><author>Koo, Hoonmo L. ; Van, John N. ; Zhao, Meina ; Ye, Xunyan ; Revell, Paula A. ; Jiang, Zhi-Dong ; Grimes, Carolyn Z. ; Koo, Diana C. ; Lasco, Todd ; Kozinetz, Claudia A. ; Garey, Kevin W. ; DuPont, Herbert L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9dba2926f34adaacc36569a93ba73aeeaacadd55e70ffde7a0f98a1b0354e0083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Asymptomatic diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - genetics</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Cross Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - diagnosis</topic><topic>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - epidemiology</topic><topic>Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Legal consent</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koo, Hoonmo L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Meina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Xunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revell, Paula A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhi-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Carolyn Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Diana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasco, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozinetz, Claudia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garey, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Herbert L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koo, Hoonmo L.</au><au>Van, John N.</au><au>Zhao, Meina</au><au>Ye, Xunyan</au><au>Revell, Paula A.</au><au>Jiang, Zhi-Dong</au><au>Grimes, Carolyn Z.</au><au>Koo, Diana C.</au><au>Lasco, Todd</au><au>Kozinetz, Claudia A.</au><au>Garey, Kevin W.</au><au>DuPont, Herbert L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>667</spage><epage>673</epage><pages>667-673</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis. Design. Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design. Setting. Large university-based hospital. Participants. Hospitalized adult patients. Methods. CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture. Results. CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. Conclusions. The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>24799643</pmid><doi>10.1086/676433</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-823X
ispartof Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014-06, Vol.35 (6), p.667-673
issn 0899-823X
1559-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_676433
source MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Antibiotics
Asymptomatic diseases
Bacterial diseases
Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen
Biological and medical sciences
Clostridium difficile
Clostridium difficile - genetics
Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification
Cross Infection - diagnosis
Cross Infection - epidemiology
Cytotoxicity
Diarrhea
Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - diagnosis
Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - epidemiology
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
Epidemiology
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Hospitals, University
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
Legal consent
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Original Article
Other diseases. Semiology
Polymerase chain reaction
Population Surveillance
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards
Reproducibility of Results
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Toxins
title Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Rising C. difficile–Associated Disease Rates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-Time%20Polymerase%20Chain%20Reaction%20Detection%20of%20Asymptomatic%20Clostridium%20difficile%20Colonization%20and%20Rising%20C.%20difficile%E2%80%93Associated%20Disease%20Rates&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Koo,%20Hoonmo%20L.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=667&rft.epage=673&rft.pages=667-673&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/676433&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/676433%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/24799643&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/676433&rfr_iscdi=true